Building actor-centric transformative capacity through city-university partnerships
- 111 Downloads
Cities worldwide are rising to the challenge of sustainable development, calling for large-scale and fast-paced transformations towards sustainability. Urban sustainability challenges are now being reframed as a lack of capacity of individuals and organizations to carry out such socio-technical transformations. This article expands on transformative capacity literature by elucidating the concept of actor-centric transformative capacity. It focuses on the unique role city-university partnerships (CUPs) can play in catalyzing and supporting effective urban sustainability transformations. Two case studies on CUPs in Portland, Oregon and Tempe, Arizona are used to identify determinants of actor-centric transformative capacity, their role in the transformative capacity of urban systems, and how they are built through CUPs. The article concludes with strategies for building effective CUPs capable of building actor-centric transformative capacity among university actors and city administrators.
KeywordsCapacity Partnerships Transformation Urban sustainability
We would like to thank the guest editors Marc Wolfram, Sungkyunkwan University, South Korea, Megan Farrelly, Monash University, Australia, and Sara Borgström, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden, for the invitation and encouragement to pursue this manuscript. The authors acknowledge funding from the Global Consortium for Sustainability Outcomes (GCSO) during the grant period February 2017–January 2018. We would also like to thank our city collaborators in Portland, Karlsruhe, Tempe, and Mexico City for the productive collaborations through this project.
- Crow, M.M., and W.B. Dabars. 2015. Designing the New American University. Baltimore: JHU Press.Google Scholar
- Loorbach, D. 2007. Transition management: New mode of governance for sustainable development. Utrecht: International Books.Google Scholar
- Marshall, N.A., S.E. Park, W.N. Adger, K. Brown, and S.M. Howden. 2012. Transformational capacity and the influence of place and identity. Environmental Research Letters 7: 034022.Google Scholar
- Phares, D. (ed.). 2009. Governing metropolitan regions in the 21st century. Armonk, NY: Sharpe.Google Scholar
- Tapscott, D., and A.D. Williams. 2010. Innovating the 21st-century university: It’s time. Educause Review 45: 16–29.Google Scholar
- UN-Habitat (= United Nations Human Settlements Programme). 2016. Urbanization and Development—Emerging Futures. World Cities Report 2016, Nairobi.Google Scholar
- West, G. 2017. Scale: The universal laws of growth, innovation, sustainability, and the pace of life in organisms, cities, economies, and companies. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
- Wiek, A. 2017. Building capacity in professionals and stakeholders to implement sustainability solutions strategies. Working Paper. Center for Global Sustainability and Cultural Transformation, Leuphana University of Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany, and Arizona State University.Google Scholar
- Wiek, A., B. Kay, and N. Forrest. 2017. Worth the trouble?! An evaluative scheme for urban sustainability transition labs (USTL) and an application to the USTL in Phoenix, Arizona. In Urban sustainability transitions, ed. N. Frantzeskaki, L. Coenen, C. Broto, and D. Loorbach, 227–256., Routledge series on sustainability transitions London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wyborn, C. 2015. Connecting knowledge with action through coproductive capacities: Adaptive governance and connectivity conservation. Ecology and Society 20: 11.Google Scholar