AMBIO

, Volume 42, Issue 8, pp 975–984 | Cite as

Financing Marine Protected Areas Through Visitor Fees: Insights from Tourists Willingness to Pay in Chile

  • Stefan Gelcich
  • Francisca Amar
  • Abel Valdebenito
  • Juan Carlos Castilla
  • Miriam Fernandez
  • Cecilia Godoy
  • Duan Biggs
Article

Abstract

Tourism is a financing mechanism considered by many donor-funded marine conservation initiatives. Here we assess the potential role of visitor entry fees, in generating the necessary revenue to manage a marine protected area (MPA), established through a Global Environmental Facility Grant, in a temperate region of Chile. We assess tourists’ willingness to pay (WTP) for an entry fee associated to management and protection of the MPA. Results show 97 % of respondents were willing to pay an entrance fee. WTP predictors included the type of tourist, tourists’ sensitivity to crowding, education, and understanding of ecological benefits of the MPA. Nature-based tourists state median WTP values of US$ 4.38 and Sun-sea-sand tourists US$ 3.77. Overall, entry fees could account for 10–13 % of MPA running costs. In Chile, where funding for conservation runs among the weakest in the world, visitor entry fees are no panacea in the short term and other mechanisms, including direct state/government support, should be considered.

Keywords

Consumer surplus Social–ecological systems Nature-based tourism Human dimensions Contingent valuation MPA Aichi targets Conservation 

Supplementary material

13280_2013_453_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (91 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 91 kb)

References

  1. Alfnes, F., C. Yue, and H. Jensen. 2010. Cognitive dissonance as a means of reducing hypothetical bias. European Review of Agricultural Economics 37: 147–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armesto, J., C. Villagrán, J. Aravena, C. Pérez, and G. Parker. 1996. Los bosques templados de la Cordillera de la Costa. In Ecología de los Bosques Nativos de Chile, ed. J. Armesto, C. Villagrán, and M. Arroyo, 199–213. Santiago: Editorial Universitaria.Google Scholar
  3. Balmford, A., J. Beresford, J. Green, R. Naidoo, M. Walpole, and A. Manica. 2009. A global perspective on trends in nature-based tourism. PLoS Biology 7: e1000144. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baral, N., M.J., Stern, and R. Bhattarai. 2008. Contingent valuation of ecotourism in Annapurna conservation area, Nepal: Implications for sustainable park finance and local development. Ecological Economics 66: 218–227.Google Scholar
  5. Bateman, I., J. Richard, T. Carson, and W.M. Hanemann. 2002. Economic valuation with stated preference techniques: A manual. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berkes, F. 2004. Rethinking community-based conservation. Conservation Biology 18: 621–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Biggs, D., J. Turpie, C. Fabricius, and A. Spenceley. 2011. The value of avitourism for community-based conservation: An analysis from South Africa. Conservation and Society 9: 80–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Castilla, J.C. 2008. El océano y la conservación en Chile: Los eternos olvidados. Estudios Públicos 112: 206–217.Google Scholar
  9. Convention on Biological Diversity. 2013. CBD Quick guides to the Aichi Biodiversity Targets, Retrieved 25 August, 2013, from http://www.cbd.int/doc/strategic-plan/targets/compilation-quick-guide-en.pdf.
  10. Cheuquepil, V. 2005. Consultoría Análisis y Sistematización de Antecedentes, Fase Diseño de Proyecto NZAID-AIML. Preparado para WWF-Chile, 32 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Christou, L. 2012. Is it possible to combine mass tourism with alternative forms of tourism: The case of Spain, Greece, Slovenia and Croatia. Journal of Business Administration Online 11: 1.Google Scholar
  12. Cundill, G., G.S. Cumming, D. Biggs, and C. Fabricius. 2012. Soft systems thinking and social learning for adaptive management. Conservation Biology 26: 13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Depondt, F., and E. Green. 2006. Diving user fees and the financial sustainability of marine protected areas: Opportunities and impediments. Ocean and Coastal Management 49: 188–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dharmaratne, G., F. Yee Sang, and L. Walling. 2000. Tourism potentials for financing protected areas. Annals of Tourism Research 27: 590–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Diamond, P., and J. Hausman. 1994. Contingent valuation: Is some number better than no number? Journal of Economic Perspectives 8: 45–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dimmock, K. 2012. The importance of marine leisure environments: Investigating visitor and local resident perceptions and uses of marine environments on Coffs Coast, NSW Australia. Annals of Leisure Research 15: 243–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Edwards, E. 2009. Sustainable financing for ocean and coastal management in Jamaica: The potential for revenues from tourist user fees. Marine Policy 33: 376–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gelcich, S., Hughes, T.P, Olsson, P., Folke, C., Defeo, O., Fernández, M. Foale, S., Gunderson, et al. 2010. Navigating transformations in governance of Chilean marine coastal resources. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107: 16794–16799.Google Scholar
  19. Gelcich, S., L. Peralta, C. Gonzalez, A. Camaño, M. Fernandez, and J.C. Castilla. 2011. Scaling-up marine coastal biodiversity conservation in Chile: A call to support and develop ancillary measures and innovative financing approaches. In Successful and Failed Experiences in Biodiversity Conservation: Lessons and policy recommendations from the American continent, ed. E. Figueroa, 199–220. Santiago: Editorial Universitaria.Google Scholar
  20. Gelcich, S., M. Fernandez, N. Godoy, A. Canepa, L. Prado, and J.C. Castilla. 2012. Territorial user rights for fisheries as ancillary instruments for marine coastal conservation in Chile. Conservation Biology 26: 1005–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Geoghegan T., A.H. Smith, and K. Thacker. 2001. Characterization of Caribbean marine protected areas: An analysis of ecological, organizational, and socio-economic factors. Caribbean Natural Resources Institute. CANARI Technical Report N.287.Google Scholar
  22. Godoy, N., S. Gelcich, J. Vasquez, and J.C. Castilla. 2010. Spearfishing to depletion: Evidence from temperate reef-fishes in Chile. Ecological Applications 20: 1504–1511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gravestock, P., M. Callum, and A. Bailey. 2008. The income requirements of marine protected areas. Ocean and Coastal Management 51: 272–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hakansson, C. 2008. A new valuation question: Analysis of and insights from interval open-ended data in contingent valuation. Environmental Resource Economics 39: 175–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hall, C.M. 2010. Crisis events in tourism: Subjects of crisis in tourism. Current Issues in Tourism 13: 401–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hanley, N., and B. Kristrom. 2002. What’s it worth? Exploring value uncertainty using interval questions in contingent valuation. Discussion papers 2002-10, Department of Economics, University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
  27. INE. 2002. Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas: Censo de Población y Vivienda 2002. Retrieved 1 March, 2010, from http://www.ine.cl/canales/chile_estadistico/censos_poblacion_vivienda/censo_pobl_vivi.php.
  28. Kalbfleisch, J.D., and R.L. Prentice. 2002. The statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kelleher, G. 1999. Guidelines for marine protected areas. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge UK. Retrieved 1 August, 2010, from http://data.iucn.org/dbtw-wpd/edocs/PAG-003.pdf.
  30. Kiss, A. 2004. Is community-based ecotourism a good use of biodiversity conservation funds? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 19: 232–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Klein, J.P., and M.L. Moeschberger. 2003. Survival analysis: Techniques for censored and truncated data. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  32. Marin, A., S. Gelcich, J.C. Castilla, and F. Berkes. 2012. Exploring social capital in Chile’s coastal benthic co-management system using a network approach. Ecology and Society 17: 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mee, L., H. Dublin, and A. Eberhard. 2008. Evaluating the global environmental facility: A goodwill gesture or a serious attempt to deliver global benefits? Global Environmental Change 18: 800–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Molina, R., M. Correa, C. Smith-Ramirez, and A. Gainza. 2006. Alerceros Huilliche de la Cordillera de la Costa de Osorno. Santiago: Editorial Andros Ltda.Google Scholar
  35. Mora, C., S. Andrefouet, M. Costello, C. Kranenburg, A. Rollo, J. Veron, K. Gaston, and R. Myers. 2006. Coral reefs and the global network of marine protected areas. Science 312: 1750–1751.Google Scholar
  36. Peters, H., and J.P. Hawkins. 2009. Access to marine parks: A comparative study in willingness to pay. Ocean and Coastal Management 52: 219–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Plan general de Administracion Lafken Mapu Lahual. 2009. Plan General de Administración y Gestión Lafken Mapu Lahual: Área Marina y Costera Protegida de Múltiples Usos D.S. 517/2006, Región de Los Lagos. 2009.Google Scholar
  38. PNUD (Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo). 2005. Documento de Proyecto: “Conservación de la Biodiversidad de Importancia Mundial a lo largo de la Costa Chilena”. Retrieved June, 2010, from http://www.pnud.cl/proyectos/fichas/gef-marino.asp.
  39. PNUD (Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo). 2011. Proyecto de Conservación de la Biodiversidad de Importancia Mundial a lo largo de la Costa Chilena, Informe Final. Final Report: Project GEF prepared by Leiva, J., Green Lane consultants. Santiago, Chile.Google Scholar
  40. Pretty, J., and D. Smith. 2004. Social capital in biodiversity conservation and management. Conservation Biology 18: 631–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ramson, K., and S. Mangi. 2010. Valuing recreational benefits of coral reefs: The case of Mombasa Marine National Park and Reserve, Kenya. Environmental Management 45: 145–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Reid-Grant, K., and M. Bhat. 2009. Financing marine protected areas in Jamaica: An exploratory study. Marine Policy 33: 128–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Robards, M.D., M.L. Schoon, C.L. Meek, and N.L. Engle. 2011. The importance of social drivers in the resilient provision of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change 21: 522–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. SERNATUR: Servicio Nacional de Turismo. 2008. Estadísticas de Alojamiento Turístico según Comunas. Retrieved 15 March, 2010, from http://www.sernatur.cl/institucional/htm_instit/estadisticas.html.
  45. SERNATUR. 2012. Estudio de Tipificación de la Demanda Turística de Chile 2011. http://www.sernatur.cl/estudios-y-estadisticas?did=154.
  46. Thur, S. 2010. User fees as sustainable financing mechanisms for marine protected areas: An application to the Bonaire National Marine Park. Marine Policy 34: 63–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Togridou, A., T. Hovardas, and J.D. Pantis. 2006. Determinants of visitors’ willingness to pay for the National Marine Park of Zakynthos, Greece. Ecological Economics 60: 308–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vásquez-Lavín, F., A. Cerda, and S. Orrego. 2007. Valoración Económica del ambiente: Fundamentos económicos, econométricos y aplicaciones, 368. Buenos Aires: Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
  49. Waldron, A., A.O. Mooer, D.C. Miller, N. Nibbelinka, D. Redding, T.S. Kuhnc, J.T. Roberts, and J.L. Gittlemana. 2013. Targeting global conservation funding to limit immediate biodiversity declines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110: 12144–12148.Google Scholar
  50. Walpole, M.J., and H.J. Goodwin. 2000. Local economic impacts of dragon tourism in Indonesia. Annals of Tourism Research 27: 559–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wang, P.-W., and J.-B. Jia. 2012. Tourists’ willingness to pay for biodiversity conservation and environment protection, Dalai Lake protected area: Implications for entrance fee and sustainable management. Ocean and Coastal Management 62: 24–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. WDPA. 2010. World Data Base on Protected Areas, Accessed online September 2010: Retrieved 15 April, 2010, from http://www.wdpa.org/AnnualRelease.aspx.
  53. Wei, L.J. 1992. The accelerated failure time model: A useful alternative to the cox regression model in survival analysis. Statistics in Medicine 11: 1871–1879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wells, S., N. Burgues, and A. Ngusaru. 2007. Towards the 2012 marine protected area targets in eastern Africa. Ocean and Coastal Management 50: 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wondolleck, J.M., and S.L. Yaffee. 2000. Making collaboration work: Lessons from Innovation in Natural Resource Management. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefan Gelcich
    • 1
    • 2
  • Francisca Amar
    • 1
    • 2
  • Abel Valdebenito
    • 3
  • Juan Carlos Castilla
    • 1
    • 2
  • Miriam Fernandez
    • 1
    • 2
  • Cecilia Godoy
    • 4
  • Duan Biggs
    • 5
  1. 1.Departamento de Ecología, Facultad de Ciencias BiológicasPontificia Universidad Católica de ChileSantiagoChile
  2. 2.Centro de Conservación Marina & Laboratorio Internacional en Cambio Global (LINCGlobal), Facultad de Ciencias BiológicasPontificia Universidad Católica de ChileSantiagoChile
  3. 3.Departamento de EstadísticaPontificia Universidad Católica de ChileSantiagoChile
  4. 4.Fundacion BiomarPuerto VarasChile
  5. 5.ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, Centre for Biodiversity & Conservation ScienceUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations