Genome-wide analyses of the Jeju, Thoroughbred, and Jeju crossbred horse populations using the high density SNP array
The Jeju horse is an indigenous Korean horse breed that is currently registered with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. However, there is severe lack of genomic studies on Jeju horse. This study was conducted to investigate genetic characteristics of horses including Jeju horse, Thoroughbred and Jeju crossbred (Jeju × Thoroughbred) populations. We compared the genomes of three horse populations using the Equine SNP70 Beadchip array. Short-range Linkage disequilibrium was the highest in Thoroughbred, whereas r2 values were lowest in Jeju horse. Expected heterozygosity was the highest in Jeju crossbred (0.351), followed by the Thoroughbred (0.337) and Jeju horse (0.311). The level of inbreeding was slightly higher in Thoroughbred (− 0.009) than in Jeju crossbred (− 0.035) and Jeju horse (− 0.038). FST value was the highest between Jeju horse and Thoroughbred (0.113), whereas Jeju crossbred and Thoroughbred showed the lowest value (0.031). The genetic relationship was further assessed by principal component analysis, suggesting that Jeju crossbred is more genetically similar to Thoroughbred than Jeju horse population. Additionally, we detected potential selection signatures, for example, in loci located on LCORL/NCAPG and PROP1 genes that are known to influence body. Genome-wide analyses of the three horse populations showed that all the breeds had somewhat a low level of inbreeding within each population. In the population structure analysis, we found that Jeju crossbred was genetically closer to Thoroughbred than Jeju horse. Furthermore, we identified several signatures of selection which might be associated with traits of interest. To our current knowledge, this study is the first genomic research, analyzing genetic relationships of Jeju horse, Thoroughbred and Jeju crossbred.
KeywordsJeju crossbred Jeju horse Thoroughbred Body size Signature of selection
This work was carried out with the support of “Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science & Technology Development (Project title: Study on the development of basic population for the use of Jeju horses, Project No. PJ01010503)” Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All experiments and all its procedures were carried out in accordance with the regulation approved by National Institute of Animal Science (NIAS, National Institute of Animal Science’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee: 2014-067).
- Harmon LJ, Braude S (2010) Conservation of small populations: effective population sizes, inbreeding, and the 50/500 rule. In: Braude S, Low BS (eds) An introduction to methods and models in ecology, evolution, and conservation biology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 125–138Google Scholar
- Hill EW, McGivney BA, Gu J, Whiston R, Machugh DE (2010) A genome-wide SNP-association study confirms a sequence variant (g.66493737C> T) in the equine myostatin (MSTN) gene as the most powerful predictor of optimum racing distance for Thoroughbred racehorses. BMC Genom 11(1):552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kim NY (2015) Distribution of Coat Colors and Molecular Genetic Study of White Patch in Jeju Horses. Dissertation, Jeju National UniversityGoogle Scholar
- McCue ME, Bannasch DL, Petersen JL, Gurr J, Bailey E, Binns MM, Distl O, Guerin G, Hasegawa T, Hill EW et al (2012) A high density SNP array for the domestic horse and extant Perissodactyla: utility for association mapping, genetic diversity, and phylogeny studies. PLoS Genet 8:e1002451CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (2018) 2017 Actual condition survey of horse industry. http://www.mafra.go.kr/bbs/mafra/68/316966/artclView. Accessed 7 Mar 2018
- Shin TG, Yang KC, Kim SH (1993) An osteological finding of equine bones excavated from Kwakji Archaeological Site in Cheju-do. Cheju Univ J 37:85–90Google Scholar