CEAS Aeronautical Journal

, Volume 3, Issue 2–4, pp 135–143 | Cite as

Aeroelastic mysteries in avian flight

Original Paper

Abstract

Avian flight is one of the remarkable achievements of vertebrate evolution. Thereby, the birds encountered, in principle, the same flight-technical problems and challenges as the human aircraft designers. From an aeronautical point of view, and with the knowledge and experience of modern aircraft design, the present study demonstrates that concealed aeroelastic effects and phenomena are also of basic importance in avian flight. Structural wing asymmetries play a fundamental role. First, as basis for the aeroelastic investigations, significant flight relevant anatomical and structural characteristics of the complex biotechnical architecture of avian wings are exposed. The further considerations are then focussed on two conspicuous asymmetric structural particularities of the wing, which contribute essentially to active flight ability of birds—an asymmetric positioning of the shaft in the vane of the primary flight feathers, and just so the eccentric location of the bony skeleton in the wing profile close to the leading edge. Ornithologists consider the asymmetry of the flight feathers as a diagnostic tool for aerial capability. However, this thesis still remains a topic of controversial debates. The study shows evidently that the magic structural wing asymmetries are imperative aeroelastic requirements for efficient flight, in particular to ensure structural strength and stability of the wing, as well as aerodynamic integrity. But these asymmetries are also fundamental to active aerodynamic generation of lift and thrust in wing flapping.

Keywords

Avian flight Structural wing asymmetries Aeroelastic phenomena 

References

  1. 1.
    Ciappe, L.M.: The first 85 million years of avian evolution. Nature 378, 349–355 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nedin, C.: All About Archaeopteryx. Nature, the Talk Origins Archive. http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/archaeopteryx/info.html (2002)
  3. 3.
    Burton, R.: Vogelflug – Aerodynamik, Anatomie, Anpassung. Franckh-Kosmos, Stuttgart (1991)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Azuma, A.: The biokinetics of flying and swimming. Springer, Tokyo (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nachtigall, W.: Warum die Vögel fliegen. Rasch und Röhring, Hamburg (1985)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hertel, H.: Structure-Form-Movements. Reinholds, New York (1969)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Van Tyne, J., Berger, A.J.: Fundamentals of ornithology, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York (1976)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Norberg, R.A.: Feather asymmetry in Archaeopteryx. Nature 374, 221 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Feduccia, A., Tordorff, H.B.: Feathers of Archaeoptryx: asymmetric vanes indicate aerodynamic function. Science 203, 1021–1022 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Speakman, J.R., Thomson, S.C.: Flight capabilities of Archaeopteryx. Nature 370, 514 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Försching, H.: Grundlagen der Aeroelastik (Fundamentals of Aeroelasticity). Springer, Berlin (1974)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rüppell, G.: Vogelflug. Rowohlt Taschenbuch, Hamburg (1980)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bilo, D.: Kinematik und Aerodynamik des Flügelabschlages beim Haussperling. Zeitschr. vgl. Physiol. 71, 382–454 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.DLR Institute of AeroelasticityGöttingenGermany

Personalised recommendations