Advertisement

Genes & Genomics

, Volume 41, Issue 11, pp 1329–1340 | Cite as

Genetic diversity and population structure of Perilla frutescens collected from Korea and China based on simple sequence repeats (SSRs)

  • Dae Hyun Park
  • Kyu Jin Sa
  • Su Eun Lim
  • Shi Jun Ma
  • Ju Kyong LeeEmail author
Research Article
  • 55 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Perilla frutescens (L.) Britt. is divided into two varieties based on morphology and use. One is P. frutescens var. frutescens, which is used both as a leafy vegetable and as an oil obtained from the seeds. The other variety is P. frutescens var. crispa, a Chinese medicine or spice vegetable crop. In addition, weedy types of var. frutescens and var. crispa are occasionally grown as relict forms and are easy to find on roadsides, in waste areas and around farmers’ fields or farmhouses. SSR markers have been successfully used to examine the genetic diversity and relationships of cultivated and weedy types of Perilla in many regions.

Objectives

In this study, we used 25 simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers were used to assess the genetic diversity and population structure of 90 Perilla accessions from Korea and China.

Methods

A total of 90 accessions of Perilla were collected in Korea and China included 45 accessions from each of Korea and China. We selected 25 SSR markers representing the polymorphism of and adequately amplifying all the Perilla accessions.

Results

A total of 153 alleles were identified, with an average of 6.12 alleles per locus. The GD level and PIC value for cultivated and weedy types of P. frutescens from China were higher than those for accessions from Korea. Weedy accessions had higher GD and PIC values than cultivated accessions. In the population structure analysis using the model-based method, the 90 Perilla accessions were divided into two main group and an admixed group based on a membership probability threshold of 0.8. Based on the distance-based unweighted pair group method with the arithmetic mean (UPGMA), all accessions were classified into four major groups with a genetic similarity of 32.8%.

Conclusion

Finally, the findings of this study will provide useful theoretical knowledge for further study of the population structure and genetic diversity of Perilla species and benefit Perilla crop breeding and germplasm conservation in Korea and China.

Keywords

Perilla frutescens Genetic diversity SSR marker UPGMA Population structure 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (#2016R1D1A1B01006461), and the Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science and Technology Development (Project nos. PJ014227032019 and PJ0142272019), Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Dae Hyun Park declares that he has no conflict of interest. Kyu Jin Sa declares that he has no conflict of interest. Su Eun Lim declares that she has no conflict of interest. Shi Jun Ma declares that she has no conflict of interest. Ju Kyong Lee declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human subjects or animals performed by any of the above authors.

Supplementary material

13258_2019_860_MOESM1_ESM.docx (29 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 29 kb)
13258_2019_860_MOESM2_ESM.docx (21 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 20 kb)

References

  1. Brown WL (1983) Genetic diversity and genetic vulnerability-an appraisal. Econ Bot 37:4–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dice LR (1945) Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology 26:297–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hamza S, Hamida WB, Rebai A, Harrabi M (2004) SSR-based genetic diversity assessment among Tunisian winter barley and relationship with morphological traits. Euphytica 135:107–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kwon SJ, Lee JK, Kim NS, Yu JW, Dixit A, Cho EG, Park YJ (2005) Isolation and characterization of SSR markers in Perilla frutescens Britt. Mol Ecol Notes 5:454–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lee JK, Kim NS (2007) Genetic diversity and relationships of cultivated and weedy types of Perilla frutescens collected from East Asia revealed by SSR markers. Korean J Breed Sci 39:491–499Google Scholar
  7. Lee JK, Ohnishi O (2001) Geographical differentiation of morphological characters among Perilla crops and their weedy types in East Asia. Breed Sci 51:247–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lee JK, Ohnishi O (2003) Genetic relationships among cultivated types of Perilla frutescens and their weedy types in East Asia revealed by AFLP markers. Genet Resour Crop Evol 50:65–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lee JK, Nitta M, Kim NS, Park CH et al (2002) Genetic diversity of Perilla and related weedy types in Korea determined by AFLP analyses. Crop Sci 42:2161–2166.  https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2002.2161 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lee JK, Kwon SJ, Park BJ, Kim MJ, Park YJ, Ma KH, Lee SY, Kim JH (2007) Analysis of genetic diversity and Relationships of cultivated and weedy types of Perilla frutescens collected from Korea by using microsatellite markers. Korean J Genet 29:81–89Google Scholar
  11. Li HL (1969) The vegetables of ancient China. Econ Bot 23:235–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Liu K, Muse SV (2005) PowerMarker: an integrated analysis environment for genetic marker analysis. Bioinformatics 21:2128–2129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Liu YX, Zhang WM (1998) Classification and resources distribution of Perilla. Chin Wild Plant Resour 17:1–4Google Scholar
  14. Liu YX, Zhang WM, Qian XS (1996) Research and utilization of Perilla. Chin Wild Plant Resour 3:24–27Google Scholar
  15. Ma SJ, Lee JK (2017) Morphological variation of two cultivated types of Perilla crop from different areas of China. Korean J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 35:510–522Google Scholar
  16. Ma SJ, Sa KJ, Hong TK, Lee JK (2019) Genetic diversity and population structure analysis in Perilla crop and their weedy types from northern and southern areas of China based on simple sequence repeat (SSRs). Genes Genom 41:267–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Makino T, Hara H, Tuyama T, Fumio M (1961) Makino’s new illustrated flora of Japan. Hokuryukan, Tokyo, p 1060Google Scholar
  18. Nitta M, Lee JK, Ohnishi O (2003) Asian Perilla crops and their weedy forms: their cultivation, utilization and genetic relationships. Econ Bot 57:245–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Palmer JD, Jansen RK, Michaels HJ, Chase MW, Manhart JR (1988) Chloroplast DNA variation and plant phylogeny. Ann Mo Bot Gard 75:1180–1206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Park YJ, Dixit A, Ma KH, Lee JK et al (2008) Evaluation of genetic diversity and relationships within an on-farm collection of Perilla frutescens (L.) Britt. using microsatellite markers. Genet Resour Crop Evol 55:523–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Park YJ, Lee JK, Kim NS (2009) Simple sequence repeat polymorphisms (SSRPs) for evaluation of molecular diversity and germplasm classification of minor crops. Molecules 14:4546–4569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Park YJ, Ramekar RV, Sa KJ, Lee JK (2015) Genetic diversity, population structure, and association mapping of biomass traits in maize with simple sequence repeat markers. Genes Genom 37:725–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Powell W, Morgante M, Andre C, Hanafey M et al (1996) The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP and SSR (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysis. Mol Breed 2:225–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pritchard JK, Wen W (2003) Documentation for STRUCTURE software: version 2. Available from http://www.pritch.bsd.uchicago.edu
  25. Rao NK (2004) Plant genetic resources: advancing conservation and use through biotechnology. Afr J Biotechnol 3:136–145Google Scholar
  26. Rao VR, Hodgkin T (2002) Genetic diversity and conservation and utilization of plant genetic resources. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 68:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rohlf FJ (1998) NTSYS-pc: numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system version. Version: 2.02. Exter Software, SetauketGoogle Scholar
  28. Sa KJ, Choi SH, Ueno M, Park KC et al (2013) Identification of genetic variations of cultivated and weedy types of Perilla species in Korea and Japan using morphological and SSR markers. Genes Genom 35:649–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sa KJ, Choi SH, Ueno M, Lee JK (2015) Genetic diversity and population structure in cultivated and weedy types of Perilla in East Asia and other countries as revealed by SSR markers. Hortic Environ Biotechnol 56:524–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sa KJ, Choi IK, Park KC, Lee JK (2018) Genetic diversity and population structure among accessions of Perilla frutescens (L.) Britton in East Asia using new developed microsatellite markers. Genes Genom 40:1319–1329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tan M, Yan M, Wang L, Wang L, Yan X (2012) Research progress on Perilla frutescens. Chin J Oil Crop Sci 34:225–231Google Scholar
  32. Vaiman D, Mercier D, Moazai G (1994) A set of 99 cattle microsatellite, characterization, synteny mapping and polymorphism. Mamm Genome 5:288–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Villa TCC, Maxted N, Scholten M, Ford-Lloyd B (2006) Defining and identifying crop landraces. Plant Genet Resour 3:373–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wang S, Guo F (2012) Genetic diversity of Perilla frutescens from Yunnan based on ISSR. Chin J Oil Crop Sci 34:372–376Google Scholar
  35. Wang R, Yu Y, Zhao J, Shi Y et al (2008) Population structure and linkage disequilibrium of a mini core set of maize inbred lines in China. Theor Appl Genet 117:1141–1153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wei Z, Li H, Feng B, Lin T, Lin W (2015) Studies on the germplasm resource investigation and utilization of Perilla frutescens (L.) in Guizhou. Seed 34:58–60Google Scholar
  37. Xia XC, Reif JC, Melchinger AE, Frisch M et al (2005) Genetic diversity among CIMMYT maize inbred lines investigated with SSR markers: II. Subtropical, tropical midaltitude, and highland maize inbred lines and their relationships with elite U.S. and European maize. Crop Sci 45:2573–2582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Xie CX, Warburton M, Li MS, Li XH, Xiao MJ, Hao ZF, Zhao Q, Zhang SH (2008) An analysis of population structure and linkage disequilibrium using multilocus data in 187 maize inbred lines. Mol Breed 21:407–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Xie W, Zhang X, Cai H, Liu W et al (2010) Genetic diversity analysis and transferability of cereal EST-SSR markers to orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.). Biochem Syst Ecol 38:740–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zeven AC (1998) Landraces: a review of definitions and classifications. Euphytica 104:127–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zeven AC, de-Wet JMJ (1982) Dictionary of cultivated plants and their regions of diversity. Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen, p 34Google Scholar
  42. Zhang X, Wu W, Zheng YL, Chen L, Cai Q (2009) Essential oil variations in different Perilla L. accessions: chemotaxonomic implications. Plant Syst Evol 281:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Genetics Society of Korea 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied Plant Sciences, College of Agriculture and Life SciencesKangwon National UniversityChuncheonKorea
  2. 2.School of Life SciencesShandong UniversityQingdaoPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations