Social Network Analysis and Mining

, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp 121–137

New forms of social and professional digital relationships: the case of Facebook

Original Article

Abstract

In recent years social media are becoming ubiquitous and important for social networking and for sharing content and knowledge; they are increasingly used for professional purposes beyond personal and home use. Social networks are spreading so much that they now represent one of the most relevant and interesting social phenomena. The study presented in this paper aims to analyse how Facebook is used by researchers, by means of a quantitative method, and the experiences and perceptions of changes and trends of professionals and researchers towards professional use, by means of a qualitative method. In particular, the study analysed: (i) how and why researchers of the National Research Council (CNR) in Italy in the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) and Cultural Identity (IC) Departments use social networks, and more specifically Facebook (ii) their attitude towards risks and privacy concerns (iii) professional use and perceptions by CNR researchers and professionals of changes over time in using Facebook for professional purposes.

Keywords

Social networks Social interaction Professional relationships Facebook 

References

  1. Acquisti A, Gross R (2006) Imagined communities: awareness, information sharing, and privacy on Facebook. In: Golle P, Danezis G (eds) Proceedings of 6th workshop on privacy enhancing technologies. Robinson College, Cambridge, pp 36–58Google Scholar
  2. Awad NF, Krishnan MS (2006) The Personalization privacy paradox: an empirical evaluation of information transparency and the willingness to be profiled online for personalization. MIS Q 30(1):13–28Google Scholar
  3. BioJobBlogger (2008) Social networking and scientific research. http://www.biojobblog.com/2008/09/articles/biojobbuzz/social-networking-and-scientific-research/. Accessed 5 June 2011
  4. Corbett P (2009) Facebook demographics and statistics report: 513% growth in 55+ year old users. http://www.istrategylabs.com/2009/07/2009-facebook-demographics-and-statistics-report-513-growth-in-55-year-old-userscollege-high-school-drop-20/. Accessed 10 Nov 2010
  5. DiMauro V, Bulmer D (2010) social media’s role in decision making by business professionals, survey results presented to ERPtips and JDEtips, 20 Jan, 2010Google Scholar
  6. DiMicco JM, Millen DR (2007) Identity management: multiple presentations of self in Facebook. In: GROUP ’07 proceedings of the international association for computing machinery (ACM) conference on Supporting group work, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Dwyer C, Hiltz SR, Passerini K (2007) Trust and privacy concerns within social networking sites: a comparison of Facebook and My Space. In: Proceedings of the thirteenth American conference on information systems, Keystone, Colorado, 09–12 August, 2007Google Scholar
  8. Ellison NB, Steinfield C, Lampe C (2007) The benefits of Facebook “friends”: social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. J Comput-Mediat Commun 12(4):1164Google Scholar
  9. Granovetter M (1983) The strength of weak ties: a network theory revisited. Sociol Theory 1:201–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gross R, Acquisti A (2005) Information revelation and privacy in online social networks (The Facebook case). In: Pre-proceedings version. association for computing machinery (ACM) workshop on privacy in the electronic society (WPES)Google Scholar
  11. Rosen D, Barnett GA, Kim JH (2011) Social networks and online environments: when science and practice co-evolve. J Soc Netw Anal Min 1(1):27–42Google Scholar
  12. Schweitzer S (2005) When students open up a little too much. http://www.boston.com/news/local/new_hampshire/articles/2005/09/26when_students_open_up_a_little_too_much. Accessed 5 Nov 2010
  13. Scott J (2011) Social network analysis: developments, advances, and prospects. J Soc Netw Anal Min 1(1):21–26Google Scholar
  14. Skeels MM, Grudin J (2009) When social networks cross boundaries: a case study of workplace use of Facebook and LinkedIn. In: Proceedings GROUP 2009, ACM Press, pp 95–104Google Scholar
  15. Sohn J (2007) 12 Ways to Use Facebook Professionally. http://gigaom.com/collaboration/12-ways-to-use-facebook-professionally/. Accessed 5 June 2011
  16. Stutzman F (2006) An evaluation of identity-sharing behaviour in social network communities. J Int Digit Media Arts Assoc 3(1):10–18Google Scholar
  17. Wang D, Sutcliffe A, Zeng X (2011) A trust-based multi-ego social network model to investigate emotion diffusion. J Soc Netw Anal Min 1(1):1–13Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fernando Ferri
    • 1
  • Patrizia Grifoni
    • 1
  • Tiziana Guzzo
    • 1
  1. 1.CNR-IRPPS, National Research CouncilInstitute of Research on Population and Social PoliciesRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations