Bioenergy development and the implications for the social wellbeing of Indigenous peoples in Canada
In this article, we focus on wellbeing as an important concept relating to bioenergy development in Canada. We use a three-dimensional or social approach to understanding wellbeing, which includes subjective and relational aspects in addition to the more traditional material dimension of wellbeing (e.g. financial resources, a healthy environment). Indigenous business leaders engaged in forestry, energy, and related resource sectors were recruited through our partner organization, the Canadian Council for Aboriginal Business, as a representative sample of key people to be engaged in the scoping of existing and future bioenergy partnerships in Canada. Participants often responded in ways that did not discretely fit into categories, but instead reflected a perspective on their own and their community’s dimensions of social wellbeing, which we captured through open coding for emergent themes. Our findings on material wellbeing illustrate that relationships between different wellbeing dimensions need to be considered for community-appropriate bioenergy development.
KeywordsBioenergy Indigenous partnerships Renewable energy Social wellbeing
This work was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) of Canada (#872-2016-1036), SSHRC Canada Research Chair in Human-Environmental Interactions (950-231641), and BiofuelNet Canada (#SO-3-Bullock). In-kind support was provided by the Canadian Council for Aboriginal Business. The authors thank the study participants for sharing their knowledge. Thanks also to our capable research assistants, Shannon Ganter and Miranda Hamilton. Any errors or omissions are our own.
- Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada (AANDC). 2018. Land Management. Retrieved from https://www.aadnc-aandc.gc.ca/eng/1100100034737/1100100034738.
- BC Energy Network. n.d. Capacity building. Retrieved from http://bcbioenergy.ca/what-we-do/capacity-building/. Accessed 2 May 2018.
- Bullock, R., and M. Zurba. 2017. Framing Indigenous partnerships in energy and allied renewable resource sectors. Final knowledge synthesis report for the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada. Centre for Forest Interdisciplinary Research, The University of Winnipeg. Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada: 24 pp.Google Scholar
- Bullock, R., M. Zurba, J. Parkins, and M. Skudra. Indigenous business leaders’ perspectives on renewable (bio)energy: Risks, barriers, benefits and opportunities. Energy Policy (under review).Google Scholar
- Coates, K., and B.L. Crowley. 2013. New beginnings: How Canada’s natural resource wealth could re-shape relations with aboriginal people., Aboriginal Canada and the Natural Resource Economy Series Ottawa: MacDonald-Laurier Institute.Google Scholar
- Cook, C.C. 2005. Assessing the impact of transport and energy infrastructure on poverty reduction. Manila: Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
- Council of the Federation. 2015. Canadian Energy Strategy. https://www.gov.mb.ca/jec/energy/pubs/canadian_energy_strategy.pdf.
- Craft, A. 2013. Breathing life into the Stone Fort Treaty. Saskatoon: Purich Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
- Cresswell, J. W. 2012. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE: p. 472.Google Scholar
- Cresswell, J.W., and C.N. Poth. 2016. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Singapore: SAGE.Google Scholar
- Eckerberg, K. 2015. Future forest governance: Multiple challenges, diverging responses. In The Future use of nordic forests, ed. F. Kraxner, K. Beland Lindahl, and E. Westholm, 83–97. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
- Geertz, C. 2008. Thick description: toward an interpretive theory of culture. In The cultural geography reader, ed. P.L. Price and T. Oakes. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
- Gris, P. 2013. Responsible energy development in Canada. Environment and Aboriginal Issues: Charrette on Energy.Google Scholar
- Jones, J., and B. Bradshaw. 2015. Addressing historical impacts through impact and benefit agreements and health impact assessment: Why it matters for Indigenous wll-being. The Northern Review 41: 81–109.Google Scholar
- Karanasios, K., and P. Parker. 2016. Recent developments in renewable energy in remote aboriginal communities, Ontario, Canada. Papers in Canadian Economic Development 16: 82–97.Google Scholar
- Merriam, S.B. 2016. Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Natural Resources Canada (NRCan). 2012. Evaluation of the Sustainable Bioenergy Strategic Priority. Retrieved from http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/evaluation/reports/2012/798. Accessed 12 Sept 2017.
- Natural Resources Canada (NRCan). 2018a. Bioenergy systems. Retrieved from http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/energy/renewable-electricity/bioenergy-systems/7311. Accessed 2 May 2018.
- Natural Resources Canada (NRCan). 2018b. How does the forest industry contribute to the economy? Retrieved from http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/forests/report/economy/16517. Accessed 2 May 2018.
- Natural Resources Canada (NRCan). 2018c. Bioenergy from biomass. Retrieved from http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/forests/industry/bioproducts/13323. Accessed 2 May 2018.
- Natural Resources Canada (NRCan). n.d. Solid biofuels bulletin No. 1. Accessed May 2, 2018, from https://www.nrcan.gc.ca/sites/www.nrcan.gc.ca/files/NRCAN_BB_no1_e_accessible.pdf.
- Palinkas, L.A., S.M. Horwitz, C.A. Green, J.P. Wisdom, N. Duan, and K. Hoagwood. 2015. Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed methods implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 42: 533–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Srigley, K., and A. Varley. 2018. Learning to unlearn: Building relationships on Anishinaabeg territory. In Indigenous research: Theories, practices, and relationships, ed. D. McGregor, J.-P. Restoule, and R. Johnston, 46–64. Toronto: Canadian Scholars Press.Google Scholar
- van Manen, M. 1990. Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. London: State University Pres.Google Scholar
- Wesche, S.D., M.A.F. O’Hare-Gordon, M.A. Robidoux, and C.W. Mason. 2016. Land-based programs in Northwest Territories: Building Indigenous food security and well-being from the ground up. Canadian Food Studies 3: 23–48.Google Scholar
- Wilson, S. 2008. Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods. Winnipeg: Fernwood.Google Scholar
- Zurba, M. 2019. Framing the governance lifecycle of First Nation-industry forestry collaboration in northwestern Ontario. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, online first.Google Scholar