AMBIO

, Volume 39, Issue 7, pp 463–466

Patagonian Fjord Ecosystems in Southern Chile as a Highly Vulnerable Region: Problems and Needs

  • Jose Luis Iriarte
  • Humberto E. González
  • Laura Nahuelhual
Report

Abstract

Southern Chile encompasses one of the most extensive fjord regions of the world, the Patagonia, currently exposed to natural and anthropogenic perturbations. These fjord ecosystems provide important services to humans, which have not been adequately measured and valued. As a consequence, ecosystem services are commonly ignored in public policy design and in the evaluation of development projects. Here we tackle questions that are highly relevant for the nation’s development, namely (1) understanding fjord functioning, and (2) developing management strategies based on ecosystem services, in order to secure simultaneous and adequate use of these ecosystems which area influenced by ecological (e.g., biogeochemical) and productive (e.g., aquaculture, fisheries) processes. We also seek to strengthen the analysis of fjord ecosystem value from the economical (including coastal zoning), socio-cultural, institutional, and governmental points of view. In addition, the investigation of current and future effects of climate change on this large region offers a unique opportunity to understand the social and economic consequences of a global phenomenon at local to regional scales. Biogeochemical and socio-economic models will be used to simulate future scenarios under a gamut of management options.

Keywords

Patagonian fjords Ecosystem services Oceanography 

References

  1. Arismendi, I., and L. Nahuelhual. 2007. Non-native salmon and trout recreational fishing in Lake Llanquihue, southern Chile: Economic benefits and management implications. Reviews in Fisheries Science 15: 311–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arzul, G., M. Seguel, L. Guzman, and E.E. Denn. 1999. Comparison of allelopathic properties in three toxic Alexandrium species. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 232: 285–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Costanza, R., R. Arge, R. de Groot, S. Farber, M. Grasso, B. Hannon, K. Limburg, S. Naeem, R.V. ONeill, J. Paruelo, R.G. Raskin, P. Sutton, and M. vanden Belt. 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387: 253–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Craig, R.K. 2007. Valuing coastal and ocean ecosystem services: The paradox of scarcity for marine resources commodities and the potential role of lifestyle value competition. Journal of Land Use and Environmental Law 22: 355–406.Google Scholar
  5. Dinerstein, E., A. Rijal, M. Bookbinder, B. Kattel, and A. Rajuria. 1998. Tigers as neighbors: Efforts to promote local guardianship of endangered species in lowland Nepal. In Riding the tiger: conserving the tiger in a human-dominated landscape, ed. J. Seidensticker, P. Jackson, and S. Christie, 316–333. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. González, H.G., Daneri, G., Iriarte, J.L., Yannicelli, B., Menschel, E., Barría, C., Pantoja, S., and Lizárraga, L. 2009. Carbon fluxes within the epipelagic zone of the Humboldt Current System off Chile: The significance of euphausiids and diatoms as key functional groups for the biological pump. Progress in Oceanography 83: 217–227.Google Scholar
  7. Iriarte, J.L., H.E. González, K.K. Liu, C. Rivas, and C. Valenzuela. 2007. Spatial and temporal variability of chlorophyll and primary productivity in surface waters of southern Chile (41.5–43°S). Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 70: 471–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Iriarte, J.L., R. Quiñones, and R. González. 2005. Relationship between biomass and enzymatic activity of a bloom-forming dinoflagellate (Dinophyceae) in southern Chile (41S): A field approach. Journal of Plankton Research 27: 159–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lara, A., R. Urrutia, B.H. Luckman, D. Soto, J.C. Aravena, J. Mc Phee, A. Wolodarsky, L. Pezoa, and J. León. 2005. The potential use of tree-rings to reconstruct streamflow and estuarine salinity in the Valdivian Rainforest eco-region. Chile Dendrochronologia 22: 155–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ptacnik, R., A. Solimini, T. Andersen, T. Tamminen, P. Brettum, L. Lepisto, E. Willen, and S. Rekolainen. 2008. Diversity predicts stability and resource use efficiency in natural phytoplankton communities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 105: 5134–5138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Rebolledo, L., C.B. Lange, D. Figueroa, S. Pantoja, P. Muñoz, and R. Castro. 2005. 20th century fluctuations in the abundance of siliceous microorganisms preserved in the sediments of the Puyuhuapi channel (44°S), Chile. Revista chilena de Historia Natural 78: 469–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sepulveda, J., S. Pantoja, K. Hughen, C. Lange, F. Gonzalez, P. Muñoz, L. Rebolledo, R. Castro, S. Contreras, A. Avila, P. Rossel, G. Lorca, M. Salamanca, and N. Silva. 2005. Fluctuations in export productivity over the last century from sediments of a southern Chilean fjord (44°S). Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 65: 587–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Silva, N., and S. Neshyba. 1979. On the southernmost extension of the Perú-Chile undercurrent. Deep-Sea Research 26: 1387–1393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Valle-Levinson, A., N. Sarkar, R. Sanay, D. Soto, and J. León. 2007. Spatial structure of hydrography and flow in a Chilean Fjord, Estuario Reloncaví. Estuaries and Coasts 30: 113–126.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jose Luis Iriarte
    • 1
  • Humberto E. González
    • 2
  • Laura Nahuelhual
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of AquacultureUniversidad Austral de ChilePuerto MonttChile
  2. 2.Institute of Marine BiologyUniversidad Austral de ChileValdiviaChile
  3. 3.Institute of Economic AgricultureUniversidad Austral de ChileValdiviaChile

Personalised recommendations