We review important advances in our understanding of the global carbon cycle since the publication of the IPCC AR4. We conclude that: the anthropogenic emissions of CO2 due to fossil fuel burning have increased up through 2008 at a rate near to the high end of the IPCC emission scenarios; there are contradictory analyses whether an increase in atmospheric fraction, that might indicate a declining sink strength of ocean and/or land, exists; methane emissions are increasing, possibly through enhanced natural emission from northern wetland, methane emissions from dry plants are negligible; old-growth forest take up more carbon than expected from ecological equilibrium reasoning; tropical forest also take up more carbon than previously thought, however, for the global budget to balance, this would imply a smaller uptake in the northern forest; the exchange fluxes between the atmosphere and ocean are increasingly better understood and bottom up and observation-based top down estimates are getting closer to each other; the North Atlantic and Southern ocean take up less CO2, but it is unclear whether this is part of the ‘natural’ decadal scale variability; large-scale fires and droughts, for instance in Amazonia, but also at Northern latitudes, have lead to significant decreases in carbon uptake on annual timescales; the extra uptake of CO2 stimulated by increased N-deposition is, from a greenhouse gas forcing perspective, counterbalanced by the related additional N2O emissions; the amount of carbon stored in permafrost areas appears much (two times) larger than previously thought; preservation of existing marine ecosystems could require a CO2 stabilization as low as 450 ppm; Dynamic Vegetation Models show a wide divergence for future carbon trajectories, uncertainty in the process description, lack of understanding of the CO2 fertilization effect and nitrogen–carbon interaction are major uncertainties.
KeywordsGlobal carbon cycle Terrestrial uptake Ocean acidification Carbon budgets Carbon-climate feedback
AJD and MKvM were partly supported by the EU FP7 project Coordination action Carbon Observation System (COCOS, Grant Agreement number 212196). This article is an outcome of a request from the Dutch Government to provide an update on Climate Science for the Copenhagen COP XV meeting in December 2009. We thank Rob van Dorland and Leo Meijer for agreement to publish this article.
- Bousquet, P., P. Ciais, J.B. Miller, E.J. Dlugokencky, D.A. Hauglustaine, C. Prigent, G.R. Van der Werf, P. Peylin, E-G. Brunke, C. Carouge, R.K. Langenfelds, J. Lathiere, F. Papa, M. Ramonet, M. Schmidt, L.P. Steele, S.C. Tyler, and J. White. 2006. Contribution of anthropogenic and natural sources to atmospheric methane variability. Nature 443: 439–443. doi: 10.1038/nature05132.Google Scholar
- Canadell, J., C. Le Quéré, M. Raupach, C. Field, E. Buitenhuis, P. Ciais, et al. 2007. Contributions to accelerating atmospheric CO2 growth from economic activity, carbon intensity, and efficiency of natural sinks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104(47): 18866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Denman, K.L., G. Brasseur, A. Chidthaisong, P. Ciais, P.M. Cox, R.E. Dickinson, D. Hauglustaine, C. Heinze, E. Holland, D. Jacob, U. Lohmann, S. Ramachandran, P.L. da Silva Dias, S.C. Wofsy, and X. Zhang. 2007. Couplings between changes in the climate system and biogeochemistry. In: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment. Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M.Tignor, and H.L. Miller. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
- Dentener, F., J. Drevet, J.F. Lamarque, I. Bey, B. Eickhout, A.M. Fiore, D. Hauglustaine, L.W. Horowitz, M. Krol, U.C. Kulshrestha, M. Lawrence, C. Galy-Lacaux, S. Rast, D. Shindell, D. Stevenson, T. Van Noije, C. Atherton, N. Bell, D. Bergman, T. Butler, J. Cofala, B. Collins, R. Doherty, K. Ellingsen, J. Galloway, M. Gauss, V. Montanaro, J.F. Müller, G. Pitari, J. Rodriguez, M. Sanderson, S. Strahan, M. Schultz, F. Solmon, K. Sudo, S. Szopa, and O. Wild. 2006. Nitrogen and sulphur deposition on regional and global scales: a multi-model evaluation. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 20: GB4003. doi: 10.1029/2005GB002672.
- Frankenberg, C., P. Bergamaschi, A. Butz, S. Houweling, J. Meirink, and J. Notholt et al. (2008). Tropical methane emissions: A revised view from SCIAMACHY onboard ENVISAT. Geophysical Research Lettters 35. doi: 10.1029/2008GL034300.
- Gregg, J.S., R.J. Andres, and G. Marland. 2008. China: Emissions pattern of the world leader in CO2 emissions from fossil fuel consumption and cement production. Geophysical Research Letters 35: L08806. doi: 10.1029/2007GL032887.
- IPCC. 2000. Special Report on Emission Scenarios (SRES). http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/sres/emission/index.htm.
- Janssens, I.A., W. Dieleman, S. Luyssaert, J.-A. Subke, M. Reichstein, R. Ceulemans, P. Ciais, A.J. Dolman, J. Grace, G. Matteucci, D. Papale, S. L. Piao, E.-D. Schulze, J. Tang, and B.E. Law. 2010. Reduction of forest soil respiration in response to nitrogen deposition. Nature Geosciences 315–322. doi: 10.1038/ngeo844.
- le Quéré, C., M.R. Raupach, J.G. Canadell, G. Marland, L. Bopp, P. Ciais, T.J. Conway, S.C. Doney, R. Feely, P. Foster, P. Friedlingstein, K. Gurney, R.A. Houghton, J.I. House, C. Huntingford, P.E. Levy, M.R. Lomas, J. Majkut, N. Metzl, J.P. Ometto, G.P. Peters, I.C. Prentice, J.T. Randerson, S.W. Running, J.L. Sarmiento, U. Schuster, S. Sitch, T. Takahashi, N. Viovy, G.R. van der Werf, and F.I. Woodward. 2009. Trends in the sources and sinks of carbon dioxide. Nature Geosciences 2: 831–836. doi: 10.1038/ngeo689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Li, W.H. et al. 2007. Future precipitation changes and their implications for tropical peatlands. Geophysical Research Letters 34. doi: 10.1029/2006GL028364.
- Petrescu, A.M. R., L.P.H. van Beek, J. van Huissteden, C. Prigent, T. Sachs, C.A.R. Corradi, F.J.W. Parmentier, and A.J. Dolman. 2010. Modeling regional to global CH4 emissions of boreal and arctic wetlands. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. doi: 10.1029/2009GB003610.
- Phillips, O., S.L. Lewis, T.R. Baker, K.-J. Chao, and N. Higuchi. 2008. The changing Amazon forest. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 363: 1819–1827.Google Scholar
- Rigby, M., R.G. Prinn, P.J. Fraser, P.G. Simmonds, R.L. Langenfelds, J. Huang, D.M. Cunnold, L.P. Steele, P.B. Krummel, R.F. Weiss, S. O’Doherty, P.K. Salameh, H.J. Wang, C.M. Harth, J. Muehle, and L.W. Porter. 2008. Renewed growth of atmospheric methane. Geophysical Research Letters 35: L22805. doi: 10.1029/2008GL036037.
- Ringeval, B., N. de Noblet‐Ducoudré, P. Ciais, P. Bousquet, C. Prigent, F. Papa, and W.B. Rossow. 2010. An attempt to quantify the impact of changes in wetland extent on methane emissions on the seasonal and interannual time scales. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 24: GB2003. doi: 10.1029/2008GB00335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schulze, E-D., P. Ciais, S. Luysaert, A. Freibauer, I.A. Janssens, J.F. Sousanna, P. Smith, J. Grace, I. Levin, Thiruchittampalam, M. Heimann, A.J. Dolman, R. Valentini, P. Bousquet, P. Peylin, W. Peters, C. Roedenbeck, G. Etiope, N. Vuichard, M. Wattenbach, G.J. Nabuurs, Z. Poussi, J. Nieschulze, J.H.C Gash, and the CarboEurope Team. 2009. Importance of methane and nitrous oxide for Europe’s terrestrial greenhouse-gas balance. Nature Geoscience 22. doi: 10.1038/NGEO686.
- Schuster, U., and A. Watson. 2007. A variable and decreasing sink for atmospheric CO2 in the North Atlantic. Journal of Geophysical Research 112. 10.1029/2006JC003941.
- Silverman, J., B. Lazar, L. Cao, K. Caldeira, and J. Erez. 2009. Coral reefs may start dissolving when atmospheric CO2 doubles. Geophysical Research Letters 36. doi: 10.1029/2008GL036282.
- Takahashi, T., S.C. Sutherland, and A. Kozyear. 2008. Global ocean surface water partial pressure of CO2 database: Measurements performed during 1968–2006 (Version 1.0). ORNL/CDIAC-152, NDP-088. Carbon dioxide information analysis center, pp. 20. Oak Ridge: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U. S. Department of Energy.Google Scholar
- Thomas, H., A. Prowe, I. Lima, S. Doney et al. 2008. Changes in the North Atlantic Oscillation influence CO2 uptake in the North Atlantic over the past 2 decades. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 22. 10.1029/2007GB003167.
- Xu-Ri, and I. Prentice. 2008. Terrestrial nitrogen cycle simulation with a dynamic global vegetation model. Global Change Biology 14(8): 1745–1764.Google Scholar