AMBIO

, Volume 39, Issue 8, pp 531–545 | Cite as

Urban Transitions: On Urban Resilience and Human-Dominated Ecosystems

  • Henrik Ernstson
  • Sander E. van der Leeuw
  • Charles L. Redman
  • Douglas J. Meffert
  • George Davis
  • Christine Alfsen
  • Thomas Elmqvist
Report

Abstract

Urbanization is a global multidimensional process paired with increasing uncertainty due to climate change, migration of people, and changes in the capacity to sustain ecosystem services. This article lays a foundation for discussing transitions in urban governance, which enable cities to navigate change, build capacity to withstand shocks, and use experimentation and innovation in face of uncertainty. Using the three concrete case cities—New Orleans, Cape Town, and Phoenix—the article analyzes thresholds and cross-scale interactions, and expands the scale at which urban resilience has been discussed by integrating the idea from geography that cities form part of “system of cities” (i.e., they cannot be seen as single entities). Based on this, the article argues that urban governance need to harness social networks of urban innovation to sustain ecosystem services, while nurturing discourses that situate the city as part of regional ecosystems. The article broadens the discussion on urban resilience while challenging resilience theory when addressing human-dominated ecosystems. Practical examples of harnessing urban innovation are presented, paired with an agenda for research and policy.

Keywords

Urban resilience Ecosystem services Social–ecological processes Cross-scale interactions Urban innovation New Orleans Cape Town Phoenix 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This article has been developed from the collaboration at the Stockholm Resilience Centre (www.stockholmresilience.org) and its research theme Urban Social-Ecological Systems and Globalization, which gathers 12 urban research groups across the globe. A special session organized by T. Elmqvist and H. Ernstson at the conference “Resilience 2008” in Stockholm, 14–17 April, 2008, triggered the co-authors to write this article. Especially Erik Andersson, Sverker Sörlin, Sara Borgström, and Cathy Wilkinson should be acknowledged for their valuable discussions on this topic. We also acknowledge Keith Tidball for his useful comments on an earlier draft. The first author acknowledges funding through Formas (Urban-NET) and Vetenskapsrådet (Swedish Links) to finalize the article. An earlier version was presented at The 2010 AESOP Complexity and Planning Workshop “Resilient Cities” in Stockholm, 26–27 February, 2010.

References

  1. ACC. 2009. Homepage African Centre for Cities (ACC), University of Cape Town. http://www.acc.uct.ac.za/. Accessed 21 July 2009.
  2. Alberti, M., and J.M. Marzluff. 2004. Ecological resilience in urban ecosystems: Linking urban patterns to human and ecological functions. Urban Ecosystems 7: 241–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen, T.F.H., R.V. O’Neill, D.L. DeAngelis, and J.B. Waide. 1986. A hierarchical concept of ecosystems, 264. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Andersson, E. 2006. Urban landscapes and sustainable cities. Ecology and Society 11 (1): 34.Google Scholar
  5. Andersson, E., S. Barthel, and K. Ahrné. 2007. Measuring social-ecological dynamics behind the generation of ecosystem services. Ecological Applications 17 (5): 1267–1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arbesman, S., J.M. Kleinberg, and S.H. Strogatz. 2009. Superlinear scaling for innovation in cities. Physical Review E 79 (016115): 1–5.Google Scholar
  7. Armitage, D.R., and D. Johnson. 2006. Can resilience be reconciled with globalization and the increasingly complex conditions of resource degradation in Asian coastal regions? Ecology and Society 11 (1), 2. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art2/.
  8. Batty, M. 2008. The size, scale, and shape of cities. Science 319: 769–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barthel, S., J. Colding, T. Elmqvist, and C. Folke. 2005. History and local management of a biodiversity-rich, urban, cultural landscape. Ecology and Society 10 (2), 10. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss2/art10/.
  10. Barthel, S., C. Folke, and J. Colding. 2010. Social-ecological memory in urban gardens: Retaining the capacity for management of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change 20 (2), 255–265. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6VFV-4YCGKS0-1/2/75fbc5c5324051e714a2b8efc20f128e.
  11. Berkes, F., and C. Folke. eds., 1998. Linking social and ecological systems, 476 pp. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Berkes, F., J. Colding, and C. Folke. eds., 2003. Navigating social-ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change, 416 pp. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Berling-Wolff, S., and J. Wu. 2004. Modeling urban landscape dynamics: A case study in Phoenix, USA. Urban Ecosystems 7: 215–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Besteman, C. 2008. Transforming Cape Town, 296 pp. Berkley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  15. Bettencourt, L.M.A., J. Lobo, D. Helbing, C. Kühnert, and G.B. West. 2007. Growth, innovation, scaling, and the pace of life in cities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 104 (17), 7301–7306. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.0610172104.
  16. Birch, E.L., and S.M. Wachter. 2006. Rebuilding urban places after disaster: Lessons from Hurricane Katrina, 416 pp. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  17. Blakely, E.J. 2007. Urban planning for climate change. Working Paper, Product Code: WP07EB1. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 29 pp. http://www.lincolninst.edu/pubs/1310_Urban-Planning-for-Climate-Change.
  18. Bolund, P., and S. Hunhammar. 1999. Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecological Economics 29: 293–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Borgström, S., T. Elmqvist, P. Angelstam, and C. Alfsen-Norodom. 2006. Scale mismatches in management of urban landscapes. Ecology and Society 11 (2): 16.Google Scholar
  20. Campanella, R., D. Etheridge, and D. Meffert. 2004. Sustainability, survivability, and the paradox of New Orleans. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1023: 289–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Carley, M., P. Jenkins, and H. Smith. eds., 2001. Urban development and civil society: The role of communities in sustainable cities, 230 pp. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  22. Carlsson, L., and F. Berkes. 2005. Co-management: Concepts and methodological implications. Journal of Environmental Management 75: 65–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. CFN. 2006. Networking people and nature in the city: Inspiration, issues and challenges, 32 pp. Cape Town: Cape Flats Nature (CFN). www.capeflatsnature.org.
  24. City of Cape Town. 2006. Integrated development plan 20062007, 245 pp. Cape Town: City of Cape Town.Google Scholar
  25. Colding, J. 2007. ‘Ecological land-use complementation’ for building resilience in urban ecosystems. Landscape and Urban Planning 81 (1–2): 46–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Colding, J., J. Lundberg, and C. Folke. 2006. Incorporating green-area user groups in urban ecosystem management. Ambio 35 (5): 237–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Costanza, R., W.J. Mitsch, and J.W. Day Jr. 2006. A new vision for New Orleans and the Mississippi delta: Applying ecological economics and ecological engineering. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 4 (9): 465–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. CPRA. 2007. Comprehensive coastal protection master plan for Louisiana, 110 pp. New Orleans, LA: Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority of Louisiana.Google Scholar
  29. Daily, G. 1997. What are ecosystem services? In Nature’s services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems, ed. G. Daily, 1–10. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  30. DCDC. 2009. Homepage and simulator (WaterSim) at Decision Center for a Desert City. http://dcdc.asu.edu/; http://watersim.asu.edu/. Accessed September 2009.
  31. Elmqvist, T., C. Alfsen-Norodom, and J. Colding. 2008. Urban systems. In Ecosystems Vol. [5] of encyclopedia of ecology, ed. S.E. Jørgensen and B.D. Fath, 3665–3672. Oxford: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ernstson, H. 2008. In Rhizomia: Actors, networks and resilience in urban landscapes, 196 pp. PhD Dissertation. Stockholm: Stockholm University. http://www.stockholmresilience.org/download/18.7f35af211c3ec4f1b1800011957/Ernstson_2008_In_Rhizomia_Thesis_21%5B1%5D.pdf
  33. Ernstson, H., S. Sörlin, and T. Elmqvist. 2008. Social movements and ecosystem services—The role of social network structure in protecting and managing urban green areas in Stockholm. Ecology and Society 13 (2), 39. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art39/.
  34. Ernstson, H., S. Barthel, E. Andersson, and S.T. Borgström. 2010. Scale-crossing brokers and network governance of urban ecosystem services: The case of Stockholm, Sweden. Ecology and Society (in press).Google Scholar
  35. Falkenmark, M. 2003. Freshwater as shared between society and ecosystems: From divided approaches to integrated challenges. Philosophical Transactions of Royal Society London 358: 2037–2049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Flyvbjerg, B. 1998. Rationality and power: Democracy in practice, 304 pp. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  37. Folke, C. 2006. Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change 16 (3): 253–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Folke, C., S. Carpenter, B. Walker, M. Scheffer, T. Elmqvist, L. Gunderson, and C.S. Holling. 2004. Regime shifts, resilience, and biodiversity in ecosystem management. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 35, 557–581. http://arjournals.annualreviews.org/loi/ecolsys.Google Scholar
  39. Folke, C., T. Hahn, P. Olsson, and J. Norberg. 2005. Adaptive governance of social–ecological systems. Annual Reviews of Environment and Resources 30: 441–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Graham, S., and P. Healey. 1999. Relational concepts of space and place: Issues for planning theory and practice. European Planning Studies 7: 623–646.Google Scholar
  41. Granovetter, M. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 76 (6): 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gober, P. 2007. Water, climate and the future of Phoenix. Geographische Rundschau 3 (4): 20–24.Google Scholar
  43. Goldstein, B.E. 2009. Resilience to surprise through communicative planning. Ecology and Society 14 (2): 33.Google Scholar
  44. Grimm, N.B., S.H. Faeth, N.E. Golubiewski, C.L. Redman, J. Wu, X. Bai, and J.M. Briggs. 2008. Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 319: 756–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Gunderson, L.H., and C.S. Holling. eds., 2002. Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems, 450 pp. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  46. Harvey, D. 1996. Justice, nature and the geography of difference, 468 pp. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  47. Heynen, N.C., M. Kaika, and E. Swyngedouw. eds., 2006. In the nature of cities: Urban political ecology and the politics of urban metabolism, 271 pp. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Holling, C.S. 1973. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecological Systems 4: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kates, R.W., E. Colten, S. Laska, and S.P. Leatherman. 2006. Reconstruction of New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina: A research perspective. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 103 (40): 14653–14660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Krasny, M.E., and K. Tidball. 2009. Community gardens as contexts for science, stewardship, and civic action learning. Cities and the Environment 2 (1): 8.Google Scholar
  51. Kupel, D.E. 2003. Fuel for growth: Water and Arizona’s urban environment, 294. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  52. Laska, S., and B.H. Morrow. 2006. Social vulnerabilities and Hurricane Katrina: An unnatural disaster in New Orleans. Marine Technology Society Journal 40 (4): 16–26.Google Scholar
  53. Leach, M. 2008. Re-framing resilience: A symposium report, 22 pp. STEPS Working Paper 13. Brighton: STEPS Centre. http://www.steps-centre.org/PDFs/Resilience.pdf.
  54. Levin, S.A. 1998. Ecosystems and the biosphere as complex adaptive systems. Ecosystems 1 (5): 431–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lopez, J.A. 2006. The multiple lines of defense strategy to sustain Louisiana’s coast, 21 pp. New Orleans, LA: Lake Pontchartrain Basin Foundation.Google Scholar
  56. LRA. 2007. Louisiana speaks regional plan: Vision and strategies for recovery and growth in south Louisiana, 13 pp. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana Recovery Authority.Google Scholar
  57. Luccarelli, M. 1996. Lewis Mumford and the ecological region: The politics of planning, 230 pp. London: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  58. MA. 2005. Millenium ecosystem assessment: Ecosystems and human well-being—Synthesis, 155 pp. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  59. Meffert, D.J. 2008. The resilience of New Orleans: Urban and coastal adaptation to disasters and climate change, 12 pp. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy (Working Paper).Google Scholar
  60. Midgley, G.F., R.A. Chapman, B. Hewitson, P. Johnston, M. De Wit, G. Ziervogel, P. Mukheibir, L. Van Niekerk, et al. 2005. A status quo, vulnerability and adaptation assessment of the physical and socio-economic effects of climate change in the Western Cape, 171 pp. Report to the Western Cape Government, South Africa. CSIR Report No. ENV-S-C 2005-073. Stellenbosch.Google Scholar
  61. Murdoch, J. 2006. Post-structuralist geography, 232 pp. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  62. OECD. 2008. OECD territorial reviews: Cape Town, South Africa, 322 pp. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  63. Pickett, S.T.A., M.L. Cadenasso, and J.M. Grove. 2004. Resilient cities: meaning, models and metaphor for integrating the ecological, socio-economic, and planning realms. Landscape and Urban Planning 69: 369–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pickett, S.T.A., M.L. Cadenasso, J.M. Grove, P.M. Groffman, L.E. Band, C.G. Boone, W.R. Burch, C.S.B. Grimmond, et al. 2008. Beyond urban legends: An emerging framework of urban ecology, as illustrated by the Baltimore Ecosystem Study. BioScience 58 (2): 139–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Pumain, D., L. Sanders, and T. Saint-Julien. 1989. Villes et auto-organisation, 191 pp. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
  66. Redman, C.L., and A.P. Kinzig. 2008. Water can flow uphill: A narrative of central Arizona. In Agrarian landscapes in transition, ed. C.L. Redman, and D.R. Foster, 238–271. USA: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Rodiek, J. 2007. Landscape planning in hazardous zones, lessons from Hurricane Katrina, August 2005. Landscape and Urban Planning 79 (1): 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Snow, D., B.J. Rochford, S. Worden, and R. Benford. 1986. Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review 51: 464–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Stanvliet, R., J. Jackson, G. Davis, C. de Swardt, J. Mokhoele, Q. Thom, and B.D. Lane. 2004. The UNESCO biosphere reserve concept as a tool for urban sustainability: The CUBES Cape Town Case Study. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1023: 80–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Swyngedouw, E. 1996. The city as a hybrid—On nature society and cyborg urbanization. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism 7 (1): 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Swyngedouw, E. 2006. Metabolic urbanization: The making of cyborg cities. In In the nature of cities: Urban political ecology and the politics of urban metabolism, ed. N.C. Heynen, M. Kaika, and E. Swyngedouw, 21–40. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
  72. Tidball, K.G., and M.E. Krasny. 2007. From risk to resilience: What role for community greening and civic ecology in cities? In Social Learning Towards a more Sustainable World, ed. A. Wals, 149–164. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  73. TMG. 2008. Homepage Mountain Group Aqufier Feasability Study & Pilot Project (TMG), Cape Town. http://www.tmg-aquifer.co.za. Accessed September 2008.
  74. Törnqvist, T.E., and D.J. Meffert. 2008. Sustaining coastal urban ecosystems. Nature Geoscience 1: 805–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Törnqvist, T.E., D.J. Wallace, J.E.A. Storms, J. Wallinga, R.L. Van Dam, M. Blaauw, M.S. Derksen, C.J.W. Klerks, et al. 2008. Mississippi Delta subsidence primarily caused by compaction of Holocene. Nature Geoscience 1 (3): 173–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Turok, I. 2000. Persistent polarisation post-apartheid? Progress towards urban integration in Cape Town. Urban Studies 38 (13): 2349–2377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Turpie, J.K., C. Marais, and J.N. Blignaut. 2008. The Working for Water Programme: Evolution of a payments for ecosystem services mechanism that addresses both poverty and ecosystem service delivery in South Africa. Ecological Economics, 65, 788–798.Google Scholar
  78. USGS. 2004. Southeast Louisiana land loss: Historical and projected land loss in the Deltaic Plain (19322050). Electronic map. MAP ID: USGS-NWRC 2005-16-0001. Lafayette, LA: US Geological Survey—National Wetlands Research Center.Google Scholar
  79. van der Leeuw, S.E. 2007. Information processing and its role in the rise of the European world system. In Sustainability or collapse? An integrated history and future of people on Earth, ed. R. Costanza, L.J. Graumlich, and W.L. Steffen, 213–241. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  80. van der Leeuw, S.E., and J. McGlade. 1993. Information, coherence, and urban dynamics. In Urban time-scales, ed. B. Lepetit, and D. Pumain, 195–245. Paris: Anthropos Economica.Google Scholar
  81. van der Leeuw, S.E., and C. Aschan-Leygonie. 2005. A long-term perspective on resilience in socio-natural systems. In Micromesomacro: Addressing complex systems couplings, ed. U. Svedin, and H. Lilienström, 227–264. London: World Scientific Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. van Wilgen, B.W., D.C. Le Maitre, and R.M. Cowling. 1998. Ecosystems services, efficiency, sustainability and equity: South Africa’s working for water programme. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 13: 378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Westrum, R. 2006. All coherence gone: New Orleans as a resilience failure. In 2nd symposium on resilience engineering. Juan-les-Pins, France, November 8–10.Google Scholar
  84. White, D.D., E.A. Corley, and M.S. White. 2008. Water managers’ perceptions of the science-policy interface in Phoenix, Arizona USA: Implications for an emerging boundary organization. Society and Natural Resources 21 (3): 230–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. WRC. 2008. Homepage Water Resource Commission (WRC), Cape Town. http://www.wrc.org.za. Accessed September 2008.
  86. Xu, Y., Y. Wu, and A. Duah. 2007. Groundwater recharge estimation of Table Mountain Group aquifer systems with case studies, 218 pp. Report No: 1329/1/07. Pretoria: Water Resource Commission (WRC).Google Scholar
  87. Zeeman, E.C. 1977. Catastrophe theory: Selected papers, 197277, 675 pp. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Henrik Ernstson
    • 1
  • Sander E. van der Leeuw
    • 2
  • Charles L. Redman
    • 3
  • Douglas J. Meffert
    • 4
  • George Davis
    • 5
  • Christine Alfsen
    • 6
  • Thomas Elmqvist
    • 7
  1. 1.Department of Systems Ecology and Stockholm Resilience CentreStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden
  2. 2.School of Human Evolution and Social ChangeArizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  3. 3.School of Human Evolution and Social Change and the School of SustainabilityArizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  4. 4.Tulane/Xavier Center for Bioenvironmental ResearchTulane UniversityLouisianaUSA
  5. 5.Urban Conservation Programme,South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI)ClaremontSouth Africa
  6. 6.Columbia University/UNESCO Joint Program on Biosphere and Society (CUBES) and Urban Biosphere Network (URBIS)UNESCONew YorkUSA
  7. 7.Department of Systems Ecology and Stockholm Resilience CentreStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations