Implementation strategies for systematic conservation planning
- 403 Downloads
The field of systematic conservation planning has grown substantially, with hundreds of publications in the peer-reviewed literature and numerous applications to regional conservation planning globally. However, the extent to which systematic conservation plans have influenced management is unclear. This paper analyses factors that facilitate the transition from assessment to implementation in conservation planning, in order to help integrate assessment and implementation into a seamless process. We propose a framework for designing implementation strategies, taking into account three critical planning aspects: processes, inputs, and context. Our review identified sixteen processes, which we broadly grouped into four themes and eight inputs. We illustrate how the framework can be used to inform context-dependent implementation strategies, using the process of ‘engagement’ as an example. The example application includes both lessons learned from successfully implemented plans across the engagement spectrum, and highlights key barriers that can hinder attempts to bridge the assessment-implementation gap.
KeywordsConformance-based evaluation Plan implementation Planning-implementation gap Performance-based evaluation Protected areas Research-implementation gap
This paper evolved from the symposium and associated workshop “From plans to outcomes: towards an implementation strategy for conservation planning” at the International Congress for Conservation Biology 2013 held in Baltimore, Maryland USA. We thank all contributors to that symposium for sharing their ideas and case studies. VMA, RW, GG, RLP, and JGAR acknowledge support of the Australian Research Council.
- Adams, V.M., J.G. Álvarez-Romero, S.J. Capon, G.M. Crowley, A.P. Dale, M.J. Kennard, M.M. Douglas, and R.L. Pressey. 2017. Making time for space: The critical role of spatial planning in adapting natural resource management to climate change. Environmental Science & Policy 74: 57–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Álvarez-Romero, J.G., M. Mills, V.M. Adams, G.G. Gurney, R.L. Pressey, R. Weeks, N.C. Ban, J. Cheok, et al. 2018. Research advances and gaps in marine planning: Towards a global database in systematic conservation planning. Biological Conservation (in press).Google Scholar
- CMP. 2013. Open standards for the practice of conservation. Version 3.0. http://cmp-openstandards.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/CMP-OS-V3-0-Final.pdf. Accessed June 2014.
- Economics, Headwaters. 2012. Implementing climate change adaptation: Lessons learned from ten examples. Bozeman, MT: Headwaters Economics.Google Scholar
- Fox, E., M. Miller-Henson, J. Ugoretz, M. Weber, M. Gleason, J. Kirlin, M. Caldwell, and S. Mastrup. 2012. Enabling conditions to support marine protected area network planning: California’s Marine Life Protection Act Initiative as a case study. Ocean & Coastal Management 74: 14–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gleason, M., S. McCreary, M. Miller-Henson, J. Ugoretz, E. Fox, M. Merrifield, W. McClintock, P. Serpa, et al. 2010. Science-based and stakeholder-driven marine protected area network planning: a successful case study from north central California. Ocean & Coastal Management 53: 52–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Groves, C.R., and E.T. Game. 2016. From planning to action and communication: The art of implementation. Conservation planning: Informed decisions for a healthier planet. New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
- IAP2 Federation. 2014. Public participation spectrum. International Association for Public Participation-IAP2 Federation, Wollongong, NSW.Google Scholar
- Mazmanian, D.A., and P.A. Sabatier. 1989. Implementation and public policy. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
- Moilanen, A., H. Possingham, and K.A. Wilson. 2009. Spatial conservation prioritization: Past, present, and future. In Spatial conservation prioritization quantitative methods and computational tools, ed. A. Moilanen, H.K. Wilson, A. Moilanen, K. Wilson, and H. Possingham, 260–268. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Najam, A. 1995. Learning from the literature on policy implementation: a synthesis perspective. IIASA Working PaperGoogle Scholar
- Pressey, R. 1998. Algorithms, politics and timber: An example of the role of science in a public, political negotiation process over new conservation areas in production forests. In Ecology for everyone: Communicating ecology to scientists, the public and the politicians, ed. R. Wills and R. Hobbs, 73–87. Sydney: Surrey Beatty and Sons.Google Scholar
- Pressey, R.L., M.E. Watts, T.W. Barrett, and M.J. Ridges. 2009. The C-Plan conservation planning system: Origins, applications, and possible futures. In Spatial conservation prioritization: Quantitative methods and computational tools, ed. A. Moilanen, K.A. Wilson, and H.P. Possingham, 211–234. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Rein, M., and F. Rabinovitz. 1980. Implementation: A theoretical perspective. In American politics and public policy, ed. W. Burnham and M. Wienburg, 307–335. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Weeks, R., R.L. Pressey, J.R. Wilson, M. Knight, V. Horigue, R.A. Abesamis, R. Acosta, and J. Jompa. 2014. Ten things to get right for marine conservation planning in the Coral Triangle. F1000Research 3: 91.Google Scholar