The 4p1000 initiative: Opportunities, limitations and challenges for implementing soil organic carbon sequestration as a sustainable development strategy
Climate change adaptation, mitigation and food security may be addressed at the same time by enhancing soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration through environmentally sound land management practices. This is promoted by the “4 per 1000” Initiative, a multi-stakeholder platform aiming at increasing SOC storage through sustainable practices. The scientific and technical committee of the Initiative is working to identify indicators, research priorities and region-specific practices needed for their implementation. The Initiative received its name due to the global importance of soils for climate change, which can be illustrated by a thought experiment showing that an annual growth rate of only 0.4% of the standing global SOC stocks would have the potential to counterbalance the current increase in atmospheric CO2. However, there are numerous barriers to the rise in SOC stocks and while SOC sequestration can contribute to partly offsetting greenhouse gas emissions, its main benefits are related to increased soil quality and climate change adaptation. The Initiative provides a collaborative platform for policy makers, practitioners, scientists and stakeholders to engage in finding solutions. Criticism of the Initiative has been related to the poor definition of its numerical target, which was not understood as an aspirational goal. The objective of this paper is to present the aims of the initiative, to discuss critical issues and to present challenges for its implementation. We identify barriers, risks and trade-offs and advocate for collaboration between multiple parties in order to stimulate innovation and to initiate the transition of agricultural systems toward sustainability.
KeywordsCarbon sequestration Climate change Food security Soil
Authors would like to acknowledge the executive secretariat of the 4p1000 initiative, Charlotte Verger and Claire Weill for their valuable contributions during the preparation of this manuscript. The input of PS contributes to the UK NERC-funded Soils-R-GGREAT project (NE/P019455/1).
- Chenu, C., D.A. Angers, P. Barré, D. Derrien, D. Arrouays, and J. Balesdent. 2019. Increasing organic stocks in agricultural soils: Knowledge gaps and potential innovations. Soil and Tillage Research 118: 42–51.Google Scholar
- de Vries, W. 2018. Soil carbon 4 per mille: A good initiative but let’s manage not only the soil but also the expectations: Comment on Minasny et al. (2017). Geoderma 292: 59–86.Google Scholar
- Diacono, M., and F. Montemurro. 2010. Long-term effects of organic amendments on soil fertility. A review. Agriculture for Sustainable Development 30: 401–422.Google Scholar
- Ditzler, L., T.A. Breland, C. Francis, M. Chakraborty, D.K. Singh, A. Srivastava, F. Eyhorn, J.C.J. Groot, et al. 2018. Identifying viable nutrient management interventions at the farm level: The case of smallholder organic Basmati rice production in Uttarakhand, India. Agricultural Systems 161: 61–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- IPCC. 2006. 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. In Prepared by the national greenhouse gas Inventories programme, eds. H.S. Eggleston, L. Buendia, K. Miwa, T. Ngara, and K. Tanabe. Japan: IGES.Google Scholar
- Pan, W.L., W.S. Schillinger, F.L. Young, E. Kirby, and G.G. Yorgey, et al. 2017. Integrating old principles and new technologies into win-win scenarios for farm and climate. Frontiers in Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2017.00076.
- Poulton, P., J. Johnston, A. MacDonald, R. White, and D. Powlson. 2018. Major limitations to achieving “4 per 1000″ increases in soil organic carbon stock in temperate regions: Evidence from long-term experiments at Rothamsted Research. UK. Global Change Biology 12: 3218–3221.Google Scholar
- Schiefer, J., G.J. Lair, C. Lüthgens, E.M. Wild, P. Steiner, and W.H. Blum. 2018. The increase of soil organic carbon as proposed by the “4/1000 initiative” is strongly limited by the status of soil development—A case study along a substrate age gradient in Central Europe. The Science of the Total Environment 628–629: 840–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- STC. 2017. The ‘4 per 1000’ Research Priorities. https://www.4p1000.org/sites/default/files/content/gov_cst_en_consortium_3-4-4p1000_research_priorities.pdf.
- UNFCCC. 2018. Koronivia Joint Work on Agriculture (decision 4/CP.23).Google Scholar