Advertisement

Handling uncertainty in social media textual information for improving venue recommendation formulation quality in social networks

  • Dionisis Margaris
  • Costas VassilakisEmail author
  • Dimitris Spiliotopoulos
Original Article
  • 17 Downloads

Abstract

One of the major problems that social media front is to continuously produce successful, user-targeted information, in the form of recommendations, which are produced by applying methods from the area of recommender systems. One of the most important applications of recommender systems in social networks is venue recommendation, targeted by the majority of the leading social networks (Facebook, TripAdvisor, OpenTable, etc.). However, recommender systems’ algorithms rely only on the existence of numeric ratings which are typically entered by users, and in the context of social networks, this information is scarce, since many social networks allow only reviews, rather than explicit ratings. Even if explicit ratings are supported, users may still resort to expressing their views and rating their experiences through submitting posts, which is the predominant user practice in social networks, rather than entering explicit ratings. User posts contain textual information, which can be exploited to compute derived ratings, and these derived ratings can be used in the recommendation process in the lack of explicitly entered ratings. Emerging recommender systems encompass this approach, without however tackling the fact that the ratings computed on the basis of textual information may be inaccurate, due to the very nature of the computation process. In this paper, we present an approach which extracts features of the textual information, a widely available source of information in venue category, to compute a confidence metric for the ratings that are computed from texts; then, this confidence metric is used in the user similarity computation and venue rating prediction formulation process, along with the computed rating. Furthermore, we propose a venue recommendation method that considers the generated venue rating predictions, along with venue QoS, similarity and spatial distance metrics in order to generate venue recommendations for social network users. Finally, we validate the accuracy of the rating prediction method and the user satisfaction from the recommendations generated by the recommendation formulation algorithm. Conclusively, the introduction of the confidence level significantly improves rating prediction accuracy, leverages the ability to generate personalized recommendations for users and increases user satisfaction.

Keywords

Social networks Recommender systems Collaborative filtering Venue recommendation formulation Rating prediction Textual information Uncertainty Confidence level 

Notes

References

  1. Aliannejadi M, Mele I, Crestani F (2016) User model enrichment for venue recommendation. In: Seffah A, Penzenstadler B, Alves C, Peng X (eds) Information retrieval technology. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 9994, pp 212–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aliannejadi M, Mele I, Crestani F (2017) Personalized ranking for context-aware venue suggestion. In: Proceedings of the symposium on applied computing, Marrakech, Morocco, pp 960–962Google Scholar
  3. Aslam J, Montague M (2001) Models for metasearch. In: Proceedings of the 24th annual international conference on research and development in information retrieval, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, pp 276–284Google Scholar
  4. Bakshy E, Rosenn I, Marlow C, Adamic L (2012a) The role of social networks in information diffusion. In: Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web, Lyon, France, pp 519–528Google Scholar
  5. Bakshy E, Eckles D, Yan R, Rosenn I (2012b) Social influence in social advertising: evidence from field experiments. In: Proceedings of the 13th ACM conference on electronic commerce, Valencia, Spain, pp 146–161Google Scholar
  6. Balabanovic M, Shoham Y (1997) Fab: content-based, collaborative recommendation. Commun ACM 40(3):66–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradley MM, Lang PJ (1999) Affective norms for English words (ANEW): instruction manual and affective ratings. Technical Report C-1, The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of FloridaGoogle Scholar
  8. Brysbaert M, Warriner AB, Kuperman V (2014) Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behav Res Methods 46(3):904–911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen L, Chen G, Wang F (2015) Recommender systems based on user reviews: the state of the art. User Model User-Adap Inter 25(2):99–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chikersal P, Poria S, Cambria E, Gelbukh A, Siong CE (2015) Modelling public sentiment in Twitter: using linguistic patterns to enhance supervised learning. In: Gelbukh A (ed) Computational linguistics and intelligent text processing. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 9042, pp 49–65Google Scholar
  11. Cieslik J (2017a) nyyelp: Predicting yelp review rating using recurrent neural networks. https://github.com/i008/nyyelp. Accessed 18 Nov 2018
  12. Cieslik J (2017b) IPython notebook document for nyyelp: predicting yelp review rating using recurrent neural networks. https://github.com/i008/nyyelp/blob/master/nlp.ipynb. Accessed 31 Nov 2018
  13. Cocarascu O, Toni F (2018) Combining deep learning and argumentative reasoning for the analysis of social media textual content using small data sets. Comput Linguist 44(4):833–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Contratres FG, Alves-Souza SN, Filgueiras LVL, DeSouza LS (2018) Sentiment analysis of social network data for cold-start relief in recommender systems. In: WorldCIST’18 2018. Proceedings of the 6th world conference on information systems and technologies, Naples, Italy, pp 122–132Google Scholar
  15. Eirinaki M, Gao J, Varlamis I, Tserpes K (2018) Recommender systems for large-scale social networks: a review of challenges and solutions. Future Gener Comput Syst 78(1):413–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fan M, Khademi M (2014) Predicting a business star in yelp from its reviews text alone. arXiv preprint arXiv:1401.0864. Accessed 15 Nov 2018
  17. Gilbert E, Karahalios K (2009) Predicting tie strength with social media. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Boston, USA, pp 211–220Google Scholar
  18. Gregory B (2013) Kaggle YELP business rating prediction. https://github.com/theusual/kaggle-yelp-business-rating-prediction. Accessed 22 Nov 2018
  19. He D, Wu D (2008) Toward a robust data fusion for document retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 2008 international conference on natural language processing and knowledge engineering (NLP-KE '08).  https://doi.org/10.1109/nlpke.2008.4906754
  20. Herlocker JL, Konstan JA, Terveen LG, Riedl JT (2004) Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems. ACM Trans Inf Syst 22(1):5–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. ITU (1998) Recommendation E.800 Quality of service and dependability vocabulary. Blue Book, Fascicle II.3Google Scholar
  22. Jameel S, Liao Y, Lam W, Schockaert S, Xie X (2016) Exploring urban lifestyles using a nonparametric temporal graphical model. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM international conference on the theory of information retrieval, Newark, DE, USA, pp 251–260Google Scholar
  23. Jones CB, Alani H, Tudhope D (2001) Geographical information retrieval with ontologies of place. In: Proceedings of the 2001 conference on spatial information theory, Morro Bay, CA, USA, pp 322–335Google Scholar
  24. Juhasz BJ, Yap MJ (2013) Sensory experience ratings for over 5000 mono- and disyllabic words. Behav Res Methods 45(1):160–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Keras (2018) The python deep learning library. https://keras.io/. Accessed 31 Nov 2018
  26. Li Y, Nie J, Zhang Y, Wang B, Yan B, Weng F (2010) Contextual recommendation based on text mining. In: Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on computational linguistics, Beijing, China, pp 692–700Google Scholar
  27. Liu B (2017) Opinion lexicon (or sentiment lexicon). https://www.cs.uic.edu/~liub/FBS/sentiment-analysis.html. Accessed 24 Nov 2018
  28. Liu F, Lee HJ (2010) Use of social network information to enhance collaborative filtering performance. Expert Syst Appl 37:4772–4778.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.12.061 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu B, Hu M, Cheng J (2005) Opinion observer: analyzing and comparing opinions on the web. In: Proceedings of the 14th international World Wide Web conference, Chiba, Japan, pp 342–351Google Scholar
  30. Maks I, Izquierdo R, Frontini F, Agerri R, Azpeitia A, Vossen P (2014) Generating Polarity Lexicons with WordNet propagation in five languages. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on language resources and evaluation, Reykjavik, Iceland, pp 1156–1161Google Scholar
  31. Margaris D, Vassilakis C (2017) Exploiting Internet of Things information to enhance venues’ recommendation accuracy. Serv Oriented Comput Appl 11(4):393–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Margaris D, Vassilakis C (2018a) Dataset for rating prediction for social media. https://github.com/costasvassilakis/socialMediaRatingPrediction. Accessed 2 March 2019
  33. Margaris D, Vassilakis C (2018b) Exploiting rating abstention intervals for addressing concept drift in social network recommender systems. Information 10(7), 230Google Scholar
  34. Margaris D, Vassilakis C (2018c) Improving collaborative filtering’s rating prediction accuracy by considering users’ rating variability. In: Proceedings of the 4th IEEE international conference on big data intelligence and computing, Athens, Greece, pp 1022–1027Google Scholar
  35. Margaris D, Vassilakis C, Georgiadis P (2015) An integrated framework for adapting WS-BPEL scenario execution using QoS and collaborative filtering techniques. Sci Comput Program 98:707–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Margaris D, Vassilakis C, Georgiadis P (2016) Recommendation information diffusion in social networks considering user influence and semantics. Soc Netw Anal Min 6(108):1–22Google Scholar
  37. Margaris D, Vassilakis C, Georgiadis P (2017) Knowledge-based leisure time recommendations in social networks. Current trends on knowledge-based systems: theory and applications. Springer, Berlin, pp 24–48Google Scholar
  38. Margaris D, Vassilakis C, Georgiadis P (2018) Query personalization using social network information and collaborative filtering techniques. Future Gener Comput Syst 78(1):440–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Maurya CG, Gore S, Rajput DS (2018) A use of social media for opinion mining: an overview (with the use of hybrid textual and visual sentiment ontology). In: Proceedings of international conference on recent advancement on computer and communication, Bhopal, India, pp 315–324Google Scholar
  40. McAuley J, Leskovec J (2013) Hidden factors and hidden topics: understanding rating dimensions with review text. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM international conference on recommender systems, Hong Kong, China, pp 165–172Google Scholar
  41. Mersha T, Adlakha V (1992) Attributes of service quality: the consumers’ perspective. Int J Serv Ind Manag 3(3):34–45.  https://doi.org/10.1108/09564239210015157 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Monfil-Contreras EU, Alor-Hernández G, Cortes-Robles G, Rodriguez-Gonzalez A, Gonzalez-Carrasco I (2013) RESYGEN: a recommendation system generator using domain-based heuristics. Expert Syst Appl 40(1):242–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Moshfeghi Y, Piwowarski B, Jose JM (2010) Handling data sparsity in collaborative filtering using emotion and semantic based features. In: Proceedings of the 34th international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval, Beijing, China, pp 625–634Google Scholar
  44. Musat CC, Liang Y, Faltings B (2013) Recommendation using textual opinions. In: Proceedings of the 23rd international joint conference on artificial intelligence, Beijing China, pp 2684–2690Google Scholar
  45. Pang B, Lee L, Vaithyanathan S (2002) Thumbs up? Sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. In: Proceedings of the 2002 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, Stroudsburg, PA, pp 79–86Google Scholar
  46. Pennington J, Socher R, Manning CD (2014) GloVe: global vectors for word representation. In: Proceedings of the conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, Doha, Qatar, pp 1532–1543Google Scholar
  47. Pero Š, Horváth T (2013) Opinion-driven matrix factorization for rating prediction. In: Proceedings of the 21st international conference on user modeling, adaptation and personalization, Rome, Italy, pp 1–13Google Scholar
  48. Pirasteh P, Jung JJ, Hwang D (2014) Item-based collaborative filtering with attribute correlation: a case study on movie recommendation. In: Proceedings of the 6th Asian conference on intelligent information and database systems (ACIIDS 2014) Bangkok, Thailand, 7–9 April 2014, Proceedings, Part II, pp 245–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Poirier D, Fessant F, Tellier I (2010) Reducing the cold-start problem in content recommendation through opinion classification. In: Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM international conference on web intelligence and intelligent agent technology, Toronto, Canada, pp 204–207Google Scholar
  50. Raghavan S, Gunasekar S, Ghosh J (2012) Review quality aware collaborative filtering. In: Proceedings of the 6th ACM conference on recommender systems, Dublin, Ireland, pp 123–130Google Scholar
  51. Ritter A, Clark S, Etzioni M, Etzioni O (2011) Named entity recognition in tweets: an experimental study. In: Proceedings of the 2011 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, pp 1524–1534Google Scholar
  52. Seroussi Y, Bohnert F, Zukerman I (2011) Personalised rating prediction for new users using latent factor models. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM conference on hypertext and hypermedia, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, pp 47–56Google Scholar
  53. Shardanand U, Maes P (1995) Social information filtering: algorithms for automating “Word of Mouth’’. In: Proceedings of the 1995 SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Denver, Colorado, USA, pp 210–217Google Scholar
  54. Tiago C, Soares C, Carvalho A (2018) Metalearning and recommender systems: a literature review and empirical study on the algorithm selection problem for collaborative filtering. Inf Sci 423:128–144MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Turney PD (2002) Thumbs up or thumbs down?: Semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. In: Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting on association for computational linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, pp 417–424Google Scholar
  56. Van der Maaten LJP (2014) Accelerating t-SNE using tree-based algorithms. J Mach Learn Res 15:3221–3245MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  57. Wang X, Zhao Y-L, Nie L, Gao Y, Nie W, Zha Z-J, Chua T-S (2015) Semantic-based location recommendation with multimodal venue semantics. IEEE Trans Multimed 17(3):409–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Yang P, Fang H (2015) Combining opinion profile modeling with complex context filtering for contextual suggestion. In: Proceedings of the 24th text retreival conference, Gaithersburg, USA, pp 1–4Google Scholar
  59. Yun Y, Hooshyar D, Jo J, Lim H (2018) Developing a hybrid collaborative filtering recommendation system with opinion mining on purchase review. J Inf Sci 44(3):331–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zhao G, Qian X, Xie X (2016) User-service rating prediction by exploring social users’ rating behaviors. IEEE Trans Multimed 18(3):496–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Informatics and TelecommunicationsUniversity of AthensAthensGreece
  2. 2.Department of Informatics and TelecommunicationsUniversity of the PeloponneseTripoliGreece

Personalised recommendations