Storing and sharing: A review of indigenous and local knowledge conservation initiatives
- 394 Downloads
Despite its relative adaptive capacity and its many values, indigenous and local knowledge (ILK) is rapidly eroding. Over the past decades a myriad of efforts have emerged to prevent this erosion. In this work, we reviewed and systematically coded 138 ILK conservation initiatives published in academic papers in order to explore trends in participation, digitalization, timing, location, and approach of the initiatives. We also explored factors influencing initiative inclusiveness. Our findings reveal that ILK holders are generally absent from most phases of the studied initiatives, although IT-based and in situ initiatives (i.e., education and community based conservation) appear as the exceptions. We also found that ex situ initiatives (i.e., research/documentation and policy/legislation efforts) are predominant, despite the challenges they reportedly face. These findings call for re-formulating the ways in which ex situ ILK conservation is done and for supporting in situ and IT based initiatives, as they offer the potential to lead the participatory turn.
KeywordsInclusiveness Indigenous and local knowledge Knowledge conservation Systematic review
We would like to thank S. Villamayor-Tomás for methodological advice regarding systematic reviewing and qualitative meta-analysis and B. Peco for statistical support. Research leading to this article received funding through the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, both through the project CSO2014-59704-P and through P. Benyei’s pre-doctoral grant (BES-2015-072155). This work contributes to the “María de Maeztu Unit of Excellence” (MdM-2015-0552).
- Alexander, M., K. Chamundeeswari, A. Kambu, M. Ruiz, and B. Tobin. 2004. The role of registers and databases in the protection of traditional knowledge. Tokyo: UNU-IAS.Google Scholar
- Aziz, M.A., M. Adnan, A.H. Khan, A.U. Rehman, R. Jan, and J. Khan. 2016. Ethno-medicinal survey of important plants practiced by indigenous community at Ladha subdivision, South Waziristan agency. Pakistan. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-016-0126-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Benyei, P., N. Turreira-Garcia, M. Orta-Martínez, and M. Cartró-Sabaté. 2017. Globalized conflicts, globalized responses. Changing manners of contestation among indigenous communities. In Hunter-gatherers in a Changing World, 233–250. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42271-8_13.Google Scholar
- Berkes, F., J. Colding, and C. Folke. 2000. Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecological Applications 10: 1251–1262. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010%5b1251:ROTEKA%5d2.0.CO;2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Brennen, J. S., and D. Kreiss. 2016. Digitalization. In The international encyclopedia of communication theory and philosophy, 1–11. Hoboken: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118766804.wbiect111.
- Burke, B.J., and N. Heynen. 2014. Transforming participatory science into socioecological praxis: Valuing marginalized environmental knowledges in the face of neoliberalization of nature and science. Environment and Society: Advances in Research 5: 7–27. https://doi.org/10.3167/ares.2014.050102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Danielsen, F., N.D. Burgess, A. Balmford, P.F. Donald, M. Funder, J.P.G. Jones, P. Alviola, D.S. Balete, et al. 2008. Local participation in natural resource monitoring a characterization of approaches. Conservation Biology 23: 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01063.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fundación Indígena, and B. Kothari. 1997. Rights to the benefits of research: Compensating indigenous peoples for their intellectual contribution. Human Organization 56: 127–137. https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.56.2.j63678502x782100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Godoy, R., V. Reyes-García, E. Byron, W.R. Leonard, and V. Vadez. 2005. The effect of market economies on the well-being of indigenous peoples and on their use of renewable natural resources. Annual Review of Anthropology 34: 121–138. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.34.081804.120412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gómez-Baggethun, E., S. Mingorría, V. Reyes-garcía, L. Calvet, and C. Montes. 2010. Traditional ecological knowledge trends in the transition to a market economy: Empirical Study in the Doñana natural areas. Conservation Biology 24: 721–729. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01401.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gómez-Baggethun, E., V. Reyes-García, P. Olsson, and C. Montes. 2012. Traditional ecological knowledge and community resilience to environmental extremes: A case study in Doñana, SW Spain. Global Environmental Change 22: 640–650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.02.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Haklay, M. 2013. Citizen science and volunteered geographic information: Overview and typology of participation. In Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge: Volunteered geographic information (VGI) in theory and practice, ed. D. Sui, S. Elwood, and M. Goodchild, 105–122. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4587-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hermes, M., M. Bang, and A. Marin. 2012. Designing indigenous language revitalization. Harvard Educational Review 82: 381–403. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.82.3.q8117w861241871j.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hernández-Morcillo, M., J. Hoberg, E. Oteros-Rozas, T. Plieninger, E. Gómez-Baggethun, and V. Reyes-García. 2014. Traditional ecological knowledge in Europe: Status Quo and insights for the environmental policy agenda. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 56: 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2014.861673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Husson, F., S. Lê, and J. Pagès. 2017. Exploratory multivariate analysis by example using R. London and New York: CRC Press.Google Scholar
- Lettington, R. 2002. Current initiatives in the protection of indigenous and local community knowledge: Problems, concepts and lessons for the future. In Advances in phytomedicine I: Ethnomedicine and drug discovery, vol. 1, ed. M.M. Iwu and J.C. Wootton, 81–101. New York: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1572-557x(02)80016-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McDade, T.W., V. Reyes-Garcia, P. Blackinton, S. Tanner, T. Huanca, and W.R. Leonard. 2007. Ethnobotanical knowledge is associated with indices of child health in the Bolivian Amazon. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104: 6134–6139. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0609123104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Méndez-López, M.E., E. García-Frapolli, I. Ruíz-Mallén, L. Porter-Bolland, M.C. Sánchez-González, and V. Reyes-García. 2018. Who participates in conservation initiatives? Case studies in six rural communities of Mexico. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2018.1462152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nadasdy, P. 1999. The politics of tek: Power and the “integration” of knowledge. Artic Anthropology 36: 1–18.Google Scholar
- Nov, O., O. Arazy, and D. Anderson. 2011. Technology-mediated citizen science participation: A motivational model. Proceedings of the Fifth international AAAI Conference on weblogs and social media. https://doi.org/10.1145/1940761.1940771.
- Oguamanam, C. 2004. The protection of traditional knowledge: Towards a cross-cultural dialogue on intellectual property rights. Australian Intellectual Property Journal 15: 34–59.Google Scholar
- Pardo-de-Santayana, M., R. Morales, L. Aceituno-Mata, and M. Molina. 2014. Inventario Español de conocimientos tradicionales relativos a la biodiversidad. Madrid: Ministerio de Agricultura y Pesca, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente.Google Scholar
- Porter-Bolland, L., E.A. Ellis, M.R. Guariguata, I. Ruiz-Mallén, S. Negrete-Yankelevich, and V. Reyes-García. 2012. Community managed forests and forest protected areas: An assessment of their conservation effectiveness across the tropics. Forest Ecology and Management 268: 6–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.05.034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Reyes-García, V., L. Aceituno-Mata, L. Calvet-Mir, T. Garnatje, E. Gómez-Baggethun, J.J. Lastra, R. Ontillera, M. Parada, et al. 2014. Resilience of traditional knowledge systems: The case of agricultural knowledge in home gardens of the Iberian Peninsula. Global Environmental Change 24: 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.11.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tang, R. 2012. An analysis of traditional ecological knowledge’s status and its conservation options. Wellington: Victoria University of Wellington.Google Scholar
- Zent, S. 1999. The quandary of conserving ethnological knowledge: A Piaroa example. In Ethnoecology: Knowledge, resources, and rights, ed. T.L. Gragson and B.G. Blount, 90–124. Athens and London: The University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar