AMBIO

, Volume 41, Issue 7, pp 709–719 | Cite as

What’s the Problem? River Management, Education, and Public Beliefs

Report

Abstract

This paper invokes the theory of planned behavior (TPB) as a diagnostic tool to explain an existing public education program’s limited success at improving river water quality in the City of Perth, Western Australia. A reflective, client-driven research approach was used. A facilitated expert workshop defined an environmental problem (excess nutrients leaving gardens and entering waterways) and a desired behavior (residents purchasing environmentally sensitive fertilizer) to address the problem. A TPB-based belief elicitation survey captured respondents’ beliefs regarding the desired behavior. The findings suggest respondents were aware of the links between purchasing environmentally sensitive fertilizer and river water quality. However, this behavior is compromised by the challenges in identifying appropriate products, product quality concerns, and cost. Viewing the content of a public education program through the lens of the TPB reveals insights into how and why the program fell short in achieving one of its key behavioral change goals.

Keywords

Theory of planned behavior Human behavior in the environment Water quality Urban water catchment River management 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The research project on which this paper is based was funded by the Swan River Trust’s Swan-Canning Research Innovation Program, Perth Western Australia. The authors thank the detailed comments of the reviewers that significantly improved this paper.

References

  1. Ahmed, S. 1990. Cleaning the River Ganga: Rhetoric and reality. AMBIO 19: 42–45.Google Scholar
  2. Ajzen, I. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50: 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ajzen, I., and M. Fishbein. 1980. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Ajzen, I., and A.S. Manstead. 2007. Changing health-related behaviours: An approach based on the theory of planned behaviour. In The scope of social psychology, ed. M. Hewstone, H.A.W. Schut, J.B.F. De Wit, K. Van Den Bos, and M.S. Stroebe, 43–63. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  5. Arana, J.E., and C. Leon. 2008. Do emotions matter? Coherent preferences under anchoring and emotional effects. Ecological Economics 66: 700–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ballantyne, R., and K. Hughes. 2006. Using front-end and formative evaluation to design and test persuasive bird feeding warning signs. Tourism Management 27: 235–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barth, C.A. 1995. Nutrient movement from the lawn to the stream. Watershed Protection Techniques 2: 239–246.Google Scholar
  8. Beeton, S., B. Weiler, and S.H. Ham. 2005. Contextual analysis for applying persuasive communication theory to managing visitor behaviour: A scoping study at Port Campbell National Park. Gold Coast: Sustainable Tourism Cooperative Research Centre.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, T., S. Ham, and M. Hughes. 2010. Picking up litter: An application of theory-based communication to influence tourist behaviour in protected areas. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 18: 879–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clayton, S. 2007. Domesticated nature: Motivations for gardening and perceptions of environmental impact. Journal of Environmental Psychology 27: 215–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Collier, G., and P. Smith. 2009. Beyond lip service: A council approach to planning for behaviour change. Australian Journal of Environmental Education 25: 129–138.Google Scholar
  12. Connelly, N.A., and B.A. Knuth. 2002. Using the co orientation model to compare community leaders’ and local residents’ views about Hudson River ecosystem restoration. Society & Natural Resources 15: 933–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cullinane, S., and K. Cullinane. 1999. Attitudes towards traffic problems and public transport in the Dartmoor and Lake District National Parks. Journal of Transport Geography 7: 79–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Duxbury, D., K. Keasey, H. Zhang, and S. Loong Chow. 2005. Mental accounting and decision making. Evidence under reverse conditions where money is spent for time saved. Journal of Economic Psychology 26: 567–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eaton, B., and D. Holding. 1996. The evaluation of public transport alternatives to the car in British national parks. Journal of Transport Geography 4: 55–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fishbein, M., and I. Ajzen. 2010. Changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  17. Fishbein, M., and M.J. Manfredo. 1992. A theory of behavior change. In Influencing human behavior: Theory and applications in recreation, tourism, and natural resources management, ed. M.J. Manfredo. Champaign: Sagamore Publishing.Google Scholar
  18. Fishbein, M., and M.C. Yzer. 2003. Using theory to design effective health behavior interventions. Communication Theory 13: 164–183.Google Scholar
  19. Fogarty, E., J. Huston, R. Maskin, B. Van Belleghem, and S. Vang. 2007. Phosphorus free for Lake Ripley: Community-based social marketing program to use phosphorus-free lawn fertilizer. University of Wisconsin-Madison. Retrieved May 22, 2008, from http://lakeripley1.homestead.com/management.html.
  20. Gerritse, R. 2000. Nutrients, water quality and algal blooms in the Canning catchment. Report for the Canning Catchment Coordinating Group, Perth, Western Australia.Google Scholar
  21. Ham, S., and E. Krumpe. 1996. Identifying audiences and messages for nonformal environmental education—a theoretical framework for interpreters. Journal of Interpretation Research 1: 11–23.Google Scholar
  22. Ham, S., B. Weiler, M. Hughes, T.J. Brown, J. Curtis, and M. Poll. 2008. Asking visitors to help: Research to guide strategic communication for protected area management. Gold Coast: Sustainable Tourism Cooperative Research Centre.Google Scholar
  23. Ham, S., T.J. Brown, J. Curtis, B. Weiler, M. Hughes, and M. Poll. 2009. Promoting Persuasion in Protected Areas: A Guide for Managers Who Want to Use Strategic Communication to Influence Visitor Behaviour. Gold Coast, Australia: Sustainable Tourism Cooperative Research Centre. Retrieved November, 2010, from http://www.crctourism.com.au/BookShop/.
  24. Hendee, J.C., and C.P. Dawson. 2002. Wilderness management: Stewardship and protection of resources and values, 3rd ed. Golden, CO: Fulcrum Publishing.Google Scholar
  25. Holding, D.M., and M. Kreutner. 1998. Achieving a balance between “carrots” and “sticks” for traffic in national parks: The Bayerischer Wald project. Transport Policy 5: 175–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Howard, J., and D. McGregor. 2002. Reducing nutrient enrichment of waterways through public education: A tale of two cities. Environmental Conservation 27: 351–358.Google Scholar
  27. Hughes, M., J. Curtis, and B. Weiler. 2009. Optimizing the Development and Use of Persuasive Communication to Influence Behaviour in The Swan-Canning River System. Perth, Western Australia: Swan River Trust. Retrieved June 22, 2010, from http://www.swanrivertrust.wa.gov.au/.
  28. Hurlimann, A., S. Dolnicar, and P. Meyer. 2009. Understanding behaviour to inform water supply management in developed nations—A review of literature, conceptual model and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Management 91: 47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jones, P., and L. Sloman. 2002. Encouraging behavioral change through marketing and management: What can be achieved? Paper read at Paper presented at the 10th International Conference on Travel Behavior Research, Lucerne, August 2003.Google Scholar
  30. Koppel, S., J. Charlton, B. Fildes, and M. Fitzharris. 2008. How important is vehicle safety in the new vehicle purchase process? Accident Analysis and Prevention 40: 994–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Littlefair, C., and R. Buckley. 2008. Interpretation reduces ecological impacts of visitors to world heritage sites. AMBIO 37: 338–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Manning, R. 2003. Emerging principles for using information/education in wilderness management. International Journal of Wilderness 9: 20–27.Google Scholar
  33. Marion, J.L., and S.E. Reid. 2007. Minimizing visitor impacts to protected areas: The efficacy of low impact education programs. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 15: 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McDade, K.W. 2008. Greener grass? Factors related to reducing environmental impacts of lawn care companies. PhD thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  35. McKenzie-Mohr, D., and W. Smith. 1999. Fostering sustainable behavior: An introduction to community-based social marketing, education for sustainability. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers.Google Scholar
  36. Najib, A. 1999. Environmental knowledge and environmental attitudes: Wedinoon, Morocco. AMBIO 28: 404–408.Google Scholar
  37. Oceanica Consulting. 2005. Swan-Canning Cleanup Program Action Plan Final Evaluation Report [Parts A and B]. Report prepared for the Swan River Trust, Perth, Western Australia. Retrieved February 15, 2009, from, www.swanrivertrust.wa.gov.au.
  38. Odada, E., D. Olago, K. Kulindwa, M. Ntiba, and S. Wandiga. 2004. Mitigation of environmental problems in Lake Victoria, East Africa: Causal chain and policy options analysis. AMBIO 33: 13–23.Google Scholar
  39. Rast, W., and M. Holland. 1988. Eutrophication of lakes and reservoirs: A framework for making management decisions. AMBIO 17: 2–12.Google Scholar
  40. Reigner, N., and S. Lawson. 2009. Improving the efficacy of visitor education in Haleakalā National Park using the Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Interpretation Research 14: 21.Google Scholar
  41. Robbins, P. 2007. Lawn people: How grasses, weeds, and chemicals make us who we are. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Roggenbuck, J. 1992. Use of persuasion to reduce resource impacts and visitor conflicts. In Influencing human behavior: Theory and application in recreation, tourism and natural resources management, ed. M. Manfredo. Champaign, IL: Sagamore Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
  43. South East Regional Centre for Urban Landcare. 2008. Fertilize Wise Campaign. Retrieved September, 2008, from http://www.sercul.org.au/fertilise_wise.html.
  44. Steiner, T.J., and A.L. Bristow. 2000. Road pricing in national parks: A case study in the Yorkshire Dales National Park. Transport Policy 7: 93–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sutton, S. 2002. Using social cognition models to develop health behavior interventions: Problems and assumptions. In Changing health behavior: Intervention and research with social cognition models, ed. D. Rutter, and L. Quine. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  46. van den Putte, B., and G. Dhondt. 2005. Developing successful communication strategies: A test of an integrated framework for effective communication. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 35: 2399–2420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. van der Stoep, G., and J. Roggenbuck. 1996. Is your park being “loved to death?”: Using communications and other indirect techniques to battle the park “love bug”. In Congestion and Crowding in the National Park System: Guidelines for Management and Research, ed. D. W. Lime. St. Paul: Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  48. Vlaev, I., N. Chater, R. Lewis, and G. Davies. 2009. Reason-based judgments: Using reasons to decouple perceived price-quality correlation. Journal of Economic Psychology 30: 721–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Weaver, D. 1993. Managing nutrient losses from rural point sources and urban environments. Fertilizer Research 36: 165–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Weller, R. 2009. Boomtown 2050. Scenarios for a rapidly growing city. Perth, WA: UWA Press.Google Scholar
  51. Werner, C.M. 2003. Changing homeowners’ use of toxic household products: A transactional approach. Journal of Environmental Psychology 23: 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yamamoto, Y., A. Suzuki, Y. Fuwa, and T. Sato. 2008. Decision making in electrical appliance use in the home. Energy Policy 36: 1679–1686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Curtin UniversityPerthAustralia
  2. 2.Southern Cross UniversityLismoreAustralia
  3. 3.Monash Sustainability InstituteMonash UniversityClaytonAustralia

Personalised recommendations