Advertisement

Ambio

, Volume 48, Issue 5, pp 478–493 | Cite as

Assessing transformative capacity for sustainable urban regeneration: A comparative study of three South Korean cities

  • Marc WolframEmail author
Urban Transformative Capacity

Abstract

Urban regeneration forms a key approach for coping with persistent sustainability problems in cities. In practice, however, it is often driven by motives other than sustainability transformation. This paper explores the preconditions that allow urban regeneration approaches to become transformative, and suggests a methodology to support this shift in practice. It does so by assessing the capacity available to prepare for, initiate, and steer a path-deviant sustainability transformation of urban areas in three South Korean cities, jointly with stakeholders. The findings reflect how local policy largely supports a conservative development pathway, favored by national government, sidelining especially ecological implications. Major deficits exist regarding systems thinking, sustainability foresight, and social learning processes, while collective visioning, intermediation, community empowerment, and repositioning science could become instant drivers. In conclusion, assessing transformative capacity offers a crucial lever to design urban-regeneration approaches for unlearning dominant development paradigms and to experimentally reconfigure urban social–ecological–technological systems.

Keywords

Governance Social learning Sustainability transformation Transformative capacity Urban ecology Urban regeneration 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author thanks all interviewees for their kind cooperation and efforts, and especially Kyuyoung Han, Kyung A Kim, Eunseon Park, Junhan Kim, and Ying Li for their invaluable support through data collection, translation, and analysis. This research has been funded by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), Contract No. 2014S1A5A8018045.

Supplementary material

13280_2018_1111_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (593 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 593 kb)

References

  1. Balaban, O., and J.A. Puppim de Oliveira. 2014. Understanding the links between urban regeneration and climate-friendly urban development: Lessons from two case studies in Japan. Local Environment 19: 868–890.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2013.798634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berman, M., G. Kofinas, and S. BurnSilver. 2017. Measuring community adaptive and transformative capacity in the arctic context. In Northern sustainabilities: understanding and addressing change in the circumpolar world, ed. G. Fondahl and G.N. Wilson, 59–75. Cham: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46150-2_6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blaikie, N.W.H. 2009. Designing social research: the logic of anticipation, 2nd ed. Cambridge, Malden: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  4. C40. 2017. Ending climate change begins in the city. London: C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group.Google Scholar
  5. CCG. 2006. Declaration of Environmental Capital. Changwon: Changwon City Government.Google Scholar
  6. Cohen-Shacham, E., G. Walters, C. Janzen, and S. Maginnis. 2016. Nature-based solutions to address global societal challenges. Gland: IUCN.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Colantonio, A., and T.J. Dixon. 2011. Urban regeneration & social sustainability: Best practice from European cities. Chichester: Real Estate Issues/RICS Research, Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  8. Cramer, J., and A. Loeber. 2004. Governance through learning: Making corporate social responsibility in Dutch industry effective from a sustainable development perspective. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 6: 271–287.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908042000344041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Folke, C., S.R. Carpenter, B. Walker, M. Scheffer, T. Chapin, and J. Rockström. 2010. Resilience thinking: Integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecology & Society 15: 1–9.Google Scholar
  10. Gelézeau, V. 2003. Séoul, ville géante, cités radieuses. Collection Asie Orientale. Paris: CNRS éditions.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gottschick, M. 2013. Reflexive capacity in local networks for sustainable development: Integrating conflict and understanding into a multi-level perspective transition framework: JEPP reflexive governance. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908x.2013.842890.Google Scholar
  12. Griffith, R. 2014. Transformative capacity. Resource Sheet RS 6. Sydney/Beechworth: Australian Resilience Center.Google Scholar
  13. Han, K. 2014. 광주광역시 지역에너지계획 (Local energy plan in Gwangju). Gwangju Metropolitan Government.Google Scholar
  14. Hodson, M., and S. Marvin. 2010. Can cities shape socio-technical transitions and how would we know if they were? Research Policy 39: 477–485.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hodson, M., and S. Marvin (eds.). 2016. Retrofitting cities: Priorities, governance and experimentation. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Hsu, J.Y., and W.H. Chang. 2013. From state-led to developer-led? The dynamics of urban renewal in Taiwan. In Companion to urban regeneration, ed. M.E. Leary and J. McCarthy, 148–158. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  17. IEA. 2017. Key world energy statistics. Paris: International Energy Agency.Google Scholar
  18. Jeon, K.-S. 2011. 광주광역시의 도시 재생과 지속가능한 도시 성장 방안 (Urban regeneration and sustainable growth strategies in Gwangju metropolitan city). Journal of the Korean Urban Geographical Society 14: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jung, T.H., J. Lee, M.H.T. Yap, and E.M. Ineson. 2015. The role of stakeholder collaboration in culture-led urban regeneration: A case study of the Gwangju project, Korea. Cities 44: 29–39.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2014.12.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Team, K.E.E.I. 2016. Monthly energy statistics, 32–38. Ulsan: Korea Energy Economics Institute.Google Scholar
  21. Kim, E. 2016a. The politics of climate change policy design in Korea. Environmental Politics 25: 454–474.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2015.1104804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kim, H.-R., and Y. Jang. 2017. Lessons from good and bad practices in retail-led urban regeneration projects in the Republic of Korea. Cities 61: 36–47.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.11.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kim, J.Y. 2016b. Cultural entrepreneurs and urban regeneration in Itaewon, Seoul. Cities 56: 132–140.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.11.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kim, K. 2014. 서울시의 도시재생사업이 주민의 마을만족도와 공동체의식에 미치는 영향 (The effect of urban regeneration on the village satisfaction and community spirit of the citizens of Seoul). 공공사회연구 4: 66–92.Google Scholar
  25. KOSTAT. 2017. Birth statistics 2016. Daejeon: Statistics Korea.Google Scholar
  26. Lang, W., T. Chen, and X. Li. 2016. A new style of urbanization in China: Transformation of urban rural communities. Habitat International 55: 1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.10.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Leach, M., A.C.C. Stirling, and I. Scoones. 2012. Dynamic sustainabilities: “‘Technology, environment, social justice’”. Hoboken: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  28. Leary, M.E., and J. McCarthy (eds.). 2013. Companion to urban regeneration. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  29. Lee, J., D. Cho, and Y. Yu. 2015. 지속가능한도시실현을위한그린인프라조성방안에관한연구 (A study on the green infrastructure plan for sustainable city). Korean Society of Environment & Ecology 25: 73–74.Google Scholar
  30. Lee, J.S., and J.W. Kim. 2016. South Korea’s urban green energy strategies: Policy framework and local responses under the green growth. Cities 54: 20–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.10.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee, K. 2007. Questioning a neoliberal urban regeneration policy: The rhetoric of “cities of culture” and the city of Gwangju, Korea. International Journal of Cultural Policy 13: 335–347.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10286630701683201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lee, M.-S. 2015. A Basic study on urban regeneration in Gwangju-city using GIS. Journal of the Korean Housing Association 26: 99–107.  https://doi.org/10.6107/JKHA.2015.26.1.099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lee, S.-H., and J. Hwang. 2013. 도시재생의 정책 배경과 패러다임의 전환 (urban regeneration, its political background and new paradigm shift). Journal of Korea Planners Association 48: 387–410.Google Scholar
  34. Lee, Y. 2017. Seoul’s energy management policy (1997–2014). Seoul Solution. October 2.Google Scholar
  35. Loeber, A. 2007. Designing for phronèsis: Experiences with transformative learning on sustainable development. Critical Policy Studies 1: 389–414.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2007.9518528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McCormick, K., S. Anderberg, L. Coenen, and L. Neij. 2013. Advancing sustainable urban transformation. Journal of Cleaner Production 50: 1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.01.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McPhearson, T., S.T.A. Pickett, N.B. Grimm, J. Niemelä, M. Alberti, T. Elmqvist, C. Weber, D. Haase, et al. 2016. Advancing urban ecology toward a science of cities. BioScience 66: 198–212.  https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Melchiorri, M., A. Florczyk, S. Freire, M. Schiavina, M. Pesaresi, and T. Kemper. 2018. Unveiling 25 years of planetary urbanization with remote sensing: Perspectives from the global human settlement layer. Remote Sensing 10: 768.  https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10050768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Olsson, P., Ö. Bodin, and C. Folke. 2010. Building transformative capacity for ecosystem stewardship in social-ecological systems. In Adaptive capacity and environmental governance, ed. D. Armitage and R. Plummer, 263–285. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Olsson, P., V. Galaz, and W.J. Boonstra. 2014. Sustainability transformations: A resilience perspective. Ecology and Society.  https://doi.org/10.5751/es-06799-190401.Google Scholar
  41. Park, C. 2013. 아파트_공적 냉소와 사적 정열이 지배하는 사회 (Apartment). Seoul: Mati.Google Scholar
  42. Park, S.H. 2016. Can we implant an artist community? A reflection on government-led cultural districts in Korea. Cities 56: 172–179.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.09.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Patton, M.Q. 2002. Qualitative research and evaluation methods, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  44. Rauschmayer, F., T. Bauler, and N. Schäpke. 2015. Towards a thick understanding of sustainability transitions—Linking transition management, capabilities and social practices. Ecological Economics 109: 211–221.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.11.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rijke, J., M. Farrelly, R. Brown, and C. Zevenbergen. 2013. Configuring transformative governance to enhance resilient urban water systems. Environmental Science & Policy 25: 62–72.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.09.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Roberts, P. W., H. Sykes, and R. Granger. 2017. Urban regeneration.Google Scholar
  47. ROK. 2013. Special act on promotion of and support for urban regeneration. Vol. 11868.Google Scholar
  48. Schuetze, T., L. Chelleri, and J.-H. Je. 2016. Measuring urban redevelopment sustainability: Exploring challenges from downtown Seoul. Sustainability 9: 40.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su9010040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Seo, J.-K. 2013. Gwangju: A hub city of asian culture and high-tech industry. Cities 31: 563–577.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shin, H., and Q. Stevens. 2013. How culture and economy meet in South Korea: The politics of cultural economy in culture-led urban regeneration: The politics of cultural economy in Gwangju, South Korea. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37: 1707–1723.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01161.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. SMG. 2014. 2030 서울도시기본계획(2030 Seoul Urban Basic Plan). Seoul: Seoul Metropolitan Government.Google Scholar
  52. SMG. 2015. 2025 서울 도시 재생 전략 (2025 Seoul urban regeneration strategy). Seoul: Seoul Metropolitan Government.Google Scholar
  53. Tsukamoto, T. 2013. Urban regeneration and neoliberal state reform: Changing roles of cities in the Japanese developmental state. In Companion to urban regeneration, ed. M.E. Leary and J. McCarthy, 88–97. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  54. Um, S. 2015. 서울시 `재개발 → 도시 재생` 본격 전환 (Seoul city changed the urban development concept from “Redevelopment” to “Regeneration.” 한국경제 TV, March 25.Google Scholar
  55. UN DESA. 2015. World Population Prospects: The 2015 Revision, Key Findings and Advance Tables. Working Paper. Working paper ESA/P/WP.241.Google Scholar
  56. UN HABITAT. 2016. World cities report 2016 Urbanization and developmentemerging futures.Google Scholar
  57. Voytenko, Y., K. McCormick, J. Evans, and G. Schliwa. 2015. Urban living labs for sustainability and low carbon cities in Europe: Towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production..  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.053.Google Scholar
  58. Walker, B., C.S. Holling, S.R. Carpenter, and A. Kinzig. 2004. Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society 9: 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Walker, B., A. Kinzig, C. Folke, S. Carpenter, L. Schultz, and L. Gunderson. 2006. A handful of heuristics and some propositions for understanding resilience in social-ecological systems. Configurations 11: 13.Google Scholar
  60. Webb, R., X. Bai, M.S. Smith, R. Costanza, D. Griggs, M. Moglia, M. Neuman, P. Newman, et al. 2017. Sustainable urban systems: Co-design and framing for transformation. Ambio.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-017-0934-6.Google Scholar
  61. Westley, F.R., O. Tjornbo, L. Schultz, P. Olsson, C. Folke, B. Crona, and Ö. Bodin. 2013. A theory of transformative agency in linked social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society.  https://doi.org/10.5751/es-05072-180327.Google Scholar
  62. Wilson, S., L.J. Pearson, Y. Kashima, D. Lusher, and C. Pearson. 2013. Separating adaptive maintenance (resilience) and transformative capacity of social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society.  https://doi.org/10.5751/es-05100-180122.Google Scholar
  63. Wolfram, M. 2016. Conceptualizing urban transformative capacity: A framework for research and policy. Cities 51: 121–130.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.11.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wolfram, M. 2017. Village communities and social innovation policies in Seoul: Exploring the urban dimension of grassroots niches. In Urban sustainability transitions. Routledge studies in sustainability transitions, ed. N. Frantzeskaki, L. Coenen, V. CastánBroto, and D. Loorbach, 106–132. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wolfram, M. 2018. Cities shaping grassroots niches for sustainability transitions: Conceptual reflections and an exploratory case study. Journal of Cleaner Production.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.044.Google Scholar
  66. Wolfram, M., and N. Frantzeskaki. 2016. Cities and systemic change for sustainability: Prevailing epistemologies and an emerging research agenda. Sustainability 8: 144.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su8020144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wolfram, M., K. Han, K. A. Kim, and E. Park. 2016. Assessing the transformative capacity of cities in Korea (ASTRA). Final Report 2014S1A5A8018045. Seoul: National Research Foundation of Korea.Google Scholar
  68. Wu, X., M. Ramesh, and M. Howlett. 2015. Policy capacity: A conceptual framework for understanding policy competences and capabilities. Policy and Society 34: 165–171.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2015.09.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Ye, L. 2011. Urban regeneration in China: Policy, development, and issues. Local Economy 26: 337–347.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094211409117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Yi, W. 2013. Who is Park Wan Su? Korea Times, January 13.Google Scholar
  71. Yin, R.K. 2014. Case study research: Design and methods, 5th ed. Los Angeles: SAGE.Google Scholar
  72. Zhou, Z. 2016. New urban paradigm beyond the west: Investigating the regeneration of urban villages in Guangzhou, China. Journal of Urbanism 5: 1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2016.1224266.Google Scholar
  73. Ziervogel, G., A. Cowen, and J. Ziniades. 2016. Moving from adaptive to transformative capacity: Building foundations for inclusive, thriving, and regenerative urban settlements. Sustainability 8: 955.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su8090955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ArchitectureSKKU (Sungkyunkwan University)SuwonSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations