Ambio

, Volume 45, Issue 3, pp 267–279 | Cite as

What do we really know about the impacts of one of the 100 worst invaders in Europe? A reality check

Review

Abstract

Invasive species are one of the greatest threats to biodiversity worldwide, and to successfully manage their introductions is a major challenge for society. Knowledge on the impacts of an invasive species is essential for motivating decision makers and optimally allocating management resources. We use a prominent invasive fish species, the round goby (Neogobius melanostomus) to objectively quantify the state of scientific knowledge on its impacts. Focusing on how native fish species are affected by round goby invasions, we analyzed 113 peer-reviewed papers and found that impacts are highly ecosystem and time scale dependent. We discovered round goby impacts to be profound, but surprisingly complex. Even if identical native species were affected, the impacts remained less comparable across ecosystems than expected. Acknowledging the breadth but also limitations in scientific knowledge on round goby impacts would greatly improve scientists’ ability to conduct further research and inform management measures.

Keywords

Invasive species impact Management Prevention Round goby Neogobius melanostomus 

Supplementary material

13280_2015_718_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (514 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 515 kb)

References

  1. Abbett, R., E.M. Waldt, J.H. Johnson, J.E. McKenna Jr., and D.E. Dittman. 2013. Interactions between invasive round gobies (Neogobius melanostomus) and fantail darters (Etheostoma flabellare) in a tributary of the St. Lawrence River, New York, USA. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 28: 529–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Almqvist, G., A.K. Strandmark, and M. Appelberg. 2010. Has the invasive round goby caused new links in Baltic food webs? Environmental Biology of Fishes 89: 79–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anonymous. 1998. Exhibition of July: Salmon 2000: Preliminary success of the renaturalization programme. Natur und Museum (Frankfurt am Main) 128: 220–223.Google Scholar
  4. Balshine, S., A. Verma, V. Chant, and T. Theysmeyer. 2005. Competitive Interactions between Round Gobies and Logperch. Journal of Great Lakes Research 31: 68–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bayliss, H.R., G.B. Stewart, A. Wilcox, and N.P. Randall. 2013. A perceived gap between invasive species research and stakeholder priorities. NeoBiota 19: 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bergstrom, M.A., and A.F. Mensinger. 2009. Interspecific resource competition between the invasive round goby and three native species: Logperch, slimy sculpin, and spoonhead sculpin. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 138: 1009–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blanchett, S., F. Leprieur, O. Beauchard, J. Staes, T. Oberdorff, and S. Brosse. 2009. Broad-scale determinants of non-native fish species richness are context-dependent. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 276: 2385–2394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Britton, J.R., and R.E. Gozlan. 2013. Geo-politics and freshwater fish introductions: How the Cold War shaped Europe’s fish allodiversity. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions 23: 1566–1574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brownscombe, J.W., and M.G. Fox. 2013. Living at the edge of the front; reduced predation risk to invasive round goby in a Great Lakes tributary. Hydrobiologia 707: 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burkhardt-Holm, P., A. Peter, and H. Segner. 2002. Decline of fish catch in Switzerland—Project Fishnet: A balance between analysis and synthesis. Aquatic Sciences 64: 36–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Campbell, L.M., R. Thacker, D. Barton, D.C.G. Muir, D. Greenwood, and R.E. Hecky. 2009. Re-engineering the eastern Lake Erie littoral food web: The trophic function of non-indigenous Ponto-Caspian species. Journal of Great Lakes Research 35: 224–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Campbell, M.L. 2011. Assessing biosecurity risk associated with the importation of non-indigenous microalgae. Environmental Research 111: 989–998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chotkowski, M.A., and J.E. Marsden. 1999. Round goby and mottled sculpin predation on lake trout eggs and fry: Field predictions from laboratory experiments. Journal of Great Lakes Research 25: 26–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Copp, G.H., V. Kováč, I. Zweimüller, A. Dias, M. Nascimento, and M. Balážová. 2008. Preliminary study of dietary interactions between invading Ponto-Caspian gobies and some native fish species in the River Danube near Bratislava (Slovakia). Aquatic Invasions 3: 193–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Copp, G.H., L. Vilizzi, J. Mumford, G.V. Fenwick, M.J. Godard, and R.E. Gozlan. 2009. Calibration of FISK, an invasiveness screening tool for nonnative freshwater fishes. Risk Analysis 29: 457–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Corkum, L.D., M.R. Sapota, and K.E. Skora. 2004. The round goby, Neogobius melanostomus, a fish invader on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean. Biological Invasions 6: 173–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Crane, D.P., J.M. Farrell, D.W. Einhouse, J.R. Lantry, and J.L. Markham. 2015. Trends in body condition of native piscivores following invasion of Lakes Erie and Ontario by the round goby. Freshwater Biology 60: 111–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Crooks, J.A. 2005. Lag times and exotic species: The ecology and management of biological invasions in slow-motion. Ecoscience 12: 316–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Daehler, C., and D.R. Gordon. 1997. To introduce or not to introduce trade-offs of non-indigenous organisms. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 12: 424–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. DAISIE. 2015. European Invasive Alien Species Gateway: 100 of the worst. Retrieved 24 June, 2015, from http://www.europe-aliens.org/speciesTheWorst.do.
  21. Davidson, A.D., and C.L. Hewitt. 2014. How often are invasion-induced ecological impacts missed? Biological Invasions 16: 1165–1173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dick, J.T.A., M.E. Alexander, J.M. Jeschke, A. Ricciardi, H.J. MacIsaac, T.B. Robinson, S. Kumschick, O.L.F. Weyl, et al. 2014. Advancing impact prediction and hypothesis testing in invasion ecology using a comparative functional response approach. Biological Invasions 16: 735–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dietrich, J.P., B.J. Morrison, and J.A. Hoyle. 2006. Alternative ecological pathways in the Eastern Lake Ontario food web—round goby in the diet of lake trout. Journal of Great Lakes Research 32: 395–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dubs, D.O.L., and L.D. Corkum. 1996. Behavioral interactions between round gobies (Neogobius melanostomus) and mottled sculpins (Cottus bairdi). Journal of Great Lakes Research 22: 838–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Duncan, J.M., C.A. Marschner, and M.J. González. 2011. Diet partitioning, habitat preferences and behavioral interactions between juvenile yellow perch and round goby in nearshore areas of Lake Erie. Journal of Great Lakes Research 37: 101–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ellender, B.R., and O.L.F. Weyl. 2014. A review of current knowledge, risk and ecological impacts associated with non-native freshwater fish introductions in South Africa. Aquatic Invasions 9: 117–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. EU. 2009. Invasive alien species: Nature and biodiversity. Retrieved June 24, 2015, from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/pubs/pdf/factsheets/Invasive%20Alien%20Species/Invasive_Alien_EN.pdf.
  28. Fitzsimons, J., B. Williston, G. Williston, G. Bravener, J.L. Jonas, R.M. Claramunt, J.E. Marsden, and B.J. Ellrott. 2006. Laboratory estimates of salmonine egg predation by round gobies (Neogobius melanostomus), sculpins (Cottus cognatus and C. bairdi), and crayfish (Orconectes propinquus). Journal of Great Lakes Research 32: 227–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fitzsimons, J.D., M. Clark, and M. Keir. 2009. Addition of round gobies to the prey community of Lake Ontario and potential implications to thiamine status and reproductive success of lake trout. Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management 12: 296–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. French, J.R.P., and D.J. Jude. 2001. Diets and diet overlap of nonindigenous gobies and small benthic native fishes co-inhabiting the St. Clair River. Michigan. Journal of Great Lakes Research 27: 300–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. García-Berthou, E., C. Alcaraz, Q. Pou-Rovira, L. Zamora, G. Coenders, and C. Feo. 2005. Introduction pathways and establishment rates of invasive aquatic species in Europe. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 62: 453–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gozlan, R.E. 2008. Introduction of non-native freshwater fish: Is it all bad? Fish and Fisheries 9: 106–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gozlan, R.E., J.R. Britton, I. Cowx, and G.H. Copp. 2010. Current knowledge on non-native freshwater fish introductions. Journal of Fish Biology 76: 751–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Heger, T., A.T. Pahl, Z. Botta-Dukát, F. Gherardi, C. Hoppe, I. Hoste, K. Jax, L. Lindström, et al. 2013. Conceptual frameworks and methods for advancing invasion ecology. Ambio 42: 527–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hensler, S.R., D.J. Jude, and Ji.X. He. 2008. Burbot growth and diets in lakes Michigan and Huron: An ongoing shift from native species to round gobies. In Burbot: Ecology, management, and culture, ed. V.L. Paragamian, and D.H. Bennett, 91–107. Bethesda: American Fisheries Society.Google Scholar
  36. Hogan, L.S., E. Marschall, C. Folt, and R.A. Stein. 2007. How non-native species in Lake Erie influence trophic transfer of mercury and lead to top predators. Journal of Great Lakes Research 33: 46–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Holmlund, C.M., and M. Hammer. 1999. Ecosystem services generated by fish populations. Ecological Economics 29: 253–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. ICPR. 2015. The Rhine. Retrieved September 7, 2015, from http://www.iksr.org/en/rhine/index.html.
  39. IGKB. 2015. The Organisation. Retrieved September 7, 2015, from http://www.igkb.org/die-igkb/die-organisation/ (in German).
  40. Jacobs, G.R., C.P. Madenjian, D.B. Bunnell, and J.D. Holuszko. 2010. Diet of lake trout and burbot in northern Lake Michigan during spring: Evidence of ecological interaction. Journal of Great Lakes Research 36: 312–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Janssen, J., and D.J. Jude. 2001. Recruitment failure of mottled sculpin Cottus bairdi in Calumet Harbor, Southern Lake Michigan, induced by the newly introduced round goby Neogobius melanostomus. Journal of Great Lakes Research 27: 319–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Johnson, T.B., D.B. Bunnell, and C.T. Knight. 2005. A potential new energy pathway in central Lake Erie: The round goby connection. Journal of Great Lakes Research 31: 238–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kalchhauser, I., P. Mutzner, P.E. Hirsch, and P. Burkhardt-Holm. 2013. Arrival of round goby Neogobius melanostomus (Pallas, 1814) and bighead goby Ponticola kessleri (Günther, 1861) in the High Rhine (Switzerland). BioInvasions Records 2: 79–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Keller, R.P., K. Frang, and D.M. Lodge. 2008. Preventing the spread of invasive species: Economic benefits of intervention guided by ecological predictions. Conservation Biology 22: 80–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Keller, R.P., D.M. Lodge, and D.C. Finnoff. 2007. Risk assessment for invasive species produces net bioeconomic benefits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104: 203–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kornis, M.S., J. Carlson, G. Lehrer-Brey, and J.M. Vander Zanden. 2014. Experimental evidence that ecological effects of an invasive fish are reduced at high densities. Oecologia 175: 325–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kornis, M.S., N. Mercado-Silva, and J.M. Vander Zanden. 2012. Twenty years of invasion: A review of round goby Neogobius melanostomus biology, spread and ecological implications. Journal of Fish Biology 80: 235–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kornis, M.S., S. Sharma, J.M. Vander Zanden, and A. Ricciardi. 2013. Invasion success and impact of an invasive fish, round goby, in Great Lakes tributaries. Diversity and Distributions 19: 184–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Krakowiak, P.J., and C.M. Pennuto. 2008. Fish and macroinvertebrate communities in tributary streams of eastern Lake Erie with and without round gobies (Neogobius melanostomus, Pallas 1814). Journal of Great Lakes Research 34: 675–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kriticos, D.J., R.W. Sutherst, J.R. Brown, S.W. Adkins, and G.F. Maywald. 2003. Climate change and biotic invasions: A case history of a tropical woody vine. Biological Invasions 5: 147–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lauer, T.E., P.J. Allen, and T.S. McComish. 2004. Changes in mottled sculpin and johnny darter trawl catches after the appearance of round gobies in the Indiana waters of Lake Michigan. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 133: 185–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lawrence, R.J. 2015. Advances in transdisciplinarity: Epistemologies, methodologies and processes. Futures 65: 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lee, C.E. 2002. Evolutionary genetics of invasive species. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17: 386–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lee, C.E., J. Remfert, and Y.-M. Chang. 2007. Response to selection and evolvability of invasive populations. Genetica 129: 179–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lee, V.A., and T.B. Johnson. 2005. Development of a bioenergetics model for the round goby (Neogobius melanostomus). Journal of Great Lakes Research 31: 125–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lehrer-Brey, G., and M.S. Kornis. 2014. Winter distributional overlap facilitates Lake Whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis) piscivory on invasive round gobies (Neogobius melanostomus) in Green Bay, Lake Michigan. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 29: 153–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lindner, K., A.F. Cerwenka, J. Brandner, S. Gertzen, J. Borcherding, J. Geist, and U.K. Schliewen. 2013. First evidence for interspecific hybridization between invasive goby species Neogobius fluviatilis and Neogobius melanostomus (Teleostei: Gobiidae: Benthophilinae). Journal of Fish Biology 82: 2128–2134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Madenjian, C.P., M.A. Stapanian, L.D. Witzel, D.W. Einhouse, S.A. Pothoven, and H.L. Whitford. 2011. Evidence for predatory control of the invasive round goby. Biological Invasions 13: 987–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Moher, D., A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, and D.G. Altman. 2009. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine 151: 264–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mychek-Londer, J.G., D.B. Bunnell, W. Stott, J.S. Diana, J.R.P. French III, and M.A. Chriscinske. 2013. Using diets to reveal overlap and egg predation among benthivorous fishes in Lake Michigan. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 142: 492–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. N’Guyen, A., P.E. Hirsch, I. Adrian-Kalchhauser, and P. Burkhardt-Holm. 2015. Improving invasive species management by integrating priorities and contributions of scientists and decision makers. Ambio. doi:10.1007/s13280-015-0723-z
  62. Ojaveer, H., and J. Kotta. 2015. Ecosystem impacts of the widespread non-indigenous species in the Baltic Sea: Literature survey evidences major limitations in knowledge. Hydrobiologia 750: 171–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pickering, C., and J. Byrne. 2014. The benefits of publishing systematic quantitative literature reviews for PhD candidates and other early-career researchers. Higher Education Research & Development 33: 534–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Poos, M., A.J. Dextrase, A.N. Schwalb, and J.D. Ackerman. 2010. Secondary invasion of the round goby into high diversity Great Lakes tributaries and species at risk hotspots: Potential new concerns for endangered freshwater species. Biological Invasions 12: 1269–1284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Pothoven, S.A., and C.P. Madenjian. 2013. Increased piscivory by Lake Whitefish in Lake Huron. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 33: 1194–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rakauskas, V., Ž. Pūtys, J. Dainys, J. Lesutienė, L. Ložpys, and K. Arbačiauskas. 2013. Increasing population of the invader round goby, Neogobius melanostomus (Actinopterygii: Perciformes: Gobiidae), and its trophic role in the Curonian Lagoon, SE Baltic Sea. Acta Ichthyologica et Piscatoria 43: 95–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Reyjol, Y., P. Brodeur, Y. Mailhot, M. Mingelbier, and P. Dumont. 2010. Do native predators feed on non-native prey? The case of round goby in a fluvial piscivorous fish assemblage. Journal of Great Lakes Research 36: 618–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Roche, K.F., M. Janač, and P. Jurajda. 2013. A review of Gobiid expansion along the Danube-Rhine corridor—geopolitical change as a driver for invasion. Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems 411: 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Roseman, E.F., J.S. Schaeffer, E. Bright, and D.G. Fielder. 2014. Angler-caught piscivore diets reflect fish community changes in Lake Huron. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 143: 1419–1433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Roseman, E.F., W.W. Taylor, D.B. Hayes, A.L. Jones, and J.T. Francis. 2006. Predation on walleye eggs by fish on reefs in western Lake Erie. Journal of Great Lakes Research 32: 415–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rosendahl, J., M.A. Zanella, S. Rist, and J. Weigelt. 2015. Scientists’ situated knowledge: Strong objectivity in transdisciplinarity. Futures 65: 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Rush, S.A., G. Paterson, T.B. Johnson, K.G. Drouillard, G.D. Haffner, C.E. Hebert, M.T. Arts, D.J. McGoldrick, et al. 2012. Long-term impacts of invasive species on a native top predator in a large lake system. Freshwater Biology 57: 2342–2355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Seidl, R., F.S. Brand, M. Stauffacher, P. Krütli, Q.B. Le, A. Spörri, G. Meylan, C. Moser, et al. 2013. Science with society in the anthropocene. Ambio 42: 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sheehy, E., and C. Lawton. 2014. Population crash in an invasive species following the recovery of a native predator: The case of the American grey squirrel and the European pine marten in Ireland. Biodiversity and Conservation 23: 753–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Simberloff, D. 2003. How much information on population biology is needed to manage introduced species? Conservation Biology 17: 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Stapanian, M.A., W.H. Edwards, and L.D. Witzel. 2011. Recent changes in burbot growth in Lake Erie. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 27: 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Stapanian, M.A., C.P. Madenjian, and J. Tost. 2007. Regional differences in size-at-age of the recovering burbot (Lota lota) population in Lake Erie. Journal of Great Lakes Research 33: 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Steinhart, G.B., E.A. Marschall, and R.A. Stein. 2004a. Round goby predation on smallmouth bass offspring in nests during simulated catch-and-release angling. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 133: 121–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Steinhart, G.B., R.A. Stein, and E.A. Marschall. 2004b. High growth rate of young-of-the-year smallmouth bass in Lake Erie: A result of the round goby invasion? Journal of Great Lakes Research 30: 381–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Stockwell, C.A., A.P. Hendry, and M.T. Kinnison. 2003. Contemporary evolution meets conservation biology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18: 94–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Strayer, D.L. 2010. Alien species in fresh waters: Ecological effects, interactions with other stressors, and prospects for the future. Freshwater Biology 55: 152–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Strayer, D.L., V.T. Eviner, J.M. Jeschke, and M.L. Pace. 2006. Understanding the long-term effects of species invasions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21: 645–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Taraborelli, A.C., M.G. Fox, T.B. Johnson, and T. Schaner. 2010. Round goby (Neogobius melanostomus) population structure, biomass, prey consumption and mortality from predation in the Bay of Quinte, Lake Ontario. Journal of Great Lakes Research 36: 625–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Truemper, H.A., and T.E. Lauer. 2005. Gape limitation and piscine prey size-selection by yellow perch in the extreme southern area of Lake Michigan, with emphasis on two exotic prey items. Journal of Fish Biology 66: 135–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Truemper, H.A., T.E. Lauer, T.S. McComish, and R.A. Edgell. 2006. Response of yellow perch diet to a changing forage base in southern Lake Michigan, 1984–2002. Journal of Great Lakes Research 32: 806–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Walsh, J.C., L.V. Dicks, and W.J. Sutherland. 2015. The effect of scientific evidence on conservation practitioners’ management decisions. Conservation Biology 29: 88–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Whitney, K.D., and C.A. Gabler. 2008. Rapid evolution in introduced species, ‘invasive traits’ and recipient communities: Challenges for predicting invasive potential. Diversity and Distributions 14: 569–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Centre for Sustainable Energy and Water SupplyUniversity of BaselBaselSwitzerland
  2. 2.Program Man-Society-Environment, Department of Environmental SciencesUniversity of BaselBaselSwitzerland
  3. 3.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations