Advertisement

AMBIO

, Volume 42, Issue 6, pp 659–674 | Cite as

Eco-certification of Farmed Seafood: Will it Make a Difference?

  • Malin Jonell
  • Michael Phillips
  • Patrik Rönnbäck
  • Max Troell
Review

Abstract

Eco-certification is widely considered a tool for reducing environmental impacts of aquaculture, but what are the likely environmental outcomes for the world’s fastest growing animal-food production sector? This article analyzes a number of eco-certification schemes based on species choice, anticipated share of the global seafood market, size of eligible producers, and targeted environmental impacts. The potential of eco-certification to reduce the negative environmental impacts of aquaculture at scale presently appears uncertain as: (a) certification schemes currently focus on species predominantly consumed in the EU and US, with limited coverage of Asian markets; (b) the share of certified products in the market as currently projected is too low; (c) there is an inequitable and non-uniform applicability of certification across the sector; (d) mechanisms or incentives for improvement among the worst performers are lacking; and (e) there is incomplete coverage of environmental impacts, with biophysical sustainability and ecosystem perspectives generally lacking.

Keywords

Eco-certification Aquaculture Seafood LCA Sustainability Environmental impacts 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank M. Beveridge for critical reading of the manuscript and also representatives of the standard holding organizations for providing valuable information on volumes of certified seafood. M. Jonell, P. Rönnbäck, and M. Troell have benefited from funding from Sida (the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency). This article contributes to the CGIAR Research Program on Livestock and Fish.

References

  1. Alder, J., B. Campbell, V. Karpouzi, K. Kaschner, and D. Pauly. 2008. Forage fish: From ecosystems to markets. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 33: 153–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. AquaGAP. 2012. Species certified by AquaGAP. http://www.aquagap.net/operators.htm. Accessed 29 Feb 2012.
  3. Auld, G., L.H. Gulbrandsen, and C.L. McDermott. 2008. Certification schemes and the impacts on forests and forestry. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 33: 187–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. BAP. 2012. http://www.aquaculturecertification.org/. Accessed 4 Dec 2012.
  5. Barbier, E.B. 2007. Valuing ecosystem services as productive inputs. Economic Policy 22: 177–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bartley, D.M., C. Brugère, D. Soto, P. Gerber, and B. Harvey. 2007. Comparative assessment of the environmental costs of aquaculture and other food production sectors: Methods for meaningful comparisons. In FAO Fisheries Proceedings No. 10. FAO: Rome, 241 pp.Google Scholar
  7. Belton, B., and D. Little. 2007. The development of aquaculture in central Thailand: Domestic demand versus export-led production. Journal of Agrarian Change 8: 123–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Belton, B., and D.C. Little. 2011. Contemporary visions for small-scale aquaculture. In Contemporary visions for world small-scale fisheries, ed. R. Chuenpagdee, 400 pp. Delft: Eburon.Google Scholar
  9. Belton, B., F. Murray, J. Young, T. Telfer, and D.C. Little. 2010. Passing the Panda standard: A TAD off the mark? AMBIO 39: 2–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Belton, B., M.M. Haque, D.C. Little, and L.X. Sinh. 2011. Certifying catfish in Vietnam and Bangladesh: Who will make the grade and will it matter? Food Policy 36: 289–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Beveridge, M.C.M., L.G. Ross, and L.A. Kelly. 1994. Aquaculture and biodiversity. AMBIO 23: 497–502.Google Scholar
  12. Burridge, L., J.S. Weis, F. Cabello, J. Pizarro, and K. Bostick. 2010. Chemical use in salmon aquaculture: A review of current practices and possible environmental effects. Aquaculture 306: 7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bush, S.R., and B. Belton. 2011. Out of the factory and into the fish pond: Can certification transform Vietnamese Pangasius. In Food practices in transitionChanging food consumption, retail and production in the age of reflexive modernity, ed. G. Spaargaren, P. Oosterveer, and L. Loeber, 356 pp. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Cao, L., J.S. Diana, G.A. Keoleian, and Q. Lai. 2011. Life cycle assessment of Chinese shrimp farming systems targeted for export and domestic sales. Environmental Science and Technology 45: 6531–6538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Corsin, F., S. Funge-Smith, and J. Clausen. 2007. A qualitative assessment of standards and certification schemes applicable to aquaculture in the Asia-Pacific region. Bangkok: RAP Publication 2007/25 APFIC/FAO, 98 pp.Google Scholar
  16. Deutsch, L., S. Gräslund, C. Folke, M. Troell, M. Huitric, N. Kautsky, and L. Lebel. 2007. Feeding aquaculture growth through globalization: Exploitation of marine ecosystems for fishmeal. Global Environmental Change 17: 238–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Diana, J.S. 2009. Aquaculture production and biodiversity conservation. BioScience 59: 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Environmental Law Institute. 2008. Gold standard for sustainable aquaculture ecolabel design. Technical report. Washington, DC, 107 pp.Google Scholar
  19. FAO. 2006. State of world aquaculture 2006. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 500. Rome: FAO, 134 pp.Google Scholar
  20. FAO. 2009. Measuring the contribution of small-scale aquaculture. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper No. 534. Rome: FAO, 180 pp.Google Scholar
  21. FAO. 2010a. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2010. Rome: FAO, 197 pp.Google Scholar
  22. FAO. 2010b. Fishery and aquaculture statistics 2008. Rome: FAO, 72 pp.Google Scholar
  23. FAO. 2012a. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2012. Rome: FAO, 209 pp.Google Scholar
  24. FAO. 2012b. FishStatJ, 2012. Version 2.0.0. Aquaculture production (quantities and values) 1950–2010 (Release date: March 2012). FAO Fisheries and aquaculture department.Google Scholar
  25. Fischer, C., F. Aguilar, P. Jawahar, and R. Sedjo. 2005. Forest certification: Toward common standards. Discussion Paper 05-10. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, 28 pp.Google Scholar
  26. Foley, J.A., N. Ramankutty, K.A. Brauman, E.S. Cassidy, J.S. Gerber, M. Johnston, N.D. Mueller, C. O′Connell, et al. 2011. Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478: 337–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Friends of the Sea. 2012. Species certified by FOS. http://www.friendofthesea.org/certified-products.asp. Accessed 29 Feb 2012.
  28. Froese, R., and A. Proelss. 2012. Evaluation and legal assessment of certified seafood. Marine Policy 36: 1284–1289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. GlobalGAP. 2011. GlobalGAP annual report 2011. http://www.globalgap.org/cms/upload/Resources/Publications/Newsletter/120321_AR11_web-FINAL.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2012.
  30. GlobalGAP. 2012. Press release, European seafood exposition, Brussels 24–26 April 2012. http://www.globalgap.org/cms/front_content.php?idart=2584_. Accessed 21 June 2012.
  31. Godfray, H.C.J., J.R. Beddington, I.R. Crute, L. Haddad, D. Lawrence, J.F. Muir, J. Pretty, S. Robinson, et al. 2010. Food security: The challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327: 812–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gräslund, S., K. Holmström, and A. Wahlström. 2003. A field survey of chemicals and biological products used in shrimp farming. Marine Pollution Bulletin 46: 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gulbrandsen, L.H. 2009. The emergence and effectiveness of the Marine Stewardship Council. Marine Policy 33: 654–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hall, S.J., A. Delaporte, M.J. Phillips, M. Beveridge, and M. O′Keefe. 2011. Blue frontiers: Managing the environmental cost of aquaculture, 92. Penang: The WorldFish Center.Google Scholar
  35. Henriksson, P.J.G., J.B. Guinée, R. Kleijn, and G.R. Snoo. 2011. Life cycle assessment of aquaculture systems—A review of methodologies. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 17: 304–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. ISEAL. 2010. Assessing the impacts of social and environmental standards systems v1.0, ISEAL code of good practice. http://www.isealalliance.org/sites/default/files/P041_ISEAL_Impacts_Codev1.0.pdf. Accessed 4 July 2012.
  37. Islam, M.S. 2005. Nitrogen and phosphorus budget in coastal and marine cage aquaculture and impacts of effluent loading on ecosystem: Review and analysis towards model development. Marine Pollution Bulletin 50: 48–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jacquet, J., and D. Pauly. 2008. Funding priorities: Big barriers to small-scale fisheries. Conservation Biology 22: 832–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jacquet, J., J. Hocevar, S. Lai, P. Majluf, N. Pelletier, T. Pitcher, E. Sala, R. Sumaila, et al. 2009. Conserving wild fish in a sea of market-based efforts. Oryx 44: 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jacquet, J., D. Pauly, D. Ainley, S. Holt, P. Dayton, and J. Jackson. 2010. Seafood stewardship in crisis. Nature 467: 28–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kalfagianni, A., and P. Pattberg. 2013. Fishing in muddy waters: Exploring the conditions for effective governance of fisheries and aquaculture. Marine Policy 38: 124–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kawarazuka, N., and C. Béné. 2010. Linking small-scale fisheries and aquaculture to household nutritional security: An overview. Food Security 2: 343–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kharas, H. 2010. The emerging middle class in developing countries. OECD, Working paper no. 285, 61 pp.Google Scholar
  44. Khiem, N., S. Bush, N. Chau, and V. Loc. 2010. Upgrading small-holders in the Vietnamese Pangasius value chain. Final report, ODI grant number RO334. An Giang University, Wageningen University and Can Tho University.Google Scholar
  45. Klinger, D., and R. Naylor. 2012. Searching for solutions in aquaculture: Charting a sustainable course. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 37: 247–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Krkošek, M., J.S. Ford, A. Morton, L. Subhash, M.A. Ransom, and M.A. Lewis. 2007. Declining wild salmon populations in relation to parasites from farm salmon. Science 318: 1772–1775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lewis, R.R. III, M.J. Phillips, B. Clough, and D.J. Macintosh. 2003. Thematic review on coastal wetland habitats and shrimp aquaculture. Report prepared under the World Bank, NACA, WWF and FAO Consortium Program on Shrimp Farming and the Environment, 81 pp.Google Scholar
  48. Lind, C.E., R.E. Brummet, and R.W. Ponzoni. 2012. Exploitation and conservation of fish genetic resources in Africa: Issues and priorities for aquaculture development and research. Reviews in Aquaculture 4: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mcleod, E., G.L. Chmura, S. Bouillon, R. Salm, M. Björk, C.M. Duarte, C.E. Lovelock, W.H. Schlesinger, et al. 2011. A blueprint for blue carbon: toward an improved understanding of the role of vegetated coastal habitats in sequestering CO2. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 9: 552–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: Wetlands and water synthesis. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute, 68 pp.Google Scholar
  51. Moberg, F., and P. Rönnbäck. 2003. Ecosystem services of the tropical seascape: Interactions, substitutions and restoration. Ocean and Coastal Management 46: 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mungkung, R.T., H. Udo De Haes, and R. Clift. 2006. Potentials and limitations of life cycle assessment in setting ecolabelling criteria: A case study of Thai shrimp aquaculture product. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 11: 55–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Naylor, R.L., R.J. Goldburg, J.H. Primavera, N. Kautsky, M.C. Beveridge, J. Clay, C. Folke, J. Lubchenco, et al. 2000. Effect of aquaculture on world fish supplies. Nature 405: 1017–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Parkes, G., J. Young, S. Walmsley, R. Abel, J. Harman, P. Horvat, A. Lem, A. MacFarlane, et al. 2010. Behind the signs—A global review of fish sustainability information schemes. Reviews in Fisheries Science 18: 344–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pauly, D., V. Christensen, S. Guénette, T.J. Pitcher, U.R. Sumaila, C.J. Walters, R. Watson, and D. Zeller. 2002. Towards sustainability in world fisheries. Nature 418: 689–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pelletier, N.L., and P. Tyedmers. 2008. Life cycle considerations for improving sustainability assessments in seafood awareness campaigns. Environmental Management 42: 918–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pelletier, N.L., P. Tyedmers, U. Sonesson, A. Scholz, F. Ziegler, A. Flysjo, S. Kruse, B. Cancino, et al. 2009. Not all salmon are created equal: Life cycle assessment (LCA) of global salmon farming systems. Environmental Science and Technology 43: 8730–8736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Phillips, M.J., M. Beveridge, F. Weirowski, W. Rogers, and A. Padiyar. 2011. Financing smallholder aquaculture enterprises. WorldFish Center Policy Brief, 2011-07, 20. Penang: The WorldFish Center, 8 pp.Google Scholar
  59. Pieniak, Z., W. Verbeke, and J. Scholderer. 2010. Health-related beliefs and consumer knowledge as determinants of fish consumption. Journal of Human Nutrition & Dietetics 23: 480–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Potts, T., R. Brenna, C. Pita, and G. Lowrie. 2011. Sustainable seafood and eco-labelling: The marine stewardship council, UK consumers, and fishing industry perspectives. SAMS Report: 270-211 Scottish Association for Marine Science, Oban, 78 pp.Google Scholar
  61. Primavera, J.H. 1997. Socio-economic impacts of shrimp culture. Aquaculture Research 28: 815–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Reardon, T., C.P. Timmer, and B. Minten. 2010. Supermarket revolution in Asia and emerging development strategies to include small farmers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109: 12332–12337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rönnbäck, P., I. Bryceson, and N. Kautsky. 2002. Coastal aquaculture development in eastern Africa and the Western Indian Ocean: Prospects and problems for food security and local economies. AMBIO 31: 537–542.Google Scholar
  64. Shrimp Aquaculture Dialogue Global Steering Committee (ShAD). 2011. Draft standards for responsible shrimp aquaculture, version 3.0 for guidance development and field testing, 104 pp.Google Scholar
  65. Stokstad, E. 2011. Seafood eco-label grapples with challenge of proving its impact. Science 334: 746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Subasinghe, R.P., and M.J. Phillips. 2007. Aquaculture certification: A challenge for the small farmer? FAO Aquaculture Newsletter 38: 34–36.Google Scholar
  67. Tacon, A.G.J., and M. Metian. 2009. Fishing for feed or fishing for food: Increasing global competition for small pelagic forage fish. AMBIO 38: 294–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Thrane, M., F. Ziegler, and U. Sonesson. 2009. Eco-labelling of wild-caught seafood products. Journal of Cleaner Production 17: 416–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tlusty, M.F. 2012. Environmental improvement of seafood through certification and ecolabelling: Theory and analysis. Fish and Fisheries 13: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Toranzo, A.E., B. Magariños, and J.L. Romalde. 2005. A review of the main bacterial fish diseases in mariculture systems. Aquaculture 246: 37–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Troell, M., P. Tyedmers, N. Kautsky, and P. Rönnbäck. 2004. Aquaculture and energy use. In: The encyclopedia of energy, vol. 1, ed. C. Cleveland, 784 pp. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  72. Umesh, N.R., A.B. ChandraMohan, G. Ravibabu, P.A. Padiyar, M.J. Phillips, C.V. Mohan, and B. Vishnu Bhat. 2010. Shrimp farmers in India: Empowering small-scale farmers through a cluster-based approach. In Success stories in Asian aquaculture, eds. S.S. De Silva and F.B. Davy, 214 pp. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  73. Vandergeest, P. 2007. Certification and communities: Alternatives for regulating the environmental and social impacts of shrimp farming. World Development 35: 1152–1171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Vandergeest, P., and M. Flaherty. 1999. A political ecology of shrimp aquaculture in Thailand. Rural Sociology 64: 573–596.Google Scholar
  75. Volpe, J.P., J. Gee, M. Beck, and V. Ethier. 2011. How green is your eco-label? Comparing the environmental benefits of marine aquaculture standards. Victoria, BC: University of Victoria, 104 pp.Google Scholar
  76. Walters, B., P. Rönnbäck, J. Kovacs, B. Crona, S. Hussain, R. Badola, J.H. Primavera, E.B. Barbier, et al. 2008. Ethnobiology, socio-economics and management of mangrove forests: A review. Aquatic Botany 89: 220–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Ward, J.T. 2008. Measuring the success of seafood ecolabelling. In Seafood ecolabelling principles and practice, eds. J.T. Ward and B. Phillips, 472 pp. Singapore: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  78. Washington, S., and L. Ababouch. 2011. Private standards and certification in fisheries and aquaculture. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 553. Rome: FAO, 181 pp.Google Scholar
  79. World Wildlife Fund (WWF). 2012. Motivation to species targeted for certification. http://www.worldwildlife.org/what/globalmarkets/aquaculture/dialogues-faqs.html#. Accessed 29 Feb 2012.Google Scholar
  80. World Wildlife Fund (WWF) Switzerland and Norway. 2007. Benchmarking study on international aquaculture certification programmes. Zurich, Oslo: WWF, 74 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Malin Jonell
    • 1
    • 5
  • Michael Phillips
    • 2
  • Patrik Rönnbäck
    • 1
    • 5
  • Max Troell
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Gotland UniversityVisbySweden
  2. 2.The WorldFish CenterPenangMalaysia
  3. 3.The Beijer InstituteSwedish Royal Academy of SciencesStockholmSweden
  4. 4.Stockholm Resilience CentreStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden
  5. 5.Uppsala UniversityVisbySweden

Personalised recommendations