Advertisement

Aeroelastic behaviour of a parameterised circulation-controlled wing

  • Nora NeuertEmail author
  • Dieter Dinkler
Original Paper
  • 18 Downloads

Abstract

The aeroelastic behaviour of the wing of a short take-off and landing aircraft using the Coandă effect depends on its properties and shape. An existing reduced-order model is parameterised for detailed investigations. On the one hand, varying mass due to tank level and varying overall stiffness is implemented in the reduced-order model. The influence of the mass change on the aeroelastic behaviour is reflected in the stability maps. On the other hand, two-dimensional steady and unsteady aerodynamics of different nose shapes are investigated with detailed computational fluid simulations and included in the reduced-order model. The dependence on the profile shape and the frequency is described. Their influence on the aeroelastic behaviour is reflected by the stability maps as well.

Keywords

Aeroelasticity Circulation control Parameterisation Reduced-order model 

List of symbols

\(A_{\text {ref}}\)

Reference wing area

\(c_{\text {L}}\)

Lift coefficient

\(c_{\text {M}}\)

Pitching moment coefficient

\(c_{\text {p}}\)

Pressure coefficient

\(c_\mu\)

Momentum coefficient of the circulation control

f

Frequency

g

Net weight

h

Heave displacement

l

Chord length

m

Mass

\(\dot{m}_{\text {jet}}\)

Mass flow in the Coandă slot

q

Generalised coordinate

\(q_\infty\)

Dynamic pressure

\(v_\infty\)

Approach velocity

\(v_{\text {jet}}\)

Jet velocity in the Coandă slot

\(\alpha\)

(Effective) angle of attack

\(\gamma _i\)

i-th participation factor

\(\delta _{\text {fl}}\)

Flap deflection

\(\eta\)

Dimensionless chord

\(\eta _{\text {k}}\)

Parameterised stiffness

\(\eta _{\text {m}}\)

Parameterised tank level

\(\omega\)

Natural frequency

\(\omega _i\)

i-th natural frequency

\(\mathbf {A_0}\)

Aerodynamic stiffness matrix

\(\mathbf {A_1}\)

Aerodynamic damping matrix

\(\mathbf {K}\)

Stiffness matrix

\(\mathbf {L}\)

Aerodynamic load vector

\(\mathbf {M}\)

Mass matrix

\(\mathbf {X}\)

Modal matrix

\(\mathbf {q}\)

Vector of generalised coordinates

\(\mathbf {x}\)

Vector of physical degrees of freedom

\(\hat{\mathbf {x}}_i\)

i-th eigenvector

\(()_0\)

Constant part

\(()_1\)

Referring to the initial configuration

\(()_2\)

Referring to the altered configuration

\(()_A\)

Referring to the discretisation of the aerodynamic model

\(()_\text {,droop}\)

Referring to droop nose

\(()_{\text {S}}\)

Referring to the discretisation of the structural model

\(\varDelta ()\)

Deviation of variable

\(\dot{()}\)

Derivative with respect to time

\(()_{,x}\)

Derivative with respect to x

Notes

Acknowledgements

Financial support has been provided by the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG) in the framework of the Coordinated Research Centre SFB 880.

References

  1. 1.
    Radespiel, R., Heinze, W.: SFB 880: fundamentals of high lift for future commercial aircraft. CEAS Aeronaut. J. 5(3), 239–251 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Flightpath, A.C.A.R.E.: 2050-Europes Vision for Aviation. Advisory Council for Aeronautics Research in Europe (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Burnazzi, M., Radespiel, R.: Design of a droopnose configuration for a Coanda active flap application. 51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lighthill, M.: Notes on the Deflection of Jets by Insertion of Curved Surfaces, and on the Design of Bends in Wind Tunnels. Aeronautics Research Council Reports and memoranda No. 2105 (1945)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Korbacher, G.K.: Aerodynamics of powered high-lift systems. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 6(1), 319–358 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Englar, R.J., Huson, G.: Development of advanced circulation control wing high-lift airfoils. J. Aircr. 21(7), 476–483 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wood, N.: Circulation control airfoils past, present, future. Technical Report 85-0204, AIAA (1985)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pfingsten, K.C., Radespiel, R.: Experimental and numerical investigation of a circulation control airfoil. AIAA Paper 2009-533 (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wilkerson, J.B.: Aeroelastic characteristics of a circulation control wing. Technical Report 76-0115, David W. Taylor Naval Ship Research and Development Center (1976)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Haas, D.J., Chopra, I.: Static aeroelastic characteristics of circulation control wings. J. Aircr. 25(10), 948–954 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Haas, D.J., Chopra, I.: Flutter of circulation control wings. J. Aircr. 26(4), 373–381 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Young, T.: Outlines of experiments and inquiries respecting sound and light. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 90, 106–150 (1800)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Englar, R.J., Smith, M., Kelley, S.M., Rover, R.C.: Application of circulation control to advanced subsonic transport aircraft, Part I—airfoil development. J. Aircr. 31(5), 1160–1168 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Englar, R.J., Smith, M., Kelley, S.M., Rover, R.C.: Application of circulation control to advanced subsonic transport aircraft, Part II—transport application. J. Aircr. 31(5), 1169–1177 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Krukow, I., Dinkler, D.: A reduced-order model for the investigation of the aeroelasticity of circulation-controlled wings. CEAS Aeronaut. J. 5(2), 145–156 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sommerwerk, K., Haupt, M.C., Horst, P.: Aeroelastic performance assessment of a wing with Coandă effect circulation control via fluid-structure interaction. 31st AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, San Diego (CA) (2013) AIAA 2013-2791Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sommerwerk, K., Michels, B., Haupt, M.C., Horst, P.: Influence of engine modeling on structural sizing and approach aerodynamics of a circulation controlled wing. CEAS Aeronaut. J. 9(1), 219–233 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schwamborn, D., Gardner, A.D., von Geyr, H., Krumbein, A., Lüdecke, H.: Development of the DLR TAU-Code for Aerospace Applications. 50th NAL International Conference on Aerospace Science and Technology, Bangalore (India) (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Spalart, P.R., Allmaras, S.R.: A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. AIAA Paper 92-0439 (1992)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dinkler, D., Krukow, I.: Flutter of circulation-controlled wings. CEAS Aeronaut. J. 6(4), 589–598 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sommerwerk, K., Krukow, I., Haupt, M.C., Dinkler, D.: Investigation of aeroelastic effects of a circulation controlled wing. J. Aircr. 53(6), 1746–1756 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Marques, A.N., Simões, C.F.C., Azevedo, J.L.F.: Unsteady aerodynamic forces for aeroelastic analysis of two-dimensional lifting surfaces. J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 28(4), 474–484 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lisandrin, P., Carpentieri, G., Van Tooren, M.: An investigation over cfd-based models for the identification of nonlinear unsteady aerodynamics responses. AIAA J. 44(9), 2043–2050 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.TU Braunschweig, Institute of Structural AnalysisBrunswickGermany

Personalised recommendations