How Resilient Are Europe’s Inshore Fishing Communities to Change? Differences Between the North and the South
- 297 Downloads
One would hypothesize that the Common Fisheries Policy, as the umbrella framework for fisheries management in the EU would have the greatest impact on fishers’ communities across Europe. There are, however, biological, economic, social, and political factors, which vary among fishing communities that can affect how these communities react to changes. This paper explores the links between institutional arrangements and ecological dynamics in two European inshore fisheries socio-ecological systems, using a resilience framework. The Mediterranean small-scale fishers do not seem to have been particularly affected by the Common Fisheries Policy regulations but appear affected by competition with the politically strong recreational fishers and the invasion of the rabbit fish population. The inshore fishers along the East coast of Scotland believe that their interests are not as sufficiently protected as the interests of their offshore counterpart. Decisions and initiatives at global, EU, and sometimes national level, tend to take into account those fisheries sectors which have a national economic importance. A socio-ecological analysis can shift the focus from biological and economic aspects to more sustainable long-term delivery of environmental benefits linked to human wellbeing.
KeywordsResilience Artisanal fisheries Socio-ecological systems Governance Cyprus Scotland Mediterranean
This research was funded by an ESRC/NERC studentship awarded to GEJ and MJK. We would like to thank all the fishers in Cyprus, Spain, and Scotland who took part in this survey and the following individuals and organizations which assisted during the visits to the various ports: Baden Gibson (East Coast Licensed Small Boat Association), Joan Moranta and everyone at the IEO (Oceanographic institute of the Balearic Islands), Fransesc Sarda Instituto de Ciencias del Mar (ICM-CSIC) in Barcelona, and Josep Grassot i Paris Cofradia de Pescadores de Palamos.
- Anderies, J.M., M.A. Janssen, and E. Ostrom. 2004. A framework to analyze robustness of social–ecological systems from an institutional perspective. Ecology and Society 9: 18.Google Scholar
- Anderson, J., and J. Guillen. 2009. The 2009 annual economic report on the European Fishing Fleet. Retrieved June 1, 2010, from http://stecf.jrc.ec.europa.eu/documents/43805/44850/09-11_SG-ECA+09-01+-+2009+AER+on+EU+fishing+fleet_JRC55030.pdf.
- Department of Fisheries and Marine Research (DFMR). 2008. Annual report for the year 2008. Retrieved March 4, 2010 from http://www.moa.gov.cy/moa/dfmr/dfmr.nsf/DMLreports_en/DMLreports_en?OpenDocument&Start=1&Count=1000&Expand=2.
- Egestad, P.S. 2001. Distrusting people while trusting numbers. The Common Property Resource Digest 56: 3–5.Google Scholar
- European Commission. 2009. Green Paper: Reform of the Common Fisheries Policy. COM(2009) 163 Final, Brussels, April 22, 2009.Google Scholar
- Folke, C., and F. Berkes. 1995. Resilience and the co-evolution of ecosystems and institutions. Paper presented at the Fifth Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property, Reinventing the Commons, Norway.Google Scholar
- Harvey, D. 1989. The conditions of postmodernity. London: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Ifremer. 2007. Small-scale coastal fisheries in Europe. Final Report of the Contract No. FISH/2005/10, 447.Google Scholar
- Janssen, M.A., and E. Ostrom. 2006. Governing social–ecological systems. In Handbook of computational economics, ed. L. Tesfatsion, and K.L. Judd, 1465–1509. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Mahoney, J., and K. Thelen. 2010. Explaining institutional change: Ambiguity, agency, and power. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Morales-Nin, B., J. Moranta, C. Garcia, M.P. Tugores, A.M. Grau, F. Riera, and M. Cerdà. 2005. The recreational fishery off Majorca Island (Western Mediterranean): Some implications for coastal resource management. ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal Du Conseil 62: 727–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nuttall, M. 2000. Crisis, risk and deskilment in North-east Scotland’s fishing industry. In Fisheries dependent regions, ed. D. Symes, 106–115. Oxford: Fishing News Books.Google Scholar
- Rova, C. 2000. Natural resources and institutional performance: Linking social and ecological systems in fisheries. Retrieved May 12, 2010, from http://swepub.kb.se/bib/swepub:oai:ltu01:455004?tab2=abs&language=en.
- Ternström, I. 2004. Disturbances and resilience in common-pool resource management systems. Paper presented at the Tenth Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property: The Commons in an Age of Global Transition: Challenges, Risks and Opportunities, Mexico.Google Scholar
- van Ginkel, R., and N. Steins. 2001. Multi-use conflicts in inshore waters. In Inshore fisheries management, ed. D. Symes, and J. Phillipson. Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
- Walker, W., C.S. Holling, S.R. Carpenter, and A. Kinzig. 2004. Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems. Ecology and Society 5(2): 5. Retrieved May 24, 2010, from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art5.
- Walker, B. H., J.M. Anderies, A.P. Kinzig, and P. Ryan. 2006. Exploring resilience in social–ecological systems through comparative studies and theory development: Introduction to the special issue. Ecology and Society 11: 12. Retrieved May 24, 2010, from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art12/.