Advertisement

Tumor Biology

, Volume 37, Issue 3, pp 3647–3656 | Cite as

Evaluation of cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptors expression in mobile tongue squamous cell carcinoma: associations with clinicopathological parameters and patients’ survival

  • Stamatios TheocharisEmail author
  • Constantinos Giaginis
  • Paraskevi Alexandrou
  • Jose Rodriguez
  • Jason Tasoulas
  • Eugene Danas
  • Efstratios Patsouris
  • Jerzy Klijanienko
Original Article

Abstract

Cannabinoid receptors (CB1R and CB2R) constitute essential members of the endocannabinoid system (ECS) which participates in many different functions indispensable to homeostatic regulation in several tissues, exerting also antitumorigenic effects. The present study aimed to assess the clinical significance of CB1R and CB2R protein expression in mobile tongue squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). CB1R and CB2R expression was assessed immunohistochemically on 28 mobile tongue SCC tissue samples and was analyzed in relation with clinicopathological characteristics and overall and disease-free patients’ survival. CB1R, CB2R, and concomitant CB1R/CB2R expression was significantly increased in older compared to younger mobile tongue SCC patients (p = 0.0243, p = 0.0079, and p = 0.0366, respectively). Enhanced CB2R and concomitant CB1R/CB2R expression was significantly more frequently observed in female compared to male mobile tongue SCC patients (p = 0.0025 and p = 0.0016, respectively). Elevated CB2R expression was significantly more frequently observed in mobile tongue SCC patients presenting well-defined tumor shape compared to those with diffuse (p = 0.0430). Mobile tongue SCC patients presenting enhanced CB1R, CB2R, or concomitant CB1R/CB2R expression showed significantly longer overall (log-rank test, p = 0.004, p = 0.011, p = 0.018, respectively) and disease-free (log-rank test, p = 0.003, p = 0.007, p = 0.027, respectively) survival times compared to those with low expression. In multivariate analysis, CB1R was identified as an independent prognostic factor for disease-free patients’ survival (Cox-regression analysis, p = 0.032). The present study provides evidence that CB1R and CB2R may play a role in the pathophysiological aspects of the mobile tongue SCC and even each molecule may constitute a potential target for the development of novel anti-cancer drugs for this type of malignancy.

Keywords

Mobile tongue squamous cell carcinoma Cannabinoid receptors Clinicopathological parameters Prognosis Immunohistochemistry 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Ms Dimitra Lambiri and Ms Eugenie Ventouri for their excellent technical assistant. All authors verify that they have not accepted any funding or support from an organization that may in any way gain or lose financially from the results of the present study. All authors verify that they have not been employed by an organization that may in any way gain or lose financially from the results of the present study.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

None

References

  1. 1.
    Izzo AA, Sharkey KA. Cannabinoids and the gut: new developments and emerging concepts. Pharmacol Ther. 2010;126:21–38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Derkinderen P, Ledent C, Parmentier M, Girault JA. Cannabinoids activate p38 mitogen-activated protein kinases through CB1 receptors in hippocampus. J Neurochem. 2001;77:957–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Xu X, Liu Y, Shengfu H, Guoxing L, Chenzhi X, et al. Overexpression of cannabinoid receptors CB1 and CB2 correlates with improved prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Can Genet Cytogenet. 2006;171:31–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Michalski CW, Oti FE, Erkan M, Sauliunaite D, Bergamnn F, et al. Cannabinoids in pancreatic cancer: correlation with survival and pain. Int J Cancer. 2008;122:742–50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chung SC, Hammarsten P, Josefsson A, et al. A high cannabinoid CB1 receptor immunoreactivity is associated with disease severity and outcome in prostate cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:174–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Klein Nulent TJ, Van Diest PJ, van der Groep P, Leusink FKJ, Kruitwagen CLJJ, et al. Cannabinoid receptor-2 immunoreactivity is associated with survival in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;51:604–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Miller LK, Devi LA. The highs and lows of cannabinoid receptor expression in disease: mechanisms and their therapeutic implications. Pharmacol Rev. 2011;63:461–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pertwee RG, Howlett AC, Abood ME, et al. International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. LXXIX. Cannabinoid receptors and their ligands: beyond CB1 and CB2. Pharmacol Rev. 2010;62:588–631.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Molina-Holgado E, Vela JM, Arevalo-Martin A, et al. Cannabinoids promote oligodendrocyte progenitor survival: involvement of cannabinoid receptors and phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase/Akt signalling. J Neurosci. 2002;22:9742–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    De Petrocellis L, Di Marzo V. An introduction to the endocannabinoid system: from the early to the latest concepts. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;23:1–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Di Marzo V, De Petrocellis L. Why do cannabinoid receptors have more than one endogenous ligand? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012;367:3216–28.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pisanti S, Picardi P, D’Alessandro A, Laezza C, Bifulco M. The endocannabinoid signaling system in cancer. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2013;34:273–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Van Dross R, Soliman E, Jha S, Johnson T, Mukhopadhyay S. Receptor-dependent and receptor-independent endocannabinoid signaling: a therapeutic target for regulation of cancer growth. Life Sci. 2013;92:463–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bello IO, Soini Y, Salo T. Prognostic evaluation of oral tongue cancer: means, markers and perspectives (I). Oral Oncol. 2010;46:630–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sano D, Myers JN. Metastasis of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2007;26:645–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shiboski CH, Schmidt BL, Jordan RC. Tongue and tonsil carcinoma: increasing trends in the U.S. population ages 20–44 years. Cancer. 2005;103:1843–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brandwein-Gensler M, Teixeira MS, Lewis CM, et al. Oral squamous cell carcinoma: histologic risk assessment, but not margin status, is strongly predictive of local disease-free and overall survival. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29:167–78.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shintani S, Matsura H, Hasegawa Y, et al. The relationship of shape of tumor invasion to depth of invasion and cervical lymph node metastasis in squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue. Oncology. 1997;54:463–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichert P, et al. Pathology and genetics of head and neck tumours. Lyon: IARC Press; 2005.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Klijanienko J, El-Naggar AK, De Braud F, et al. Tumor vascularization, mitotic index, histopathologic grade, and DNA ploidy in the assessment of 114 head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Cancer. 1995;75:1649–56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Po Wing Yuen A, Lam KY, Lam LK, et al. Prognostic factors of clinically stage I and II oral tongue carcinoma-A comparative study of stage, thickness, shape, growth pattern, invasive front malignancy grading, Martinez-Gimeno score, and pathologic features. Head Neck. 2002;24:513–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Theocharis S, Theohari I, Giannopoulou I, et al. Clinical significance of cannabinoid receptor 2 in human invasive breast carcinoma. Virchows Arch. 2014;465:S119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Theocharis S, Klijanienko J, Giaginis C, et al. Metallothionein expression in mobile tongue squamous cell carcinoma: associations with clinicopathological parameters and patient survival. Histopathology. 2011;59:514–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Theocharis S, Klijanienko J, Giaginis C, et al. Ephrin receptor (Eph) -A1, -A2, -A4 and -A7 expression in mobile tongue squamous cell carcinoma: associations with clinicopathological parameters and patients survival. Pathol Oncol Res. 2014;20:277–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Theocharis S, Klijanienko J, Giaginis C, et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ in mobile tongue squamous cell carcinoma: associations with clinicopathological parameters and patients survival. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2011;137:251–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Theocharis S, Kotta-Loizou I, Klijanienko J, Giaginis C, Alexandrou P, Dana E, et al. Extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) expression and activation in mobile tongue squamous cell carcinoma: associations with clinicopathological parameters and patients survival. Tumour Biol. 2014;35:6455–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Martínez-Martínez E, Gómez I, Martín P, et al. Cannabinoids receptor type 2, CB2, expression correlates with human colon cancer progression and predicts patient survival. Oncoscience. 2015;2(2):131–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jung CK, Kang Park JM, Ahn HJ, Kim SW, Oh ST, Choi KY. Expression of the cannabinoid type I receptor and prognosis following surgery in colorectal cancer. Oncol Lett. 2013;5:870–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Aviello G, Romano B, Borrelli F, et al. Chemopreventive effect of the non-psychotropic phytocannabinoid cannabidiol on experimental colon cancer. J Mol Med. 2012;90:925–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Romano B, Borrelli F, Pagano E, Cascio MG, Pertwee RG, Izzo AA. Inhibition of colon carcinogenesis by a standardized Cannabis sativa extract with high content of cannabidiol. Phytomed. 2014;21:631–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Carracedo A, Gironella M, Lorente M, et al. Cannabinoids induce apoptosis of pancreatic tumor cells via endoplasmic reticulum stress–related genes. Cancer Res. 2006;66:6748–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Preet A, Qamri Z, Nasser MW, et al. Cannabinoid receptors, CB1 and CB2, as novel targets for inhibition of non-small cell lung cancer growth and metastasis. Cancer Prev Res. 2011;4:65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Grimaldi C, Pisanti S, Laezza C, et al. Anandamide inhibits adhesion and migration of breast cancer cells. Exp Cell Res. 2006;312:363–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Huang L, Ramirez JC, Frampton GA, et al. Anandamide exerts its antiproliferative actions on cholangiocarcinoma by activation of the GPR55 receptor. Lab Invest. 2011;91:1007–17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pellerito O, Calvaruso G, Portanova P, et al. The synthetic cannabinoid WIN 55,212-2 sensitizes hepatocellular carcinoma cells to tumor necrosis factor related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL)-induced apoptosis by activating p8/CCAAT/enhancer binding protein homologous protein (CHOP)/death receptor 5 (DR5) axis. Mol Pharmacol. 2010;77:854–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gustafsson SB, Lindgren T, Jonsson M, Jacobsson SOP. Cannabinoid receptor-independent cytotoxic effects of cannabinoids in human colorectal carcinoma cells: synergism with 5-Xuorouracil. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2009;63:691–701.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society of Oncology and BioMarkers (ISOBM) 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stamatios Theocharis
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Constantinos Giaginis
    • 1
    • 3
  • Paraskevi Alexandrou
    • 1
  • Jose Rodriguez
    • 4
  • Jason Tasoulas
    • 1
  • Eugene Danas
    • 1
  • Efstratios Patsouris
    • 1
  • Jerzy Klijanienko
    • 2
  1. 1.First Department of Pathology, Medical SchoolUniversity of AthensAthensGreece
  2. 2.Department of PathologyInstitut CurieParisFrance
  3. 3.Department of Food Science and NutritionUniversity of the AegeanLemnosGreece
  4. 4.Department of Head and Neck SurgeryInstitut CurieParisFrance

Personalised recommendations