Ambio

, Volume 47, Issue 3, pp 327–339 | Cite as

Experiences from harvest-driven conservation: Management of Amazonian river turtles as a common-pool resource

Report
  • 119 Downloads

Abstract

Understanding what causes variability in the outcomes of common-pool resources management and governance has important policy implications for biodiversity conservation, in particular for the conservation of wild plants and animals subject to harvest. We report an exploratory study focusing on Amazonian river turtles as a common-pool resource under harvest-driven conservation and management efforts in Peru. Based on document analysis, literature review and a series of interviews, we describe the management program as a social process and identify the most important governance and management outcomes achieved (increased turtle abundance and benefits for harvesters, harvester formalization), factors hindering and facilitating the program implementation (four natural and three societal factors), and key governance actions behind the program outcomes (awareness and capacity building, crafting and enforcing rules). We then highlight the existing knowledge gaps and the needs and possible means to address particular risks related to turtle management on a harvest-driven setting.

Keywords

Co-governance Co-management Egg relocation Pacaya Samiria Peru Podocnemis unifilis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the editors and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments. Funding for the research was provided by the Kone Foundation, Finnish Cultural Foundation and the North-South-South North–South-South Higher Education Institution Network Programme of the Centre for International Mobility (CIMO). We thank María Isabel Torres Vásquez, Reserva Nacional Pacaya Samiria – SERNANP and Pronaturaleza – Fundación Peruana para la Conservación de la Naturaleza for providing us the photographs used in the article.

Supplementary material

13280_2017_943_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (155 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 155 kb)

References

  1. Agrawal, A. 2002. Common Resources and Institutional Sustainability. In The Drama of the Commons ed. National Research Council, 41–86. Washington DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  2. Agrawal, A. 2014. Studying the Commons, Governing Common-Pool Resource Outcomes: Some Concluding Thoughts. Environmental Science & Policy 36: 86–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alho, C.J.R. 1985. Conservation and Management Strategies for Commonly Exploited Amazonian Turtles. Biological Conservation 32: 291–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Álvarez, M.U. 1998. Evaluation Study of the Ecological Impact of the Community-based Reproductive Management of Taricaya (Podocnemis unifilis), in the Sector Dorado in Pacaya Samiria National Reserve, Loreto, Peru. Iquitos: Pro Naturaleza. (in Spanish).Google Scholar
  5. Bates, H.W. 1863. The Naturalist on the River Amazons: A Record of Adventures, Habits of Animals, Sketches of Brazilian and Indian Life, and Aspects of Nature Under the Equator, During Eleven Years of Travel, 2001. Reprint, London: The Electric Book Company.Google Scholar
  6. Bayley, P., P. Vásquez, F. Ghersi, P. Soini, and M. Pinedo. 1992. Environmental review of the Pacaya-Samiria Reserve in Peru and Assessment of Project Pacaya Samiria. Arlington: The Nature Conservancy.Google Scholar
  7. Bergman, R. 1990. Amazonian Economy:Subsistence Strategieson the Banks of the Ucayali River in Peru. Lima: Centro Amazónico de Antropología y Aplicación Práctica–CAAAP (in Spanish).Google Scholar
  8. Caputo, F.P., D. Canestrelli, and L. Boitani. 2005. Conserving the terecay (Podocnemis unifilis, Testudines: Pelomedusidae) through a community-based sustainable harvest of its eggs. Biological Conservation 126: 84–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Castello, L., J.P. Viana, G. Watkins, M. Pinedo-Vasquez, and V.A. Luzadis. 2009. Lessons from integrating fishers of arapaima in small-scale fisheries management at the Mamirauá Reserve, Amazon. Environmental Management 43: 197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooney, R. 2004. The Precautionary Principle in Biodiversity Conservation and Natural Resource Management: An Issues Paper for Policy-makers, Researchers and Practitioners. Gland/Cambridge: IUCN.Google Scholar
  11. Cox, M., G. Arnold, and S.V. Tomás. 2010. A review of design principles for community-based natural resource management. In Elinor Ostrom and the Blooming School of Political Economy, Volume 2: Resource Governance, ed. D.H. Cole, and M.D. McGinnis, 249–280. Lexington Books. Google Scholar
  12. Dourojeanni, M. 2009. Forestry Chronicle of Peru. Lima: UNALM-UNMSM. (in Spanish).Google Scholar
  13. Fachín-Terán, A., and E.M. von Mülhen. 2003. Reproduction of taricaya Podocnemis unifilis Troschel 1848 (Testudines: Podocnemididae) in the Mid-Solimões Floodplain, Amazonas, Brazil. Ecologia Aplicada 2: 125–132. (in Spanish).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. IUCN. 2017. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2017-1. Retrieved 9 June, 2017, from http://www.iucnredlist.org.
  15. Gockel, C.K., and L.C. Gray. 2009. Integrating Conservation and Development in the Peruvian Amazon. Ecology and Society 14: 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gockel, C.K., and L.C. Gray. 2011. Debt-for-Nature Swaps in Action: Two Case Studies in Peru. Ecology and Society 16: 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Milner-Gulland, E.J., and H.R. Akçakaya. 2001. Sustainability Indices for Exploited Populations. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16: 686–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. MINAM. 2014. Non-detriment Finding for Taricaya (Podocnemis unifilis) Populations for the Export Quota 2014. Lima: Ministerio del Ambiente. (in Spanish).Google Scholar
  19. Miorando, P.S., G.H. Rebêlo, M.T. Pignati, and J.C. Brito Pezzuti. 2013. Effects of Community-Based Management on Amazon River Turtles: A Case Study of Podocnemis sextuberculata in the Lower Amazon Floodplain, Pará, Brazil. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 12: 143–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mogollones, S.C., D.J. Rodríguez, O. Hernández, and G.R. Barreto. 2010. A Demographic Study of the Arrau Turtle (Podocnemis expansa) in the Middle Orinoco River, Venezuela. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 9: 79–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Moxnes, E. 2004. Misperceptions of Basic Dynamics: The Case of Renewable Resource Management. System Dynamics Review 20: 139–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the Commons: the Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Páez, V.P., A. Lipman, B.C. Bock, and S.S. Heppell. 2015. A Plea to Redirect and Evaluate Conservation Programs for South America’s Podocnemidid River Turtles. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 14: 205–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Peres, C.A., and I.R. Lake. 2003. Extent of Nontimber Resource Extraction in Tropical Forests: Accessibility to Game Vertebrates by Hunters in the Amazon Basin. Conservation Biology 17: 521–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Salo, M., A. Sirén, and R. Kalliola. 2014. Diagnosing Wild Species Harvest: Resource Use and Conservation. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  26. SERNANP. 2010a. Management Plan for Podocnemis Unifilis “taricaya” in the Pacaya Watershed, Pacaya Samiria National Reserve 2010–2015. Iquitos: SERNANP. (in Spanish).Google Scholar
  27. SERNANP. 2010b. Management Plan for Podocnemis Unifilis “taricaya” in the Sector of Yanayacu Grande – Samiria Watershed 2010–2015. Iquitos: SERNANP. (in Spanish).Google Scholar
  28. SERNANP. 2010c. Management Plan for Podocnemis Unifilis “taricaya” in the Yanayacu Pucate Watershed, Pacaya Samiria National Reserve 2010–2015. Iquitos: SERNANP. (in Spanish).Google Scholar
  29. SERNANP. 2011a. Final Report: management of Podocnemis unifilis “taricaya” in the Pacaya Samiria National Reserve. Iquitos: SERNANP (in Spanish).Google Scholar
  30. SERNANP. 2011b. Integrated Management Plan for Aquatic Turtles in the Samiria Watershed, Pacaya Samiria National Reserve (PSNR) 2011–2015. Iquitos: SERNANP. (in Spanish).Google Scholar
  31. Smith, N.J.H. 1979. Aquatic Turtles of Amazonia: An Endangered Resource. Biological Conservation 16: 165–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Soini, P. 1980. Pacaya Report No 2. Research, Reproduction and Management of Aquatic Turtles from the Genus Podocnemis (Charapa, cupiso y taricaya) in the Pacaya watershed. In Reporte Pacaya-Samiria eds. Soini, P., A. Tovar, and U. Valdez, 3–30. Iquitos: Dirección Regional de Agricultura (in Spanish).Google Scholar
  33. Soini, P. 1986. Pacaya Report No 19 Comparative Summary of the Reproductive Ecology of Aquatic Turtles (Informe de Pacaya No 19. In Reporte Pacaya-Samiria, ed. P. Soini, A. Tovar, and U. Valdez, 215–226. Iquitos: Dirección Regional de Agricultura. (in Spanish).Google Scholar
  34. Soini, P. 1992. Report No 38. Management of Aquatic Turtles. In Reporte Pacaya-Samiria, eds. Soini, P., Tovar, A., and U. Valdez, pp. 395–399. Iquitos: Dirección Regional de Agricultura (in Spanish).Google Scholar
  35. Soini, P. 1996. Reproduction, Abundance, and Situation of Aquatic Turtles in the Pacaya-Samiria National Reserve, Peru. Folia Amazonica 8: 145–162. (in Spanish).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Soini, P. 1998. A Manual for the Management of Aquatic Turtles in Peruvian Amazonia(Charapa, Taricaya y Cupiso). Iquitos: Instituto de Investigaciones de la Amazonia Peruana. (in Spanish).Google Scholar
  37. Thorbjarnarson, J., C. Lagueux, D. Bolze, M. Klemens, and A. Meylan. 2000. Human use of turtle: a worldwide perspective. In Turtle Conservation, ed. M. Klemens, 33–84. Washington DC: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
  38. Torres Vásquez, M.I. 2015. Search and Identification of Successful Management Experiences of “Taricaya” (Podocnemis unifilis)in Aquatic Ecosystems – Systematization. Lima: Ministerio del Ambiente. (in Spanish).Google Scholar
  39. Townsend, W.R., A. Randall Borman, E. Yiyoguaje, and L. Mendua. 2004. Cofán Indians’ Monitoring of Freshwater Turtles in Zábalo, Ecuador. Biodiversity and Conservation 14: 2743–2755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vásquez, P., and C. Tovar. 2009. The wild fauna of the pacaya samiria national reserve: A guide for community-based management. Lima: CDC-UNALM (in Spanish).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biodiversity UnitUniversity of TurkuTurkuFinland
  2. 2.HelsinkiFinland
  3. 3.Department of Geosciences and GeographyUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
  4. 4.Inti Anka Taripay, General Villamil y Francisco de OrellanaPuyoEcuador
  5. 5.Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke)TurkuFinland

Personalised recommendations