, Volume 39, Issue 2, pp 190–193 | Cite as

Using Heronry Birds to Monitor Urbanization Impacts: A Case Study of Painted Stork Mycteria leucocephala Nesting in the Delhi Zoo, India

  • Abdul Jamil UrfiEmail author

Although urbanization is a frequently cited cause of biodiversity loss (Czech and Krausman 1997) our understanding about urban ecology is severely limited (Marzluff et al. 2001). Birds are popular bio-indicators of environmental change because they are ecologically versatile, their populations as well as select fitness parameters can be conveniently monitored, often with the voluntary involvement of local nature enthusiasts across large geographical scales, and their presence/absence in a particular area is consequential (Bibby et al. 1992; Urfi 2004). In India, while several studies have focused on changes in bird populations and distributions in natural habitats (Urfi et al. 2005), very few have actually attempted to study either the impacts of urbanization on birds or how different species have adjusted to environmental change. However, many Indian cities offer foraging and nesting habitat for birds, especially colonial waterbirds such as stork, ibis, spoonbill, heron, egret,...


Clutch Size Sexual Size Dimorphism Nest Habitat Endangered Wildlife Citizen Science Program 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



I thank the officials of the Delhi Zoo for their cooperation. This study was made possible by funds from the Ministry of Environment & Forests, Government of India, University of Delhi’s scheme to “Strengthen R & D Doctoral Research Programme by providing funds to university faculty” and a Kushlan grant from the Waterbird Society, USA. I thank Mr. M. Mahendiran for assistance in preparation of the figure.


  1. Bibby, C., N.D. Burgess, and D.A. Hill. 1992. Bird census techniques, 257. Oxford, UK: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  2. Birdlife International. 2001. Threatened birds of Asia: The Birdlife International Red Data Book, 3038. Cambridge, UK: Birdlife International.Google Scholar
  3. British Trust for Ornithology (BTO). 2009. Heronries surveys. British Trust for Ornithology, Nunnery, Thetford. Aug 2009.
  4. Central Zoo Authority (CZA). 2009. Central Zoo authority. Statutory Body under the Ministry of Environment and Forests, Govt. of India. Central Zoo Authority, New Delhi. Aug 2009.
  5. Czech, B., and P.R. Krausman. 1997. Distribution and causation of species endangerment in the United States. Science 277: 1116–1117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Desai, J.H. 1971. Feeding ecology and nesting of Painted Stork (Ibis leucocephala) at the Delhi Zoo. International Zoo Yearbook 11: 208–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Desai, J.H., R.V. Shah, and G.K. Menon. 1974. Diet and food requirement of Painted Stork at the breeding colony in Delhi Zoological Park. Pavo 12: 13–23.Google Scholar
  8. Desai, J.H., G.K. Menon, and R.V. Shah. 1977. Studies on the reproductive pattern of the Painted Stork, Ibis leucocephalus, Pennant. Pavo 15: 1–32.Google Scholar
  9. Greenwood, J.J.D. 2007. Citizens, science and bird conservation. Journal of Ornithology 148 (Supplement 1): 77–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jamgaonkar, A.V., P.G. Jacob, S.N. Rajagopal, and H.R. Bhat. 1994. Records of new breeding colonies of Painted Stork Mycteria leucocephala in Karnataka. Pavo 32: 59–62.Google Scholar
  11. Kalam, A., and A.J. Urfi. 2008. Foraging behaviour and prey size of the painted stork (Mycteria leucocephala). Journal of Zoology 274: 198–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Marzluff, J.M., R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly. eds. 2001. Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world, 608. Boston, USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  13. Meganathan, T., and A.J. Urfi. 2009. Inter-colony variations in nesting ecology of Painted Stork (Mycteria leucocephala) in the Delhi Zoo (North India). Waterbirds 32: 352–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Parasharya, B.M., and R.M. Naik. 1990. Ciconiiform birds breeding in Bhavnagar city, Gujarat. In Conservation in developing countries: Problems and prospects: 1990, ed. J.C., Daniel and J.S. Serrao, 429. Mumbai, India: Bombay Natural History Society and Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Shah, R.V., and J.H. Desai. 1975a. Growth and development of Painted Stork Ibis leucocephalus Pennant. I. Embryonic development. Pavo 13: 83–87.Google Scholar
  16. Shah, R.V., and J.H. Desai. 1975b. Growth and development of Painted Stork Ibis leucocephalus Pennant. II. Post hatching growth pattern and motor development. Pavo 13: 88–101.Google Scholar
  17. Urfi, A.J. 1993. Breeding patterns of Painted Stork (Mycteria leucocephala) at Delhi Zoo, India. Colonial Waterbirds 16: 95–97.Google Scholar
  18. Urfi, A.J. 1997. The significance of Delhi Zoo for wild waterbirds, with specialreference to the Painted Stork Mycteria leucocephala. Forktail 12: 87–97.Google Scholar
  19. Urfi, A.J. 1998. A monsoon delivers storks. Natural History 107: 32–39.Google Scholar
  20. Urfi, A.J. 2004. Birds: Beyond watching, 214. Hyderabad, India: Universities Press.Google Scholar
  21. Urfi, A.J. 2006. Biodiversity conservation in an urban landscape. A case study of some Important Bird Areas on the river Yamuna in Delhi (India). In Conservation biology in Asia: 2006, ed. J.A. McNeely, T.M. McCarthy, A. Smith, L. Olsvig-Whittaker and E.D. Wikramanayake, 303. Kathmandu, Nepal: Society for Conservation Biology (Asia Section) and Resources Himalaya Foundation.Google Scholar
  22. Urfi, A.J., and A. Kalam. 2006. Sexual size dimorphism and mating pattern in the Painted Stork (Mycteria leucocephala). Waterbirds 29: 489–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Urfi, A.J., M. Sen, A. Kalam, and T. Meganathan. 2005. Counting birds in India: A review of methodologies and trends. Current Science 89: 1997–2003.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental BiologyUniversity of DelhiNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations