Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

A review of ecosystem service benefits from wild bees across social contexts

Abstract

In order to understand the role of wild bees in both social and ecological systems, we conducted a quantitative and qualitative review of publications dealing with wild bees and the benefits they provide in social contexts. We classified publications according to several attributes such as services and benefits derived from wild bees, types of bee–human interactions, recipients of direct benefits, social contexts where wild bees are found, and sources of changes to the bee–human system. We found that most of the services and benefits from wild bees are related to food, medicine, and pollination. We also found that wild bees directly provide benefits to communities to a greater extent than individuals. In the social contexts where they are found, wild bees occupy a central role. Several drivers of change affect bee–human systems, ranging from environmental to political drivers. These are the areas where we recommend making interventions for conserving the bee-human system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  1. Allsopp, M.H., W.J. de Lange, and R. Veldtman. 2008. Valuing insect pollination services with cost of replacement. PLoS ONE 3: e3128. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003128.

  2. Andersson, E., S. Barthel, and K. Ahrné. 2007. Measuring social–ecological dynamics behind the generation of ecosystem services. Ecological Applications 17: 1267–1278.

  3. Banaszak-Cibicka, W., and M. Żmihorski. 2012. Wild bees along an urban gradient: Winners and losers. Journal of Insect Conservation 16: 331–343. doi:10.1007/s10841-011-9419-2.

  4. Bennett, E.M., G.D. Peterson, and L.J. Gordon. 2009. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecology Letters 12: 1394–1404. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01387.x.

  5. Berkes, F., and C. Folke. 2002. Back to the future: Ecosystem dynamics and local knowledge. In Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems, ed. L.H. Gunderson, and C.S. Holling, 121–146. Washington, DC: Island Press.

  6. Berkes, F., J. Colding, and C. Folke. 2003. Introduction. In Navigating social–ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity, ed. F. Berkes, J. Colding, and C. Folke, 1–30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  7. Biesmeijer, J.C., S.P.M. Roberts, M. Reemer, R. Ohlemüller, M. Edwards, T. Peeters, A.P. Schaffers, S.G. Potts, et al. 2006. Parallel declines in pollinators and insect-pollinated plants in Britain and the Netherlands. Science 313: 351–354. doi:10.1126/science.1127863.

  8. Bodin, O., and M. Tengö. 2012. Disentangling intangible social–ecological systems. Global Environmental Change 22: 430–439. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.01.005.

  9. Boyd, E., and C. Folke. 2012. Conclusions: Adapting institutions and resilience. In Adapting institutions: Governance, complexity and social–ecological resilience, ed. E. Boyd, and C. Folke, 264–280. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  10. Brown, M.J.F., and R.J. Paxton. 2009. The conservation of bees: A global perspective. Apidologie 40: 410–416. doi:10.1051/apido/2009019.

  11. Callo-Concha, D., J.H. Sommer, J. Kleemann, F.W. Gatzweiler, and M. Denich. 2014. Marginality from a socio-ecological perspective. In Marginality: addressing the nexus of poverty, exclusion and ecology, ed. J. von Braun, and F.W. Gatzweiler, 56–65. Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7061-4.

  12. Cameron, S.A., J.D. Lozier, J.P. Strange, J.B. Koch, N. Cordes, L.F. Solter, and T.L. Griswold. 2011. Patterns of widespread decline in North American bumble bees. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108: 662–667. doi:10.1073/pnas.1014743108.

  13. Carpenter, S.R., E.M. Bennett, and G.D. Peterson. 2006. Scenarios for ecosystem services: An overview. Ecology and Society 11: 29.

  14. Daniel, T.C., A. Muhar, A. Arnberger, O. Aznar, J.W. Boyd, K.M.A. Chan, R. Costanza, T. Elmqvist, et al. 2012. Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109: 8812–8819. doi:10.1073/pnas.1114773109.

  15. Daw, T.M., K. Brown, S. Rosendo, and R. Pomeroy. 2011. Applying the ecosystem services concept to poverty alleviation: The need to disaggregate human well-being. Environmental Conservation 38: 370–379. doi:10.1017/S0376892911000506.

  16. Daw, T.M., S. Coulthard, W.W.L. Cheung, K. Brown, C. Abunge, D. Galafassi, G.D. Peterson, T.R. McClanahan, et al. 2015. Evaluating taboo trade-offs in ecosystems services and human well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112: 6949–6954. doi:10.1073/pnas.1414900112.

  17. de Carvalho, R.M.A., C.F. Martins, and J. da Silva Mourão. 2014. Meliponiculture in Quilombola communities of Ipiranga and Gurugi, Paraíba state, Brazil: An ethnoecological approach. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 10: 1–12. doi:10.1186/1746-4269-10-3.

  18. Fischer, B., K. Turner, M. Zylstra, R. Brouwer, R. de Groot, S. Farber, P. Ferraro, R. Green, et al. 2008. Ecosystem services and economic theory: Integration for policy-relevant research. Ecological Applications 18: 2050–2067.

  19. Fischer, J., T.A. Gardner, E.M. Bennett, P. Balvanera, R. Biggs, S. Carpenter, T. Daw, C. Folke, et al. 2015. Advancing sustainability through mainstreaming a social–ecological systems perspective. Current Opinion on Environmental Sustainability 14: 149. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2015.06.002.

  20. Garibaldi, L.A., I. Steffan-Dewenter, R. Winfree, M.A. Aizen, R. Bommarco, S.A. Cunningham, C. Kremen, L.G. Carvalheiro, et al. 2013. Wild pollinators enhance fruit set of crops regardless of honey bee abundance. Science 339: 1608–1611. doi:10.1126/science.1230200.

  21. Gingrich, S., M. Schmid, T. Dirnböck, I. Dullinger, R. Garstenauer, V. Gaube, H. Haberl, M. Kainz, et al. 2016. Long-term socio-ecological research in practice: Lessons from inter- and transdisciplinary research in the Austrian Eisenwurzen. Sustainability 8: 743. doi:10.3390/su8080743.

  22. González-Varo, J.P., J.C. Biesmeijer, R. Bommarco, S.G. Potts, O. Schweiger, H.G. Smith, I. Steffan-Dewenter, H. Szentgyörgyi, M. Woyciechowski, and M. Vilà. 2013. Combined effects of global change pressures on animal-mediated pollination. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 28: 524–530. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2013.05.008.

  23. Goulson, D., G.C. Lye, and B. Darvill. 2008. Decline and conservation of bumble bees. Annual Review of Entomology 53: 191–208. doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.53.103106.093454.

  24. Haines-Young, R., and M. Potschin. 2010. The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being. In Ecosystem ecology: A new synthesis, ed. D.G. Raffaelli, and C.L.J. Frid, 110–139. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press and British Ecological Society.

  25. Jaffé, R., V. Dietemann, M.H. Allsopp, C. Costa, R.M. Crewe, R. Dall’olio, P.D.E. LA Rúa, M.A. El-Niweiri, et al. 2009. Estimating the density of honeybee colonies across their natural range to fill the gap in pollinator decline censuses. Conservation Biology 24: 583–593. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01331.x.

  26. Kennedy, C.M., E. Lonsdorf, M.C. Neel, N.M. Williams, T.H. Ricketts, R. Winfree, R. Bommarco, C. Brittain, et al. 2013. A global quantitative synthesis of local and landscape effects on wild bee pollinators in agroecosystems. Ecology Letters 16: 584–599. doi:10.1111/ele.12082.

  27. Keune, H., N. Dendoncker, and S. Jacobs. 2014. Ecosystem service practices. In Ecosystem services: Global issues, local practices, ed. S. Jacobs, N. Dendoncker, and H. Keune, 91–95. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

  28. Kremen, C., N.M. Williams, M.A. Aizen, B. Gemmill-Herren, G. LeBuhn, R. Minckley, L. Packer, S.G. Potts, et al. 2007. Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: A conceptual framework for the effects of land-use change. Ecology Letters 10: 299–314. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01018.x.

  29. Le Conte, Y., and M. Navajas. 2008. Climate change: Impact on honey bee populations and diseases. Revue Scientifique Et Technique (International Office of Epizootics) 27: 499–510.

  30. Le Féon, V., A. Schermann-Legionnet, Y. Delettre, S. Aviron, R. Billeter, R. Bugter, F. Hendrickx, and F. Burel. 2010. Intensification of agriculture, landscape composition and wild bee communities: A large scale study in four European countries. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 137: 143–150. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2010.01.015.

  31. Matheson, A., S.L. Buchmann, C. O’Toole, P. Westrich, and I.H. Williams. 1996. The conservation of bees. London: Academic Press.

  32. Meacham, M., C. Queiroz, A.V. Norström, and G.D. Peterson. 2016. Social-ecological drivers of multiple ecosystem services: What variables explain patterns of ecosystem services across the Norrström drainage basin? Ecology and Society 21: 14. doi:10.5751/ES-08077-210114.

  33. Michener, C. 2007. The bees of the world. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

  34. Milcu, I.A., J. Hanspach, D. Abson, and J. Fischer. 2013. Cultural ecosystem services: A literature review and prospects for future research. Ecology and Society 18: 44. doi:10.5751/ES-05790-180344.

  35. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA). 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.

  36. Morse, R.A. and N.W. Calderone. 2000. The value of honey bees as pollinators of U.S. Crops in 2000. Bee Culture 128: 15 pp insert.

  37. Newig, J. and O. Fritsch. 2009. The case survey method and applications in political science—meeting paper. American Political Science Association, Toronto, Canada. Retrieved June 27, 2016 from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1451643.

  38. Okoye, C.U., and A.U. Agwu. 2008. Factors affecting agroforestry sustainability in bee endemic parts of Southeastern Nigeria. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 26: 132–154. doi:10.1080/10549810701879685.

  39. Oldroyd, B.P., and P. Nanork. 2009. Conservation of Asian honey bees. Apidologie 40: 296–312. doi:10.1051/apido/2009021.

  40. Patiny, S., D. Michez, and P. Rasmont. 2009. A survey and review of the status of wild bees in the West-Palaearctic region. Apidologie 40: 313–331.

  41. Potts, S.G., J.C. Biesmeijer, C. Kremen, P. Neumann, O. Schweiger, and W.E. Kunin. 2010. Global pollinator declines: Trends, impacts and drivers. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 25: 345–353. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.007.

  42. Queiroz, C., M. Meacham, K. Richter, A.V. Norström, E. Andersson, J. Norberg, and G. Peterson. 2015. Mapping bundles of ecosystem services reveals distinct types of multifunctionality within a Swedish landscape. Ambio 44: 89–101. doi:10.1007/s13280-014-0601-0.

  43. Rader, R., I. Bartomeus, L. Garibaldi, M.P.D. Garratt, B.G. Howlett, R. Winfree, S.A. Cunningham, M.M. Mayfield, et al. 2016. Non-bee insects are important contributors to global crop pollination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113: 146–151. doi:10.1073/pnas.1517092112.

  44. Reyers, B., R. Biggs, G.S. Cumming, T. Elmqvist, A.P. Hejnowicz, and S. Polasky. 2013. Getting the measure of ecosystem services: A social–ecological approach. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 11: 268–273.

  45. Rissman, A.R., and S. Gillon. 2016. Where are ecology and biodiversity in social–ecological systems research? A review of research methods and applied recommendations. Conservation Letters. doi:10.1111/conl.12250.

  46. Roubik, D.W. 1995. Pollination of cultivated plants in the tropics. FAO Agricultural Services Bulletin No. 118. Rome: FAO.

  47. Scheffer, M., F. Westley, W.A. Brock, and M. Holmgren. 2002. Dynamic interactions of societies and ecosystems: Linking theories from ecology, economy, and sociology. In Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems, ed. L.H. Gunderson, and C.S. Holling, 195–239. Washington, DC: Island Press.

  48. Scoones, I. 1998. Sustainable rural livelihoods: A framework for analysis. Working Paper 72. Institute of Development Studies, Brighton, United Kingdom.

  49. Southwick, E.E., and L. Southwick Jr. 1992. Estimating the economic value of honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) as agricultural pollinators in the United States. Journal of Economic Entomology 85: 621–633. doi:10.1093/jee/85.3.621.

  50. Spangenberg, J.H. 2014. Ecosystem services in a societal context. In Ecosystem services: Global issues, local practices, ed. S. Jacobs, N. Dendoncker, and H. Keune, 91–95. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

  51. Vanbergen, J., and The Insect Pollinators Initiative (IPI). 2013. Threats to an ecosystem service: Pressures on pollinators. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 11: 251–259. doi:10.1890/120126.

  52. von Bertalanffy, L. 1968. General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. New York: George Braziller Inc.

  53. Watson, K., and J.A. Stallins. 2016. Honey bees and colony collapse disorder: A pluralistic reframing. Geography Compass 10: 222–236. doi:10.1111/gec3.12266.

  54. Westley, F., S. Carpenter, W.A. Brock, C.S. Holling, and L.H. Gunderson. 2002. Why systems of people and nature are not just social and ecological systems. In Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems, ed. L.H. Gunderson, and C.S. Holling, 121–146. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.

  55. Winfree, R. 2010. The conservation and restoration of wild bees. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1195: 169–197. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05449.

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Andrea Alberti, Guido Lüchters, and Heike Zimmermann for their assistance in data analysis and two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments. Denise Margaret S. Matias is grateful to the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) for financial support.

Author information

Correspondence to Denise Margaret S. Matias.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 115 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matias, D.M.S., Leventon, J., Rau, A. et al. A review of ecosystem service benefits from wild bees across social contexts. Ambio 46, 456–467 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0844-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Community
  • Ecosystem cascade framework
  • Livelihoods framework
  • Social–ecological systems