Reconciling certification and intact forest landscape conservation
In 2014, the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) added a new criterion to its principles that requires protection of intact forest landscapes (IFLs). An IFL is an extensive area of forest that lacks roads and other signs of human activity as detected through remote sensing. In the Congo basin, our analysis of road networks in formally approved concessionary logging areas revealed greater loss of IFL in certified than in noncertified concessions. In areas of informal (i.e., nonregulated) extraction, road networks are known to be less detectable by remote sensing. Under the current definition of IFL, companies certified under FSC standards are likely to be penalized relative to the noncertified as well as the informal logging sector on account of their planned road networks, despite an otherwise better standard of forest management. This could ultimately undermine certification and its wider adoption, with implications for the future of sustainable forest management.
KeywordsCongo Basin Frontier forests FSC Land sharing versus land sparing Landscape approach Reduced impact logging
Fritz Kleinschroth is funded by the DAFNE project of the European Union H2020 programme (Grant Number 690268). Sylvie Gourlet-Fleury, Alain Karsenty, and John R. Healey provided helpful discussion. Diana Franco Gil kindly helped with Fig. 1. The authors thank Peter Ellis and three anonymous reviewers for their useful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.
- Burivalova, Z., F. Hua, L.P. Koh, C. Garcia, and F. Putz. 2016. A critical comparison of conventional, certified, and community management of tropical forests for timber in terms of environmental, economic, and social variables. Conservation Letters 10: 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cerutti, P.O., and G. Lescuyer. 2014. The domestic market for small-scale chainsaw milling in Cameroon: Present situation, opportunities and challenges. Occasional Paper, vol. 61. Bogor: Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR).Google Scholar
- Forest Stewardship Council. 2017a. Advice Note for the interpretation of the default clause of Motion 65. FSC Directive on FSC Forest Management Evaluations, FSC-DIR-20-007.Google Scholar
- Forest Stewardship Council. 2017b. International Generic Indicators. FSC-STD-60-004 V1-1 EN.Google Scholar
- Haurez, B., K. Daïnou, C. Vermeulen, F. Kleinschroth, F. Mortier, S. Gourlet-Fleury, and J.-L. Doucet. 2017. A look at Intact Forest Landscapes (IFLs) and their relevance in Central African forest policy. Forest Policy and Economics 80: 192–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.03.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kleinschroth, F., S. Gourlet-Fleury, P. Sist, V. Gond, and J.R. Healey. 2016b. Logging roads in tropical forests: Synthesis of literature written in French and English highlights environmental impact reduction through improved engineering. Bois et Forêts des Tropiques 328: 13–26. https://doi.org/10.19182/bft2016.328.a31299 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lawson, S. 2014. Illegal logging in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. London: Chatham House.Google Scholar
- Miettinen, P., D. Franco Gil, and M. Karmann. 2017. High conservation values and intact forest landscapes—changes and challenges for certified operation. In IUFRO 125th Anniversary Congress, Freiburg.Google Scholar
- Morgan, D., R. Mundry, C. Sanz, C.E. Ayina, S. Strindberg, E. Lonsdorf, and H.S. Kühl. 2017. African apes coexisting with logging: Comparing chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes troglodytes) and gorilla (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) resource needs and responses to forestry activities. Biological Conservation 218: 277–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.10.026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- FSC Policy and Standards Unit. 2010. FSC forest stewardship standards: structure, content and suggested indicators. FSC-GUI-60-004 (V1-0) EN. Bonn: Forest Stewardship Council.Google Scholar
- Potapov, P., M.C. Hansen, L. Laestadius, S. Turubanova, A. Yaroshenko, C. Thies, W. Smith, I. Zhuravleva, et al. 2017. The last frontiers of wilderness: Tracking loss of intact forest landscapes from 2000 to 2013. Science Advances 3: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1600821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Putz, F.E., P.A. Zuidema, T. Synnott, M. Peña-Claros, M.A. Pinard, D. Sheil, J.K. Vanclay, P. Sist, et al. 2012. Sustaining conservation values in selectively logged tropical forests: The attained and the attainable. Conservation Letters 5: 296–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263x.2012.00242.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Romero, C., E.O. Sills, M. Guariguata, P.O. Cerutti, G. Lescuyer, and F.E. Putz. 2017. Evaluation of the impacts of Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certification of natural forest management in the tropics. International Forestry Review 19: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/004347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Smith, P., and P. Perreault. 2017. Are all forest certification systems equal? An opinion on indigenous engagement in the Forest Stewardship Council and the Sustainable Forestry Initiative. Ottawa: National Aboriginal Forestry Association. http://www.nafaforestry.org/pdf/2017/FSCSFIComparisonPaper_Final_28sep2017.pdf.
- Stokes, E.J., S. Strindberg, P.C. Bakabana, P.W. Elkan, F.C. Iyenguet, B. Madzoké, G.A.F. Malanda, B.S. Mowawa, et al. 2010. Monitoring Great Ape and elephant abundance at large spatial scales: Measuring effectiveness of a conservation landscape. PLoS ONE 5: e10294. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- WRI and MDDEFE. 2012. Atlas forestier interactif du Congo. Version 3.0. Document de Synthese. Washington, D.C.: World Resources Institute & République du Congo Ministère de l’economie forestière et du développement durable.Google Scholar
- WRI and MINFOF. 2012. Interactive forest atlas of Cameroon. Version 3.0. Overview Report. Washington, D.C.: World Resources Institute & Ministère des Fôrets et de la Faune Cameroun.Google Scholar
- Yaroshenko, A.Y., P.V. Potapov, and S.A. Turubanova. 2001. The last intact forest landscapes of Northern European Russia. Moscow: Greenpeace Russia and Global Forest Watch.Google Scholar