AMBIO

, Volume 41, Issue 4, pp 327–340 | Cite as

A Review of the Elements of Human Well-Being with an Emphasis on the Contribution of Ecosystem Services

  • J. K. Summers
  • L. M. Smith
  • J. L. Case
  • R. A. Linthurst
Review Paper

Abstract

Natural ecosystems perform fundamental life-support services upon which human civilization depends. However, many people believe that nature provides these services for free and therefore, they are of little or no value. While we do not pay for them, we pay significantly for their loss in terms of wastewater treatment facilities, moratoriums on greenhouse gases, increased illnesses, reduced soil fertility and losses in those images of nature that contribute to our basic happiness. Little is understood about the well-being benefits of the natural environment and its ecosystem services. The interwoven relationship of ecosystems and human well-being is insufficiently acknowledged in the wider philosophical, social, and economic well-being literature. In this article, we discuss an approach to examine human well-being and the interactions of its four primary elements—basic human needs, economic needs, environmental needs, and subjective well-being—and ecosystem services.

Keywords

Ecosystem services Human well-being Sustainability Ecological economics Subjective happiness 

Notes

Disclaimer

The information in this document has been funded wholly (or in part) by the US Environmental Protection Agency. It has been subjected to review by the National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory and approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents reflect the views of the Agency, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.

References

  1. Ackerman, F., L. Heinzerling, and R.I. Massey. 2007. Wrong in retrospect: Cost-benefit analysis of past successes, 7–35. In Frontiers in ecological economic theory and application, eds. J.D. Erickson, and J.M. Gowdy, 365 pp. Chelterham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  2. Akpalu, W. 2009. Economics of biodiversity and sustainable fisheries management. Ecological Economics 68: 2729–2733.Google Scholar
  3. Albrecht, G. 2005. Solastalgia, a new concept in human health and identity. Philosophy Activism Nature 3: 41–44.Google Scholar
  4. Arana, J.E., and C.J. Leon. 2009. Understanding the use of non-compensatory decision rules in discrete choice experiments: The role of emotions. Ecological Economics 68: 2316–2326.Google Scholar
  5. Aristotle. 1984. The complete works of Aristotle. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Aronson, J., S.J. Milton, and J.N. Blignaut. 2007. Restoring natural capital: Science, business and practice, 384. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  7. Balvanera, P., A.B. Pfisterer, N. Buchmann, J. He, T. Nakashizuka, D. Raffaelli, and B. Schmid. 2006. Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. Ecology Letters 9: 1146–1156.Google Scholar
  8. Bellenger, M.J., and A.T. Herlihy. 2009. An economic approach to environmental indices. Ecological Economics 68: 2216–2223.Google Scholar
  9. Bentham, J. 1995. The Panopticon writings. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  10. Berleant, A. 1992. The aesthetics of environment. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bond, C.A., K.G. Cullen, and D.M. Larsen. 2009. Joint estimation of discount rates and willingness to pay for public goods. Ecological Economics 68: 2751–2758.Google Scholar
  12. Boyd, J. 2008. Counting nonmarket, ecological public goods: the elements of a welfare-significant ecological quantity index. Discussion Paper, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, RFF DP 97–42.Google Scholar
  13. Boyd, J., and S. Banzhaf. 2007. What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecological Economics 63: 616–626.Google Scholar
  14. Boyd, J., D. King, and L. Wainger. 2001. Compensation for lost ecosystem services: The need for benefits-based transfer ratios and restoration criteria. Stanford Environmental Law Journal 20: 393–412.Google Scholar
  15. Campbell, D.E. 2000. Using emergy systems theory to define, measure and interpret ecological integrity and ecosystem health. Ecosystem Health 6: 181–204.Google Scholar
  16. Carroll, N., J. Fox, and R. Bayon (eds.). 2008. Conservation and biodiversity banking, 298. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  17. Chambers, C.M., and J.C. Whitehead. 2003. A contingent valuation estimate of the benefits of wolves in Minnesota. Environmental and Resource Economies 26: 249–267.Google Scholar
  18. Chavas, J.P. 2009. On the productive value of biodiversity. Environmental Resource Economics 42: 109–131.Google Scholar
  19. Chepesiuk, R. 2009. Missing the dark: Health effects of light pollution. Environmental Health Perspectives 117: A20–A27.Google Scholar
  20. Chichilnisky, G., and G. Heal. 1998. Economic returns from the biosphere. Nature 391: 629–630.Google Scholar
  21. Clark, D., and M. McGillivray. 2007. Measuring human well-being: Key findings and policy lesions. United Nations University, World Institute for Development Economics Research. Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
  22. Cloninger, C.R. 2004. Feeling good: The science of well-being, 374. Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Cohn, S., and D. Horm-Wingerd. 1993. Children and the environment: Ecological awareness among preschool children. Environment and Behavior 25: 103–120.Google Scholar
  24. Collard, D. 2006. Research on well-being: Some advice from Jeremy Bentham. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36: 330–354.Google Scholar
  25. Colombo, S., A. Angus, J. Morris, D.J. Parsons, M. Brawn, K. Stacey, and N. Hanley. 2009. A comparison of citizen and “expert” preferences using an attribute-based approach to choice. Ecological Economics 68: 2834–2841.Google Scholar
  26. Costanza, R. 1991. Ecological economics: The science and management of sustainability, 525. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Costanza, R., B. Fisher, S. Ali, C. Beer, L. Bond, R. Boumans, N.L. Danigelis, J. Dickinson, et al. 2007. Quality of life: An approach integrating opportunities, human needs and subjective well-being. Ecological Economics 61: 267–276.Google Scholar
  28. Costanza, R., O. Perez-Maqueo, M.L. Martinez, P. Sutton, S.J. Anderson, and K. Mulder. 2008. The value of coastal wetlands for hurricane protection. AMBIO 37: 241–248.Google Scholar
  29. Cropper, M.L. 2000. Has economic research answered the needs of environmental policy? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 39: 328–350.Google Scholar
  30. Daily, G.C. 1997. Nature’s services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems, 391. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  31. Daily, G.C. 2000. Management objectives for the protection of ecosystem services. Environmental Science & Policy 3: 333–339.Google Scholar
  32. Daily, G.C., S. Alexander, P.R. Ehrlich, L. Goulder, J. Lubchenco, P.A. Matson, H.A. Mooney, S. Postel, S.H. Schneider, D. Tilman, and G.M. Woodwell. 1997. Ecosystem services: Benefits supplied to human societies by natural ecosystems. In Biodiversity and human health, eds. F. Grifo, and J. Rosenthal, Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  33. Daily, G., P. Dasgupta, B. Bolin, P. Crosson, J. du Guerny, P. Ehrlich, C. Folke, A.M. Jansson, B. Jansson, N. Kautsky, A. Kinzig, S. Levin, K. Mäler, P. Pinstrup-Andersen, D. Siniscalco, and B. Walker. 1998. Food production, population growth, and the environment. Science 281: 1291–1292.Google Scholar
  34. Dasgupta, P. 2001. Human well-being and the natural environment, 351. Oxford: Oxford Press.Google Scholar
  35. Daskon, C.D. 2008. Gross national happiness: A new paradigm. Towards global transformation: Proceedings of the third international conference on gross national happiness. The Centre for Bhutan Studies, 167–182. Thimphu, Bhutan.Google Scholar
  36. de Groot, R.B.A., and L.M. Hermans. 2009. Broadening the picture: Negotiating payment schemes for water-related environmental services in the Netherlands. Ecological Economics 68: 2760–2767.Google Scholar
  37. de Groot, R.S., M.A. Wilson, and R.M.J. Boumans. 2002. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics 41: 393–408.Google Scholar
  38. Dekkers, J.E.C., and J.W. van der Straaten. 2009. Monetary valuation of aircraft noise: A hedonic analysis around Amsterdam airport. Ecological Economics 68: 2850–2858.Google Scholar
  39. Descartes, R. 1650. Collected works. In: Great books of the Western World, ed. Adler, M.J., 223–588. Chicago: Britannica.Google Scholar
  40. Diener, E., and M.E.P. Seligman. 2004. Beyond money: Toward an economy of well-being. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 5: 1–31.Google Scholar
  41. Diette, G.B., N. Lechtzin, E. Haponik, A. Devrotes, and H.R. Rubin. 2003. Distraction therapy with nature sights and sounds reduces pain during flexible bronchoscopy. Chest 123: 941–948.Google Scholar
  42. Englin, J., D. Lambert, and W.D. Shaw. 1997. A structural equations approach to modeling consumptive recreation demand. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 33: 31–43.Google Scholar
  43. Faber Taylor, A.F., F.E. Kuo, and W.C. Sullivan. 2001a. Coping with ADD: The surprising connection to green play settings. Environmental Behavior 33: 54–77.Google Scholar
  44. Faber Taylor, A.F., F.E. Kuo, and W.C. Sullivan. 2001b. Views of nature and self-discipline: Evidence from inner city children. Journal of Environmental Psychology 21: 1–15.Google Scholar
  45. Faber, S., R. Costanza, D.L. Childers, J. Erickson, K. Gross, M. Grove, C.S. Hopkins, J. Kahn, et al. 2006. Linking ecology and economics for ecosystem management. BioScience 56: 121–133.Google Scholar
  46. Fisher, B.P., and J.D. Erickson. 2007. Growth and equity: Kaldor-Kuznets-Solow consensus, 53–71. In Frontiers in ecological economic theory and application, eds. J.D. Erickson, and J.M. Gowdy, 365 pp. Chelterham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  47. Freeman III, M.A. 2003. The measurement of environmental and resource values resources for the future. Washington, DC: RFF Press.Google Scholar
  48. Frey, B.S., S. Luechinger, and A. Stutzer. 2009. The life satisfaction approach to environmental valuation. IZA Discussion Paper No. 4478, Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
  49. Gigliotti, C.M., S.E. Jarrott, and J. Yorgason. 2004. Harvesting health: Effects of three types of horticultural therapy activities for persons with dementia. Dementia 3: 161–170.Google Scholar
  50. Guo, Z., X. Xiao, and D. Li. 2000. An assessment of ecosystem services: Water flow regulation and hydroelectric power production. Ecological Applications 10: 925–936.Google Scholar
  51. Guyatt, G.H., D.H. Feeny, and D.L. Patrick. 1993. Measuring health-related quality of life. Annals of Medicine 118: 622–629.Google Scholar
  52. Harris, J.M. 2007. Reorienting macroeconomic theory towards environmental sustainability, 36–52. In Frontiers in ecological economic theory and application, eds. J.D. Erickson, and J.M. Gowdy, 365 pp. Chelterham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  53. Heerwagen, J.H., and G.H. Orians. 2002. The ecological world of children. In Children and nature, eds. P.H. Kahn, and S.R. Kellert, 29–64. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  54. Holmlund, C.M., and M. Hammer. 1999. Ecosystem services generated by fish populations. Ecological Economics 29: 253–268.Google Scholar
  55. Hoyos, D., P. Mariel, and J. Fernandez-Macho. 2009. The influence of cultural identity on the WTP to protect natural resources: Some empirical evidence. Ecological Economics 68: 2372–2381.Google Scholar
  56. Jackson, L.E. 2003. The relationship of urban design to human health and condition. Landscape and Urban Planning 64: 191–200.Google Scholar
  57. Jackson, L.E., E.D. Hilborn, and J.C. Thomas. 2006. Towards landscape design guidelines for reducing Lyme disease risk. International Journal of Epidemiology 35: 315–322.Google Scholar
  58. Jordan, S.J., S.E. Hayes, D. Yoskowitz, L.M. Smith, J.K. Summers, M. Russell, and W.H. Benson. 2010. Accounting for natural resources and environmental sustainability: Linking ecosystem services to human well-being. Environmental Science and Technology 44: 1530–1536.Google Scholar
  59. Jørgensen, S.E., S.N. Nielsen, and H. Mejer. 1995. Emergy, environ, exergy and ecological modeling. Ecological Modelling 77: 109–399.Google Scholar
  60. Jorgenson, A.K. 2003. Consumption and environmental degradation: A cross-national analysis of the ecological footprint. Social Problems 50: 374–394.Google Scholar
  61. Kahn Jr, P.H. 1999. The human relationship with nature, 281. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  62. Kahn Jr, P.H., and S.R. Kellert. 2002. Children and nature: Psychological, sociocultural and evolutionary investigations, 348. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  63. Kahnemann, D., E. Diener, and N. Schwarz (eds.). 1999. Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology, 593. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  64. Kaiser Family Foundation. 2005. Generation M: Media use in the lives of 8–18 year-olds. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.Google Scholar
  65. Kaplan, S. 1995. The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology 5: 169–182.Google Scholar
  66. Kaval, P., and J. Loomis. 2007. The relationship between well-being and wildfire. International Journal of Ecological Economics and Statistics 7: 29–43.Google Scholar
  67. Kellert, S.R., and E.O. Wilson. 1993. The biolphila hypothesis, 484. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  68. Kirby, M.A. 1989. Nature as refuge. Children’s Environments Quarterly 6: 3–7.Google Scholar
  69. Kumar, M., and P. Kumar. 2007. Valuation of the ecosystem services: A psycho-cultural perspective. Ecological Economics 64: 808–819.Google Scholar
  70. Kuo, F. 2001. Coping with poverty: Impacts of environment and attention in the inner city. Environment and Behavior 33: 5–34.Google Scholar
  71. Kuo, F., and W.G. Sullivan. 2001. Aggression and violence in the inner city: Effects of environment via mental fatigue. Environment and Behavior 33: 543–571.Google Scholar
  72. Layard, R. 2005. Happiness: Lessons from a new science. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  73. Lieberman, G.A., and L.L. Hoody. 1998. Closing the achievement gap: Using the environment as an integrating context for learning. San Diego, CA: State Education and Environment Roundtable.Google Scholar
  74. Lindahl, J.C. 2005. On my Swedish Island: Discovering the secrets of Scandinavian well-being, 301. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  75. Longcore, T., and C. Rich. 2004. Ecological light pollution. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2: 191–198.Google Scholar
  76. Losey, J.E., and M. Vaughan. 2006. The economic value of ecological services provided by insects. BioScience 56: 311–323.Google Scholar
  77. Louv, R. 2005. Last child in the woods: Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder, 390. Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin Books of Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
  78. Louv, R. 2008. The right to walk in the woods. http://www.childrenandnature.org/blog. Accessed 27 June 2008.
  79. Lubchenco, J. 1998. Entering the century of the environment: A new social contract for science. Science 279: 491–497.Google Scholar
  80. Malone, K. 2007. The bubble-wrap generation: Children growing up in walled gardens. Environmental Education Research 13: 513–527.Google Scholar
  81. Maslow, A.H. 1943. A theory of psychological motivation. Psychological Review 50: 370–396. Google Scholar
  82. Maslow, A.H. 1954. Motivation and personality, 236. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  83. Maslow, A.H. 1998. Maslow on management, 312 pp. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  84. McGillivray, M., and M. Clarke. 2006. Understanding human well-being. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
  85. Mendelsohn, R., and M. Balick. 1995. The value of undiscovered pharmaceuticals in tropical forests. Economic Botany 49: 223–228.Google Scholar
  86. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2003. Ecosystems and wellbeing: A framework for assessment. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
  87. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
  88. Moore, K.A., L. Lippman, and B. Brown. 2004. Indicators of child well-being: The promise for positive youth development. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 591: 125–145.Google Scholar
  89. Næss, A. 1989. Ecology, community and lifestyle, 223 pp. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  90. Naiman, R.R. 2006. Healing night: The science and spirit of sleeping, dreaming and awakening, 227. Minneapolis: Syren Book Company.Google Scholar
  91. New Economics Foundation (nef). 2005. Well-being and the environment, 11. London, UK.Google Scholar
  92. New Economics Foundation (nef). 2009. The unhappy planet index 2.0. Friends of the earth.Google Scholar
  93. Nicholls, S., and J.L. Crompton. 2005. The impact of greenways on property values: Evidence from Austin, Texas. Journal of Leisure Research 37: 241–321.Google Scholar
  94. Nussbaum, M.C. 1992. Human functioning and social justice. Political Theory 20: 202–206.Google Scholar
  95. Paine, T. 1996. Rights of man. Ware: Wordsworth.Google Scholar
  96. Parks, P., and M. Bonifaz. 1994. Nonsustainable use of renewable resources: Mangrove deforestation and mariculture in Ecuador. Marine Resource Economics 9: 1–18.Google Scholar
  97. Parris, T.M., and R.W. Kates. 2003. Characterizing and measuring sustainable development. Annual Review of Environmental Resources 28: 559–5865.Google Scholar
  98. Perry, A.L., P.J. Low, J.R. Ellis, and J.D. Reynolds. 2005. Climate change and distribution shifts in marine fishes. Science 308: 1912–1915.Google Scholar
  99. Peterson, C.H., and J. Lubchenco. 1997. Marine ecosystem services. In Natures’ services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems, ed. G. Daily, 177–194. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  100. Pimental, D., R. Zuniga, and D. Morrison. 2005. Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecological Economics 52: 273–288.Google Scholar
  101. Plato. 1956. Protagoras. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
  102. Postel, S., and S. Carpenter. 1997. Freshwater ecosystem services, 195–214: In Nature’s services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems, ed. G.C. Daily, 391 pp. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  103. Poudyal, N.C., D.G. Hodges, J.M. Bowker, and H.K. Cordell. 2003. Evaluating natural resources amenities in a human life expectancy production function. Ecological Economics 68: 253–258.Google Scholar
  104. Pretty, J., J. Peacock, R. Hine, M. Sellens, N. South, and M. Griffin. 2007. Green exercise in the UK countryside: Effects on health and psychological well-being, and implications for policy and planning. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 50: 211–231.Google Scholar
  105. Raffestin, C., and R. Lawrence. 1990. An ecological perspective on housing, health and well-being. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare 17: 143–160.Google Scholar
  106. Rapport, D.J., R. Costanza, and A.J. McMichael. 1998. Assessing ecosystem health. TREE 13: 397–402.Google Scholar
  107. Rockel, M.L., and M.J. Kealy. 1991. The value of nonconsumptive wildlife recreation in the United States. Land Economics 67: 422–434.Google Scholar
  108. Sanchez-Azofeifa, A., A. Pfaff, J.A. Robalino, and J.P. Boomhower. 2007. Cosa Rica’s payment for ecosystem services program: Intention, implementation and impact. Conservation Biology 21: 1165–1173.Google Scholar
  109. Sandhu, H.S., S.D. Wratten, R. Cullen, and B. Case. 2007. The future of farming: The value of ecosystem services in conventional and organic arable land. An experimental approach. Ecological Economics 64: 835–848.Google Scholar
  110. Sandhu, H.S., S.D. Wratten, and R. Cullen. 2010. Organic agriculture and ecosystem services. Environmental Science & Policy 13: 1–7.Google Scholar
  111. Schneider, B. 2009. Nature-deficit disorder tops list of important stories. New West, December 31, 2009. www.newwest.net. Accessed 25 June 2010.
  112. Sen, A. 1985. Commodities and capabilities. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  113. Snelgrove, P.V.R. 1999. Getting to the bottom of marine biodiversity: Sedimentary habitats. BioScience 49: 129–138.Google Scholar
  114. Soares, W.L., and M.F. de Souza Porto. 2009. Estimating the social cost of pesticide use: An assessment from acute poisoning in Brazil. Ecological Economics 68: 2721–2728.Google Scholar
  115. Southwick Associates. 2007. Sportfishing in America: An economic engine and conservation powerhouse. Produced for the American Sportfishing Association, 11.Google Scholar
  116. Spinoza, B. 1955. Works of Spinoza. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  117. Srinivasan, J.T., and V. Ratna Reddy. 2009. Impact of irrigation water quality on human health: A case study in India. Ecological Economics 68: 2800–2807.Google Scholar
  118. Stoll, J.R., R.B. Ditton, and T.L. Eubanks. 2006. Platte River birding and the spring migration: Humans, value and unique ecological resources. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 11: 241–254.Google Scholar
  119. Sutton-Smith, B. 1990. School playground as festival. Children’s Environments Quarterly 7: 3–7.Google Scholar
  120. Talberth, J., C. Cobb, and N. Slattery. 2006. The genuine progress indicator 2006—a tool for sustainable development. Redefining progress—the nature of economics, 31. Oakland, CA.Google Scholar
  121. Taylor, P.W. 1986. Respect for nature: A theory of environmental ethics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  122. Theodoropoulou, S., and F. Zuleeg. 2009. What do citizens want? Well-being measurement and its importance for European social policy-making. EPC Issue Paper No. 59. Europe’s Political Economy Programme. ISSN 1782-494X.Google Scholar
  123. Tuan, Y.-F. 1961. Topophilia, or sudden encounter with the landscape. Landscape 11: 29–32.Google Scholar
  124. Ulrich, R.S. 1999. Effects of gardens on health outcomes: Theory and research. In Healing gardens. Therapeutic benefits and design recommendations, eds. M.C. Cooper, and B. Marni, 27–86. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  125. US Government Accountability Office (GAO). 2007. Measuring our natural resources and environmental sustainability. GAO-08-127SP. Washington, DC. http://www.gao.gov/cgi-bin/getrpt?GAO-08-127SP. Accessed 24 June 2010.
  126. van Noy, R. 2008. A natural sense of wonder: Connecting kids with nature through the seasons, 164. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
  127. Veenhoven, R. 2004. Happiness as a public policy aim: The greatest happiness principle. In Positive psychology in practice, eds. P.A. Linley, and S. Joseph, 658–678. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  128. Vemuri, A.W., and R. Costanza. 2006. The role of human, social, built and natural capital in explaining life satisfaction at the country level: Toward a national well-being index (NWI). Ecological Economics 58: 119–133.Google Scholar
  129. Verbeek, P., and F.B.M. de Waal. 2002. The primate relationship with nature: Biophilia as a general pattern. In Children and nature, eds. P.H. Kahn, and S.R. Kellert, 1–28. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  130. Vitousek, P.M., H.A. Mooney, J. Lubchenco, and J.M. Melillo. 1997. Human domination of earth’s ecosystems. Science 277: 494–499.Google Scholar
  131. Wackernagel, M., N. Schultz, D. Deumling, A. Linares, V. Kapos, C. Montfredo, J. Loh, N. Myers, et al. 2002. Tracking the ecological overshoot of the human economy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99: 9266–9271.Google Scholar
  132. Waterman, A. 1993. Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (Eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64: 678–691.Google Scholar
  133. Welsch, H. 2009. Implications of happiness research for environmental economics. Ecological Economics 68: 2735–2742.Google Scholar
  134. Wilson, M.A., and S.R. Carpenter. 1999. Economic valuation of freshwater ecosystem services in the United States: 1971–1997. Ecological Applications 9: 772–783.Google Scholar
  135. World Economic Forum. 2002. Environmental sustainability index; main report, global leaders of tomorrow environmental task force, world economic forum. www.ciesin.columbia.edu/indicators/ESI.
  136. World Wildlife Fund. 2008. Living planet report 2008. Gland: WWF. Accessed 28 June 2010.Google Scholar
  137. Worm, B., E.B. Barbier, N. Beaumont, J.E. Duffy, C. Folke, B.S. Halpern, J.B.C. Jackson, H.K. Lotze, et al. 2006. Impacts of biodiversity loss on ocean ecosystem services. Science 314: 787–790.Google Scholar
  138. Wunscher, T., S. Engel, and S. Wunder. 2006. Payments for environmental services in Costa Rica: Increasing efficiency through spatial differentiation. Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture 45: 317–335.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. K. Summers
    • 1
  • L. M. Smith
    • 1
  • J. L. Case
    • 1
  • R. A. Linthurst
    • 2
  1. 1.Gulf Ecology Division, National Health and Environmental Effects Research LaboratoryUS Environmental Protection AgencyGulf BreezeUSA
  2. 2.Office of Research and Development, Ecosystems Services Research ProgramUS Environmental Protection AgencyResearch Triangle ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations