Advertisement

Ambio

, Volume 48, Issue 2, pp 153–159 | Cite as

Reconciling certification and intact forest landscape conservation

  • Fritz KleinschrothEmail author
  • Claude Garcia
  • Jaboury Ghazoul
Perspective

Abstract

In 2014, the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) added a new criterion to its principles that requires protection of intact forest landscapes (IFLs). An IFL is an extensive area of forest that lacks roads and other signs of human activity as detected through remote sensing. In the Congo basin, our analysis of road networks in formally approved concessionary logging areas revealed greater loss of IFL in certified than in noncertified concessions. In areas of informal (i.e., nonregulated) extraction, road networks are known to be less detectable by remote sensing. Under the current definition of IFL, companies certified under FSC standards are likely to be penalized relative to the noncertified as well as the informal logging sector on account of their planned road networks, despite an otherwise better standard of forest management. This could ultimately undermine certification and its wider adoption, with implications for the future of sustainable forest management.

Keywords

Congo Basin Frontier forests FSC Land sharing versus land sparing Landscape approach Reduced impact logging 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Fritz Kleinschroth is funded by the DAFNE project of the European Union H2020 programme (Grant Number 690268). Sylvie Gourlet-Fleury, Alain Karsenty, and John R. Healey provided helpful discussion. Diana Franco Gil kindly helped with Fig. 1. The authors thank Peter Ellis and three anonymous reviewers for their useful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.

References

  1. Brandt, J.S., C. Nolte, J. Steinberg, and A. Agrawal. 2014. Foreign capital, forest change and regulatory compliance in Congo Basin forests. Environmental Research Letters 9: 44007.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/4/044007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Burivalova, Z., F. Hua, L.P. Koh, C. Garcia, and F. Putz. 2016. A critical comparison of conventional, certified, and community management of tropical forests for timber in terms of environmental, economic, and social variables. Conservation Letters 10: 4–14.  https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cerutti, P.O., and G. Lescuyer. 2014. The domestic market for small-scale chainsaw milling in Cameroon: Present situation, opportunities and challenges. Occasional Paper, vol. 61. Bogor: Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR).Google Scholar
  4. Cerutti, P.O., L. Tacconi, R. Nasi, and G. Lescuyer. 2011. Legal vs. certified timber: Preliminary impacts of forest certification in Cameroon. Forest Policy and Economics 13: 184–190.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2010.11.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cordero-Sancho, S., and K.M. Bergen. 2018. Relationships of agricultural land use to an expanded road network within tropical forest landscapes of Cameroon and Republic of the Congo. Professional Geographer 70: 60–72.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2017.1325752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Forest Stewardship Council. 2017a. Advice Note for the interpretation of the default clause of Motion 65. FSC Directive on FSC Forest Management Evaluations, FSC-DIR-20-007.Google Scholar
  7. Forest Stewardship Council. 2017b. International Generic Indicators. FSC-STD-60-004 V1-1 EN.Google Scholar
  8. Griscom, B.W., R.C. Goodman, Z. Burivalova, and F.E. Putz. 2017. Carbon and biodiversity impacts of intensive versus extensive tropical forestry. Conservation Letters.  https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12362.Google Scholar
  9. Gullison, R.E. 2003. Does forest certification conserve biodiversity? Oryx 37: 153–165.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s0030605303000346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Haurez, B., K. Daïnou, C. Vermeulen, F. Kleinschroth, F. Mortier, S. Gourlet-Fleury, and J.-L. Doucet. 2017. A look at Intact Forest Landscapes (IFLs) and their relevance in Central African forest policy. Forest Policy and Economics 80: 192–199.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.03.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Karsenty, A., N. Bayol, P. Cerutti, D. Ezzine de Blas, and E. Forni. 2010. The 2008–2009 timber sector crisis in Africa and some lessons for the forest taxation regime. International Forestry Review 12: 172–176.  https://doi.org/10.1505/ifor.12.2.172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kleinschroth, F., and J.R. Healey. 2017. Impacts of logging roads on tropical forests. Biotropica 49: 620–635.  https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kleinschroth, F., S. Gourlet-Fleury, P. Sist, F. Mortier, and J.R. Healey. 2015. Legacy of logging roads in the Congo Basin: How persistent are the scars in forest cover? Ecosphere 6: 64.  https://doi.org/10.1890/es14-00488.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kleinschroth, F., J.R. Healey, P. Sist, F. Mortier, and S. Gourlet-Fleury. 2016a. How persistent are the impacts of logging roads on Central African forest vegetation? Journal of Applied Ecology 53: 1127–1137.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kleinschroth, F., S. Gourlet-Fleury, P. Sist, V. Gond, and J.R. Healey. 2016b. Logging roads in tropical forests: Synthesis of literature written in French and English highlights environmental impact reduction through improved engineering. Bois et Forêts des Tropiques 328: 13–26.  https://doi.org/10.19182/bft2016.328.a31299 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kleinschroth, F., J.R. Healey, and S. Gourlet-Fleury. 2016c. Sparing forests in Central Africa: Re-use old logging roads to avoid creating new ones. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 14: 9–10.  https://doi.org/10.1002/feekleinschroth.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kleinschroth, F., J.R. Healey, S. Gourlet-Fleury, F. Mortier, and R.S. Stoica. 2017. Effects of logging on roadless space in intact forest landscapes of the Congo Basin. Conservation Biology 31: 1–24.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Laporte, N.T., J.A. Stabach, R. Grosch, T.S. Lin, and S.J. Goetz. 2007. Expansion of industrial logging in Central Africa. Science 316: 1451.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1141057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Laurance, W.F., M. Goosem, and S.G.W. Laurance. 2009. Impacts of roads and linear clearings on tropical forests. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24: 659–669.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.06.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lawson, S. 2014. Illegal logging in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. London: Chatham House.Google Scholar
  21. Lescuyer, G., P.O. Cerutti, and V. Robiglio. 2013. Artisanal chainsaw milling to support decentralized management of timber in Central Africa? An analysis through the theory of access. Forest Policy and Economics 32: 68–77.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2013.02.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Miettinen, P., D. Franco Gil, and M. Karmann. 2017. High conservation values and intact forest landscapes—changes and challenges for certified operation. In IUFRO 125th Anniversary Congress, Freiburg.Google Scholar
  23. Morgan, D., R. Mundry, C. Sanz, C.E. Ayina, S. Strindberg, E. Lonsdorf, and H.S. Kühl. 2017. African apes coexisting with logging: Comparing chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes troglodytes) and gorilla (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) resource needs and responses to forestry activities. Biological Conservation 218: 277–286.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.10.026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pearson, T.R.H., S. Brown, and F.M. Casarim. 2014. Carbon emissions from tropical forest degradation caused by logging. Environmental Research Letters 9: 34017.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/3/034017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Peres, C.A., J. Barlow, and W.F. Laurance. 2006. Detecting anthropogenic disturbance in tropical forests. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21: 227–229.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2006.03.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. FSC Policy and Standards Unit. 2010. FSC forest stewardship standards: structure, content and suggested indicators. FSC-GUI-60-004 (V1-0) EN. Bonn: Forest Stewardship Council.Google Scholar
  27. Potapov, P., A. Yaroshenko, S. Turubanova, M. Dubinin, L. Laestadius, C. Thies, D. Aksenov, A. Egorov, et al. 2008. Mapping the world’s intact forest landscapes by remote sensing. Ecology and Society 13: 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Potapov, P., M.C. Hansen, L. Laestadius, S. Turubanova, A. Yaroshenko, C. Thies, W. Smith, I. Zhuravleva, et al. 2017. The last frontiers of wilderness: Tracking loss of intact forest landscapes from 2000 to 2013. Science Advances 3: 1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1600821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Putz, F.E., P.A. Zuidema, T. Synnott, M. Peña-Claros, M.A. Pinard, D. Sheil, J.K. Vanclay, P. Sist, et al. 2012. Sustaining conservation values in selectively logged tropical forests: The attained and the attainable. Conservation Letters 5: 296–303.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263x.2012.00242.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Romero, C., E.O. Sills, M. Guariguata, P.O. Cerutti, G. Lescuyer, and F.E. Putz. 2017. Evaluation of the impacts of Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certification of natural forest management in the tropics. International Forestry Review 19: 1–14.  https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/004347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Smith, P., and P. Perreault. 2017. Are all forest certification systems equal? An opinion on indigenous engagement in the Forest Stewardship Council and the Sustainable Forestry Initiative. Ottawa: National Aboriginal Forestry Association. http://www.nafaforestry.org/pdf/2017/FSCSFIComparisonPaper_Final_28sep2017.pdf.
  32. Stokes, E.J., S. Strindberg, P.C. Bakabana, P.W. Elkan, F.C. Iyenguet, B. Madzoké, G.A.F. Malanda, B.S. Mowawa, et al. 2010. Monitoring Great Ape and elephant abundance at large spatial scales: Measuring effectiveness of a conservation landscape. PLoS ONE 5: e10294.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Watson, J. E. M., T. Evans, O. Venter, B. Williams, A. Tulloch, C. Stewart, I. Thompson, J. C. Ray, et al. 2018. The exceptional value of intact forest ecosystems. Nature Ecology & Evolution 2: 599–610.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0490-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. WRI and MDDEFE. 2012. Atlas forestier interactif du Congo. Version 3.0. Document de Synthese. Washington, D.C.: World Resources Institute & République du Congo Ministère de l’economie forestière et du développement durable.Google Scholar
  35. WRI and MINFOF. 2012. Interactive forest atlas of Cameroon. Version 3.0. Overview Report. Washington, D.C.: World Resources Institute & Ministère des Fôrets et de la Faune Cameroun.Google Scholar
  36. Yaroshenko, A.Y., P.V. Potapov, and S.A. Turubanova. 2001. The last intact forest landscapes of Northern European Russia. Moscow: Greenpeace Russia and Global Forest Watch.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ecosystem Management, Department of Environmental Systems ScienceETH ZurichZurichSwitzerland
  2. 2.Department of Environmental Systems Science, Institute of Terrestrial EcosystemsETH ZurichZurichSwitzerland
  3. 3.CIRAD, UPR Forêts et SociétésZurichSwitzerland
  4. 4.Prince Bernhard Chair of International Nature Conservation, Ecology and Biodiversity, Department of BiologyUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations