AMBIO

, Volume 39, Issue 1, pp 2–13 | Cite as

Passing the Panda Standard: A TAD Off the Mark?

  • Ben Belton
  • Francis Murray
  • James Young
  • Trevor Telfer
  • David C. Little
Review Paper

Abstract

Tilapia, a tropical freshwater fish native to Africa, is an increasingly important global food commodity. The World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), a major environmental nongovernmental organization, has established stakeholder dialogues to formulate farm certification standards that promote “responsible” culture practices. As a preface to its “tilapia aquaculture dialogue,” the WWF for Nature commissioned a review of potential certification issues, later published as a peer-reviewed article. This article contends that both the review and the draft certification standards subsequently developed fail to adequately integrate critical factors governing the relative sustainability of tilapia production and thereby miss more significant issues related to resource-use efficiency and the appropriation of ecosystem space and services. This raises a distinct possibility that subsequent certification will promote intensive systems of tilapia production that are far less ecologically benign than existing widely practiced semi-intensive alternatives. Given the likely future significance of this emergent standard, it is contended that a more holistic approach to certification is essential.

Keywords

Aquaculture Sustainability Eco-certification Standards Tilapia Environmental impacts 

References

  1. Aarset, B., S. Beckman, E. Bigne, M. Beveridge, T. Bjorndal, J. Bunting, P. McDonagh, C. Mariojouls, et al. 2004. European consumers’ understanding and perceptions of the “organic” food regime. The case of aquaculture. British Food Journal 106: 93–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abery, N., F. Sukadi, A.A. Budhiman, E.S. Kartamihardja, S. Koeshendrajana, B. Buddhiman, and S.S. De Silva. 2005. Fisheries and cage culture in three reservoirs in West Java, Indonesia; a case study of ambitious development and resulting interactions. Fisheries Management and Ecology 12: 315–330.Google Scholar
  3. Asian Development Bank (ADB). 2005. An Evaluation of Small-Scale Freshwater Rural Aquaculture Development for Poverty Reduction. ADB, Manila.Google Scholar
  4. Belton, B., D.C. Little, and K. Grady. 2009. Is responsible aquaculture sustainable aquaculture? WWF and the eco-certification of tilapia. Society and Natural Resources 22(9): 840–855.Google Scholar
  5. Berg, H., P. Michelsen, M. Troell, C. Folke, and N. Kautsky. 1996. Managing aquaculture for sustainability in Lake Kariba, Zimbabwe. Ecological Economics 18: 141–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beveridge, M., L. Ross, and L. Kelly. 1994. Aquaculture and biodiversity. AMBIO 23: 497–502.Google Scholar
  7. Boyd, C. 2004. Farm-Level Issues in Aquaculture Certification: Tilapia. (http://www.worldwildlife.org/what/globalmarkets/aquaculture/item5223.html).
  8. Boyd, C., A.A. McNevin, J. Clay, and H.M. Johnson. 2005. Certification issues for some common aquaculture species. Reviews in Fisheries Science 13: 231–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bunch, E., and I. Bejarano. 1997. The effects of environmental factors on the susceptibility of hybrid Oreochromis niloticus × Oreochromis aureas to streptococcosis. Israeli Journal of Aquaculture 49(2): 67–76.Google Scholar
  10. Chinabut, S. 2002. A case study of isopod infestation in Tilapia cage culture in Thailand. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper Issue 406, 201–202.Google Scholar
  11. Clemmens, A.J., R.G. Allen, and C.M. Burt. 2008. Technical concepts related to conservation of irrigation and rainwater in agricultural systems. Water Resources Research 44, W00E03. doi:10.1029/2007WR006095
  12. Connell, J.J., and R. Hardy. 1982. Trends in fish utilisation. Oxford: Fishing News Books.Google Scholar
  13. Daly, H. 1999. Globalization versus internationalism—some implications. Ecological Economics 31: 31–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Delgado, C., N. Wada, M.W. Rosegrant, S. Meijer, and M. Ahmed. 2003. Fish to 2020: Supply and demand in changing global markets. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
  15. Dempster, P. 2007. Main future technological challenges: Views of supply industry. In Presentation Given at the First Stakeholder Meeting of the European Aquaculture Technology Platform. Paleis der Academiën, Brussels.Google Scholar
  16. Edwards, P. 1993. Environmental issues in integrated agriculture-aquaculture and wastewater-fed fish culture systems. In Environment and aquaculture in developing countries, ed. R. Pullin, H. Rosenthal, and J. Maclean, 139–167. Manila: International Centre for Living Aquatic Resources Management.Google Scholar
  17. Edwards, P. 1998. A systems approach to the promotion of integrated aquaculture. Aquaculture Economics and Management 2: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eves, A., C. Turner, A. Yakupitiyage, N. Tongdee, and S. Ponza. 1995. The microbiological and sensory quality of septageraised Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquaculture 132: 261–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. FAO. 2006. Regional review of aquaculture development 3. Asia and the Pacific—2005. In FAO fisheries circular, 97. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
  20. Fearnside, P. 2001. Soybean cultivation as a threat to the environment in Brazil. Environmental Conservation 28: 23–28.Google Scholar
  21. Fitzsimmons, K. 2006. Prospect and potential for global production. In Tilapia: Biology, culture and nutrition, ed. C. Lim and C. Webster, 51–62. New York: Food Products Press.Google Scholar
  22. Folke, C. 1988. Energy economy of salmon aquaculture in the Baltic Sea. Environmental Management 12: 525–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). 2007. FISHSTAT Database.Google Scholar
  24. Garcia, J., P. Klesius, and J. Evans. 2004. Survival and virulence of Streptococcus agalactiae and its transmission from Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) to Sheepshead Minnows (Cyprinodon variegatus) when exposed to different water microcosms and temperatures. [Abstract]. In 19th Annual Meeting of the Southern Conference on Animal Parasites. Biloxi, MS: United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research ServiceGoogle Scholar
  25. Gong, Z., and P. Zie. 2001. Impact of eutrophication on biodiversity of the macrozoobenthos community in a Chinese shallow lake. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 16: 171–178.Google Scholar
  26. Helminen, H., J. Karjalain, M. Kurkilahti, M. Rask, and J. Sarvala. 2000. Eutrophication and fish biodiversity in Finnish Lakes. Verhandlungen Internationale Vereinigung Limnologie 27: 194–199.Google Scholar
  27. Intervet. 2006. Diseases of Tilapia—an introduction. (http://www.thefishsite.com/articles/139/diseases-of-tilapia-an-introduction).
  28. Jacquet, J., and D. Pauly. 2007. The rise of seafood awareness campaigns in an era of collapsing fisheries. Marine Policy 31: 308–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Karapanagiotidis, I.T., M.V. Bell, D.C. Little, A. Yakupitiyage, and S.K. Rakshit. 2006. Polyunsaturated fatty acid content of wild and farmed Tilapias in Thailand: Effect of aquaculture practices and implications for human nutrition. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry 54: 4304–4310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Karim, M. 2006. The Livelihood Impacts of Fishponds Integrated Within Farming Systems in Mymensingh District, Bangladesh. University of Stirling, Stirling, 317 pp.Google Scholar
  31. Kautsky, N., H. Berg, C. Folke, J. Larsson, and M. Troell. 1997. Ecological footprint for assessment of resource use and development limitations in shrimp and Tilapia culture. Aquaculture Research 28: 753–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Knud-Hansen, C.F., K.D. Hopkins, and H. Guttman. 2003. A comparative analysis of the fixed-input, computer modelling, and algal bioassay approaches for identifying pond fertilization requirements for semi-intensive aquaculture. Aquaculture 228: 189–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lehane, L., and G. Rawlin. 2000. Topically acquired bacterial zoonoses from fish: A review. Medical Journal of Australia 173: 256–259.Google Scholar
  34. Little, D.C., M. Karim, D. Turongrouang, E.J. Morales, F.J. Murray, B.K. Barman, M.M. Hague, N. Kundu, et al. 2007. Livelihood impacts of ponds in Asia: Opportunities and constraints, in fishponds in farming systems. In Fishponds in Farming Systems, ed. A. van der Zijpp, and J.A.J. Verreth, 177–202. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  35. Little, D.C. and B. Belton. 2008. Understanding limitations of the Tilapia Aquaculture Dialogue. Paper presented the WWF TAD Meeting, December 15–16, in Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  36. Little, D.C., and P. Edwards. 1999. Alternative strategies for livestock-fish integration with emphasis on Asia. AMBIO 28: 118–124.Google Scholar
  37. Little, D.C., and P. Edwards. 2003. Integrated livestock-fish farming systems. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
  38. Little, D.C., P. Surintaraseree, and N.L. Innes-Taylor. 1996. Fish culture in rainfed ricefields of Northeast Thailand. Aquaculture 140: 295–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Little, D.C., F.J. Murray, E. Azim, W. Leschen, K. Boyd, A. Watterson, and J.A. Young. 2008. Options for producing a warm-water fish in the UK: Limits to “Green Growth”? Trends in Food Science and Technology 19: 255–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lowe-McConnell, R. 2006. The Tilapia Trail: The Life Story of a Fish Biologist. Ascot, UK: MPM Publishing.Google Scholar
  41. Mantilla, D., H.G. Kristinsson, M.O. Balaban, W.S. Otwell, F.A. Chapman, and S. Raghavan. 2008. Carbon monoxide treatments to impart and retain muscle color in tilapia fillets. Journal of Food Science 73: 390–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Montero, D., M.S. Izquierdo, L. Tort, L. Robaina, and J.M. Vergara. 1999. High stocking density produces crowding stress altering some physiological and biochemical parameters in Gilthead Seabream, Sparus aurata, juveniles. Fish Physiology and Biochemistry 20: 53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Muendo, P., J.J. Stoorvogel, N.E. Gamal, and M.C.J. Verdegem. 2005. Rhizons improved estimation of nutrient losses because of seepage in aquaculture ponds. Aquaculture Research 36: 1333–1336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Naylor, R., R.J. Goldburg, H. Mooney, M. Beveridge, J. Clay, C. Folke, N. Kautsky, J. Lubchenco, et al. 1998. Nature’s subsidies to shrimp and salmon farming. Science 282: 883–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Naylor, R.L., R.J. Goldburg, J.H. Primavera, N. Kautsky, M.C.M. Beveridge, J. Clay, C. Folke, J. Lubchenco, et al. 2000. Effect of aquaculture on world fish supplies. Nature 405: 1017–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nemtzov, S.C., and L. Olsvig-Whittaker. 2004. The use of netting over fish ponds as a hazard to waterbirds. Waterbirds 26: 416–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Papatryphon, E., J. Petit, S.J. Kaushik, and H.M.G. van der Werf. 2004. Environmental impact assessment of salmonid feeds using life cycle assessment. AMBIO 33: 316–323.Google Scholar
  48. Phong Lan, N.T., P.C. Cam, A. Dalsgaard, and D. Mara. 2007. Microbiological quality offish grown in wastewater-fed and non-wastewater-fed fishponds in Hanoi, Vietnam: Influence of hygiene practices in local retail markets. Journal of Water Health 5: 209–218.Google Scholar
  49. Pimental, D., B. Berger, D. Filiberto, M. Newton, B. Wolfe, E. Karabinakis, S. Clark, E. Poon, et al. 2004. Water resources: Agricultural and environmental issues. Biosciences 54: 909–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shoemaker, C. and P. Klesius. 1997. Streptococcal disease problems and control: A review. In Tilapia aquaculture, ed. K. Fitzsimmons, 671–680. NREAES, Ithaca.Google Scholar
  51. Snieszko, S. 1974. The effects of environmental stress on outbreaks of infectious diseases of fishes. Journal of Fish Biology 6: 197–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tacon, A., M. Hasan, and R. Subasinghe. 2006. Use of fishery resources as feed inputs to aquaculture development: Trends and policy implications. In FAO fisheries circular. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
  53. Tucker, C. 2000. Off-flavor problems in aquaculture. Reviews in Fisheries Science 8: 45–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vandergeest, P. 2007. Certification and communities: Alternatives for regulating the social and environmental impacts of shrimp farming. World Development 35: 1152–1157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. WWF. 2007. Tilapia aquaculture dialogues—ensuring responsible management of the world’s farmed fish. (http://www.worldwildlife.org/cci/pubs/salmonfactsheet.pdf).
  56. WWF. 2008a. Tilapia Aquaculture Dialogue Draft Standards Version 1.0. (http://www.worldwildlife.org/what/globalmarkets/aquaculture/WWFBinaryitem10225.pdf).
  57. WWF. 2008b. Pangasius aquaculture dialogue. 3–4 December 2008. Meeting Summary. (http://www.worldwildlife.org/what/globalmarkets/aquaculture/WWFBinaryitem11128.pdf).
  58. WWF. 2008c. (http://www.wwf.org/).
  59. WWF. 2009. WWF to Help Fund Creation Of Aquaculture Stewardship Council. (http://www.worldwildlife.org/who/media/press/2009/WWFPresitem11339.html).
  60. Yi, Y., and K.C. Lin. 2002. Supplemental feeding for semi-intensive culture of Red Tilapia in brackishwater ponds. In Pond Dynamics/Aquaculture CRSP Annual Technical Report, ed. K. McElwee, K. Lewis, M. Nidiffer, and P. Buitrago, 97–102. Oregon State University, Corvallis.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ben Belton
    • 1
  • Francis Murray
    • 1
  • James Young
    • 2
  • Trevor Telfer
    • 1
  • David C. Little
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of AquacultureUniversity of StirlingStirlingUK
  2. 2.Department of MarketingUniversity of StirlingStirlingUK

Personalised recommendations