Advertisement

Ambio

, Volume 49, Issue 1, pp 74–84 | Cite as

Whither the forest transition? Climate change, policy responses, and redistributed forests in the twenty-first century

  • Thomas K. RudelEmail author
  • Patrick Meyfroidt
  • Robin Chazdon
  • Frans Bongers
  • Sean Sloan
  • H. Ricardo Grau
  • Tracy Van Holt
  • Laura Schneider
Review

Abstract

Forest transitions occur when net reforestation replaces net deforestation in places. Because forest transitions can increase biodiversity and augment carbon sequestration, they appeal to policymakers contending with the degrading effects of forest loss and climate change. What then can policymakers do to trigger forest transitions? The historical record over the last two centuries provides insights into the precipitating conditions. The early transitions often occurred passively, through the spontaneous regeneration of trees on abandoned agricultural lands. Later forest transitions occurred more frequently after large-scale crisis narratives emerged and spurred governments to take action, often by planting trees on degraded, sloped lands. To a greater degree than their predecessors, latecomer forest transitions exhibit centralized loci of power, leaders with clearly articulated goals, and rapid changes in forest cover. These historical shifts in forest transitions reflect our growing appreciation of their utility for countering droughts, floods, land degradation, and climate change.

Keywords

Forest gains Forest transitions Latecomer effects Tree plantations 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper is a product of the PARTNERS Research Coordination Network Grant #DEB1313788 from the U.S. NSF Coupled Natural and Human Systems Program.

References

  1. Abatzoglou, J., and P. Williams. 2016. Impact of anthropogenic climate change on wildfire across western U.S. forests. PNAS 113: 11770–11775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aide, T.M., M. Clark, H. Grau, D. López-Carr, M. Levy, D. Redo, M. Bonilla-Moheno, G. Riner, et al. 2013. Deforestation and reforestation of Latin America and the Caribbean (2001–2010). Biotropica 45: 262–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen, C., A. Macalady, H. Chenchouni, D. Bachelet, N. McDowell, M. Vennetier, T. Kitzberger, A. Rigling, et al. 2009. A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests. Forest Ecol Manag 259: 660–684.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alywin, J., N. Yanez, R. Sanchez. 2014. Chile: Tree plantation companies and indigenous rights, a longstanding conflict. World Rainforest Movement, Bulletin 199. http://wrm.org.uy/articles-from-the-wrm-bulletin/section1/chile-tree-plantation-companies-and-indigenous-rights-a-longstanding-conflict/.
  5. Ansharyani, I. 2018. Barriers to climate change adaptation and livelihoods: Conflicts in knowledge, policy, and management of forests, Batulandeh Watershed, Sumbawa, Indonesia. Ph.D. Geography. Rutgers University.Google Scholar
  6. Austin, K., M. González-Roglich, D. Schaffer-Smith, A. Schwantes and J. Swenson. 2017b. Trends in size of tropical deforestation events signal increasing dominance of industrial-scale drivers. Environ Research Letters. http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aa6a88/meta.Google Scholar
  7. Austin, K., A. Mosnier, J. Pirker, I. McCallum, S. Fritz, and P. Kasibhatla. 2017a. Shifting patterns of oil palm driven deforestation in Indonesia and implications for zero-deforestation commitments. Land Use Policy 69: 41–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barney, K. 2008. China and the production of forestlands in Laos: A political ecology of transnational enclosure. In Taking Southeast Asia to market: Commodities, nature, and people in the neoliberal age, ed. J. Nevins and N.L. Peluso, 91–107. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Beckfield, J. 2010. The social structure of the world polity. American Journal of Sociology 115: 1018–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bremer, L., and K. Farley. 2010. Does plantation forestry restore biodiversity or create green deserts? A synthesis of the effects of land-use transitions on plant species richness. Biodiversity and Conservation 14: 3893–3915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chazdon, R.L., P.H.S. Brancalion, L. Laestadius, A. Bennett-Curry, K. Buckingham, C. Kumar, J. Moll-Rocek, I.C.G. Vieira, et al. 2016. When is a forest a forest? Forest concepts and definitions in the era of forest and landscape restoration. Ambio 45: 538–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Curtis, P.G., C. Slay, N. Harris, A. Tyukavina, and M. Hansen. 2018. Classifying drivers of global forest loss. Science 361: 1108–1111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Delang, C., and Z. Yuan. 2015. China’s grain for green program: A review of the largest rural development and ecological restoration program in the world, 2015. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  14. Dobbin, F., B. Simmons, and G. Garrett. 2007. The global diffusion of public policies: Social construction, coercion, competition, or learning? Annual Review of Sociology 33: 449–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Foster, D. 1992. Land-use history, 1730–1990, and vegetation dynamics in central New England, USA. Journal of Ecology 80: 753–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gerschenkron, A. 1962. Economic backwardness in historical perspective, 1962. Cambridge, Ma: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Holmgren, P., E. Masakha, and H. Sjoholm. 1994. Not all African land is being degraded: A recent survey of trees on farms in Kenya reveals rapidly increasing forest resources. Ambio 23: 390–396.Google Scholar
  18. Houghton, R.A. 1999. The annual net flux of carbon to the atmosphere from changes in land use 1850-1990. Tellus B 51: 298–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jadin, I., P. Meyfroidt, and E. Lambin. 2016. International trade, and land use intensification and spatial reorganization explain Costa Rica’s forest transition. Environmental Research Letters 11: 035005.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/3/035005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kastner, T., K. Erb, and H. Haberl. 2014. Rapid growth in agricultural trade: Effects on global area efficiency and the role of management. Environ Research Letters 9(3). http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/9/3/034015/meta.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Klooster, D. 2003. Forest transitions in Mexico: Institutions and forests in a globalized countryside. The Professional Geographer 55: 227–237.Google Scholar
  22. Kuemmerle, T., J. Kaplan, A. Prishchepov, I. Rylsky, O. Chaskovskyy, V. Tikunov, and D. Muller. 2015. Forest transitions in Eastern Europe and their effects on carbon budgets. Global Change Biology 21: 3049–3061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kull, C. 1998. Leimavo revisited: Agrarian land use change in the highlands of Madagascar. Professional Geographer 50: 163–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lambin, E., and P. Meyfroidt. 2010. Land use transitions: Socio-ecological feedback versus socio-economic change. Land Use Policy 27: 108–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Leblond, J. 2014. Thai forest debates and the unequal appropriation of spatial knowledge tools. Conservation and Society 12: 425–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Maathai, W. 2003. The green belt movement: Sharing the approach and the experience. Herndon, VA: Lantern Books.Google Scholar
  27. Marx, K. 1867. Capital, I. Preface to the First German Edition. Marxist Internet Archive. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1867-c1/index.htm.
  28. Mather, A. 1992. The forest transition. Area 24: 367–379.Google Scholar
  29. Mather, A. 2004. Forest transition theory and the reforesting of Scotland. Scottish Geographical Journal 120: 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mather, A. 2007. Recent Asian forest transitions in relation to forest-transition theory. International Forestry Review 9: 491–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mather, A., and J. Fairbairn. 2000. From floods to reforestation: The forest transition in Switzerland. Environment and History 6: 399–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mather, A., and C. Needle. 1998. The forest transition: A theoretical basis. Area 30: 117–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mather, A., C. Needle, and J. Coull. 1998. From resource crisis to sustainability. The forest transition in Denmark. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 5: 182–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mather, A., J. Fairbairn, and C. Needle. 1999. The course and drivers of the forest transition: The case of France. The Journal of Rural Studies 15: 65–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Meyfroidt, P., and E. Lambin. 2008a. Forest transition in Vietnam and its environmental impacts. Global Change Biology 14: 1319–1336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Meyfroidt, P., and E. Lambin. 2008b. The causes of the reforestation in Vietnam. Land Use Policy 25: 182–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Meyfroidt, P., and E. Lambin. 2011. Global forest transition: Prospects for an end to deforestation. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 36: 343–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Meyfroidt, P., T. Rudel, and E. Lambin. 2010. Forest transitions, trade, and the displacement of land use. PNAS 107: 20917–20922.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1014773107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Meyfroidt, P., F. Schierhorn, A. Prishchepov, D. Müller, and T. Kuemmerle. 2016. Drivers, constraints and trade-offs associated with recultivating abandoned cropland in Russia, Ukraine and Kazakhstan. Global Environmental Change 37: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nagendra, H. 2010. Reforestation and regrowth in the human dominated landscapes of South Asia. In Reforesting landscapes: Linking pattern and process, ed. H. Nagendra and J. Southworth, 149–174. Munich: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nanni, A., and H. Grau. 2014. Agricultural adjustment, population dynamics and forest redistribution in a subtropical watershed of NW Argentina. Regional Environmental Change 14: 1641–1649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nanni, A., and H. Grau. 2017. Land-use redistribution compensated for ecosystem service losses derived from agriculture expansion, with mixed effects on biodiversity in a NW Argentina watershed. Forests.  https://doi.org/10.3390/f8080303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pan, Y., R. Birdsey, J. Fang, R. Houghton, P. Kauppi, W. Kurz, O. Phillips, A. Shvidenko, et al. 2011. A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science 333: 988–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Parés-Ramos, I., W. Gould and T. Aide. 2008. Agricultural abandonment, suburban growth, and forest expansion in Puerto Rico between 1991 and 2000. Ecology Society 13(2). https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art1/ES-2008-2479.pdf.
  45. Park, M. and Y. Yeo-Sang. 2016. Reforestation policy integration by the multiple sectors toward forest transition in the Republic of Korea. Forest Policy and Economics http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.05.019.
  46. Petit, C.C., and E.F. Lambin. 2002. Long-term land-cover changes in the Belgian Ardennes (1775-1929): Model based reconstruction vs. historical maps. Global Change Biology 8: 616–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Redo, D., H. Grau, T. Aide, and M. Clark. 2012. Asymmetric forest transition driven by the interaction of socioeconomic development and environmental heterogeneity in Central America. PNAS.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1201664109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Reij, C. 2014. Re-greening the sahel: linking adaptation to climate change, poverty reduction, and sustainable development in drylands. In The social lives of forests: The past present, and future of woodland resurgence, ed. C. Padoch, Susanna. Hecht, and Kathleen. Morrison, 303–312. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Reij, C., G. Tappan, and M. Smale. 2009. Agroenvironmental transformation in the Sahel: Another kind of green revolution. IFPRI Discussion Paper 914. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
  50. Rudel, T.K., and C. Fu. 1996. A requiem for the southern regionalists: reforestation in the South and the uses of regional social science. Social Science Quarterly 77: 804–820.Google Scholar
  51. Rudel, T., and P. Meyfroidt. 2014. Organizing anarchy: The food security - biodiversity - climate crisis and the genesis of rural land use planning in the developing world. Land Use Policy 36: 239–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rudel, T., M. Perez-Lugo, and H. Zichal. 2000. When fields revert to forests: Development and spontaneous reforestation in post-war Puerto Rico. The Professional Geographer 52: 386–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rudel, T., D. Bates, and R. Machinguiashi. 2002. A tropical forest transition?: Out-migration, agricultural change, and reforestation in the Ecuadorian Amazon. American Association of Geographers Annals 92: 87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rudel, T., O. Coomes, E. Moran, A. Angelsen, F. Achard, E. Lambin, and J. Xu. 2005. Forest transitions: Towards an understanding of global land use change. Global Environmental Change 14: 23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rueda, X., and E. Lambin. 2013. Linking globalization to local land uses: How eco-consumers and gourmands are changing the Colombian coffee landscapes. World Development 41: 286–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Scott, J. 1999. Seeing like a State: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Shands, W. 1992. The lands nobody wanted: The legacy of the eastern national forests. In Origins of the national forests: A centennial symposium, ed. Steen, H.K., 19–44. Durham, NC: Forest History Society, 1992.Google Scholar
  58. Sikor, T. 2001. The allocation of forestry land in Vietnam: Did it cause the expansion of forests in the north-west? Forest Policy and Economics 2: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sikor, T., N. Tuyen, J. Sowerwine, and J. Romm. 2012. Upland transformations in Vietnam. Singapore: NUS Press.Google Scholar
  60. Song, X., M. Hansen, S. Stehman, P. Potapov, A. Tyukavina, E. Vermote, and J. Townshend. 2018. Global land change from 1982 to 2016. Nature 560: 639–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sunderlin W., A. Ekaputri, E. Sills, A. Duchelle, D. Kweka, R. Diprose, N. Doggart, S. Ball et al. 2014. The challenge of establishing REDD + on the ground: insights from 23 subnational initiatives in six countries. Occasional Paper 104, CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia.Google Scholar
  62. Taff G., D. Müller, T. Kuemmerle, E. Ozdeneral, S. Walsh. 2010. Reforestation in Central and Eastern Europe after the breakdown of socialism. In Reforesting landscapes: linking pattern and process, eds. H. Nagendra and J. Southworth, 121–147, Springer Landscape Series Volume 10, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  63. Tiffen, M., M. Mortimore, and F. Gichuki. 1994. More people, less erosion: Environmental recovery in Kenya. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  64. Van Holt, T., M. Binford, K. Portier, and R. Vergar. 2016. A stand of trees a forest does not make: Tree plantations and forest transitions. Land Use Policy 56: 147–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wilson, S., J. Schelhas, H. Grau, A. Nanni, and S. Sloan. 2017. Forest ecosystem service transitions: The ecological dimensions of the forest transition. Ecology and Society 22: 38.  https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09615-220438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wolosin, M. 2017. Large scale forestation for mitigation: Lessons from South Africa, China, and India. Washington, DC: Climate and Land Use Alliance.Google Scholar
  67. Zhang, Z., J. Zinda, and W. Li. 2017. Forest transitions in Chinese villages: Explaining community-level variation under the returning farmland to forest program. Land Use Policy 64: 245–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas K. Rudel
    • 1
    Email author
  • Patrick Meyfroidt
    • 2
  • Robin Chazdon
    • 3
  • Frans Bongers
    • 4
  • Sean Sloan
    • 5
  • H. Ricardo Grau
    • 6
  • Tracy Van Holt
    • 7
  • Laura Schneider
    • 8
  1. 1.Department of Human Ecology, School of Environmental and Biological SciencesRutgers UniversityNew BrunswickUSA
  2. 2.Universite Catholique de LouvainLouvain-la-NeuveBelgium
  3. 3.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of ConnecticutStorrsUSA
  4. 4.Department of Environmental SciencesWageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands
  5. 5.James Cook UniversitySmithfieldAustralia
  6. 6.Instituto de Ecología RegionalUniversidad Nacional de TucumanTucumánArgentina
  7. 7.Academic Research, Center for Sustainable Business, Stern School of BusinessNew York UniversityNew YorkUSA
  8. 8.Department of Geography, Lucy Stone HallRutgers UniversityPiscatawayUSA

Personalised recommendations