AMBIO

, 40:762 | Cite as

Tipping Toward Sustainability: Emerging Pathways of Transformation

  • Frances Westley
  • Per Olsson
  • Carl Folke
  • Thomas Homer-Dixon
  • Harrie Vredenburg
  • Derk Loorbach
  • John Thompson
  • Måns Nilsson
  • Eric Lambin
  • Jan Sendzimir
  • Banny Banerjee
  • Victor Galaz
  • Sander van der Leeuw
Invited Paper

Abstract

This article explores the links between agency, institutions, and innovation in navigating shifts and large-scale transformations toward global sustainability. Our central question is whether social and technical innovations can reverse the trends that are challenging critical thresholds and creating tipping points in the earth system, and if not, what conditions are necessary to escape the current lock-in. Large-scale transformations in information technology, nano- and biotechnology, and new energy systems have the potential to significantly improve our lives; but if, in framing them, our globalized society fails to consider the capacity of the biosphere, there is a risk that unsustainable development pathways may be reinforced. Current institutional arrangements, including the lack of incentives for the private sector to innovate for sustainability, and the lags inherent in the path dependent nature of innovation, contribute to lock-in, as does our incapacity to easily grasp the interactions implicit in complex problems, referred to here as the ingenuity gap. Nonetheless, promising social and technical innovations with potential to change unsustainable trajectories need to be nurtured and connected to broad institutional resources and responses. In parallel, institutional entrepreneurs can work to reduce the resilience of dominant institutional systems and position viable shadow alternatives and niche regimes.

Keywords

Social-ecological systems Innovation Transformation Resilience transitions Sustainability 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge support from Stiftelsen Futura, Kjell and Märta Beijer Foundation, Formas, and Mistra through a core grant to the Stockholm Resilience Centre, a cross-faculty research centre at Stockholm University.

References

  1. Akvo. 2011. http://www.akvo.org/. Accessed 14 April 2011.
  2. Allenby, B. 1993. Supporting environmental quality: Developing an infrastructure for design. Environmental Quality Management 2: 303–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allenby, B., and D. Richards. 1994. The greening of industrial ecosystems. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  4. Almedom, A.M. 2004. Factors that mitigate war-induced anxiety and mental distress. Journal of Biosocial Science 36: 445–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Almedom, A.M., B. Tesfamichael, A. Yacob, Z. Debretsion, K. Teklehaimanot, T. Beyene, K. Kuhn, and Z. Alemu. 2003. Maternal psychosocial well-being in Eritrea: Application of participatory methods and tools of investigation and analysis in complex emergency settings. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 81: 360–366.Google Scholar
  6. Armitage, D., F. Berkes, and N. Doubleday (eds.). 2007. Adaptive co-management: Collaboration, learning and multilevel governance. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
  7. Aronson, E. 2008. The social animal, 10th edition ed. New York: Worth/Freeman.Google Scholar
  8. Arthur, B. 2009. The nature of technology: What it is and how it evolves. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  9. Banerjee, B. 2008. Designer as agent of change: A vision for catalyzing rapid change. Changing the Change Conference Proceedings, Torino. http://www.changingthechange.org. Accessed 14 April 2011.
  10. Barry, J., and S. Quilley. 2009. The transition to sustainability: Transition towns and sustainable communities. In Transition to sustainable living and practice, advances in ecopolitics, vol. 4, ed. L. Leonard, and J. Barry. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Group Ltd.Google Scholar
  11. Barthel, S., C. Folke, and J. Colding. 2010. Social-ecological memory in urban gardens: Retaining the capacity for management of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change 20: 255–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bason, C. 2011. Leading public sector innovation. Bristol: Public Policy Press.Google Scholar
  13. Bebbington, A. 1997. Social capital and rural intensification: Local organizations and islands of sustainability in the rural Andes. The Geographical Journal 163: 189–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Berkes, F. 2009. Evolution of co-management: Role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management 90: 1692–1702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Berkes, F. 2010. Devolution of environment and resources governance: Trends and future. Environmental Conservation 37: 489–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bodin, Ö., and B. Crona. 2009. The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference? Global Environmental Change 19: 366–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bormann, B.T., and A.R. Kiester. 2004. Options forestry: Acting on uncertainty. Journal of Forestry 102: 22–27.Google Scholar
  18. Brooks, S., J. Thompson, H. Odame, B. Kibaara, S. Nderitu, F. Karin, and E. Millstone. 2009. Environmental change and maize innovation in Kenya: Exploring pathways in and out of maize. STEPS Working Paper 36. Brighton: STEPS Centre.Google Scholar
  19. Brown, T. 2009. Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. New York: HarperBusiness.Google Scholar
  20. Burgelman, R.A. 1983. A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm. Administrative Science Quarterly 28: 223–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chapin III, F.S., S.R. Carpenter, G.P. Kofinas, C. Folke, N. Abel, W.C. Clark, P. Olsson, D.M. Stafford Smith, et al. 2010. Ecosystem stewardship: Sustainability strategies for a rapidly changing planet. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 25: 241–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Christensen, C.M., H. Baumann, R. Ruggles, and T.M. Sadtler. 2006. Disruptive innovation for social change. Harvard Business Review 84: 94–101.Google Scholar
  23. Clark, W.C. 2001. A transition toward sustainability. Ecology Law Quarterly 27: 1021–1076.Google Scholar
  24. Commoner, B. 1993. Making peace with the planet. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  25. Crona, B. 2006. Of mangroves and middlemen: a study of social and ecological linkages in a coastal community. PhD thesis. Stockholm: Stockholm University.Google Scholar
  26. Crowder, L.B., G. Osherenko, O.R. Young, S. Airame, E.A. Norse, N. Baron, J.C. Day, F. Douvere, et al. 2006. Resolving mismatches in US ocean governance. Science 313: 617–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Cundill, G., and C. Fabricius. 2010. Monitoring the governance dimension of natural resource comanagement. Ecology and Society 15: 15. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss1/.
  28. Dewulf, A., G. Francois, C. Pahl-Wostl, and T. Taillieu. 2007. A framing approach to cross-disciplinary research collaboration: Experiences from a large-scale research project on adaptive water management. Ecology and Society 12: 14. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss2/art14/.
  29. Dewulf, A., B. Gray, L. Putnam, R. Lewicki, N. Aarts, R. Bouwen, and C. van Woerkum. 2009. Disentangling approaches to framing in conflict and negotiation research: A meta-paradigmatic perspective. Human Relations 62: 155–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dietz, T., E. Ostrom, and P.C. Stern. 2003. The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302: 1902–1912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Edwards, C. 2010. Resilient nation. London: Demos.Google Scholar
  32. Ernstson, H., S. Barthel, E. Andersson, and S.T. Borgström. 2010. Scale-crossing brokers and network governance of urban ecosystem services: The case of Stockholm. Ecology and Society 15: 28. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art28/.
  33. ETC Group. 2010. The new biomasters: Synthetic biology and the next assault on biodiversity and livelihoods. ETC Group communiqué 104. http://www.etcgroup.org. Accessed 14 April 2011.
  34. Espinoza, J.L., and H. Vredenburg. 2010. Towards a model of wind energy industry development in industrial and emerging economies. Global Business and Economics Review 12: 203–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Feinberg, M., and R. Willer. 2011. Apocalypse soon? Dire messages reduce belief in global warming by contradicting just-world beliefs. Psychological Science 22: 34–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Folke, C., S.R. Carpenter, B.H. Walker, M. Scheffer, F.S. Chapin III, and J. Rockström. 2010. Resilience thinking: Integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecology and Society 15(4): 20. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art20/.
  37. Folke, C., Å. Jansson, J. Rockström, P. Olsson, S. Carpenter, A.-S. Crepín, G. Daily, J. Ebbesson, et al. 2011. Reconnecting to the biosphere. Ambio. doi: 10.1007/s13280-011-0184-y.
  38. Folke, C., T. Hahn, P. Olsson, and J. Norberg. 2005. Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30: 441–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Foster Brown, I. 2006. Monitoring fires in Southwestern Amazonia Rain Forests. Eos 87: 253–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Galaz, V., B. Crona, T. Daw, Ö. Bodin, M. Nyström, and P. Olsson. 2010. Can webcrawlers revolutionize ecological monitoring? Frontiers in Ecology and Environment 8: 99–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Garaway, C.J., and R.I. Arthur. 2004. Adaptive learning: A practical framework for the implementation of adaptive co-management. Lessons from selected experiences in South and Southeast Asia. London: MRAG.Google Scholar
  42. Geels, F.W., and J.W. Schot. 2007. Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy 36: 399–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gelcich, S., T. Hughes, P. Olsson, C. Folke, O. Defeo, M. Fernández, S. Foale, L.H. Gunderson, et al. 2010. Navigating transformations in governance of Chilean marine coastal resources. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107: 16794–16799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Giddens, A. 1976. New rules of sociological method: A positive critique of interpretative sociologies. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  45. Girard, R. 1990. Innovation and repetition. SubStance 62(63): 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Graedel, T., and B. Allenby. 1995. Industrial ecology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  47. Grau, H.R., and M. Aide. 2008. Globalization and land-use transitions in Latin America. Ecology and Society 13: 16.Google Scholar
  48. Grin, J., J. Rotmans, and J.W. Schot. 2010. Transitions to sustainable development: New directions in the study of long term transformative change. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
  49. Gunderson, L.H. 1999. Resilience, flexibility and adaptive management—antidotes for spurious certitude? Conservation Ecology 3: 7. http://www.consecol.org/vol3/iss1/art7/.
  50. Gutiérrez, N.L., R. Hilborn, and O. Defeo. 2011. Leadership, social capital and incentives promote successful fisheries. Nature 470: 386–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hall, J., and H. Vredenburg. 2003. The challenges of innovating for sustainable development. MIT Sloan Management Review Fall 45: 61–68.Google Scholar
  52. Higginson, N., and H. Vredenburg. 2010. Collaborating for sustainability: Strategic knowledge networks, natural resource management and regional development. International Journal of Sustainable Economy 2: 334–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hillman, K., M. Nilsson, T. Magnusson, and A. Rickne. 2011. Fostering sustainable technologies—a framework for analysing the governance of innovation systems. Science and Public Policy. Appeared online 10 Feb 2011.Google Scholar
  54. Holling, C.S. 2001. Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems 4: 390–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Holmgren, M., and M. Scheffer. 2001. El Niño as a window of opportunity for the restoration of degraded arid ecosystems. Ecosystems 4: 151–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Homer-Dixon, T. 1995. The ingenuity gap: Can poor countries adapt to resource scarcity? Population and Development Review 21: 587–612. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art16/.
  57. Homer-Dixon, T. 2000. The ingenuity gap. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  58. Huitema, D., and S. Meijerink (eds.). 2009. Water policy entrepreneurs: A research companion to water transitions around the globe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  59. Hwang, J., and C.M. Christensen. 2007. Disruptive innovation in health care delivery. Health Affairs 27: 1329–1335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kaiser, A. 2003. Redirecting infrasystems towards sustainability. In Individual and structural determinants of environmental practice, ed. A. Biel, B. Hansson, and M. Mårtensson. London: Ashgate Publishers.Google Scholar
  61. Kenny, B., H. Vredenburg, and A. Lucas. 2011. The new role of law in stimulating industrial innovation and regional development: The Canadian experience with reflexive law in reconciling economic development, environmental protection and entrepreneurship in the energy industry. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development (in press).Google Scholar
  62. Lambin, E.F., and P. Meyfroidt. 2011. Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108: 3465–3472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Lane, D., D. Pumain, and S. van der Leeuw. 2009. Complexity perspectives in innovation and social change. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Leach, M., I. Scoones, and A. Stirling. 2010. Dynamic sustainabilities: Technology, environment and social justice. Pathways to sustainability series. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  65. Loorbach, D. 2010. Transition management for sustainable development: A prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework. Governance 23: 161–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Loorbach, D., J. Van Bakel, G. Whiteman, and J. Rotmans. 2010. Business strategies for transitions towards sustainable systems. Business Strategy and the Environment 19: 133–146.Google Scholar
  67. Manring, S.L. 2007. Creating and managing interorganizational learning networks to achieve sustainable ecosystem management. Organization and Environment 20: 325–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Markard, J., and B. Truffer. 2008. Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework. Research Policy 37: 596–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Maunder, R.G., L. Molyn, D. Savage, M.A. Adam, N. Peladeau, D. Romano, M. Rose, and B. Schulman. 2008. Applying the lessons of SARS to pandemic influenza: An evidence-based approach to mitigating the stress experienced by healthcare workers. Canadian Journal of Public Health 99: 486–488.Google Scholar
  70. McSweeney, K., and O. Coomes. 2011. Climate-related disaster opens a window of opportunity for rural poor in northeastern Honduras. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108: 5203–5208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Moore, M.L., and F. Westley. 2011. Public sector policy and strategies for facilitating social innovation. Horizons. The Public Policy Journal March, 2011. http://www.pri-rp.gc.ca/page.asp?pagenm=2011_0061_Moore_Westley. Accessed 14 April 2011.
  72. Moser, T. 2001. MNCs and sustainable business practice: The case of the Colombian and Peruvian petroleum industries. World Development 29: 291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. National Endowment for Science, Technology and Arts (NESTA). 2010. The big green challenge. Final Evaluation Report. Executive Summary. http://www.nesta.org.uk/library/documents/BGC-Evaluation-Exec-Summary-FINAL.pdf. Accessed 14 April 2011.
  74. Nguyen, N.C., O.J.H. Bosch, and K.E. Maani. 2011. Creating ‘learning laboratories’ for sustainable development in biospheres: A systems thinking approach. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 28: 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Nonaka, I., and T. Nishiguchi (eds.). 2001. Knowledge emergence: Social, technical, and evolutionary dimensions of knowledge creation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Nonaka, I., and H. Takeuchi. 1995. The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  77. North, D.C. 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.Google Scholar
  78. Olsson, P., C. Folke, and T. Hahn. 2004. Social-ecological transformation for ecosystem management: The development of adaptive co-management of a wetland landscape in southern Sweden. Ecology and Society 9: 2 http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss4/art2.
  79. Olsson, P., L.H. Gunderson, S.R. Carpenter, P. Ryan, L. Lebel, C. Folke, and C.S. Holling. 2006. Shooting the rapids: Navigating transitions to adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society 11: 18. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art18/.
  80. Olsson, P., and V. Galaz. (2011). Social-ecological innovation and transformation. In Social innovation: blurring sector boundaries and challenging institutional arrangements, eds. A. Nicholls, and A. Murdoch (Forthcoming) London: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  81. Olsson, P., C. Folke, and T.P. Hughes. 2008. Navigating the transition to ecosystem-based management of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105: 9489–9494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Orts, E.W. 1995. Reflexive environmental law. Northwestern University Law Review 89: 1227–1340.Google Scholar
  83. Österblom, H., U.R. Sumaila, Ö. Bodin, J. Hentati Sundberg, and A.J. Press. 2010. Adapting to regional enforcement: Fishing down the governance index. PLoS One 5: e12832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Pahl-Wostl, C., J. Sendzimir, P. Jeffrey, J. Aerts, G. Berkamp, and K. Cross. 2007. Managing change toward adaptive water management through social learning. Ecology and Society 12: 30. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss2/art30/.
  85. Pelling, M., C. High, J. Dearing, and D. Smith. 2008. Shadow spaces for social learning: a relational understanding of adaptive capacity to climate change within organisations. Environment and Planning A 40: 867–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Petersen, H., and H. Vredenburg. 2009. Morals or economics? Institutional investor preferences for corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 90: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Porter, M., and M. Kramer. 2011. Creating shared value: How to reinvent capitalism—and unleash a wave of innovation and growth. Harvard Business Review January–February.Google Scholar
  88. Raskin, P., T. Banuri, G. Gallopin, P. Gutman, A. Hammond, R. Kates, and R. Swart. 2002. Great transition: The promise and lure of the times ahead. GTI Paper Series no.1. Boston: Stockholm Environmental Institute, Tellus Institute and Great Transition Initiative.Google Scholar
  89. Reij, C.P., and E.M.A. Smaling. 2008. Analyzing successes in agriculture and land management in Sub-Saharan Africa: Is macro-level gloom obscuring positive micro-level change? Land Use Policy 25: 410–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Rockefeller Foundation. 2008. Design for social impact. Workshop publication. New York: Rockefeller Foundation. http://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/news/publications/design-social-impact. Accessed 14 April 2011.
  91. Rockström, J., W. Steffen, K. Noone, Å. Persson, F.S. Chapin III, E.F. Lambin, T.M. Lenton, M. Scheffer, et al. 2009. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461: 472–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Rotmans, J., and D. Loorbach. 2009. Complexity and transition management. Journal of Industrial Ecology 13: 184–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Rudd, M.A. 2004. An institutional framework for designing and monitoring ecosystem-based fisheries management policy experiments. Ecological Economics 48: 109–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Schultz, L., A. Duit, and C. Folke. 2011. Participation, adaptive co-management, and management performance in the world network of biosphere reserves. World Development 39: 662–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Scoones, I., and J. Thompson. 2011. The politics of seed in Africa’s green revolution: Alternative narratives and competing pathways. IDS Bulletin 42: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Sendzimir, J., P. Magnuszewski, Z. Flachner, P. Balogh, G. Molnar, A. Sarvari, and Z. Nagy. 2008. Assessing the resilience of a river management regime: Informal learning in a shadow network in the Tisza River Basin. Ecology and Society 13: 11. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss1/art11/.
  97. Sheuerman, W. 2001. Reflexive law and the challenges of globalization. Journal of Political Philosophy 9: 81–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Steffen, W., Å. Persson, L. Deutsch, M. Williams, J. Zalasiewicz, C. Folke, J. Rockström, C. Crumley, et al. 2011. The Anthropocene: From global change to planetary stewardship. Ambio. doi: 10.1007/s13280-011-0185-x.
  99. Steffen, W., P.J. Crutzen, and J.R. McNeill. 2007. The Anthropocene: Are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature? Ambio 36: 614–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Strebel, P. 2004. The case for contingent governance. MIT Sloan Management Review 45: 59–66.Google Scholar
  101. The Royal Society. 2011. Knowledge, networks and nations—Global Scientific Collaboration in the 21st Century. London: The Royal Society. http://royalsociety.org/uploadedFiles/Royal_Society_Content/Influencing_Policy/Reports/2011-03-28-Knowledge-networks-nations.pdf. Accessed 14 April 2011.
  102. Thompson, J., S. Brooks, M. Morgan, E. Millstone, H. Odame, F. Karin, and A. Adwera. 2010a. Maize security ≠ food security? Breaking the ‘lock in’ to the dominant maize pathway. STEPS Maize Briefing Paper 4. Brighton: STEPS Centre.Google Scholar
  103. Thompson, J. S., M. Brooks, E. Morgan, H. Millstone, H. Odame, B. Kibaara, S. Nderitu, F. Karin, and A. Adwera. 2010b. Environmental change and maize innovation pathways in Kenya: Seeking resilience through diversity. STEPS Maize Briefing Paper 1. Brighton: STEPS Centre.Google Scholar
  104. Tjörnbo, O., F. Westley, and D. Riddell. 2010. Case study: The Great Bear Rainforest. SiG@Waterloo Case Study 003. Waterloo, Canada: University of Waterloo. http://sig.uwaterloo.ca/sites/default/files/documents/SiG%20GBRF%20Web_Feb2%202010.pdf. Accessed 14 April 2011.
  105. van den Berg, J. 2010. Environment versus growth—a criticism of “degrowth” and a plea for “a-growth”. Ecological Economics 70: 881–890.Google Scholar
  106. van der Leeuw, S. 2010. The archaeology of innovation: Lessons for our times. In Innovation: Perspectives for the 21st Century, 33–53. Madrid: BBVA.Google Scholar
  107. Walker, B.H., C.S. Holling, S.R. Carpenter, and A. Kinzig. 2004. Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society 9: 5. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art5.
  108. Walker, B.H., N. Abel, J. M. Anderies, and P. Ryan. 2009. Resilience, adaptability, and transformability in the Goulburn-Broken Catchment, Australia. Ecology and Society 14: 12. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art12/.
  109. Walker, B.H., and F. Westley. 2011. Perspectives on resilience to disasters across sectors and cultures. Ecology and Society 16: 4. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss2/art4/.
  110. WeAdapt. 2011. http://www.weadapt.org/. Accessed 14 April 2011.
  111. Westley, F. 1990. Middle management and strategy: Microdynamics of inclusion. Strategic Management Journal 11: 337–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Westley, F. 2002. The devil in the dynamics: Adaptive management on the front lines. In Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems, ed. L.H. Gunderson, and C. S. Holling. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  113. Westley, F., and N. Antadze. 2010. Making a difference: Strategies for scaling social innovation for greater impact. The Innovation Journal 15, article 2.Google Scholar
  114. Westley, F., M.Q. Patton, and B. Zimmerman. 2006. Getting to maybe: How the world is changed. Toronto: Random House Canada.Google Scholar
  115. Westley, F., and H. Vredenburg. 1997. Interorganizational collaboration and the preservation of global biodiversity. Organization Science 8: 381–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frances Westley
    • 1
  • Per Olsson
    • 2
  • Carl Folke
    • 2
    • 3
  • Thomas Homer-Dixon
    • 4
    • 5
  • Harrie Vredenburg
    • 6
    • 7
  • Derk Loorbach
    • 8
  • John Thompson
    • 9
  • Måns Nilsson
    • 10
  • Eric Lambin
    • 11
    • 12
  • Jan Sendzimir
    • 13
  • Banny Banerjee
    • 14
    • 15
  • Victor Galaz
    • 2
  • Sander van der Leeuw
    • 16
    • 17
  1. 1.Social Innovation GenerationUniversity of WaterlooKitchenerCanada
  2. 2.Stockholm Resilience CentreStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden
  3. 3.Beijer Institute of Ecological Economics, Royal Swedish Academy of SciencesStockholmSweden
  4. 4.Waterloo Institute for Complexity and InnovationUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada
  5. 5.Centre for International Governance Innovation, Balsillie School of International AffairsWaterlooCanada
  6. 6.Haskayne School of BusinessUniversity of CalgaryAlbertaCanada
  7. 7.Institute for Sustainable Energy, Environment & EconomyUniversity of CalgaryAlbertaCanada
  8. 8.Faculty of Social Sciences, Dutch Research Institute for Transitions (DRIFT)Erasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands
  9. 9.ESRC STEPS Centre, Institute of Development StudiesUniversity of SussexBrightonUK
  10. 10.Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI)StockholmSweden
  11. 11.Department of GeographyUniversity of LouvainLouvainBelgium
  12. 12.Georges Lemaître Centre for Earth and Climate Research, Earth and Life InstituteUniversité catholique de LouvainLouvain-la-NeuveBelgium
  13. 13.The International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)LaxenburgAustria
  14. 14.Stanford Design Group and Stanford Change LabsStanfordUSA
  15. 15.Hasso Plattner Institute of DesignStanfordUSA
  16. 16.School of Sustainability and School of Human Evolution and Social ChangeArizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  17. 17.ASU-GIOSTempeUSA

Personalised recommendations