Molecular & Cellular Toxicology

, 7:251

Synergistic genotoxic effect between gene and environmental pollutant: Oxidative DNA damage induced by thioredoxin reductase 1 silencing under nickel treatment

Original Paper

Abstract

Nickel has been known to represent a lethal toxicity to human under environmental exposure. Particulary, nickel accumulation is able to cause oxidative DNA damage and tumor development. Redox imbalance by oxidative stress is rescued via modulation by redox factors which can scavenge excessively produced reactive oxygen species (ROS). Thioredoxin reductase 1 (Trr 1) is one of major redox factors having a potential role in cellular defense system against oxidative stress. In this study, we investigated whether Trr 1 has protective roles against nickel-induced oxidative stress and genotoxicity using ROS measurement, comet and micronucleus (MN) assay. We found significant increase of intracellular ROS generation in nickel-treated Trr 1 defective cells compared with Trr 1 proficient cells. In addition, under nickel treatment, Trr1 knockdown cells showed higher amount of DNA strand breaks as oxidative DNA damage rather than in Trr 1 wild type cells. Moreover, MN as a crucial biomarker for carcinogenicity was remarkably induced in the nickel-exposed Trr 1 silencing cells. Therefore, these results might provide novel insight on the role of Trr 1 in cellular protection from environmental nickelinduced genotoxicity. In conclusion, we emphasized the synergistic toxicity of Trr 1 knockdown and environmental nickel exposure in relevance to gene-environment interactions.

Keywords

Nickel Thioredoxin reductase (Trr 1) Oxidative stress DNA damage Carcinogenicity 

References

  1. 1.
    Denkhaus, E. & Salnikow, K. Nickel essentiality, toxicity, and carcinogenicity. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 42: 35–56 (2002).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Magnus, K., Andersen, A. & Høgetveit, A. C. Cancer of respiratory organs among workers at a nickel refinery in Norway. Int J Cancer 30:681–685 (1982).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kawanishi, S., Inoue, S. & Yamamoto, K. Site-specific DNA damage induced by nickel (II) ion in the presence of hydrogen peroxide. Carcinogenesis 10:2231–2235 (1989).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tkeshelashvili, L. K., Reid, T. M., McBride, T. J. & Loeb, L. A. Nickel induces a signature mutation for oxygen free radical damage. Cancer Res 53:4172–4174 (1993).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhong, Z. J., Troll, W., Koenig, K. L. & Frenkel, K. Carcinogenic sulfide salts of nickel and cadmium induce H2O2 formation by human polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Cancer Res 50:7564–7570 (1990).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kasprzak, K. S. The role of oxidative damage in metal carcinogenicity. Chem Res Toxicol 4:604–615 (1991).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kawanishi, S. et al. Oxidative DNA damage in cultured cells and rat lungs by carcinogenic nickel compounds. Free Radic Biol Med 31:108–116 (2001).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kasprzak, K. S. & Hernandez, L. Enhancement of hydroxylation and deglycosylation of 2?-deoxyguanosine by carcinogenic nickel compounds. Cancer Res 49: 5964–5968 (1989).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Clayson, D. B., Mehta, R. & Iverson, F. International Commission for Protection Against Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens. Oxidative DNA damagethe effects of certain genotoxic and operationally nongenotoxic carcinogens. Mutat Res 317:25–42 (1994).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ames, B. N., Gold, L. S. & Willett, W. C. The causes and prevention of cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92: 5258–5265 (1995).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ischiropoulos, H. & Beckman, J. S. Oxidative stress and nitration in neurodegeneration: cause, effect, or association? J Clin Invest 111:163–169 (2003).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hirota, K. et al. Nucleoredoxin, glutaredoxin, and thioredoxin differentially regulate NF-kappaB, AP-1, and CREB activation in HEK293 cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 274:177–1782 (2000).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Karimpour, S. et al. Thioredoxin reductase regulates AP-1 activity as well as thioredoxin nuclear localization via active cysteines in response to ionizing radiation. Oncogene 21:6317–6327 (2002).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bresgen, N. et al. Oxidative stress in cultured cerebral endothelial cells induces chromosomal aberrations, micronuclei, and apoptosis. J Neurosci Res 72:327–333 (2003).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jeong, S. W. & Seo, Y. R. Transcriptomic analysis of Caenorhabditis elegans exposed to nickel (II) acetate using microarray. BioChip J 5:78–85 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mustacich, D. & Powis, G. Thioredoxin reductase. Biochem J 346:1–8 (2000).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fredenburgh, L. E., Perrella, M. A. & Mitsialis, S. A. The role of heme oxygenase-1 in pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 36:158–165 (2007).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yoshitake, S., Nanri, H., Fernando, M. R. & Minakami, S. Possible differences in the regenerative roles played by thioltransferase and thioredoxin for oxidatively damaged proteins. J Biochem 116:42–46 (1994).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Björnstedt, M., Xue, J., Huang, W., Akesson, B. & Holmgren, A. The thioredoxin and glutaredoxin systems are efficient electron donors to human plasma glutathione peroxidase. J Biol Chem 269:29382–29384 (1994).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Anversa, P. et al. Apoptosis and myocardial infarction. Basic Res Cardiol 93:8–12 (1998).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sadoshima, J. Redox regulation of growth and death in cardiac myocytes. Antioxid Redox Signal 8:1621–1624 (2006).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stadtman, E. R. Protein oxidation and aging. Science 257:1220–1224 (1992).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jeong, S. W., Kim, H. L. & Seo, Y. R. Microarray analysis of global gene expression in Caenorhabditis elegans exposed to potassium dichromate. BioChip J 5:151–157 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhong, Z. J., Troll, W., Koenig, K. L. & Frenkel, K. Carcinogenic sulfide salts of nickel and cadmium induce H2O2 formation by human polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Cancer Res 50:7564–7570 (1990).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Huang, X., Frenkel, K., Klein, C. B. & Costa, M. Nickel induces increased oxidants in intact cultured mammalian cells as detected by dichlorofluorescein fluorescence. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 120:29–36 (1993).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Von Sonntag, C. The chemical basis of radiation biology. Taylor and Francis 515 (1987).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Torreilles, J. & Guérin, M. C. Nickel (II) as a temporary catalyst for hydroxyl radical generation. FEBS Lett 272:58–60 (1990).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Heddle, J. A. et al. The induction of micronuclei as a measure of genotoxicity. A report of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Gene-Tox Program. Mutat Res 123:61–118 (1983).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fenech, M. The in vitro micronucleus technique. Mutat Res 455:81–95 (2000).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Danadevi, K., Rozati, R., Banu, B. S. & Grover, P. Genotoxic evaluation of welders occupationally exposed to chromium and nickel using the Comet and micronucleus assays. Mutagenesis 19:35–41 (2004).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mucci, L. A., Wedren, S., Tamimi, R. M., Trichopoulos, D. & Adami, H. O. The role of gene-environment interaction in the aetiology of human cancer: examples from cancers of the large bowel, lung and breast. J Intern Med 249:477–493 (2001).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Padyukov, L., Silva, C., Stolt, P., Alfredsson, L. & Klareskog, L. A gene-environment interaction between smoking and shared epitope genes in HLA-DR provides a high risk of seropositive rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 50:3085–3092 (2004).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lichtenstein, P. et al. Environmental and heritable factors in the causation of cancer-analyses of cohorts of twins from Sweden, Denmark, and Finland. N Engl J Med 343:78–85 (2000).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Masuko, H. et al. An interaction between Nrf2 polymorphisms and smoking status affects annual decline in FEV1: a longitudinal retrospective cohort study. BMC Med Genet 12:97 (2011).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yoo, M. H., Xu, X. M., Carlson, B. A., Gladyshev, V. N. & Hatfield, D. L. Thioredoxin reductase 1 deficiency reverses tumor phenotype and tumorigenicity of lung carcinoma cells. J Biol Chem 281:13005–13008 (2006).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Yoo, M. H. et al. Targeting thioredoxin reductase 1 reduction in cancer cells inhibits self-sufficient growth and DNA replication. PLoS One 2:1112 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Singh, N. P., McCoy, M. T., Tice, R. R. & Schneider E. L. A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. Exp Cell Res 175: 184–191 (1988).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society of Toxicogenomics and Toxicoproteomics and Springer Netherlands 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Life ScienceDongguk UniversitySeoulKorea
  2. 2.Institute of Environmental Medicine for Green ChemistryDongguk UniversitySeoulKorea
  3. 3.Department of Pharmacology, Institute for Biomedical Science Institute (IBMS), School of MedicineKyung Hee UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations