Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative analysis of queuing mechanisms: Droptail, RED and NLRED

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Social Network Analysis and Mining Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Congestion control in today’s Internet is an important issue. Congestion control algorithms have been extensively studied for managing the traffic and maintaining the stability in the network. In traffic management system, queuing plays an important role. This paper presents a comparison of three queuing mechanisms, namely Drop-tail, random early detection (RED) and nonlinear random early detection (NLRED) in wired network on the basis of different performance metrics such as end-to-end delay, throughput, packet drop and packet delivery ratio using NS2 simulator. The simulation results show that in high congestion, NLRED performs best while in low cohesive network Droptail gives good result. Also, we analyzed these queuing mechanisms in real audio traffic; again, all the experiments show that in congested network NLRED and RED are better while in low congested network Drop-tail is better because in heavy congested network congestion avoidance mechanism will help the network to achieve better performance. But in low congested network, the unnecessary computation avoidance mechanisms will degrade the network performance. However, if parameters are set effectively in RED, then it will be the best queuing mechanism for that particular network.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdel-jaber H (2015) Performance study of active queue management methods: adaptive GRED, REDD, and GRED-linear analytical model. J King Saud Univ Comput Inform Sci 27(4):416–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Hu C, Ji Z (2010) An improved ARED algorithm for congestion control of network transmission. Math Probl Eng 2010:329035. doi:10.1155/2010/329035

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chhabra K, Kshirsagar M, Zadgaonkar AS (2013) Effective congestion indication for performance improvement of random early detection. Int J Innov Technol Explor Eng 3:35–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Huebner F (2004) Performance, quality of service, and control of next-generation communication networks ii. In: Proceedings of SPIE international society for optical engineering

  • Hui WANG, Xiao-Hui LIN, Kai-Yu ZHOU, Nin XIE, Hui LI (2009) On the scalable fairness and efficient active queue management 399 of RED. Int J Commun Netw Syst Sci 2(01):73–83. doi:10.4236/ijcns.2009.21009

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain T, Annappa B, Tahiliani MP (2014). Performance evaluation of CoDel for active queue management in wired-cum-wireless networks. In: 2014 fourth international conference on advanced computing and communication technologies (ACCT). IEEE, pp 381–385

  • Jiang K, Wang X, Xi Y (2004) Nonlinear analysis of RED—a comparative study. Chaos Solitons Fractals 21(5):1153–1162

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi M, Mansata A, Talauliker S, Beard C (2005) Design and analysis of multi-level active queue management mechanisms for emergency traffic. Comput Commun 28(2):162–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katiyar V, Jain AC (2014) A survey on red and some it’s varients incongestioncontrol mechanism. Int J Eng Manage Res 4(4):184–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaur K, Kaur N, Singh G (2013) Performance comparison of queuing algorithms: a review. IOSR J Electron Commun Eng (IOSR- JECE) 8(4):46–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khademi N, Othman M (2010) Least attained service queue management for ns-2 network simulator. In: 2010 second international conference on computer research and development. IEEE, pp 317–321

  • Mohamed MHE (2010) Some active queue management methods for controlling packet queueing delay. Design and performance evaluation of some new versions of active queue management schemes for controlling packet queueing delay in a buffer to satisfy quality of service requirements for real-time multimedia applications. Doctoral dissertation, University of Bradford

  • Soni H, Mishra PK (2013) Reducing packet loss in active queue management. Int J Comput Appl 81(16):25–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu Q, Sun J (2014) A simple active queue management based on the prediction of the packet arrival rate. J Netw Comput Appl 42:12–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yahia M, Bíró J (2005) Admission control for elastic traffic using RED and/or droptail queues. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on telecommunications, 2005. ConTEL 2005, vol 2. IEEE, pp 391–396

  • Zaheer H, Pant M (2015) A differential evolution approach for solving integer programming problems. In: Proceedings of fourth international conference on soft computing for problem solving. Springer, India, pp 409–420

  • Zaheer H, Pant M, Kumar S, Monakhov O, Monakhova E, Deep K (2014) A new guiding force strategy for differential evolution. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag. doi:10.1007/s13198-014-0322-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou K, Yeung KL, Li VO (2006) Nonlinear RED: a simple yet efficient active queue management scheme. Comput Netw 50(18):3784–3794

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hira Zaheer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rastogi, S., Zaheer, H. Comparative analysis of queuing mechanisms: Droptail, RED and NLRED. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 6, 70 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-016-0382-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-016-0382-5

Keywords

Navigation