Advertisement

Multi-objective optimization to identify key players in large social networks

  • R. Chulaka GunasekaraEmail author
  • Kishan Mehrotra
  • Chilukuri K. Mohan
Original Article

Abstract

Identification of a set of key players in a given social network is of interest in many disciplines such as sociology, politics, finance, economics, etc. Although many algorithms have been proposed to identify a set of key players, each emphasizes a single objective of their interest. Consequently, the prevailing deficiency of each of these methods is that they perform well only when we consider their objective of interest as the only characteristic the set of key players should have. But in complicated real life applications, we need a set of key players which can perform well with respect to multiple objectives of interest. In this paper, we propose a new perspective for key player identification, based on optimizing multiple objectives of interest. This method allows us to compare other methods of key player identification. The sets of key players identified by this method are better when multiple objectives must be addressed. In addition we propose an algorithm to select the most suitable sets of key players when multiple choices are available. To reduce the computational complexity of the proposed approach for large networks, we propose a new sampling approach based on Degree centrality. We apply these algorithms in eventual influence limitation (EIL) problem and immunization problem and show that our multi-objective methodology outperforms previous key player identification approaches.

Keywords

Social network analysis Influential users Multi-objective optimization Genetic algorithms Network sampling EIL problem Immunization problem 

References

  1. Bae Y, Lee H (2012) Sentiment analysis of twitter audiences: measuring the positive or negative influence of popular twitterers. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 63(12):2521–2535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barthelemy M (2004) Betweenness centrality in large complex networks. Eur Phys J B Condens Matter Complex Syst 38(2):163–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blondel VD, Guillaume JL, Lambiotte R, Lefebvre E (2008) Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J Stat Mech Theory Exp 2008(10):P10008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonacich P (1972) Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification. J Math Sociol 2(1):113–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonacich P (1987) Power and centrality: a family of measures. Am J Sociol 1170–1182Google Scholar
  6. Borgatti SP (2006) Identifying sets of key players in a social network. Comput Math Org Theory 12(1):21–34zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borgatti SP, Everett MG (2006) A graph-theoretic perspective on centrality. Soc Netw 28(4):466–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Broecheler M, Shakarian P, Subrahmanian V (2010) A scalable framework for modeling competitive diffusion in social networks. In: Proceedings of social computing (SocialCom), 2010 IEEE second international conference, IEEE, pp 295–302Google Scholar
  9. Budak C, Agrawal D, El Abbadi A (2011) Limiting the spread of misinformation in social networks. In: Proceedings of the 20th international conference on world wide web, ACM, pp 665–674Google Scholar
  10. Chen Y, Paul G, Havlin S, Liljeros F, Stanley HE (2008) Finding a better immunization strategy. Phys Rev Lett 101(5):058701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: Nsga-ii. Evolut Comput IEEE Trans 6(2):182–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Freeman LC (1979) Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc Netw 1(3):215–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Granovetter MS (1973) The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol 1360–1380Google Scholar
  14. Gutiérrez G, Margain L, de Luna C, Padilla A, Ponce J, Canul J, Ochoa A (2014) A sentiment analysis model: to process subjective social corpus through the adaptation of an affective semantic lexicon. In: Proceedings of human-inspired computing and Its applications, Springer, New York, pp 233–244Google Scholar
  15. Huang S, Cui H, Ding Y (2014) Evaluation of node importance in complex networks. arXiv:1402.5743
  16. Ilyas MU, Radha H (2011) Identifying influential nodes in online social networks using principal component centrality. In: Proceedings of communications (ICC), 2011 IEEE international conference, IEEE, pp 1–5Google Scholar
  17. Janssen R, Monsuur H (2013) Identifying stable network structures and sets of key players using a w-covering perspective. Math Soc Sci 66(3):245–253zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kang C, Molinaro C, Kraus S, Shavitt Y, Subrahmanian V (2012) Diffusion centrality in social networks. In: Proceedings of the 2012 international conference on advances in social networks analysis and mining (ASONAM 2012), IEEE Computer Society, pp 558–564Google Scholar
  19. Katzir L, Liberty E, Somekh O, Cosma IA (2014) Estimating sizes of social networks via biased sampling. Int Math (just-accepted)Google Scholar
  20. Kitsak M, Gallos LK, Havlin S, Liljeros F, Muchnik L, Stanley HE, Makse HA (2010) Identification of influential spreaders in complex networks. Nat Phys 6(11):888–893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Konak A, Coit DW, Smith AE (2006) Multi-objective optimization using genetic algorithms: a tutorial. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 91(9):992–1007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lee CY (2006) Correlations among centrality measures in complex networks. arXiv:physics/0605220
  23. Lee SH, Kim PJ, Jeong H (2006) Statistical properties of sampled networks. Phys Rev E 73(1):016102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Leskovec J, Faloutsos C (2006) Sampling from large graphs. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, ACM, pp 631–636Google Scholar
  25. Leskovec J, Krevl A (2014) SNAP Datasets: Stanford large network dataset collection. http://snap.stanford.edu/data
  26. Lusseau D, Newman ME (2004) Identifying the role that animals play in their social networks. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 271(Suppl 6):S477–S481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. MacRae D (1960) Direct factor analysis of sociometric data. Sociometry 360–371Google Scholar
  28. Marsden PV (2002) Egocentric and sociocentric measures of network centrality. Soc Netw 24(4):407–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Masuda N (2009) Immunization of networks with community structure. New J Phys 11(12):123018MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Newman ME (2002) Spread of epidemic disease on networks. Phys Rev E 66(1):016128MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Okamoto K, Chen W, Li XY (2008) Ranking of closeness centrality for large-scale social networks. In: Proceedings of frontiers in algorithmics, Springer, New York, pp 186–195Google Scholar
  32. Ortiz-Arroyo D, Hussain DA (2008) An information theory approach to identify sets of key players. In: Proceedings of intelligence and security informatics, Springer, New York, pp 15–26Google Scholar
  33. Page L, Brin S, Motwani R, Winograd T (1999) The pagerank citation ranking: bringing order to the webGoogle Scholar
  34. Probst F, Grosswiele DKL, Pfleger DKR (2013) Who will lead and who will follow: identifying influential users in online social networks. Bus Inf Syst Eng 5(3):179–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schneider CM, Mihaljev T, Havlin S, Herrmann HJ (2011) Suppressing epidemics with a limited amount of immunization units. Phys Rev E 84(6):061911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shams B, Khansari M (2013) Immunization of complex networks using stochastic hill-climbing algorithm. In: Proceedings of computer and knowledge engineering (ICCKE), 2013 3rd international eConference, IEEE, pp 283–288Google Scholar
  37. Valente TW, Coronges K, Lakon C, Costenbader E (2008) How correlated are network centrality measures? Connections (Toronto, Ont) 28(1):16Google Scholar
  38. Yoon S, Lee S, Yook SH, Kim Y (2007) Statistical properties of sampled networks by random walks. Phys Rev E 75(4):046114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zitzler E, Laumanns M, Bleuler S (2004) A tutorial on evolutionary multiobjective optimization. In: Proceedings of Metaheuristics for multiobjective optimisation, Springer, New York, pp 3–37Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceSyracuse UniversitySyracuseUSA

Personalised recommendations