LivestockPlus: Forages, sustainable intensification, and food security in the tropics
- 535 Downloads
The increased use of grain-based feed for livestock during the last two decades has contributed, along with other factors, to a rise in grain prices that has reduced human food security. This circumstance argues for feeding more forages to livestock, particularly in the tropics where many livestock are reared on small farms. Efforts to accomplish this end, referred to as the ‘LivestockPlus’ approach, intensify in sustainable ways the management of grasses, shrubs, trees, and animals. By decoupling the human food and livestock feed systems, these efforts would increase the resilience of the global food system. Effective LivestockPlus approaches take one of two forms: (1) simple improvements such as new forage varieties and animal management practices that spread from farmer to farmer by word of mouth, or (2) complex sets of new practices that integrate forage production more closely into farms’ other agricultural activities and agro-ecologies.
KeywordsForages Livestock Livestock plus Sustainable intensification Tropics
Funds from the U.S. National Science Foundation Grant #1009499 supported this research.
- Artiles, E., R. Van Der Hoek, R. Lima Orozco, C. Rodriguez, S. Hoede, P. Sarria, and S. Martens. 2012. Performance of pigs fed with fresh and ensiled forage of Vigna unguiculata CIAT 4555, Lablab purpureus CIAT 22759 and Cajanus cajan. Proceedings of the XVI international silage conference, Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
- CIAT (International Center for Tropical Agriculture). 2012. More chicken and pork in the pot, and money in pocket: Improving forages for monogastric animals with low-income farmers. Final project report submitted to Bundesministerium für Wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung (BMZ), Cali, Colombia.Google Scholar
- Coffey, L. 2001. Multispecies grazing. Appropriate Technology Transfer for Rural Areas (ATTRA). Retrieved from http://whatcom.wsu.edu/ag/documents/other_animals/MultispeciesGrazing.pdf.
- D’Alexis, S., D. Sauvant, and M. Boval. 2013. Mixed grazing systems of sheep and cattle to improve liveweight gain: a quantitative review. Journal of Agricultural Science. doi: 10.1017/S0021859613000622.
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2009. The state of food and agriculture, 2009: Livestock in the balance. Retrieved June 3, 2014, from http://www.fao.org/docrep/012/i0680e/i0680e.pdf.
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2014a. The use of concentrate feeds in livestock production. Retrieved April 15, 2014, from http://www.fao.org/ag/againfo/programmes/en/lead/toolbox/Refer/fcrpsec1.pdf.
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2014b. FAOSTAT. Retrieved April 15, 2014, from http://faostat.fao.org/.
- Fujisaka, S., F. Holmann, M. Peters, A. Schmidt, D. White, C. Burgos, J. Ordoñez, M. Mena, et al. 2005. Estrategias para minimizar la escasez de forrajes en zonas con sequías prolongadas en Honduras y Nicaragua. Pasturas Tropicales 27: 73–92.Google Scholar
- Khan, Z., C. Midega, J. Pittchar, J. Pickett, and T. Bruce. 2011. Push–pull technology: A conservation agriculture approach for integrated management of insect pests, weeds and soil health in Africa. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 9: 162–170. doi: 10.3763/ijas.2010.0558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Khan, Z., C. Midega, J. Pittchar, A. Murage, M. Birkett, T. Bruce, and J. Pickett. 2014. Achieving food security for one million sub-Saharan African poor through push–pull innovation by 2020. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series B. Biological Sciences 369: 20120284. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lukuyu, B., S. Franzel, P. Ongadi, and A. Duncan. 2011. Livestock feed resources: Current production and management practices in central and northern rift valley provinces of Kenya. Livestock Research for Rural Development 23.Google Scholar
- Montpellier Panel. 2013. Sustainable intensification: A new paradigm for African agriculture. London: Agriculture for Impact, Imperial College.Google Scholar
- Notenbaert, A., M. Herrero, R. Kruska, L. You, S. Wood, P. Thornton, and A. Omolo. 2009. Classifying livestock production systems for targeting agricultural research and development in a rapidly changing world. ILRI Discussion Paper No. 19 (p. 41). Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
- Pitesky, M., K. Stackhouse, and F. Mitloehner. 2009. Clearing the air: Livestock’s contribution to climate change. Advances in Agronomy 103: 3–40.Google Scholar
- Rao, I., M. Peters, A. Castro, R. Schultze-Kraft, D. White, M. Fisher, J. Miles, C. Lascano, et al. 2015. Livestock Plus: Sustainable intensification of forage-based systems for improving livelihoods and enhancing ecosystem services in the tropics. Tropical Grasslands—Forrajes Tropicales (in press).Google Scholar
- Rivas, L., and F. Holmann. 2004. Impacto de la Adopción de Híbridos de Brachiarias Resistentes al Salivazo en Colombia, México y Centroamérica. Cali: CIAT.Google Scholar
- Torres-Acosta, J., M. Molento, and P. Mendoza de Gives. 2012. Research and implementation of novel approaches for the control of nematode parasites in Latin America and the Caribbean: Is there sufficient incentive for a greater extension effort? Veterinary Parasitology 186: 132–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Trostle, R. 2008. Global agricultural supply and demand: Factors contributing to the recent increase in food commodity prices. Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture. WRS-0801, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- World Bank. 1998. Rural well-being: From vision to action. In Proceedings of the fourth annual World Bank conference on environmentally sustainable development. ed. I. Serageldin and D. Steeds, 434 pp. Washington, DC.Google Scholar