Advertisement

Ambio

pp 1–14 | Cite as

The social dimensions of a river’s environmental quality assessment

  • Anne-Lise Boyer
  • Emeline Comby
  • Silvia Flaminio
  • Yves-François Le Lay
  • Marylise Cottet
Research Article

Abstract

Integrated water resources management, promoted in developed countries, obliges to integrate social aspects with hydrological and ecological dimensions when assessing river quality. To better understand these social aspects, we propose a mixed-method to study public perceptions of an impounded river. Since the 1930s, the management of the Ain river (France) has been challenged by conflicts about the river’s quality. We surveyed (using interviews and mental maps) various stakeholders along the river. The results based on textual and content analysis show variations in the public’s perceptions according to the residence area, practices, and the degree of emotional attachment to the river. The assessment of environmental quality needs to take into account different types of knowledge, sometimes conflicting, that reveal and shape the variety of waterscapes which compose the Ain River. The social dimensions highlight integrated water management’s inherent complexity by considering the river basin as a place to live and by involving multiple stakeholders.

Keywords

Environmental quality Indicators Mental maps Public perceptions Stakeholders Waterscape 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research project was part of a research program entitled “Living the Ain River: 19th–21st century”, which was funded by the Rhône Basin LITER (Long Term Ecological Research), the Rhône-Méditerranée Water Agency, and Électricité de France (EDF).

References

  1. Amoros, C., G. Bornette, and C.P. Henry. 2000. A vegetation-based method for ecological diagnosis of riverine wetlands. Environmental Management 25: 211–227.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s002679910017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakker, K. 2012. Water: Political, biopolitical, material. Social Studies of Science 42: 616–623.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312712441396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bakker, K., and G. Bridge. 2006. Material worlds? Resource geographies and the matter of nature. Progress in Human Geography 30: 5–27.  https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132506phoa.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bertaux, D. 1981. From the life-history approach to the transformation of sociological practice. In Biography and society: The life history approach in the social sciences:, ed. D. Bertaux, 29–45. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Boelens, R., J. Hoogesteger, E. Swyngedouw, J. Vos, and P. Wester. 2016. Hydrosocial territories: A political ecology perspective. Water International 41: 1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2016.1134898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bouleau, G. 2014. The co-production of science and waterscapes: The case of the Seine and the Rhône Rivers, France. Geoforum 57: 248–257.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.01.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bouleau, G., C. Argillier, Y. Souchon, C. Barthélémy, and M. Babut. 2009. How ecological indicators construction reveals social changes. The case of lakes and rivers in France. Ecological Indicators 9: 1198–1205.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.03.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, T.C., and T.C. Daniel. 1991. Landscape aesthetic of riparian environments: Relationship of flow quantity to scenic quality along a wild and scenic river. Water Resources Research 27: 1787–1795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coeterier, J.F. 1996. Dominant attributes in the perception and evaluation of the Dutch landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning 34: 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Comby, E., Y.F. Le Lay, and H. Piégay. 2014a. How chemical pollution becomes a social problem. Risk communication and assessment through regional newspapers during the management of PCB pollutions of the Rhône River (France). Science of the Total Environment 482: 100–115.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.02.137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Comby, E., Y.F. Le Lay, and H. Piégay. 2014b. The achievement of decentralized water management through broad stakeholder participation. An example from the Drôme River Catchment Area in France (1981–2008). Environmental Management 54: 1074–1089.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0378-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cottet, M., G. Bornette, and H. Piégay. 2013. Does human perception of wetland aesthetics and health relate to ecological functioning? Journal of Environmental Management 128: 1012–1022.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.06.056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cottet, M., F. Piola, Y.F. Le Lay, S. Rouifed, and A. Rivière-Honegger. 2015. How environmental managers perceive and approach the issue of invasive species: The case of Japanese knotweed sl (Rhône River, France). Biological Invasions 17: 3433–3453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Coughlin, R.E. 1976. The perception and valuation of water quality. Boston: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cuaz, M., B. Meuret, and H. Piégay. 1996. Social surveys of users and property owners: What interest for river management? Revue de Géographie de Lyon 71: 353–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. De Groot, M. 2012. Exploring the relationship between public environmental ethics and river flood policies in Western Europe. Journal of Environmental Management 93: 1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.08.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dick, J., D.E. Orenstein, J.M. Holzer, C. Wohner, A.-L. Achard, C. Andrews, N. Avriel-Avni, et al. 2018. What is socio-ecological research delivering? A literature survey across 25 international LTSER platforms. Science of the Total Environment 622–623: 1225–1240.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dufour, S., and H. Piégay. 2010. Channel vertical mobility, hydro-geomorphic disturbances and understory vegetation in floodplain forests of the Ain River (France). Géomorphologie: Relief, Processus, Environnement 4: 371–386.  https://doi.org/10.4000/geomorphologie.8101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fernandez, S. 2014. Much ado about minimum flows… Unpacking indicators to reveal water politics. Geoforum 57: 258–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Germaine, M.A., and L. Lespez. 2017. The failure of the largest project to dismantle hydroelectric dams in Europe? (Sélune River, France, 2009–2017). Water Alternatives 10: 655–676.Google Scholar
  21. Gieseking, J.J. 2013. Mapping or where we go from here: The spatial mental mapping method and its analytic components for social science data gathering. Qualitative Inquiry 19: 637–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gobster, P.H. 1998. Nearby neighborhood residents’ images and perceptions of the river. In People and the river: Perception and use of Chicago waterways for recreation, 5–48. https://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/pubs/misc/chicagoriver/peopleandtheriver.pdf#page=25.
  23. Gobster, P.H., J.I. Nassauer, T.C. Daniel, and G. Fry. 2007. The shared landscape: What does aesthetics have to do with ecology? Landscape Ecology 22: 959–972.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-007-9110-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gould, P., and R. White. 1984. Mental Maps. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  25. Granek, E.F., E.M. Madin, M.A. Brown, W. Figueira, D.S. Cameron, Z. Hogan, G. Kristianson, P. De Villiers, et al. 2008. Engaging recreational fishers in management and conservation: Global case studies. Conservation Biology 22: 1125–1134.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00977.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gregory, K.J., and R.J. Davis. 1993. The perception of riverscape aesthetics: An example from two Hampshire rivers. Journal of Environmental Management 39: 171–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gueben-Venière, S. 2011. How can mental maps, applied to the coast environment, help in collecting and analyzing spatial representations? EchoGéo.  https://doi.org/10.4000/echogeo.12625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Guest, G., B. Arwen, and L. Johnson. 2006. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods 18: 59–82.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gugger, M., S. Lenoir, C. Berger, A. Ledreux, J.C. Druart, J.F. Humbert, C. Guette, and C. Bernard. 2005. First report in a river in France of the benthic cyanobacterium Phormidium favosum producing anatoxin-associated with dog neurotoxicosis. Toxicon 45: 919–928.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2005.02.031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hall, C.M., and T. Härkönen (Eds.). 2006. Lake tourism: An integrated approach to lacustrine tourism systems, vol. 32. Clevedon: Channel View Publications.Google Scholar
  31. Heiden, S., J.P. Magué, and B. Pincemin. 2010. TXM: Une plateforme logicielle open-source pour la textométrie—conception et développement. In Statistical analysis of textual dataProceedings of 10th International Conference JADT, ed. S. Bolasco et al. Rome: Edizioni Universitarie di Lettere Economia Diritto.Google Scholar
  32. Hering, D., A. Borja, J. Carstensen, L. Carvalho, M. Elliott, C.K. Feld, A.S. Heiskanen, R.K. Johnson, et al. 2010. The European Water Framework Directive at the age of 10: A critical review of the achievements with recommendations for the future. Science of the Total Environment 408: 4007–4019.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.05.031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. House, M.A., and M. Fordham. 1997. Public perceptions of river corridors and attitudes towards river works. Landscape Research 22: 25–44.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01426399708706499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. House, M.A., and E.K. Sangster. 1991. Public perception of river-corridor management. Water and Environment Journal 5: 312–316.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-6593.1991.tb00624.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hudson, B. 2006. Waterfalls, tourism and landscape. Geography: An International Journal 91: 3–12.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08873631.2013.828482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kaika, M. 2003. The Water Framework Directive: A new directive for a changing social, political and economic European framework. European Planning Studies 11: 299–316.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310303640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kellens, W., R. Zaalberg, T. Neutens, W. Vanneuville, and P. De Maeyer. 2011. An analysis of the public perception of flood risk on the Belgian coast. Risk Analysis 31: 1055–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lassettre, N.S., H. Piégay, S. Dufour, and A.J. Rollet. 2008. Decadal changes in distribution and frequency of wood in a free meandering river, the Ain River, France. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 33: 1098–1112.  https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Le Lay, Y.F., H. Piégay, K. Gregory, A. Chin, S. Dolédec, A. Elosegi, et al. 2008. Variations in cross-cultural perception of riverscapes in relation to in- channel wood. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 33: 268–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Le Lay, Y.F., H. Piégay, and A. Rivière-Honegger. 2013. Perception of braided river landscapes: Implications for public participation and sustainable management. Journal of Environmental Management 119: 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.01.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lebart, L., A. Salem, and L. Berry. 1998. Exploring textual data. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lejot, J., C. Delacourt, H. Piégay, T. Fournier, M.L. Trémélo, and P. Allemand. 2007. Very high spatial resolution imagery for channel bathymetry and topography from an unmanned mapping controlled platform. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 32: 1705–1725.  https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Linton, J. 2010. What is water? The history of a modern abstraction. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
  44. Linton, J., and J. Budds. 2014. The hydrosocial cycle: Defining and mobilizing a relational dialectical approach to water. Geoforum 57: 170–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lynch, K. 1960. The image of the city. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  46. Mallet, J.P., N. Lamouroux, P. Sagnes, and H. Persat. 2000. Habitat preferences of European grayling in a medium size stream, the Ain River, France. Journal of Fish Biology 56: 1312–1326.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2000.tb02145.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Marston, R.A., J. Girel, G. Pautou, H. Piegay, J.P. Bravard, and C. Arneson. 1995. Channel metamorphosis, floodplain disturbance, and vegetation development: Ain River. France. Geomorphology 13: 121–131.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-555X(95)00066-E.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McKenna, J., R.J. Quinn, D.J. Donnelly, and J.A.G. Cooper. 2008. Accurate mental maps as an aspect of local ecological knowledge (LEK): A case study from Lough Neagh, Northern Ireland. Ecology and Society 13: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Moser, G. 1984. Water quality perception, a dynamic evaluation. Journal of Environmental Psychology 4: 201–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mosley, M.P. 1989. Perceptions of New Zealand Scenery. New Zealand Geographer 45: 2–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Orlove, B., and S.C. Caton. 2010. Water sustainability: Anthropological approaches and prospects. Annual Review of Anthropology 39: 401–415.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.105045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pahl-Wostl, C. 2006. The importance of social learning in restoring the multifunctionality of rivers and floodplains. Ecology and Society 11: 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Persat, H. 1996. Threatened populations and conservation of the European grayling, Thymallus thymallus (L., 1758). In Conservation of endangered freshwater fish in Europe, 233–247. Basel: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
  54. Piégay, H., P. Dupont, and J.A. Faby. 2002. Questions of water resources management. Feedback on the implementation of the French SAGE and SDAGE plans (1992–2001). Water policy 4: 239–262.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1366-7017(02)00008-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Piégay, H., K.J. Gregory, V. Bondarev, A. Chin, N. Dahlstrom, A. Elosegi, S.V. Gregory, V. Joshi, et al. 2005. Public perception as a barrier to introducing wood in rivers for restoration purposes. Environmental Management 36: 665–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Poirel, A., J. Gailhard, and H. Capra. 2010. Influence des barrages-réservoirs sur la temperature de l’eau—Effects of dams on water temperature: example of the Ain River (France). La Houille Blanche 4: 72–79.  https://doi.org/10.1051/lhb/2010044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rollet, A.J., H. Piegay, S. Dufour, G. Bornette, and H. Persat. 2014. Assessment of consequences of sediment deficit on a gravel river bed downstream of dams in restoration perspectives: Application of a multicriteria, hierarchical and spatially explicit diagnosis. River Research and Applications 30: 939–953.  https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.2689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ryan, R.L. 1998. Local perceptions and values for Midwestern river corridor. Landscape and Urban Planning 66: 53–66.Google Scholar
  59. Saravanan, V.S., G.T. McDonald, and P.P. Mollinga. 2009. Critical review of integrated water resources management: Moving beyond polarised discourse. Natural Resources Forum 33: 76–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Smith, D.G., G.F. Crocker, and K. McFarlane. 1995. Human perception of water appearance. 1. Clarity and colour for bathing and aesthetics. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 29: 29–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Stemler, S. 2001. An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation 7: 137–146. http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=17.
  62. Swyngedouw, E. 1999. Modernity and hybridity: Nature, regeneracionismo, and the production of the Spanish waterscape, 1890–1930. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 89: 443–465.  https://doi.org/10.1111/0004-5608.00157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Vaske, J.J., and K.C. Kobrin. 2001. Place attachment and environmentally responsible behavior. The Journal of Environmental Education 32: 16–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Vorkinn, M., and H. Riese. 2001. Environmental concern in a local context: The significance of place attachment. Environment and behavior 33: 249–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Walker-Springett, K., R. Jefferson, K. Böck, A. Breckwoldt, E. Comby, M. Cottet, G. Hübner, Y.F. Le Lay, S. Shaw, and K. Wyles. 2016. Ways forward for aquatic conservation: Applications of environmental psychology to support management objectives. Journal of Environmental Management 166: 525–536.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.11.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wawrzyniak, V., H. Piégay, P. Allemand, L. Vaudor, R. Goma, and P. Grangjean. 2016. Effects of geomorphology and groundwater level on the spatio-temporal variability of riverine cold water patches assessed using thermal infrared (TIR) remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment 175: 337–348.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.12.050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wyżga, B., J. Zawiejska, and Y.F. Le Lay. 2009. Influence of academic education on the perception of wood in watercourses. Journal of Environmental Management 90: 587–603.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.12.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CNRS UMR 5600 Environnement Ville Société, ENS de Lyon, 15 Parvis René DescartesUniversity of LyonLyon Cedex 07France
  2. 2.UMR 6049 ThéMA, Université de Franche-ComtéUniversity of Franche-ComtéBesançon CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations