Molecular & Cellular Toxicology

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 293–301 | Cite as

The effect of metal-doped TiO2 nanoparticles on zebrafish embryogenesis

  • Hyung-Geun Park
  • Jung In Kim
  • Misook Kang
  • Min-Kyeong Yeo
Original Paper

Abstract

In this study, we manufactured metal-doped TiO2 nanoparticles using several transition metals (Mn, Fe, Ni, and Cu). Their physicochemical properties were evaluated by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, and UV-visible spectra. The energy efficiency of the metals increased in the order of Ni-<Cu-<Mn-<Fe-TiO2. For toxicity testing, zebrafish embryos were exposed to 4 mg L−1 of metal-doped TiO2 nanoparticles. We determined the survival rate (%) and abnormal morphology rate (%) of the exposed embryos and also observed apoptosis and necrosis using confocal microscopy. The metal TiO2 nanoparticles showed acute toxicity in the order of Mn-<Cu-<Ni-≤Fe-TiO2. Although the Fe-TiO2 NPs group demonstrated the highest photocatalytic performance, it also exhibited the highest toxic effects. Among the metals, the Mn-TiO2 NPs group demonstrated improved photocatalysis compared to the other samples except for the Fe-TiO2 NPs along with the lowest toxic effects. For these reasons, the most suitable doping metal was the Mn-TiO2 NPs group considering its energy activity and environmental impacts.

Keywords

Metal-doped TiO2 nanoparticles Photocatalysis Energy efficiency Toxicity Zebrafish embryos 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Lee, S. Y., & Park, S. J. TiO2 photocatalyst for water treatment applications. J Ind Eng Chem 19:1761–1769 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Weir, A. A. Titanium dioxide nanomaterials: Human exposure and environmental release. In Proquest, Umi Dissertation Publishing, Academic press: Arizona State University, AZ, USA (2011).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Menard, A., Drobne, D., & Jemec, A. Ecotoxicity of nanosized TiO2. Review of in vivo data. Environ Pollut 159:677–684 (2011).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bianchi, C. L. et al. Photocatalytic degradation of acetone, acetaldehyde and toluene in gas-phase: Comparison between nano and micro-sized TiO2. Appl Catal B-Environ 146:123–130 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cheng, X., Liu, H., Chen, Q., Li, J., & Wang, P. Enhanced photoelectrocatalytic performance for degradation of diclofenac and mechanism with TiO2 nano-particles decorated TiO2 nano-tubes arrays photoelectrode. Electrochim Acta 108:203–210 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sato, T., Koizumi, Y., & Taya, M. Photocatalytic deactivation of airborne microbial cells on TiO2-loaded plate. Biochem Eng J 14:149–152 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    He, F., Li, J., Li, T., & Li, G. Solvothermal synthesis of mesoporous TiO2: The effect of morphology, size and calcination progress on photocatalytic activity in the degradation of gaseous benzene. Chem Eng J 237:312–321 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yao, K. S. et al. Comparison of photocatalytic activities of various dye-modified TiO2 thin films under visible light. Surf Coat Technol 203:922–924 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    van der Meulen, T., Mattson, A. & Österlund, L. A comparative study of the photocatalytic oxidation of propane on anatase, rutile, and mixed-phase anataserutile TiO2 nanoparticles: Role of surface intermediates. J Catal 251:131–144 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ni, M., Leung, M. K. H., Leung, D. Y. C., & Sumathy, K. A review and recent developments in photocatalytic water-splitting using TiO2 for hydrogen production. Renew Sust Energ Rev 11:401–425 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chen, X., Shen, S., Guo, L., & Mao, S. S. Semiconductor-based photocatalytic hydrogen generation. Chem Rev 110:6503–6570 (2010).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Seery, M. K., George, R., Floris, P., & Pillai, S. C. Silver doped titanium dioxide nanomaterials for enhanced visible light photocatalysis. J Photochem Photobiol A-Chem 189:258–263 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yang, Y. Z., Chang, C. H., & Idriss, H. Photo-catalytic production of hydrogen form ethanol over M/TiO2 catalysts (M=Pd, Pt or Rh). Appl Catal B-Environ 67:217–222 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kwak, B. S., Chae, J., Kim, J., & Kang, M. Enhanced hydrogen production from methanol/water photo-splitting in TiO2 including Pd component. Bull Korean Chem Soc 30:1047–1053 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chae, J., Lee, J., Jeong, J. H., & Kang, M. Hydrogen production from photo splitting of water using the Gaincorporated TiO2s prepared by a solvothermal method and their characteristics. Bull Korean Chem Soc 30:302–308 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lee, G., Yeo, M. K., Um, M. H., & Kang, M. High-efficiently photoelectrochemical hydrogen production over Zn-incorporated TiO2 nanotubes. Int J Photoenergy 2012:1–10 (2012).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yeo, M. K., & Kang, M. The biological toxicities of two crystalline phases and differential sizes of TiO2 nanoparticles during zebrafish embryogenesis development. Mol Cell Toxicol 8:317–326 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yeo, M. K., & Park, H. G. Gene expression in zebrafish embryos following exposure to Cu-doped TiO2 and pure TiO2 nanometer-sized photocatalysts. Mol Cell Toxicol 8:127–137 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stohs, S. J., & Bagchi, D. Oxidative mechanisms in the toxicity of metal ions. Free Radic Biol Med 18:321–336 (1995).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhu, X., Chang, Y., & Chen, Y. Toxicity and bioaccumulation of TiO2 nanoparticle aggregates in Daphnia magna. Chemosphere 78:209–215 (2010).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhu, X., Zhou, J., & Cai, Z. The toxicity and oxidative stress of TiO2 nanoparticles in marine abalone (Haliotis diversicolor supertexta). Mar Pollut Bull 63:334–338 (2011).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hao, L., Wang, Z., & Xing, B. Effect of sub-acute exposure to TiO2 nanoparticles on oxidative stress and histopathological changes in Juvenile Carp (Cyprinus carpio). J Environ Sci 21:1459–1466 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ghasemi, S., Rahimnejad, S., Setayesh, S. R., Rohani, S., & Gholami, M. R. Transition metal ions effect on the properties and photocatalytic activity of nanocrystalline TiO2 prepared in an ionic liquid. J Hazard Mater 172:1573–1578 (2009).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Liu, Y., Wang, Z., Fan, W., Geng, Z., & Feng, L. Enhancement of the photocatalytic performance of Ni-loaded TiO2 photocatalyst under sunlight. Ceram Int 40:3887–3893 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Huang, Y. W., Wu, C. H., & Aronstam, R. S. Toxicity of transition metal oxide nanoparticles: recent insights from in vitro studies. Materials 3:4842–4859 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Manke, A., Wang, L., & Rojanasakul, Y. Mechanisms of nanoparticle-induced oxidative stress and toxicity. Biomed Res Int 2013:1–15 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dasari, T. P., Pathakoti, K., Hwang, H. M. Determination of the mechanism of photoinduced toxicity of selected metal oxide nanoparticles (ZnO, CuO, Co3O4 and TiO2) to E. coli bacteria. J Environ Sci (China) 25:882–888 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Park, S. et al. Cellular toxicity of various inhalable metal nanoparticles on human alveolar epithelial cells. Inhal Toxicol 19:59–65 (2007).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Aboelzahab, A., Azad, A. M., & Goel, V. Necrosis of Staphylococcus aureus by the electrospun Fe- and Ag-Doped TiO2 nanofibers. ISRN Orthop 2012:1–11 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zhang, X. Q., Yin, L. H., Tang, M., & Pu, Y. P. ZnO, TiO2, SiO2, and Al2O3 nanoparticles-induced toxic effects on human fetal lung fibroblasts. Biomed Environ Sci 24:661–669 (2011).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Westerfield, M. The zebrafish book: A guide for the laboratory use of zebrafish Danio (Brachydanio) rerio. Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon. Available at http://zfin.org/zf_info/zfbook/zfbk.html.
  32. 32.
    Kimmel, C. B., Ballard, W. W., Kimmel, S. R., Ullmann, B., & Schilling, T. F. Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. Dev Dyn 203:253–310 (1995).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gawlitta, D., Oomens, C. W., Baaijens, F. P., & Bouten, C. V. Evaluation of a continuous quantification method of apoptosis and necrosis in tissue cultures. Cytotechnology 46:139–150 (2004).PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Park, H. G., & Yeo, M. K. The toxicity of triclosan, bisphenol A, bisphenol A diglycidyl ether to the regeneration of cnidarian, Hydra magnipapillata. Mol Cell Toxicol 8:209–216 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society of Toxicogenomics and Toxicoproteomics and Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hyung-Geun Park
    • 1
  • Jung In Kim
    • 1
  • Misook Kang
    • 2
  • Min-Kyeong Yeo
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Environmental Science and Environmental Research Center, College of EngineeringKyung Hee UniversityGyeonggi-doKorea
  2. 2.Department of Chemistry, College of ScienceYeungnam UniversityGyeongsan, GyeongbukKorea

Personalised recommendations