Measuring UK crime gangs: a social network problem

Original Article

Abstract

This paper describes the output of a study to tackle the problem of gang-related crime in the UK; we present the intelligence and routinely-gathered data available to a UK regional police force, and describe an initial social network analysis of gangs in the Greater Manchester area of the UK between 2000 and 2006. By applying social network analysis techniques, we attempt to detect the birth of two new gangs based on local features (modularity, cliques) and global features (clustering coefficients). Thus for the future, identifying the changes in these can help us identify the possible birth of new gangs (sub-networks) in the social system. Furthermore, we study the dynamics of these networks globally and locally, and have identified the global characteristics that tell us that they are not random graphs—they are small world graphs—implying that the formation of gangs is not a random event. However, we are not yet able to conclude anything significant about scale-free characteristics due to insufficient sample size. A final analysis looks at gang roles and develops further insight into the nature of the different link types, referring to Klerks’ ’third generation’ analysis, as well as a brief discussion of the potential UK policy applications of this work.

Keywords

Gangs Gun crime Scale-free networks Small-world networks Social distance Communities Crime policy 

References

  1. Albert R, Barabási AL (2002) Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev Mod Phys 74(1):47–91MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albert R, Albert I, Nakarado GL (2004) Structural vulnerability of the North American Power Grid. Phys Rev E 69(2)Google Scholar
  3. Aldridge J, Medina-Ariza J, Ralphs R (2008) Street Gangs, Migration and Ethnicity, Willan, chap Dangers and Problems of Doing ’Gang’ Research in the UK, pp 31–46Google Scholar
  4. Andamic LA, Lukose RM, Huberman B (2003) Handbook of graphs and networks: from the genome to the internet, chap Local Search in Unstructured Networks, Wiley pp 295–317Google Scholar
  5. Baron SW, Tindall DB (1993) Network structure and delinquent attitudes within a Juvenile Gang. Soc Netw 15(3):255–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barrows J, Huff CR (2009) Gangs and Public Policy: Constructing and Deconstructing Gang Databases. Criminol Public Policy 8(4):675–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Batchelor S (2009) Girls, gangs and violence: Assessing the evidence. Probat J 56(4):399–414MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. BBC News (2003) Gangs and guns - who takes the rap? http://www.bbc.co.uk/manchester/have_your_say/2003/01/06/gun_crime.shtml. Accessed 01 May 2015
  9. BBC News (2004) Gun gang members ‘die by age 24’. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/manchester/3907049.stm. Accessed 01 May 2015
  10. BBC News (2010) Greater Manchester gun crime down by 20%. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-11563463. Accessed 01 May 2015
  11. Bjerregaard B, Lizotte AJ (1995) Gun ownership and gang membership. J Crim Law Criminol 86(1):37–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Borgatti SP, Everett MG (2000) Models of core/periphery structures. Soc Netw 21(4):375–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bricknell S (2008) Criminal use of handguns in Australia. Australian Institute of Criminology, no, Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, p 361Google Scholar
  14. Bullock K, Tilley N (2002) Shootings, gangs and violent incidents in manchester: developing a crime reduction strategy. Crime Reduction Research Series CRRS13, UK Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
  15. Bullock K, Tilley N (2009) Evidence-based policing and crime reduction. Policing 3(4):381–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Burnap P, Williams ML, Sloan L, Rana OF, Housley W, Edwards A, Knight V, Procter R, Voss A (2014) Tweeting the terror: modelling the social media reaction to the Woolwich terrorist attack. Soc Netw Anal Mining 4(1):206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Calvó-Armengol A, Zenou Y (2004) Social networks and crime decisions: the role of social structure in facilitating delinquent behavior. Int Econ Rev 45(3):939–958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Calvó-Armengol A, Verdier T, Zenou Y (2007) Strong and weak ties in employment and crimes. J Pub Econ 91(1–2):203–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Clauset A, Shalizi CR, Newman MEJ (2009) Power-law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Rev 51(4):661–703MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Costa LF, Rodrigues FA, Travieso G, Villas Boas PR (2007) Characterization of complex networks: a survey of measurements. Adv Phys 56(1):167–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Duijn PAC, Kashirin V, Sloot PMA (2014) The relative ineffectiveness of criminal network disruption. Sci Reports 4(4238). doi:10.1038/srep04238
  22. Ferrara E, De Meo P, Catanese S, Fiumara G (2014) Detecting criminal organizations in mobile phone networks. Exp Syst Appl 41(13):5733–5750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Golding B, McClory J (2008) Getting to the point—Reducing gun and knife crime in Britain: lessons from abroad. Tech. rep, Policy Exchange. ISBN 978-1-906097-39-4Google Scholar
  24. Goldstein ML, Morris SA, Yen GG (2004) Problems with fitting to the power-law distribution. Eur Phys J B Conden Matter Comp Syst 41(2):255–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hales G, Lewis C, Silverstone D (2006) Gun Crime: the market in and use of illegal firearms. Home Office Research Study 298, UK Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
  26. Hallsworth S, Silverstone D (2009) ‘That’s life innit’ A British perspective on guns, crime and social order. Criminol Crim Just 9(3):359–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hansen LL (2005) Girl “Crew” members doing gender, boy “crew” members doing violence: an ethnographic and network analysis of Maria Hinojosa’s New York gangs. West Crim Rev 6(1):134–144Google Scholar
  28. Hill KG, Lui C, Hawkins JD (2001) Early precursors of gang membership: a study of Seattle Youth. Juvenile Justice BulletinGoogle Scholar
  29. Hughes LA (2005) Studying youth gangs: alternative methods and conclusions. J Contemp Crim Justice 21(2):98–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hutchins CE, Benham-Hutchins M (1995) Hiding in plain sight: criminal network analysis. Comput Math Organ Theory 16(1):89–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jackson MO (2010) Social and economic networks. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  32. Jacobs JB (2009) Gang databases: context and questions. Criminol Public Policy 8(4):705–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Klerks P (2001) The network paradigm applied to criminal organizations. Connections 24(3):53–65Google Scholar
  34. Liu W, Pellegrini M, Wang X (2014) Detecting communities based on network topology. Sci Reports 4(5739)Google Scholar
  35. Lo TW (2011) Triadization of youth gangs in Hong Kong. Br J Criminol 52(3):556–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Newman MEJ (2003) The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev 45(2):167–256MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Oatley G, Crick T (2014a) Changing faces: identifying complex behavioural profiles. In: Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Human Aspects of Information Security, Privacy and Trust (HAS 2014), Springer, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8533, pp 282–293Google Scholar
  38. Oatley G, Crick T (2014b) Exploring UK Crime Networks. In: 2014 International Symposium on Foundations of Open Source Intelligence and Security Informatics (FOSINT-SI 2014), IEEE PressGoogle Scholar
  39. Oatley G, Crick T (2014c) Measuring UK Crime Gangs. In: 2014 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM 2014), IEEE PressGoogle Scholar
  40. Oatley G, Zeleznikow J, Leary R, Ewart B (2005) From links to meaning: a Burglary Data Case Study. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems (KES 2005), Springer, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3684, pp 813–822Google Scholar
  41. Oatley G, Ewart B, Zeleznikow J (2006a) Decision support systems for police: lessons from the application of data mining techniques to “soft” forensic evidence. Artif Intel Law 14(1–2):35–100Google Scholar
  42. Oatley G, McGarry K, Ewart B (2006b) Offender network metrics. WSEAS Trans Inform Sci and Appl 12(3):2440–2448Google Scholar
  43. Oatley G, Crick T, Howell R (2015) Data exploration with GIS viewsheds and social network analysis. In: Proceedings of 23rd GIS Research UK Conference (GISRUK 2015)Google Scholar
  44. Orman G, Labatut V, Cherifi H (2011a) On accuracy of community structure discovery algorithms. J Converg Inform Technol 6(11)Google Scholar
  45. Orman G, Labatut V, Cherifi H (2011b) Qualitative Comparison of Community Detection Algorithms. Digital Information and Communication Technology and Its Applications. Springer, Communications in Computer and Information Science, pp 265–279Google Scholar
  46. Papachristos AV (2006) Studying Youth Gangs, chap Social Network Analysis and Gang Research: Theory and Methods, AltaMira PressGoogle Scholar
  47. Papachristos AV (2009) Murder by structure: dominance relations and the social structure of Gang Homicide. Am J Sociol 115(1):74–128MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Patacchini E, Zenou Y (2008) The strength of weak ties in crime. Eur Econ Rev 52(2):209–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pitts J (2007) Reluctant Gangsters: Youth Gangs in Waltham Forest. University of Bedfordshire, Tech. repGoogle Scholar
  50. Pitts J (2008) Reluctant Gangsters: the changing face of youth crime. WillanGoogle Scholar
  51. Procter R, Crump J, Karstedt S, Voss A, Cantijoch M (2013) Reading the riots: what were the police doing on Twitter? Polic Soc 23(4):413–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rombach M, Porter MA, Fowler JH, Mucha PJ (2014) Core-Periphery structure in networks. SIAM J Appl Math 74(1):167–190MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rosvall M, Axelsson D, Bergstrom CT (2010) The map equation. Eur Phys J Spec Topics 178(1):13–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Walsh P (2005) Gang War: the inside story of the Manchester Gangs. Milo BooksGoogle Scholar
  55. Watts DJ (2003) Small Worlds: the dynamics of networks between order and randomness. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  56. Watts DJ, Strogatz SH (1998) Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393(6684):440–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Webb VJ, Ren L, Zhao J, He N, Marshall IH (2011) A comparative study of youth gangs in china and the United States: definition, offending, and victimization. Int Crim Just Rev 21(3):225–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wright JD (2005) The constitutional failure of gang databases. Stanford J Civil Rights Civil LibertiesGoogle Scholar
  59. Xu J, Chen H (2005) Criminal network analysis and visualization. Commun ACM 48(6):100–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Yan B, Gregory S (2012) Detecting community structure in networks using edge prediction methods. J Stat Mech 2012(P09008):Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computing & Information SystemsCardiff Metropolitan UniversityCardiffUK

Personalised recommendations