Ambio

, Volume 46, Issue 4, pp 456–467 | Cite as

A review of ecosystem service benefits from wild bees across social contexts

  • Denise Margaret S. Matias
  • Julia Leventon
  • Anna-Lena Rau
  • Christian Borgemeister
  • Henrik von Wehrden
Review

Abstract

In order to understand the role of wild bees in both social and ecological systems, we conducted a quantitative and qualitative review of publications dealing with wild bees and the benefits they provide in social contexts. We classified publications according to several attributes such as services and benefits derived from wild bees, types of bee–human interactions, recipients of direct benefits, social contexts where wild bees are found, and sources of changes to the bee–human system. We found that most of the services and benefits from wild bees are related to food, medicine, and pollination. We also found that wild bees directly provide benefits to communities to a greater extent than individuals. In the social contexts where they are found, wild bees occupy a central role. Several drivers of change affect bee–human systems, ranging from environmental to political drivers. These are the areas where we recommend making interventions for conserving the bee-human system.

Keywords

Community Ecosystem cascade framework Livelihoods framework Social–ecological systems 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Andrea Alberti, Guido Lüchters, and Heike Zimmermann for their assistance in data analysis and two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments. Denise Margaret S. Matias is grateful to the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) for financial support.

Supplementary material

13280_2016_844_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (115 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 115 kb)

References

  1. Allsopp, M.H., W.J. de Lange, and R. Veldtman. 2008. Valuing insect pollination services with cost of replacement. PLoS ONE 3: e3128. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersson, E., S. Barthel, and K. Ahrné. 2007. Measuring social–ecological dynamics behind the generation of ecosystem services. Ecological Applications 17: 1267–1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banaszak-Cibicka, W., and M. Żmihorski. 2012. Wild bees along an urban gradient: Winners and losers. Journal of Insect Conservation 16: 331–343. doi: 10.1007/s10841-011-9419-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bennett, E.M., G.D. Peterson, and L.J. Gordon. 2009. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecology Letters 12: 1394–1404. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01387.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berkes, F., and C. Folke. 2002. Back to the future: Ecosystem dynamics and local knowledge. In Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems, ed. L.H. Gunderson, and C.S. Holling, 121–146. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  6. Berkes, F., J. Colding, and C. Folke. 2003. Introduction. In Navigating social–ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity, ed. F. Berkes, J. Colding, and C. Folke, 1–30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Biesmeijer, J.C., S.P.M. Roberts, M. Reemer, R. Ohlemüller, M. Edwards, T. Peeters, A.P. Schaffers, S.G. Potts, et al. 2006. Parallel declines in pollinators and insect-pollinated plants in Britain and the Netherlands. Science 313: 351–354. doi: 10.1126/science.1127863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bodin, O., and M. Tengö. 2012. Disentangling intangible social–ecological systems. Global Environmental Change 22: 430–439. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.01.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boyd, E., and C. Folke. 2012. Conclusions: Adapting institutions and resilience. In Adapting institutions: Governance, complexity and social–ecological resilience, ed. E. Boyd, and C. Folke, 264–280. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, M.J.F., and R.J. Paxton. 2009. The conservation of bees: A global perspective. Apidologie 40: 410–416. doi: 10.1051/apido/2009019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Callo-Concha, D., J.H. Sommer, J. Kleemann, F.W. Gatzweiler, and M. Denich. 2014. Marginality from a socio-ecological perspective. In Marginality: addressing the nexus of poverty, exclusion and ecology, ed. J. von Braun, and F.W. Gatzweiler, 56–65. Dordrecht: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-7061-4.Google Scholar
  12. Cameron, S.A., J.D. Lozier, J.P. Strange, J.B. Koch, N. Cordes, L.F. Solter, and T.L. Griswold. 2011. Patterns of widespread decline in North American bumble bees. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108: 662–667. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1014743108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carpenter, S.R., E.M. Bennett, and G.D. Peterson. 2006. Scenarios for ecosystem services: An overview. Ecology and Society 11: 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Daniel, T.C., A. Muhar, A. Arnberger, O. Aznar, J.W. Boyd, K.M.A. Chan, R. Costanza, T. Elmqvist, et al. 2012. Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109: 8812–8819. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1114773109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Daw, T.M., K. Brown, S. Rosendo, and R. Pomeroy. 2011. Applying the ecosystem services concept to poverty alleviation: The need to disaggregate human well-being. Environmental Conservation 38: 370–379. doi: 10.1017/S0376892911000506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Daw, T.M., S. Coulthard, W.W.L. Cheung, K. Brown, C. Abunge, D. Galafassi, G.D. Peterson, T.R. McClanahan, et al. 2015. Evaluating taboo trade-offs in ecosystems services and human well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112: 6949–6954. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1414900112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. de Carvalho, R.M.A., C.F. Martins, and J. da Silva Mourão. 2014. Meliponiculture in Quilombola communities of Ipiranga and Gurugi, Paraíba state, Brazil: An ethnoecological approach. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 10: 1–12. doi: 10.1186/1746-4269-10-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fischer, B., K. Turner, M. Zylstra, R. Brouwer, R. de Groot, S. Farber, P. Ferraro, R. Green, et al. 2008. Ecosystem services and economic theory: Integration for policy-relevant research. Ecological Applications 18: 2050–2067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fischer, J., T.A. Gardner, E.M. Bennett, P. Balvanera, R. Biggs, S. Carpenter, T. Daw, C. Folke, et al. 2015. Advancing sustainability through mainstreaming a social–ecological systems perspective. Current Opinion on Environmental Sustainability 14: 149. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2015.06.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Garibaldi, L.A., I. Steffan-Dewenter, R. Winfree, M.A. Aizen, R. Bommarco, S.A. Cunningham, C. Kremen, L.G. Carvalheiro, et al. 2013. Wild pollinators enhance fruit set of crops regardless of honey bee abundance. Science 339: 1608–1611. doi: 10.1126/science.1230200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gingrich, S., M. Schmid, T. Dirnböck, I. Dullinger, R. Garstenauer, V. Gaube, H. Haberl, M. Kainz, et al. 2016. Long-term socio-ecological research in practice: Lessons from inter- and transdisciplinary research in the Austrian Eisenwurzen. Sustainability 8: 743. doi: 10.3390/su8080743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. González-Varo, J.P., J.C. Biesmeijer, R. Bommarco, S.G. Potts, O. Schweiger, H.G. Smith, I. Steffan-Dewenter, H. Szentgyörgyi, M. Woyciechowski, and M. Vilà. 2013. Combined effects of global change pressures on animal-mediated pollination. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 28: 524–530. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2013.05.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goulson, D., G.C. Lye, and B. Darvill. 2008. Decline and conservation of bumble bees. Annual Review of Entomology 53: 191–208. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.53.103106.093454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Haines-Young, R., and M. Potschin. 2010. The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being. In Ecosystem ecology: A new synthesis, ed. D.G. Raffaelli, and C.L.J. Frid, 110–139. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press and British Ecological Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jaffé, R., V. Dietemann, M.H. Allsopp, C. Costa, R.M. Crewe, R. Dall’olio, P.D.E. LA Rúa, M.A. El-Niweiri, et al. 2009. Estimating the density of honeybee colonies across their natural range to fill the gap in pollinator decline censuses. Conservation Biology 24: 583–593. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01331.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kennedy, C.M., E. Lonsdorf, M.C. Neel, N.M. Williams, T.H. Ricketts, R. Winfree, R. Bommarco, C. Brittain, et al. 2013. A global quantitative synthesis of local and landscape effects on wild bee pollinators in agroecosystems. Ecology Letters 16: 584–599. doi: 10.1111/ele.12082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Keune, H., N. Dendoncker, and S. Jacobs. 2014. Ecosystem service practices. In Ecosystem services: Global issues, local practices, ed. S. Jacobs, N. Dendoncker, and H. Keune, 91–95. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  28. Kremen, C., N.M. Williams, M.A. Aizen, B. Gemmill-Herren, G. LeBuhn, R. Minckley, L. Packer, S.G. Potts, et al. 2007. Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: A conceptual framework for the effects of land-use change. Ecology Letters 10: 299–314. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01018.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Le Conte, Y., and M. Navajas. 2008. Climate change: Impact on honey bee populations and diseases. Revue Scientifique Et Technique (International Office of Epizootics) 27: 499–510.Google Scholar
  30. Le Féon, V., A. Schermann-Legionnet, Y. Delettre, S. Aviron, R. Billeter, R. Bugter, F. Hendrickx, and F. Burel. 2010. Intensification of agriculture, landscape composition and wild bee communities: A large scale study in four European countries. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 137: 143–150. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2010.01.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Matheson, A., S.L. Buchmann, C. O’Toole, P. Westrich, and I.H. Williams. 1996. The conservation of bees. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  32. Meacham, M., C. Queiroz, A.V. Norström, and G.D. Peterson. 2016. Social-ecological drivers of multiple ecosystem services: What variables explain patterns of ecosystem services across the Norrström drainage basin? Ecology and Society 21: 14. doi: 10.5751/ES-08077-210114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Michener, C. 2007. The bees of the world. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Milcu, I.A., J. Hanspach, D. Abson, and J. Fischer. 2013. Cultural ecosystem services: A literature review and prospects for future research. Ecology and Society 18: 44. doi: 10.5751/ES-05790-180344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA). 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  36. Morse, R.A. and N.W. Calderone. 2000. The value of honey bees as pollinators of U.S. Crops in 2000. Bee Culture 128: 15 pp insert.Google Scholar
  37. Newig, J. and O. Fritsch. 2009. The case survey method and applications in political science—meeting paper. American Political Science Association, Toronto, Canada. Retrieved June 27, 2016 from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1451643.
  38. Okoye, C.U., and A.U. Agwu. 2008. Factors affecting agroforestry sustainability in bee endemic parts of Southeastern Nigeria. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 26: 132–154. doi: 10.1080/10549810701879685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Oldroyd, B.P., and P. Nanork. 2009. Conservation of Asian honey bees. Apidologie 40: 296–312. doi: 10.1051/apido/2009021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Patiny, S., D. Michez, and P. Rasmont. 2009. A survey and review of the status of wild bees in the West-Palaearctic region. Apidologie 40: 313–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Potts, S.G., J.C. Biesmeijer, C. Kremen, P. Neumann, O. Schweiger, and W.E. Kunin. 2010. Global pollinator declines: Trends, impacts and drivers. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 25: 345–353. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Queiroz, C., M. Meacham, K. Richter, A.V. Norström, E. Andersson, J. Norberg, and G. Peterson. 2015. Mapping bundles of ecosystem services reveals distinct types of multifunctionality within a Swedish landscape. Ambio 44: 89–101. doi: 10.1007/s13280-014-0601-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rader, R., I. Bartomeus, L. Garibaldi, M.P.D. Garratt, B.G. Howlett, R. Winfree, S.A. Cunningham, M.M. Mayfield, et al. 2016. Non-bee insects are important contributors to global crop pollination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113: 146–151. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1517092112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Reyers, B., R. Biggs, G.S. Cumming, T. Elmqvist, A.P. Hejnowicz, and S. Polasky. 2013. Getting the measure of ecosystem services: A social–ecological approach. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 11: 268–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rissman, A.R., and S. Gillon. 2016. Where are ecology and biodiversity in social–ecological systems research? A review of research methods and applied recommendations. Conservation Letters. doi: 10.1111/conl.12250.Google Scholar
  46. Roubik, D.W. 1995. Pollination of cultivated plants in the tropics. FAO Agricultural Services Bulletin No. 118. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
  47. Scheffer, M., F. Westley, W.A. Brock, and M. Holmgren. 2002. Dynamic interactions of societies and ecosystems: Linking theories from ecology, economy, and sociology. In Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems, ed. L.H. Gunderson, and C.S. Holling, 195–239. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  48. Scoones, I. 1998. Sustainable rural livelihoods: A framework for analysis. Working Paper 72. Institute of Development Studies, Brighton, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  49. Southwick, E.E., and L. Southwick Jr. 1992. Estimating the economic value of honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) as agricultural pollinators in the United States. Journal of Economic Entomology 85: 621–633. doi: 10.1093/jee/85.3.621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Spangenberg, J.H. 2014. Ecosystem services in a societal context. In Ecosystem services: Global issues, local practices, ed. S. Jacobs, N. Dendoncker, and H. Keune, 91–95. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  51. Vanbergen, J., and The Insect Pollinators Initiative (IPI). 2013. Threats to an ecosystem service: Pressures on pollinators. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 11: 251–259. doi: 10.1890/120126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. von Bertalanffy, L. 1968. General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. New York: George Braziller Inc.Google Scholar
  53. Watson, K., and J.A. Stallins. 2016. Honey bees and colony collapse disorder: A pluralistic reframing. Geography Compass 10: 222–236. doi: 10.1111/gec3.12266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Westley, F., S. Carpenter, W.A. Brock, C.S. Holling, and L.H. Gunderson. 2002. Why systems of people and nature are not just social and ecological systems. In Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems, ed. L.H. Gunderson, and C.S. Holling, 121–146. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.Google Scholar
  55. Winfree, R. 2010. The conservation and restoration of wild bees. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1195: 169–197. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Natural Resources Management, Center for Development ResearchUniversity of BonnBonnGermany
  2. 2.Faculty of Sustainability, Center for Methods, Institute of EcologyLeuphana UniversityLüneburgGermany
  3. 3.Faculty of Sustainability, Institute of Ethics and Transdisciplinary Sustainability ResearchLeuphana UniversityLüneburgGermany
  4. 4.Faculty of Sustainability, Center for MethodsLeuphana UniversityLüneburgGermany

Personalised recommendations