Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Deciphering forest change: Linking satellite-based forest cover change and community perceptions in a threatened landscape in India

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Ambio Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Global conservation efforts have traditionally focused on biodiversity hotspots and other priority landscapes. However, large areas outside priority sites have high conservation value and are referred to as neglected landscapes. The Eastern Ghats of India is an unexplored forest landscape of high conservation value with several endemic and threatened species reported, and is also home to many indigenous forest-dwelling communities. However, it remains a neglected area for conservation and only 3.53% of this landscape is protected. Here, we examine the effectiveness of protected areas in neglected landscapes in preventing forest degradation, and how community perceptions can be used to understand satellite-based landscape change analyses at village level. This study was conducted in Papikonda National park (PNP) and its unprotected buffers in India’s Eastern Ghats. Forest degradation was higher in the buffer (32%) than inside PNP (12%) between 1991 and 2014. Communities attributed shifting cultivation, plantations and over-extraction of forest resources as being the major drivers of forest degradation. Community observations of change were not significantly correlated with spatial measures of change. Forest degradation was higher outside the PA at a landscape level and inside the PA at the village level, therefore the PA was effective in reducing degradation at the landscape level but not at the village level inside the PA. We further discuss the role of community observations in interpreting forest degradation in neglected forest landscapes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://www.eptrienvis.nic.in/Introduction.html.

  2. http://censusindia.gov.in/.

References

  • Aditya, V., and T. Ganesh. 2016. Camera trap records of Rusty-spotted Cat Prionailurus rubiginosus and Leopard Cat Prionailurus bengalensis (Mammalia: Carnivora: Felidae) from Papikonda National Park, northern Eastern Ghats, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 8: 8818–8819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aditya, V., and T. Ganesh. 2017. Mammals of Papikonda Hills, northern Eastern Ghats, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 9: 10823–10830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal, I., A. Datta-Roy, A.M. Bauer, and V.B. Giri. 2012. Rediscovery of Geckoella jeyporensis (Squamata: Gekkonidae), with notes on morphology, coloration and habitat. Hamadryad 36: 17–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, J., T.A. Gardner, I.S. Araujo, T.C. Ávila-Pires, A.B. Bonaldo, J.E. Costa, M.C. Esposito, L.V. Ferreira, J. Hawes, M.I. Hernandez, and M.S. Hoogmoed. 2007. Quantifying the biodiversity value of tropical primary, secondary, and plantation forests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences United States of America 104: 18555–18560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bawa, K.S., R. Seidler, and P.H. Raven. 2004. Reconciling conservation paradigms. Conservation Biology 18: 859–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, T.M., R.A. Mittermeier, G.A. da Fonseca, J. Gerlach, M. Hoffmann, J.F. Lamoreux, C.G. Mittermeier, J.D. Pilgrim, and A.S. Rodrigues. 2006. Global biodiversity conservation priorities. Science 313: 58–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cardillo, M., G.M. Mace, J.L. Gittleman, and A. Purvis. 2006. Latent extinction risk and the future battlegrounds of mammal conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences United States of America 103: 4157–4161.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • CEPF. 2017. Protected area coverage in the hotspots. Retrieved May 31, 2017, from http://www.cepf.net/resources/hotspots/Conservation-Responses/Pages/Protected-Area-Coverage-in-the-Hotspots.aspx.

  • Chazdon, R.L., C.A. Harvey, O. Komar, D.M. Griffith, B.G. Ferguson, and M. Martínez-Ramos. 2009. Beyond reserves: A research agenda for conserving biodiversity in human-modified tropical landscapes. Biotropica 41: 142–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conservation International. 2017. Why Hotspots Matter. Retrieved June 26, 2017, from http://www.conservation.org/How/Pages/Hotspots.aspx.

  • Coppin, P., I. Jonckhere, K. Nackarts, and B. Muys. 2004. Digital change detection methods in ecosystem monitoring: A review. International Journal of Remote Sensing 25: 1565–1596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daily, G.C., P.R. Ehrlich, and G.A. Sanchez-Azofeifa. 2001. Countryside biogeography: Use of human-dominated habitats by the avifauna of southern Costa Rica. Ecological Applications 11: 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeFries, R., A. Hansen, A.C. Newton, and M.C. Hansen. 2005. Increasing isolation of protected areas in tropical forests over the past twenty years. Ecological Applications 15: 19–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeFries, R., K.K. Karanth, and S. Pareeth. 2010. Interactions between protected areas and their surroundings in human-dominated tropical landscapes. Biological Conservation 143: 2870–2880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fazey, I., J. Fischer, and D.B. Lindenmayer. 2005. What do conservation biologists publish? Biological Conservation 124: 63–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, J., D.B. Lindenmayer, and A.D. Manning. 2006. Biodiversity, ecosystem function, and resilience: Ten guiding principles for commodity production landscapes. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 4: 80–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gujja, B., S. Ramakrishna, and V. Goud (eds.). 2006. Perspectives on Polavaram: A major irrigation project on Godavari, 35. London: Academic Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, A.J., and R. DeFries. 2007. Ecological mechanisms linking protected areas to surrounding lands. Ecological Applications 17: 974–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, C.A., and J.A.G. Villalobos. 2007. Agroforestry systems conserve species-rich but modified assemblages of tropical birds and bats. Biodiversity and Conservation 16: 2257–2292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holm, A.M., S.W. Cridland, and M.L. Roderick. 2003. The use of time-integrated NOAA NDVI data and rainfall to assess landscape degradation in the arid shrubland of Western Australia. Remote Sensing of Environment 85: 145–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janzen, D.H. 1983. No park is an island: increase in interference from outside as park size decreases. In Ecosystem management (pp. 192–202). Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4018-1_18.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jha, C.S., C.B.S. Dutt, and K.S. Bawa. 2000. Deforestation and land use changes in Western Ghats, India. Current Science 79: 231–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, S., G.A. Blackburn, B. Gharai, S. Sudhakar, A.P. Thomas, and M.S.R. Murthy. 2009. Monitoring conservation effectiveness in a global biodiversity hotspot: The contribution of land cover change assessment. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 158: 169–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karanth, K.K., L.M. Curran, and J.D. Reuning-Scherer. 2006. Village size and forest disturbance in Bhadra wildlife sanctuary, Western Ghats, India. Biological Conservation 128: 147–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, R., and G. Shahabuddin. 2005. Effects of biomass extraction on vegetation structure, diversity and composition of forests in Sariska Tiger Reserve, India. Environmental Conservation 32: 248–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, T.S., R. Chandra, and P.A. Azeez. 2010. The birds of Araku, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 2: 662–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lele, N., P.K. Joshi, and S.P. Agrawal. 2008. Assessing forest fragmentation in northeastern region (NER) of India using landscape matrices. Ecological Indicators 8: 657–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer, D., R.J. Hobbs, R. Montague-Drake, J. Alexandra, A. Bennett, M. Burgman, P. Cale, A. Calhoun, V. Cramer, P. Cullen, and D. Driscoll. 2008. A checklist for ecological management of landscapes for conservation. Ecology Letters 11: 78–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurance, W.F. 2007. Forest destruction in tropical Asia. Current Science 93: 1544–1550.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R.I., P. Kareiva, and R.T. Forman. 2008. The implications of current and future urbanization for global protected areas and biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation 141: 1695–1703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menon, S., and K.S. Bawa. 1997. Applications of geographic information systems, remote-sensing, and landscape ecology approach to biodiversity conservation in the Western Ghats. Current Science 73: 134–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohan, R.R. 2006. Major loss, minor gain: Polavaram project in AP. Economic and Political Weekly 2006: 604–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murali, K.S., U. Shankar, R.U. Shaanker, K.N. Ganeshaiah, and K.S. Bawa. 1996. Extraction of non-timber forest products in the forests of Biligiri Rangan Hills, India. 2. Impact of NTFP extraction on regeneration, population structure, and species composition. Economic Botany 50: 252–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, N., R.A. Mittermeier, C.G. Mittermeier, G.A. Da Fonseca, and J. Kent. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403: 853–858.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nagendra, H., S. Pareeth, and R. Ghate. 2006. People within parks—forest villages, land-cover change and landscape fragmentation in the Tadoba Andhari Tiger Reserve, India. Applied Geography 26: 96–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagendra, H., S. Pareeth, B. Sharma, C.M. Schweik, and K.R. Adhikari. 2008. Forest fragmentation and regrowth in an institutional mosaic of community, government and private ownership in Nepal. Landscape Ecology 23: 41–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagendra, H. 2008. Do parks work? Impact of protected areas on land cover clearing. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment 37: 330–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagendra, H., D. Rocchini, and R. Ghate. 2010. Beyond parks as monoliths: Spatially differentiating park-people relationships in the Tadoba Andhari Tiger Reserve in India. Biological Conservation 143: 2900–2908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naughton-Treves, L., M.B. Holland, and K. Brandon. 2005. The role of protected areas in conserving biodiversity and sustaining local livelihoods. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30: 219–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newmark, W.D. 2008. Isolation of African protected areas. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 6: 321–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NRSC. 2017. Major and Medium Irrigation Projects. Retrieved June 13, 2017, from http://india-wris.nrsc.gov.in/wrpinfo/index.php?title=Major_%26_Medium_Irrigation_Projects.

  • Oskarsson, P. 2010. The law of the land contested: Bauxite mining in tribal, central India in an age of economic reform. Doctoral dissertation. Norfolk, UK: School of International Development, University of East Anglia.

  • Pettorelli, N., S. Ryan, T. Mueller, N. Bunnefeld, B. Jędrzejewska, M. Lima, and K. Kausrud. 2011. The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI): unforeseen successes in animal ecology. Climate Research 46: 15–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, C.S., K.R.M. Rao, C. Pattanaik, and P.K. Joshi. 2009. Assessment of large-scale deforestation of Nawarangpur district, Orissa, India: A remote sensing based study. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 154: 325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarma, P.K., B.P. Lahkar, S. Ghosh, A. Rabha, J.P. Das, N.K. Nath, S. Dey, and N. Brahma. 2008. Land-use and land-cover change and future implication analysis in Manas National Park, India using multi-temporal satellite data. Current Science 95: 223–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahabuddin, G., and M. Rao. 2010. Do community-conserved areas effectively conserve biological diversity? Global insights and the Indian context. Biological Conservation 143: 2926–2936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somanathan, H., and R.M. Borges. 2000. Influence of exploitation on population structure, spatial distribution and reproductive success of dioecious species in a fragmented cloud forest in India. Biological Conservation 94: 243–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sreekar, R., and C. Srinivasulu. 2010. New site record of yellow-throated Bulbul Pycnonotus xantholaemus from Andhra Pradesh. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 92: 266–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian, H., K. Banger, T. Bo, and V.K. Dadhwal. 2014. History of land use in India during 1880–2010: Large-scale land transformations reconstructed from satellite data and historical archives. Global and Planetary Change 121: 78–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandermeer, J., and I. Perfecto. 2007. The agricultural matrix and a future paradigm for conservation. Conservation Biology 21: 274–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakeel, A., K.S. Rao, R.K. Maikhuri, and K.G. Saxena. 2005. Forest management and land use/cover changes in a typical micro watershed in the mid elevation zone of Central Himalaya, India. Forest Ecology and Management 213: 229–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WDPA. 2015. The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA). Retrieved July 7, 2017. Cambridge (UK): UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre. New York, New York, USA. https://www.protectedplanet.net/.

  • Wittemyer, G., P. Elsen, W.T. Bean, A.C. Burton, and J.S. Brashares. 2008. Accelerated human population growth at protected area edges. Science 321: 123–126.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Conservation Leadership Programme for providing financial support, the Andhra Pradesh Forest Department for granting research permits, and staff at the Ecoinformatics Lab at ATREE for assisting with GIS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE), Royal Enclave, Sriramapura, Jakkur post, Bangalore, Karnataka, 560064, India

    Vikram Aditya & Thyagarajan Ganesh

Authors
  1. Vikram Aditya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thyagarajan Ganesh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vikram Aditya.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aditya, V., Ganesh, T. Deciphering forest change: Linking satellite-based forest cover change and community perceptions in a threatened landscape in India. Ambio 48, 790–800 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-018-1108-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-018-1108-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation