Genes & Genomics

, Volume 34, Issue 3, pp 265–273 | Cite as

Revelation of the early responses of salt tolerance in maize via SSH libraries

  • Dong Ding
  • Zhixia Xiao
  • Hailin Xiao
  • Tao Xia
  • YongLian Zheng
  • Fazhan Qiu
Research Article

Abstract

Maize (Zea mays L.), one of the most important cereal crops in the world, is salt-sensitive. It is critical to study the genes associated with salt tolerance, the differential gene expression pattern between salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive lines, and the mechanism of salt tolerance in maize. Two maize inbred lines with different salt sensitivity, NC286 and Huangzao4, were used to reveal early responsive genes under high salinity condition. Suppression subtractive hybridization (SSH) assay was conducted to identify potential genes involved in the early stage of maize seedlings in responses to 200mM NaCl. A custom μparaflo™ microfluidic array (LC science USA) containing Release version 10.1 plant miRNA probes (http://microrna.sanger.ac.uk/) was used to discover salt stress responsive miRNAs using the differences in miRNAs expression between these two maize lines. Cis-elemnet analysis was performed in the promoter regions of these two kinds of salt stress responsive transcriptions. The expression of a total of 141 unique genes was significantly changed under 200mM NaCl salt shock within 24 hours. These genes were involved in a broad spectrum of biochemical, cellular, and physiological processes. They were assigned to 14 categories based on their biological functions. Some of them were previously reported to be associated with biotic and abiotic stresses, and several novel genes detected. A gene model was proposed which showed how these genes could sense and response to the high salinity environment. The promoter regions of these 141 salt responsive genes were analyzed, and salt responsive key cis-elements uncovered. The cis-elements usage bias of the salt responsive mRNAs and non-coding RNAs were of the same. The different expression profiles of the genes, especially the ones involved in salt signal cascades and phytohormones responding, could explain the different salt stress response in the two maize inbred lines. The similar cis-elements usage bias of two kinds of salt responsive transcriptions suggests they may be regulated by the same trans-factors.

Keywords

Maize (Zea mays L.) Salt stress Gene expression Suppression Subtractive Hybridization (SSH) Cis-elememts 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Supplementary material

13258_2011_196_MOESM1_ESM.doc (397 kb)
Supplementary material, approximately 397 KB.

References

  1. Achard P, Cheng H, De Grauwe l, Decat J, Schoutteten H, Moritz T, Van Der Straeten D Peng JR and Harberd NP (2006) Integration of plant responses to environmentally activated phytohormonal signals. Science 311: 91–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aguilar R C and Wendland B (2003) Ubiqutin: not just for proteasomes anymore. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 15: 184–190.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chung JS, Zhu JK, Bressan RA, Hasegawa PM and Shi H (2008) Reactive oxygen species mediate Na+-induced SOS1 mRNA stability in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 53: 554–565.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Conaway RC, Brower CS and Conaway JW (2002) Emerging roles of ubiquitin in transcriptional regulation. Science 296: 1254–1258.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ding D, Zhang L, Wang H, Liu Z, Zhang Z and Zheng Y (2009) Differential expression of miRNAs in response to salt stress in maize roots. Ann. Bot. (Lond). 103: 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dong CH, Agarwal M, Zhang YY, Xie Q and Zhu JK (2006) The negative regulator of plant cold responses, HOS1, is a RING E3 ligase that mediates the ubiquitination and degradation of ICE1. Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.USA 103: 8281–8286.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Feder ME and Hofmann GE (1999) Heat-shock proteins, molecular chaperones, and the stress response: evolutionary and ecological physiology. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 61: 243–282.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Feng JX, Liu D, Pan Y, Gong W, Ma LG, Luo JC, Deng XW and Zhu YX (2005) An annotation update via cDNA sequence analysis and comprehensive profiling of developmental, hormonal or environmental responsiveness of the Arabidopsis AP2/EREBP transcription factor gene family. Plant Mol. Biol. 59: 853–868.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Johnson N, Revenga C and Echeverria J (2001) Managing water for people and nature. Science 292: 1071–1072.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jung C, Seo JS, Han WH, Koo YJ, Kim CH, Song SI, Nahm BH, Choi YD and Cheong JJ (2008) Overexpressiong of AtMYB44 enhances stomatal closure to confer abiotic stress tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 146: 623–635.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kamei A, Seki M, Umezawa T, Ishida J, Satou M, Akiyama K, Zhu JK and Shinozaki K (2005) Analysis of gene expression profiles in Arabidopsis salt overly sensitive mutants sos2-1 and sos3-1. Plant Cell Environ. 28: 1267–1275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kuhn JM, Boisson-Dernier A, Dizon MB, Maktabi MH and Schroeder JI (2006) The protein phosphatase AtPP2CA negatively regulates abscisic acid signal transduction in Arabidopsis, and effects of abh1 on AtPP2CA mRNA. Plant Physiol. 140: 127–139.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lee Y, Kim M, Han J, Yeom KH, Lee S, Baek SH and Kim VN (2004) MicroRNA genes are transcribed by RNA polymerase II. EMBO J. 23: 4051–4060.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Luo JH, Shen GX, Yan JQ, He CX and Zhang H (2006) AtCHIP functions as an E3 ubiquitin ligase of protein phosphatase 2A subunits and alters plant response to abscisic acid treatment. Plant J. 46: 649–657.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Munns R (2002) Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant Cell Environ. 25: 239–250PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ouyang B, Yang T, Li HX, Zhang L, Zhang YY, Zhang JH, Fei ZJ and Ye ZB (2007) Identification of early salt stress response genes in tomato root by suppression subtractive hybridization and microarray analysis. J. Exp. Bot. 58: 507–520.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Phillips JR, Dalmay T and Bartels D (2007) The role of small RNAs in abiotic stress. FEBS Lett. 581: 3592–3597.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Reyes D, Rodriguez D, Gonzalez-Garcia MP, Lorenzo O, Nicolas G, Garcia-Martinez JL and Nicolas C (2006) Overexpression of a protein phosphatase 2C from beech seeds in Arabidopsis shows phenotypes related to Abscisic Acid responses and gibberellin biosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 141: 1414–1424.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sakuma Y, Maruyama K, Qin F, Osakabe Y, Shinozaki K and Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (2006) Dual function of an Arabidopsis transcription factor DREB2A in water-stress-responsive and heat-stress-responsive gene expression. Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.USA 103: 18822–18827.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shukla RK, Raha S, Tripathi V and Chattopadhyay D (2006) Expression of CAP2, an APETALA2-family transcription factor from chickpea, enhances growth and tolerance to dehydration and salt stress in transgenic tobacco. Plant Physiol. 142: 113–123.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tang M, Sun J, Liu Y, Chen F and Shen S (2007) Isolation and functional characterization of the JcERF gene, a putative AP2/EREBP domain-containing transcription factor, in the woody oil plant Jatropha curcas. Plant Mol. Biol. 63: 419–428.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Torney F, Moeller L, Scarpa A and Wang K (2007) Genetic engineering approaches to improve bioethanol production from maize. Curr. Opin. Biotech. 18: 193–199PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Vinocur B and Altman A (2005) Recent advances in engineering plant tolerance to abiotic stress: achievements and limitations. Curr. Opin. Biotech. 16: 123–132.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Yang X, Liang Z, Wen X and Lu C (2008) Genetic engineering of the biosynthesis of glycinebetaine leads to increased tolerance of photosynthesis to salt stress in transgenic tobacco plants. Plant Mol. Biol. 66: 73–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zhang HX and Blumwald E (2001) Transgenic salt-tolerant tomato plants accumulate salt in foliage but not in fruit. Nat. Biotechnol. 19: 765–768.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zhang ZX, Zou XL, Tang WH and Zheng YL (2006) Revelation on early response and molecular mechanism of submergence tolerance in maize roots by microarray and suppression subtractive hybridization. Environ. Exp. Bot. 58: 53–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zörb C, Schmitt S, Neeba A, Karl S, Linder M and Schubert S (2004) The biochemical reaction of maize (Zea mays L.) to salt stress is characterized by a mitigation of symptoms and not by a specific adaptation. Plant Sci. 167: 91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Genetics Society of Korea and Springer Netherlands 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dong Ding
    • 1
    • 2
  • Zhixia Xiao
    • 1
  • Hailin Xiao
    • 1
  • Tao Xia
    • 3
  • YongLian Zheng
    • 1
  • Fazhan Qiu
    • 1
  1. 1.National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic ImprovementHuazhong Agricultural UniversityWuhanChina
  2. 2.College of AgronomyHenan Agricultural UniversityZhengzhouChina
  3. 3.College of Life Science East China Normal UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations