AMBIO

, Volume 41, Issue 4, pp 341–349 | Cite as

The Impact of First-Generation Biofuels on the Depletion of the Global Phosphorus Reserve

Report

Abstract

The large majority of biofuels to date is “first-generation” biofuel made from agricultural commodities. All first-generation biofuel production systems require phosphorus (P) fertilization. P is an essential plant nutrient, yet global reserves are finite. We argue that committing scarce P to biofuel production involves a trade-off between climate change mitigation and future food production. We examine biofuel production from seven types of feedstock, and find that biofuels at present consume around 2% of the global inorganic P fertilizer production. For all examined biofuels, with the possible exception of sugarcane, the contribution to P depletion exceeds the contribution to mitigating climate change. The relative benefits of biofuels can be increased through enhanced recycling of P, but high increases in P efficiency are required to balance climate change mitigation and P depletion impacts. We conclude that, with the current production systems, the production of first-generation biofuels compromises food production in the future.

Keywords

Biofuels Phosphorus Climate change Trade-off 

References

  1. Agricultural Marketing Service. 2010. National weekly agricultural energy round-up. USDA, Livestock & Grain Market News 9 April 2010, Des Moines, Iowa.Google Scholar
  2. Aidoo, K.E. 1993. Post-harvest storage and preservation of tropical crops. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation 32: 161–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen, M.R., D.J. Frame, C. Huntingford, C.D. Jones, J.A. Lowe, M. Meinshausen, and N. Meinshausen. 2009. Warming caused by cumulative carbon emissions towards the trillionth tonne. Nature 458: 1163–1166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balat, M. 2007. Global bio-fuel processing and production trends. Energy Exploration and Exploitation 25: 195–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Balat, M., and H. Balat. 2009. Recent trends in global production and utilization of bio-ethanol fuel. Applied Energy 86: 2273–2282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Biofuels Platform. 2010. Production of Biofuel in the EU. Biofuels Platform, Lausanne. www.biofuels-platform.ch. Retrieved 27 May 2010.
  7. Boddey, R.M., L.H. Soares, B.J.R. Alves, and S. Urquiaga. 2008. Bio-ethanol production in Brazil. In Biofuels, solar and wind as renewable energy systems, ed. D. Pimentel. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Bouwman, L., K.K. Goldewijk, K.W. Van Der Hoek, A.H.W. Beusen, D.P. Van Vuuren, J. Willems, M.C. Rufino, and E. Stehfest. 2011. Exploring global changes in nitrogen and phosphorus cycles in agriculture induced by livestock production over the 1900–2050 period. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Published ahead of print May 16, 2011. doi:10.1073/pnas.1012878108.
  9. Bringezu, S., H. Schütz, M. O′Brien, L. Kauppi, R. W. Howarth, and J. McNeely 2009. Towards sustainable production and use of resources: Assessing biofuels. Paris: UNEP.Google Scholar
  10. Chernoff, C. B., and G. J. Orris. 2002. Data set of world phosphate mines, deposits, and occurrences—part A geologic data. US Geological Survey, Report 02–156–A, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  11. Cordell, D., J.O. Drangert, and S. White. 2009. The story of phosphorus: global food security and food for thought. Global Environmental Change 19: 292–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crutzen, P.J., A.R. Mosier, K.A. Smith, and W. Winiwarter. 2007. N2O release from agro-biofuel production negates global warming reduction by replacing fossil fuels. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physical Discussions 7: 11191–11205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cushion, E., A. Whiteman, and G. Dieterle. 2010. Bioenergy development; issues and impacts for poverty and natural resource management. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  14. Dairy Development Centre. 2010. Feed prices. www.ddc-wales.co.uk/public. Retrieved 20 June 2010.
  15. de Vries, B.J.M., D.P. van Vuuren, and M.M. Hoogwijk. 2007. Renewable energy sources: Their global potential for the first-half of the 21st century at a global level: An integrated approach. Energy Policy 35: 2590–2610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. de Vries, S.C., G.W.J. van de Ven, M.K. van Ittersum, and K.E. Giller. 2010. Resource use efficiency and environmental performance of nine major biofuel crops, processed by first-generation conversion techniques. Biomass and Bioenergy 34: 588–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Driver, J., D. Lijmbach, and I. Steen. 1999. Why recover phosphorus for recycling, and how? Environmental Technology 20: 651–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. ERS, USDA. 2009. Global agricultural supply and demand: Factors contributing to the recent increase in food commodity prices. Economic research service report WRS-0801, 30. Washington DC: United States Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
  19. European Environment Agency. 2009. EEA signals 2009: Key environmental issues facing Europe. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.Google Scholar
  20. Giampietro, M., S. Ulgiati, and D. Pimentel. 1997. Feasibility of large-scale biofuel production. BioScience 47: 587–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Haberl, H., T. Beringer, S.C. Bhattacharya, K.-H. Erb, and M. Hoogwijk. 2010. The global technical potential of bio-energy in 2050 considering sustainability constraints. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2: 394–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heffer, P. 2009. Assessment of fertilizer use by crop at the global level. Paris: International Fertilizers Industry Association.Google Scholar
  23. Herring, J., and R. Fantel. 1993. Phosphate rock demand into the next century: Impact on world food supply. Natural Resources Research 2: 226–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. International Energy Agency. 2008. Energy technology perspectives 2008: Scenarios and strategies to 2050. Paris: International Energy Agency.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jasinski, S. 2010. Mineral commodity summary. Reston: U.S. Geological Survey.Google Scholar
  26. Jasinski, S. 2011. Mineral commodity summary. Reston: U.S. Geological Survey.Google Scholar
  27. Jelsma, I., K. Giller, and T. Fairhurst. 2009. Smallholder oil palm production systems in Indonesia: Lessons learned from the NESP Ophir Project. Wageningen: Plant Sciences Group, Wageningen University.Google Scholar
  28. Kader, A. 2005. Increasing food availability by reducing post-harvest losses of fresh produce. Acta Hortensius 682: 2169–2176.Google Scholar
  29. Kauwenbergh, S. V. 2010. World phosphate rock reserves and resources. Alabama: Technical Bulletin-IFDC Muscle Shoals.Google Scholar
  30. Lavado, R.S., and M.A. Taboada. 2009. The Argentinean Pampas: A key region with a negative nutrient balance and soil degradation needs better nutrient management and conservation programs to sustain its future viability as a world agroresource. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 64: 150A–153A.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Leemans, R., and B. Eickhout. 2004. Another reason for concern: regional and global impacts on ecosystems for different levels of climate change. Global Environmental Change 14: 219–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Leemans, R., A.R. Van Amstel, C. Battjes, G.J.J. Kreileman, and A.M.C. Toet. 1996. The land cover and carbon cycle consequences of large-scale utilizations of biomass as an energy source. Global Environmental Change 6: 335–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Malaysian Palm Oil Board. 2010. www.mpob.gov.my. Retrieved 15 June 2010.
  34. Martinot, E. 2005. Renewables 2005 global status report. Washington, DC: Worldwatch Institute.Google Scholar
  35. Matthews, H.D., N.P. Gillett, P.A. Stott, and K. Zickfeld. 2009. The proportionality of global warming to cumulative carbon emissions. Nature 459: 829–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Meinshausen, M., N. Meinshausen, W. Hare, S.C.B. Raper, K. Frieler, R. Knutti, D.J. Frame, and M.R. Allen. 2009. Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2°C. Nature 458: 1158–1162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Molinos-Senante, M., F. Hernández-Sancho, R. Sala-Garrido, and M. Garrido-Baserba. 2011. Economic feasibility study for phosphorus recovery processes. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment 40: 408–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nature. 2010. Not quite assured. Nature 467: 1005–1006.Google Scholar
  39. OECD. 2008. Biofuels support policies: An economic assessment, 146. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  40. Ometto, R.A., M. Zwicky Hauschild, and W.N. Lopes Roma. 2009. Lifecycle assessment of fuel ethanol from sugarcane in Brazil. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 14: 236–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Parry, M.L.O.F.C., J.P. Palutikof, P.J. van der Linden, and C.E. Hanson. 2007. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Patzek, T.W. 2004. Thermodynamics of the corn-ethanol biofuel cycle. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 23: 519–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pimentel, D., C. Harvey, P. Resosudarmo, K. Sinclair, D. Kurz, M. McNair, S. Crist, L. Shpritz, L. Fitton, R. Saffouri, and R. Blair. 1995. Environmental and economic costs of soil erosion and conservation benefits. Science 267: 1117–1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pimentel, D., D. Pimentel, and T. W. Patzek. 2008. Ethanol production: energy and economic issues related to U.S. and Brazilian sugarcane. Biofuels, Solar and Wind as Renewable Energy Systems. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  45. Product Board MVO. 2009. Market analysis oils and fats for fuel, 40. Rijswijk, The Netherlands: Product Board Margarine, Fats and Oils.Google Scholar
  46. Pushparajah, E. F., and S. S. Magat. 1990. Phosphorus requirements and management of oil plam, coconut and rubber. In: Phosphorus requirements for sustainable agriculture in Asia and Oceania. Manila: IRRI.Google Scholar
  47. Ragauskas, A.J., C.K. Williams, B.H. Davison, G. Britovsek, J. Cairney, C.A. Eckert, W.J. Frederick Jr, J.P. Hallett, et al. 2006. The path forward for biofuels and biomaterials. Science 311: 484–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Renewable Fuels Agency. 2010. Detailed carbon intensity data 2010–11. www.renewablefuelsagency.gov.uk/sites/rfa/files/RFA_C_and_S_TG_Part_two_Detailed_carbon_intensity_data_2010-1_v3.xls. Retrieved 20 October 2010.
  49. Rosegrant, M. W. 2008. Biofuels and grain prices: impacts and policy responses. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
  50. Roy, R. N., A. Finck, G. J. Blair, and H. L. S. Tandon 2006. Plant Nutrition for Food Security: A guide for integrated nutrient management. Rome: FAO Fertilizer and Plant Nutrition Bulletin 16.Google Scholar
  51. Scheiner, J.D., R.S. Lavado, and R. Alvareza. 1996. Difficulties in recommending phosphorus fertilizers for soybeans in Argentina. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 27: 521–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schneider, S.H. 2001. What is a dangerous climate change. Nature 411: 17–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schuchardt, F., K. Wulfert, and T. Herawan. 2008. Protect the environment and make a profit from the waste in palm oil industry. Braunschweig: Johann Heinrich von Thunen-Institute & Institute of Agricultural Technology and Biosystems Engineering.Google Scholar
  54. Sharpley, A. 1995. Identifying sites vulnerable to phosphorus loss in agricultural runoff. Journal of Environmental quality 24: 947–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Simpson, T. W., L. A. Martinelli, A. N. Sharpley, and R. W. Howarth 2009. Impact of ethanol production on nutrient cycles and water quality: The United States and Brazil as case studies. In: Biofuels: Environmental Consequences and Interactions with Changing Land Use. R. Howarth and S. Bringezu (eds.). Ithaca: Cornell University.Google Scholar
  56. Smil, V. 2000. Phosphorus in the environment: Natural flows and human interferences. Annual Review of Energy and Environment 25: 53–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Smith, J.B., S.H. Schneider, M. Oppenheimer, G.W. Yohe, W. Hare, M.D. Mastrandrea, A. Patwardhan, I. Burton, et al. 2009. Assessing dangerous climate change through an update of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change IPCC ‘reasons for concern’. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106: 4133–4137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Solomon, S. 2009. Post-harvest deterioration of sugarcane. Sugar Technology 11: 109–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M.M.B. Tignor, and H.L. Miller (eds.). 2007. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Sparovek, G., and E. Schnug. 2001a. Soil tillage and precision agriculture: A theoretical case study for soil erosion control in Brazilian sugar cane production. Soil and Tillage Research 61: 47–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sparovek, G., and E. Schnug. 2001b. Temporal erosion-induced soil degradation and yield Loss. Soil Science Society of America Journal 65: 1479–1486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Steen, I. 1998. Phosphorus availability in the 21st century: management of a non-renewable resource. Phosphorus and Potassium 217: 25–31.Google Scholar
  63. Stewart, T.R.W. 2002. Inorganic phosphorus and potassium production and reserves. Better Crops 86: 6–10.Google Scholar
  64. Stewart, W., Hammond, L., and Kauwenbergh, S.J.V. 2005. Phosphorus as a natural resource. phosphorus: agriculture and the environment. Agronomy Monograph 46, Crop Science Society of America. Madison: Soil Science Society of America.Google Scholar
  65. The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. 2003. DIRECTIVE 2003/30/EC of 8 May 2003 on the promotion of the use of biofuels or other renewable fuels for transport. Official Journal of the European Union 123: 42–46.Google Scholar
  66. Tiessen, H., M.V. Ballester, and I. Salcedo. 2011. Phosphorus in action. In Phosphorus and global change, ed. E. Bünemann, A. Oberson, and E. Frossard. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  67. Tilman, D., R. Socolow, J.A. Foley, J. Hill, E. Larson, L. Lynd, S. Pacala, J. Reilly, T. Searchinger, C. Somerville, and R. Williams. 2009. Beneficial biofuels—The food, energy, and environment trilemma. Science 325: 270–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. USDA Agricultural Statistics Board. 2007. June crop report. Baton Rouge: National Agricultural Statistics Service.Google Scholar
  69. USDA Economics Research Service. 2010. Oil crops outlook. http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/MannUsda/viewDocumentInfo.do?documentID=1288. Retrieved 20 June 2010.
  70. Wicke, B., V. Dornburg, M. Junginger, and A. Faaij. 2008. Different palm oil production systems for energy purposes and their greenhouse gas implications. Biomass and Bioenergy 32: 1322–1337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. World Bank. 2009. Bioenergy development, issues and impacts for poverty and natural resource management. Agricultural and rural development series, 272. Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Environmental Systems Analysis GroupWageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations