Advertisement

Applying the Clique Percolation Method to analyzing cross-market branch banking network structure: the case of Illinois

  • Bin ZhouEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

This study applies the Clique Percolation Method (CPM) to an investigation of the changing spatial organization of the Illinois cross-market branch banking network. Nonoverlapping community detection algorithms assign nodes into exclusive communities and, when results are mapped, these techniques may generate spatially disjointed geographical regions, an undesirable characteristic for geographical study. Alternative overlapping community detection algorithms allow overlapping membership where a node can be a member of different communities. Such a structure simultaneously accommodates spatial proximity and spatial separation which occur with respect to a node in relation to other nodes in the system. Applying such a structure in geographical analysis helps preserve well-established principles regarding spatial relationships within the geography discipline. The result can also be mapped for display and correct interpretation. The CPM is chosen in this study due to the complete connection within cliques which simulates the practice by banking institutions of forming highly connected networks through multi-location operations in order to diversify their business and hedge against risks. Applying the CPM helps reveal the spatial pattern of branch banking connections which would otherwise be difficult to see. However, the CPM has been shown to not be among the best performing overlapping community detection algorithms. Future research should explore other possible algorithms for detecting overlapping communities. Detecting communities in a network only reveals certain characteristics of the spatial organization of the network, rather than providing explanation of the spatial-network patterns revealed. Full interpretation of the pattern must rely on the attribute data and additional information. This may illustrate the value of an integrated approach in geographical analysis using both social network analysis and spatial analysis techniques.

Keywords

Social network analysis Clique percolation method Overlapping communities Branch banking network Illinois 

References

  1. Adam J, Faust K, Lovasi GS (2012) Capturing context: integrating spatial and social network analysis. Soc Netw 34:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aldecoa R, Marín I (2013) Exploring the limits of community detection strategies in complex networks. PubMed Central 17(July). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3713530/. Accessed Dec 5 2015
  3. Allen F, Gale D (2000) Financial contagion. J Polit Econ 108:1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blondel, VD, Guillaume, JP, Lambiotte R, Lefebvre E (2008) Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J Stat Mech Theor Exp: P10008Google Scholar
  5. Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Johnson JC (2013) Analyzing social networks. Sage Publications Ltd., LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Brevoort KP, Wolken JD (2009) Does distance matter in banking? In: Alessandrini P, Fratianni M, Zazzaro A (eds) The changing geography of banking and finance. Springer, New York, pp 27–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Broome LL (2004) The legal giants that propelled the North Carolina banks to national prominence: Paul J. Polking, Marion A. Cowell, and Jerong C. Herring. N C Bank Inst J 8:119–140Google Scholar
  8. Calomiris CW (2000) US banking deregulation in historical perspective. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chapman JM, Westerfield RB (1942) Branch banking: its historical and theoretical position in America and abroad. Harper & Brothers Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Chicago Tribune (2001) Interest groups stand in the way of greatness. Chicago Tribune April 25 2001. http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2001-04-25/news/0104250249_1_banking-industry-investment-banks-chicago-banks. Accessed May 24 2015
  11. Cotugno M, Monferrà S, Sampagnaro G (2012) Relationship lending, hierarchical distance and credit tightening: Evidence from the financial crisis. J Bank Finance 37:1372–1385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Daragonova G, Pattison P, Mitchell J, Bill A, Watts, Baum S (2012) Network and geography: modelling network community structures as the outcome of both spatial and network processes. Soc Netw 34:6–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Davison L (1997) Continental Illinois and “Too big to fail”. In: History of the eighties: lessons for the future. Washington D.C.: FDIC, pp 235–258Google Scholar
  14. DeYoung R, Klier T (2004) Why bank one left Chicago: one piece in a bigger puzzle. Chicago Fed Letter (April) No. 201Google Scholar
  15. Emch M, Root ED, Giebultowicz S, Ali M, Perez-Heydrich C, Yunus M (2012) Integration of spatial and social network analysis in disease transmission studies. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 102(5):1004–1015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ferrier GD, Shao Y, Yeager TJ (2013) The effect of distance on community bank performance following acquisitions and consolidations. In: Proceedings of Community Banking in the 21st Century Conference, the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. https://www.stlouisfed.org/~/media/Files/PDFs/Banking/CBRC-2013/Effect_of_Distance_on_Community_Bank_Mergers.pdf. Accessed 4 May 2015
  17. Fortunato S (2010) Community detection in graphs. Phys Rep 486:75–174MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gaskins F (2011) IPO preview: midland states Bancorp. http://seekingalpha.com/article/286334-ipo-preview-midland-states-bancorp. Accessed 4 May 2015
  19. Girvan M, Newman MEJ (2002) Community structure in social and biological networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:9821–9826MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation (2015) Illinois bank branching history. http://www.idfpr.com/Banks/cbt/STATS/BR-HIST.ASP. Accessed 4 May 2015
  21. Lancichinetti A, Fortunato S (2009) Community detection algorithms: a comparative study. Phys Rev E 80:056117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lancichinetti A, Radicchi F, Ramasco JJ, Fortunato S (2011) Finding strategically significant communities in networks. PLoS One 6(4):e18961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Morgan DP, Rime B, Strahan PE (2004) Bank integration and business cycles. Q J Econ 126:1555–1584CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Newman MEJ (2004) Detecting community structure in networks. Eur Phys J B 38:321–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Newman MEJ, Girvan M (2004) Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Phys Rev E 69:026113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Palla G, Derenyi I, Farkas I, Vicsek T (2005) Uncovering the overlapping community structure of complex networks in nature and society. Nature 435:814–818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Park KY (2012) Interstate banking deregulation and bank loan commitment. BE J Macroecon 12:1–27Google Scholar
  28. Petersen MA, Rajan RG (2002) Does distance still matter? The information revolution in small business lending. J Financ 57(6):2533–2570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Phillips KR, Nordlund J, Coronado R (2011) Factors behind the convergence of economic performance across the US States. Federal Reserve Bank Dallas Work Paper 1108Google Scholar
  30. Radil SM, Flint C, Tina GE (2010) Spatializing social networks: Using social network analysis to investigate geographies of gang rivalry, territoriality, and violence in Los Angeles. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 100(2):308–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Raghavan UN, Albert R, Kumara R (2007) Near linear time algorithm to detect community structures in large-scale networks. Phys Rev E 76:030106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rice T, Davis E (2007) The branch banking boom in Illinois: a byproduct of restrictive branching laws. Chicago Fed Letter (May)Google Scholar
  33. Rosvall M, Bergstrom CT (2007) An information theoretic-framework for solving community structure in complex networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104(18):7327–7331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schmeltzer J (2004) Illinois laws curb banks' size, scope. Chicago Tribune (Jan. 16)Google Scholar
  35. Tobler W (1970) A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Econ Geogr 46(2):234–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Van den Heuvel S (2012) Banking conditions and the effects of monetary policy: evidence from US states. BE J Macroecon 12(1):20Google Scholar
  37. Vasudevan M, Balakrishnan H, Deo N (2009) Community discovery algorithms: An overview. Congr Numer 196:127–142MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. Xie J, Szymanski BK (2013) LabelRank: a stabilized label propagation algorithm for community detection in networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE Network Science Workshop, pp 138–143Google Scholar
  39. Xie J, Kelley S, Szymanski BK (2013) Overlapping community detection in networks: the state-of-the-art and comparative study. ACM Computing Surveys 45(4): Article 43Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographySouthern Illinois University EdwardsvilleEdwardsvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations