Tumor Biology

, Volume 35, Issue 6, pp 6127–6138 | Cite as

Diagnostic accuracy of serum HE4, CA125 and ROMA in patients with ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis

Research Article

Abstract

CA125, human epididymis secretary protein 4 (HE4) and the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA) could be used for diagnosing ovarian cancer (OCa). However, it has not been conclusively determined which of these markers yields the best diagnostic accuracy. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic value of these markers. We systematically searched the PubMed and ScienceDirect databases and identified 32 studies that evaluated the role of CA125, HE4 and ROMA in diagnosing OCa. The bivariate random-effects approach was used to calculate the pooled estimates by considering the heterogeneity of major related parameters such as the menopausal status, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages, detection method and blinded design. Three tests yielded similar discriminatory performances in the OCa diagnosis (AUC [95 % CI]—0.89 [0.86–0.92] for HE4; 0.87 [0.84–0.90] for CA125; 0.91 [0.88–0.93] for ROMA). HE4 yielded a higher specificity than CA125 and ROMA (HE4 93.60 [90.00–95.90] > CA125 82.10 [76.60–86.50] and ROMA 82.40 [77.40–86.50]), especially in the premenopausal subgroup (HE4 93.80 [88.40–96.80] > CA125 76.30 [63.30–85.70] and ROMA 85.10 [80.40–88.80]). In contrast, CA125 and ROMA performed significantly better in the postmenopausal subgroup than in the premenopausal subgroup (AUC [95 % CI]—CA125-premenopausal 0.85 [0.82–0.88] < post 0.92 [0.89–0.94]; ROMA-premenopausal 0.86 [0.83–0.89] < post 0.93 [0.90–0.95]). HE4 might be useful for diagnosing OCa due to its high specificity, especially in the premenopausal population. CA125 and ROMA are more suitable for diagnosing OCa in the postmenopausal population. More high-quality RCTs are needed.

Keywords

Ovarian cancer Human epididymis protein 4 CA125 Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm 

References

  1. 1.
    Somigliana E, Vigano P, Tirelli AS, Felicetta I, Torresani E, Vignali M, et al. Use of the concomitant serum dosage of CA 125, CA 19-9 and interleukin-6 to detect the presence of endometriosis. Results from a series of reproductive age women undergoing laparoscopic surgery for benign gynaecological conditions. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(8):1871–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Moore RG, Miller MC, Eklund EE, Lu KH, Bast RC, Jr., Lambert-Messerlian G. Serum levels of the ovarian cancer biomarker HE4 are decreased in pregnancy and increase with age. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Escudero JM, Auge JM, Filella X, Torne A, Pahisa J, Molina R. Comparison of serum human epididymis protein 4 with cancer antigen 125 as a tumor marker in patients with malignant and nonmalignant diseases. Clin Chem. 2011;57(11):1534–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Holcomb K, Vucetic Z, Miller MC, Knapp RC. Human epididymis protein 4 offers superior specificity in the differentiation of benign and malignant adnexal masses in premenopausal women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205(4):358.e1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kirchhoff C, Habben I, Ivell R, Krull N. A major human epididymis-specific cDNA encodes a protein with sequence homology to extracellular proteinase inhibitors. Biol Reprod. 1991;45(2):350–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ono K, Tanaka T, Tsunoda T, Kitahara O, Kihara C, Okamoto A, et al. Identification by cDNA microarray of genes involved in ovarian carcinogenesis. Cancer res. 2000;60(18):5007–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Huhtinen K, Suvitie P, Hiissa J, Junnila J, Huvila J, Kujari H, et al. Serum HE4 concentration differentiates malignant ovarian tumours from ovarian endometriotic cysts. Br J Cancer. 2009;100(8):1315–9.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hellstrom I, Raycraft J, Hayden-Ledbetter M, Ledbetter JA, Schummer M, McIntosh M, et al. The HE4 (WFDC2) protein is a biomarker for ovarian carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2003;63(13):3695–700.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Drapkin R, von Horsten HH, Lin Y, Mok SC, Crum CP, Welch WR, et al. Human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) is a secreted glycoprotein that is overexpressed by serous and endometrioid ovarian carcinomas. Cancer res. 2005;65(6):2162–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chan KK, Chen CA, Nam JH, Ochiai K, Wilailak S, Choon AT, et al. The use of HE4 in the prediction of ovarian cancer in Asian women with a pelvic mass. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;128(2):239–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Moore RG, McMeekin DS, Brown AK, DiSilvestro P, Miller MC, Allard WJ, et al. A novel multiple marker bioassay utilizing HE4 and CA125 for the prediction of ovarian cancer in patients with a pelvic mass. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;112(1):40–6.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003;3:25.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Riley RD, Abrams KR, Sutton AJ, Lambert PC, Thompson JR. Bivariate random-effects meta-analysis and the estimation of between-study correlation. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7:3.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Reitsma JB, Glas AS, Rutjes AW, Scholten RJ, Bossuyt PM, Zwinderman AH. Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58(10):982–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557–60.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Thompson SG, Sharp SJ. Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods. Stat Med. 1999;18(20):2693–708.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. 1994;50(4):1088–101.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lenhard M, Stieber P, Hertlein L, Kirschenhofer A, Furst S, Mayr D, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of two human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) testing systems in combination with CA125 in the differential diagnosis of ovarian masses. Clin Chem Lab Med : CCLM / FESCC. 2011;49(21):2081–8.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lawicki S, Bedkowska GE, Gacuta-Szumarska E, Szmitkowski M. The plasma concentration of VEGF, HE4 and CA125 as a new biomarkers panel in different stages and sub-types of epithelial ovarian tumors. J Ovarian Res. 2013;6(1):45.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Anastasi E, Granato T, Falzarano R, Storelli P, Ticino A, Frati L, et al. The use of HE4, CA125 and CA72-4 biomarkers for differential diagnosis between ovarian endometrioma and epithelial ovarian cancer. J Ovarian Res. 2013;6(1):44.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan S, Hackethal A, Bowtell D, Obermair A. Differentiating stage 1 epithelial ovarian cancer from benign ovarian tumours using a combination of tumour markers HE4, CA125, and CEA and patient’s age. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;129(3):467–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kaijser J, Van Gorp T, Van Hoorde K, Van Holsbeke C, Sayasneh A, Vergote I, et al. A comparison between an ultrasound based prediction model (LR2) and the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA) to assess the risk of malignancy in women with an adnexal mass. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;129(2):377–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hamed EO, Ahmed H, Sedeek OB, Mohammed AM, Abd-Alla AA, Abdel Ghaffar HM. Significance of HE4 estimation in comparison with CA125 in diagnosis of ovarian cancer and assessment of treatment response. Diagn Pathol. 2013;8:11.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sandri MT, Bottari F, Franchi D, Boveri S, Candiani M, Ronzoni S, et al. Comparison of HE4, CA125 and ROMA algorithm in women with a pelvic mass: correlation with pathological outcome. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;128(2):233–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Novotny Z, Presl J, Kucera R, Topolcan O, Vrzalova J, Fuchsova R, et al. HE4 and ROMA index in Czech postmenopausal women. Anticancer Res. 2012;32(9):4137–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Karlsen MA, Sandhu N, Hogdall C, Christensen IJ, Nedergaard L, Lundvall L, et al. Evaluation of HE4, CA125, Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA) and risk of malignancy index (RMI) as diagnostic tools of epithelial ovarian cancer in patients with a pelvic mass. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;127(2):379–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Anton C, Carvalho FM, Oliveira EI, Maciel GA, Baracat EC, Carvalho JP. A comparison of CA125, HE4, risk ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA), and risk malignancy index (RMI) for the classification of ovarian masses. Clin (Sao Paulo). 2012;67(5):437–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Freydanck MK, Laubender RP, Rack B, Schuhmacher L, Jeschke U, Scholz C. Two-marker combinations for preoperative discrimination of benign and malignant ovarian masses. Anticancer Res. 2012;32(5):2003–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zheng H, Gao Y. Serum HE4 as a useful biomarker in discriminating ovarian cancer from benign pelvic disease. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2012;22(6):1000–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kadija S, Stefanovic A, Jeremic K, Radojevic MM, Nikolic L, Markovic I, et al. The utility of human epididymal protein 4, cancer antigen 125, and risk for malignancy algorithm in ovarian cancer and endometriosis. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2012;22(2):238–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bandiera E, Romani C, Specchia C, Zanotti L, Galli C, Ruggeri G, et al. Serum human epididymis protein 4 and risk for ovarian malignancy algorithm as new diagnostic and prognostic tools for epithelial ovarian cancer management. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20(12):2496–506.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Molina R, Escudero JM, Auge JM, Filella X, Foj L, Torne A, et al. HE4 a novel tumour marker for ovarian cancer: comparison with CA 125 and ROMA algorithm in patients with gynaecological diseases. Tumour Biol : J Int Soc for Oncodevelopmental Biol Med. 2011;32(6):1087–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Moore RG, Miller MC, Disilvestro P, Landrum LM, Gajewski W, Ball JJ, et al. Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm in women with a pelvic mass. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(2 Pt 1):280–8.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ruggeri G, Bandiera E, Zanotti L, Belloli S, Ravaggi A, Romani C, et al. HE4 and epithelial ovarian cancer: comparison and clinical evaluation of two immunoassays and a combination algorithm. Clin Chim Acta. 2011;412(15–16):1447–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Park Y, Kim Y, Lee EY, Lee JH, Kim HS. Reference ranges for HE4 and CA125 in a large Asian population by automated assays and diagnostic performances for ovarian cancer. Int J Cancer. 2011;130(5):1136–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Jacob F, Meier M, Caduff R, Goldstein D, Pochechueva T, Hacker N, et al. No benefit from combining HE4 and CA125 as ovarian tumor markers in a clinical setting. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;121(3):487–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kim YM, Whang DH, Park J, Kim SH, Lee SW, Park HA, et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of serum human epididymis protein 4 in combination with CA125 for detecting ovarian cancer: a prospective case-control study in a Korean population. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011;49(3):527–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Van Gorp T, Cadron I, Despierre E, Daemen A, Leunen K, Amant F, et al. HE4 and CA125 as a diagnostic test in ovarian cancer: prospective validation of the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm. Br J Cancer. 2011;104(5):863–70.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Montagnana M, Danese E, Ruzzenente O, Bresciani V, Nuzzo T, Gelati M, et al. The ROMA (Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm) for estimating the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in women presenting with pelvic mass: is it really useful? Clin Chem Lab Med : CCLM / FESCC. 2011;49(3):521–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Abdel-Azeez HA, Labib HA, Sharaf SM, Refai AN. HE4 and mesothelin: novel biomarkers of ovarian carcinoma in patients with pelvic masses. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2010;11(1):111–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Anastasi E, Marchei GG, Viggiani V, Gennarini G, Frati L, Reale MG. HE4: a new potential early biomarker for the recurrence of ovarian cancer. Tumour Biol : J Int Soc for Oncodevelopmental Biol Med. 2010;31(2):113–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Nolen B, Velikokhatnaya L, Marrangoni A, De Geest K, Lomakin A, Bast Jr RC, et al. Serum biomarker panels for the discrimination of benign from malignant cases in patients with an adnexal mass. Gynecol Oncol. 2010;117(3):440–5.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Shah CA, Lowe KA, Paley P, Wallace E, Anderson GL, McIntosh MW, et al. Influence of ovarian cancer risk status on the diagnostic performance of the serum biomarkers mesothelin, HE4, and CA125. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18(5):1365–72.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Moore RG, Brown AK, Miller MC, Skates S, Allard WJ, Verch T, et al. The use of multiple novel tumor biomarkers for the detection of ovarian carcinoma in patients with a pelvic mass. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;108(2):402–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Pitta Dda R, Sarian LO, Barreta A, Campos EA, Andrade LL, Fachini AM, et al. Symptoms, CA125 and HE4 for the preoperative prediction of ovarian malignancy in Brazilian women with ovarian masses. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:423.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society of Oncology and BioMarkers (ISOBM) 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Zhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina
  2. 2.Department of Thoracic Surgery, Key Laboratory Diagnosis and Treatment Technology on Thoracic OncologyZhejiang Cancer HospitalHangzhouChina
  3. 3.Clinical Laboratory, Cancer Institute and HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
  4. 4.Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Institute and HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations