AMBIO

, Volume 40, Issue 3, pp 274–284 | Cite as

Effects of Natural Disasters on Conservation Policies: The Case of the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake, China

  • Andrés Viña
  • Xiaodong Chen
  • William J. McConnell
  • Wei Liu
  • Weihua Xu
  • Zhiyun Ouyang
  • Hemin Zhang
  • Jianguo Liu
Report

Abstract

Conservation policies are increasing in response to human-induced ecosystem degradation, but little is known about their interplay with natural disasters. Through an analysis of satellite imagery and field data we evaluated the impacts of a devastating earthquake on forest recovery and avoided forest loss estimated to have been obtained by two of the largest conservation programs in the world. Results show that more than 10% of the forests in Wenchuan County, Sichuan province, China were immediately affected by the 2008 earthquake, offsetting some gains in forest cover observed since the enactment of the conservation programs. But without the enactment of these conservation programs, the combined effects of human disturbance and earthquake-induced landslides could have severely reduced the region’s forest cover. The continuation—and enhancement—of incentives for participation in conservation programs will be important for reducing the environmental impacts of the combined effects of human disturbance and natural hazards not only in the study area but also in many disaster-prone regions around the world.

Keywords

Conservation Grain-to-Green Program Natural disasters Natural Forest Conservation Program Payments for ecosystem services Wenchuan Earthquake 

References

  1. An, L., M. Linderman, J. Qi, A. Shortridge, and J. Liu. 2005. Exploring complexity in a human-environment system: An agent-based spatial model for multidisciplinary and multiscale integration. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 95: 54–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Araújo, M.B., R.G. Pearson, W. Thuiller, and M. Erhard. 2005. Validation of species-climate impact models under climate change. Global Change Biology 11: 1504–1513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berry, P.A.M., J.D. Garlick, and R.G. Smith. 2007. Near-global validation of the SRTM DEM using satellite radar altimetry. Remote Sensing of Environment 106: 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Botha, J., E.T.F. Witkowski, and J. Cock. 2006. The South African experience of conservation and social forestry outreach nurseries. Environmental Management 38: 733–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Browder, J.O. 2002. Conservation and development projects in the Brazilian Amazon: Lessons from the community initiative program in Rondonia. Environmental Management 29: 750–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caldwell, J.C. 1976. Toward a restatement of demographic transition theory. Population and Development Review 2: 321–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen, X.D., F. Lupi, G.M. He, and J.G. Liu. 2009a. Linking social norms to efficient conservation investment in payments for ecosystem services. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106: 11812–11817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen, X.D., F. Lupi, G.M. He, Z.Y. Ouyang, and J.G. Liu. 2009b. Factors affecting land reconversion plans following a payment for ecosystem service program. Biological Conservation 142: 1740–1747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cincotta, R.P., J. Wisnewski, and R. Engelman. 2000. Human population in the biodiversity hotspots. Nature 404: 990–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crk, T., M. Uriarte, F. Corsi, and D. Flynn. 2009. Forest recovery in a tropical landscape: What is the relative importance of biophysical, socioeconomic, and landscape variables? Landscape Ecology 24: 629–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Daily, G.C., and P.A. Matson. 2008. Ecosystem services: From theory to implementation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105: 9455–9456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. DeFries, R.S., J.A. Foley, and G.P. Asner. 2004. Land-use choices: Balancing human needs and ecosystem function. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2: 249–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dilley, M., R.S. Chen, U. Deichmann, A.L. Lerner-Lam, M. Arnold, J. Agwe, P. Buys, O. Kjekstad, B. Lyon, and G. Yetman. 2005. Natural disaster hotspots: A global risk analysis. Version 1.0 edition. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  14. Fan, J. 2009. Assessment of resource/environment carrying capacity. Beijing: Science Press.Google Scholar
  15. Foley, J.A., R. DeFries, G.P. Asner, C. Barford, G. Bonan, S.R. Carpenter, F. Chapin, M.T. Coe, G.C. Daily, H.K. Gibbs, J.H. Helkowski, T. Holloway, E.A. Howard, C.J. Kucharik, C. Monfreda, J.A. Patz, I.C. Prentice, N. Ramankutty, and P.K. Snyder. 2005. Global consequences of land use. Science 309: 570–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2010. Global Forest Resources Assessment FRA 2010. Country Report. China.Google Scholar
  17. Ghate, R. 2003. Global gains at local costs: Imposing protected areas—evidence from central India. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 10: 377–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hanley, J.A., and B.J. McNeil. 1982. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143: 29–36.Google Scholar
  19. He, L. 2004. Option for accelerating surplus rural labor migration in China. Problem of Agricultural Economy 5: 37–40. Google Scholar
  20. He, G.M., X.D. Chen, W. Liu, S. Bearer, S.Q. Zhou, L.Y.Q. Cheng, H.M. Zhang, Z.Y. Ouyang, and J.G. Liu. 2008. Distribution of economic benefits from ecotourism: A case study of Wolong Nature Reserve for giant pandas in China. Environmental Management 42: 1017–1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. He, G.M., X. Chen, S. Bearer, M. Colunga, A. Mertig, L. An, S.Q. Zhou, M. Linderman, Z. Ouyang, S. Gage, S. Li, and J. Liu. 2009. Spatial and temporal patterns of fuel collection in Wolong Nature Reserve: Implications for panda conservation. Landscape and Urban Planning 92: 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jensen, J.R. 1996. Introductory digital image processing, a remote sensing perspective, 2nd ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  23. Johannesen, A.B., and A. Skonhoft. 2005. Tourism, poaching and wildlife conservation: What can integrated conservation and development projects accomplish? Resource and Energy Economics 27: 208–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kathuria, S., and K.N. Ganeshaiah. 2002. Tectonic activities shape the spatial patchiness in the distribution of global biological diversity. Current Science 82: 76–81.Google Scholar
  25. Liu, J.G. 2010. China’s road to sustainability. Science 328: 50–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Liu, J.G., and J. Diamond. 2008. Science and government—revolutionizing China’s environmental protection. Science 319: 37–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Liu, J., M. Linderman, Z. Ouyang, L. An, and H. Zhang. 2001. Ecological degradation in protected areas: The case of Wolong Nature Reserve for giant pandas. Science 292: 98–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liu, J., G.C. Daily, P.R. Ehrlich, and G.W. Luck. 2003. Effects of household dynamics on resource consumption and biodiversity. Nature 421: 530–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu, J.G., T. Dietz, S.R. Carpenter, C. Folke, M. Alberti, C.L. Redman, S.H. Schneider, E. Ostrom, A.N. Pell, J. Lubchenco, W.W. Taylor, Z.Y. Ouyang, P. Deadman, T. Kratz, and W. Provencher. 2007. Coupled human and natural systems. Ambio 36: 639–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Liu, J.G., S.X. Li, Z.Y. Ouyang, C. Tam, and X.D. Chen. 2008. Ecological and socioeconomic effects of China’s policies for ecosystem services. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105: 9477–9482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mather, A.S. 2004. Forest transition theory and the reforesting of Scotland. Scottish Geographical Journal 120: 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mather, A.S. 2007. Recent Asian forest transitions in relation to forest-transition theory. International Forestry Review 9: 491–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mather, A.S., C.L. Needle, and J.R. Coull. 1998. From resource crisis to sustainability: The forest transition in Denmark. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 5: 182–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McConnell, W.J., S.P. Sweeney, and B. Mulley. 2004. Physical and social access to land: Spatio-temporal patterns of agricultural expansion in Madagascar. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 101: 171–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mittermeier, R.A., P. Robles-Gil, M. Hoffmann, J.D. Pilgrim, T.B. Brooks, C.G. Mittermeier, J.L. Lamoreux, and G.A.B. Fonseca. 2004. Hotspots revisited: Earth’s biologically richest and most endangered ecoregions. Mexico City, Mexico: CEMEX.Google Scholar
  36. Myers, N., R.A. Mittermeier, C.G. Mittermeier, G.A.B. da Fonseca, and J. Kent. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403: 853–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nagendra, H., J. Southworth, and C. Tucker. 2003. Accessibility as a determinant of landscape transformation in western Honduras: Linking pattern and process. Landscape Ecology 18: 141–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Parker, A.J. 1982. The topographic relative moisture index: An approach to soil-moisture assessment in mountain terrain. Physical Geography 3: 160–168.Google Scholar
  39. Perz, S.G. 2007. Grand theory and context-specificity in the study of forest dynamics: Forest transition theory and other directions. Professional Geographer 59: 105–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rudel, T.K. 1998. Is there a forest transition? Deforestation, reforestation, and development. Rural Sociology 63: 533–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rudel, T.K., O.T. Coomes, E. Moran, F. Achard, A. Angelsen, J.C. Xu, and E. Lambin. 2005. Forest transitions: Towards a global understanding of land use change. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions 15: 23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sala, O.E., F.S. Chapin, J.J. Armesto, E. Berlow, J. Bloomfield, R. Dirzo, E. Huber-Sanwald, L.F. Huenneke, R.B. Jackson, A. Kinzig, R. Leemans, D.M. Lodge, H.A. Mooney, M. Oesterheld, N.L. Poff, M.T. Sykes, B.H. Walker, M. Walker, and D.H. Wall. 2000. Biodiversity—global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287: 1770–1774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. SAS. 2004. SAS/STAT User’s Guide Version 9.1.. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
  44. Seno, S.K., and W.W. Shaw. 2002. Land tenure policies, Maasai traditions, and wildlife conservation in Kenya. Society and Natural Resources 15: 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sichuan Department of Forestry. 2008. Overall planning for post-Wenchuan earthquake restoration and reconstruction in Wolong National Nature Reserve. Government Report. Chengdu: Sichuan Department of Forestry.Google Scholar
  46. Sichuan Statistics Bureau. 2008. Sichuan Statistical Yearbook 2007. Beijing: China Statistics Press.Google Scholar
  47. Song, J., and E. Wang. 2001. Model and development trend of rural surplus labor migration in China. Population Science of China 6: 5.Google Scholar
  48. Southworth, J., and C. Tucker. 2001. The influence of accessibility, local institutions, and socioeconomic factors on forest cover change in the mountains of western Honduras. Mountain Research and Development 21: 276–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Southworth, J., D. Munroe, and H. Nagendra. 2004. Land cover change and landscape fragmentation—comparing the utility of continuous and discrete analyses for a western Honduras region. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 101: 185–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. State Planning Group of Post-Wenchuan Earthquake Restoration and Reconstruction. 2008. The State Overall Planning for Post-Wenchuan Earthquake restoration and Reconstruction. Beijing.Google Scholar
  51. Swets, J.A. 1988. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240: 1285–1293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Timms, B.F. in press. The (mis)use of disaster as opportunity: Coerced relocation from Celaque National Park, Honduras. Antipode (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  53. Uchida, E., J.T. Xu, and S. Rozelle. 2005. Grain for green: Cost-effectiveness and sustainability of China’s conservation set-aside program. Land Economics 81: 247–264.Google Scholar
  54. Uchida, E., S. Rozelle, and J.T. Xu. 2009. Conservation payments, liquidity constraints, and off-farm labor: Impact of the Grain-for-Green program on rural households in China. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 91: 70–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Viña, A., and J. Cavelier. 1999. Deforestation rates (1938–1988) of tropical lowland forests on the Andean foothills of Colombia. Biotropica 31: 31–36.Google Scholar
  56. Viña, A., F.R. Echavarria, and D.C. Rundquist. 2004. Satellite change detection analysis of deforestation rates and patterns along the Colombia-Ecuador border. Ambio 33: 118–125.Google Scholar
  57. Viña, A., S. Bearer, X. Chen, G. He, M. Linderman, L. An, H. Zhang, Z. Ouyang, and J. Liu. 2007. Temporal changes in giant panda habitat connectivity across boundaries of Wolong Nature Reserve, China. Ecological Applications 17: 1019–1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Walker, R. 2008. Forest transition: Without complexity, without scale. Professional Geographer 60: 136–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Weladji, R.B., S.R. Moe, and P. Vedeld. 2003. Stakeholder attitudes towards wildlife policy and the Benoue Wildlife Conservation Area. North Cameroon Environmental Conservation 30: 334–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wenchuan County People’s Government, Guangdong Province People’s Government, and Guangdong Province Institute of Planning and Design. 2008. Overall planning for post-earthquake restoration and reconstruction in Wenchuan County. Government Report. Chengdu.Google Scholar
  61. Xu, W., X. Wang, Z. Ouyang, J. Zhang, Z. Li, Y. Xiao, and H. Zheng. 2009. Conservation of giant panda habitat in south Minshan, China, after the May 2008 earthquake. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7: 353–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Yamagawa, H., S. Ito, Y. Mitsuda, and K. Fukuzato. 2006. Effects of topography and management history on natural forest recovery in abandoned forest after clear-cutting in Miyazaki, Japan. Journal of Forest Research 11: 99–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Yin, Y.P., F.W. Wang, and P. Sun. 2009. Landslide hazards triggered by the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake, Sichuan, China. Landslides 6: 139–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zhang, X.D. 2010. A path to modernization: A review of documentaries on migration and migrant labor in China. International Labor and Working-Class History 77: 174–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrés Viña
    • 1
  • Xiaodong Chen
    • 1
  • William J. McConnell
    • 1
  • Wei Liu
    • 1
  • Weihua Xu
    • 2
  • Zhiyun Ouyang
    • 2
  • Hemin Zhang
    • 3
  • Jianguo Liu
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Fisheries and WildlifeCenter for Systems Integration and Sustainability, Michigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional EcologyResearch Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.China’s Center for Giant Panda Research and Conservation, Wolong Nature ReserveSichuanChina

Personalised recommendations