AMBIO

, Volume 43, Issue 2, pp 234–243 | Cite as

Power Discourses of Fish Death: Case of Linnunsuo Peat Production

Report

Abstract

This article explores the peat production impacts on Jukajoki river in Finland by implementing discourse analysis. Four discourses are explored: state truth statements; company statements that are in close proximity of state power; discourses provided by the local community Selkie, who provided counter-narratives to the official views; and finally media and related discourses. In conclusion, the discourses by the state and closely related actors (A–B) comprised implementation of their power and justifying it at the expense of those who are excluded from such power, in this case the village. The village narrative (C) contains elements that strongly contradict the statements provided by those with power. The results indicate local communities should be taken more seriously. The systematic denial of local peoples’ rights should be reviewed, and local participation in environmental permit assessments implemented.

Keywords

Peat production Fish death Discourse analysis Jukajoki North Karelia Finland Local knowledge 

References

Official Documents

  1. Agency for Environmental Permits for Eastern Finland. Environmental Permit for the “Linnunsuo” Peat Production Area, 2003. Dnro ISY-2002-Y-192 (In Finnish).Google Scholar
  2. Center of Economic Development, Transport and the Environment—CEDTE. Decision. POKELY/469/07.00/2010. 23rd November 2010 (In Finnish).Google Scholar
  3. Center of Economic Development, Transport and the Environment—CEDTE. Decision. POKELY/469/07.00/2010. 3rd November 2011 (In Finnish).Google Scholar
  4. Complaint Submitted by the Village Association of Selkie to the Center of Economic Development, Transport and the Environment—CEDTE, North Karelia, 26.07.2010 (In Finnish).Google Scholar
  5. (a) Complaint Submitted by the Village Association of Selkie to the Regional State Administrative Agency for Eastern Finland, 28.1.2011 (In Finnish).Google Scholar
  6. (b) Clarifying Explanation of the Village Association of Selkie in Response to the Response Provided by the Company “VAPO”, submitted 23.5.2011 at the Regional State Administrative Agency—Eastern Finland (In Finnish).Google Scholar
  7. Police. The Report for the Criminal Investigation. 16.02.2012. 8480/R/10360/11 (In Finnish).Google Scholar
  8. Regional State Administrative Agency-RAA. Decision. ISAVI/13/04.08/2011 (In Finnish).Google Scholar
  9. Regional State Administrative Agency-RAA. Decision. ISAVI/9/04.08/2012 (In Finnish).Google Scholar
  10. VAPO. Suggestion for a Course of Action. 17.11.2010. Submitted at the Center of Economic Development, Transport and the Environment in Joensuu (In Finnish).Google Scholar
  11. VAPO. Response to the Complaint Submitted by the Village Association of Selkie. 20.4.2011 (In Finnish).Google Scholar
  12. (a) VAPO. A Letter to the Village of Selkie. February 2012 (In Finnish).Google Scholar

Published Sources

  1. Beck, U. 1999. World at risk. Malden: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  2. Berkes, F. 1999. Sacred ecology—Traditional ecological knowledge and resource management. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  3. Ettlinger, N. 2011. Governmentality as epistemology. Annals of Association of American Geographers 101: 537–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Foucault, M. 1990. Intellectuals and power. In Discourses: Conversations in postmodern art and culture, ed. Ferguson, R, W. Olander, M. Tucker, K. Fiss, 471 pp. New York: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  5. Foucault, M. 2005. Archaeology of knowledge. Tampere: Vastapaino (In Finnish).Google Scholar
  6. Foucault, M. 2010. The order of things: An archaeology of human sciences. Helsinki: Gaudeamus (In Finnish).Google Scholar
  7. Husserl, E. 2011. The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. Helsinki: Gaudeamus (In Finnish).Google Scholar
  8. Lehtinen, M. 2011. Afterword by the translator. In The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology, ed. Husserl, E. Helsinki: Gaudeamus (In Finnish).Google Scholar
  9. Luotonen, E. 2006. Oura of the fisherman. In The unknown archipelagoThe lived landscape of Selkämeri Sea, ed. Häyrynen, M, E. Luotonen, E. Mustalampi, E. Bruk. Helsinki: Otava (In Finnish).Google Scholar
  10. Miettinen, T. 2012. Europe as a philosophical idea. Tieteessä tapahtuu 6: 3–12. (In Finnish).Google Scholar
  11. Mustonen, T. 2009. Never-ending life-world of peoples of the bear. Joensuu: Joensuun yliopisto (In Finnish, English summary).Google Scholar
  12. Mustonen, T. 2012a. Re-reading critical infrastructure—A view from the indigenous communities of the Russian Arctic. In Russian critical infrastructuresVulnerabilities and policies, ed. Pynnöniemi, K, 124 pp. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of International Affairs.Google Scholar
  13. Mustonen, T. 2012b. Rebirth of indigenous Arctic Nations and polar resource management: Critical perspectives from Siberia and Sámi areas of Finland. Biodiversity 1–9. doi:10.1080/14888386.2012.725652.
  14. Mustonen, T. 2013. Ice fishing cultures of North Karelia, Finland—The case of Puruvesi winter seining. In EcoculturesBlueprints for sustainable communities, ed. Böhm, S, Z. Bharucha, J. Pretty. Essex: University of Essex Press (in press).Google Scholar
  15. Mustonen, T., K. Mustonen, A. Aikio, and P. Aikio. 2010. Drowning reindeer, drowning homes—Indigenous Sámi and hydroelectricity development in Sompio, Finland. Kontiolahti: Snowchange Cooperative.Google Scholar
  16. Nevalainen, J. 2004. Knowledge politics of game of spaceA struggle for the change of city center. Joensuu: Joensuun yliopisto (In Finnish, English Summary).Google Scholar
  17. Orru, M., and H. Orru. 2008. Sustainable use of Estonian peat reserves and environmental challenges. Estonian Journal of Earth Sciences 2008: 87–93. doi:10.3176/earth.2008.2.04.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pynnöniemi, K. (ed.). 2012. Russian critical infrastructures—Vulnerabilities and policies. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of International Affairs.Google Scholar
  19. Rannikko, P, and N. Schuurman (eds.). 1997. The magic of living in the Taiga. Human and nature in the biosphere of North Karelia. Joensuu: Publications of Karelian Institute (In Finnish).Google Scholar
  20. Selkien kyläyhdistys. 2004. SelkieCultural village. Jyväskylä: Village Association of Selkie (In Finnish).Google Scholar
  21. Tanskanen, M. 2000. Behind the seenAn inquiry into cultural aspects of a landscape of a marsh-mire ditched for forestry. Joensuu: Joensuun yliopisto (In Finnish, English summary).Google Scholar
  22. (b) VAPO. 2012. Peat production on sulfide soil. Case Linnunsuo in Eastern Finland. In Geological survey of Finland. 7th International acid sulfate soil conference: Towards harmony between land use and the environment. Proceedings Volume. Vaasa: Geological Survey of Finland.Google Scholar
  23. Vesajoki, H, and M. Pihlatie. 2011. PielisjokiStream of life. Hyvinkää: Authors (In Finnish, English Summary).Google Scholar
  24. Wahlström, E, E. Hallanaro, and S. Manninen. 1996. Future of the Finnish environment. Helsinki: Edita (In Finnish).Google Scholar

Media Sources

  1. Engineering and Mining Journal. www.e-mj.com. Accessed March 2010.
  2. Hassi, S. 2010. Holy peat cow and fish deaths. Blog, www.satuhassi.fi. 17th November 2010. http://www.satuhassi.fi. Accessed 12 June 2013 (In Finnish).
  3. Karjalainen. Jukajoki is dead. Karjalainen 17.11.2010 (In Finnish).Google Scholar
  4. Karjalainen. The dead fish returned. Karjalainen 23.6.2011 (In Finnish).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Eastern FinlandJoensuuFinland

Personalised recommendations