Genes & Genomics

, Volume 33, Issue 4, pp 391–397 | Cite as

Uncovering signatures of selection in the soybean genome using SSR diversity near QTLs of agronomic importance

  • Tae-Hwan Jun
  • Kyujung Van
  • Moon Young Kim
  • Myounghai Kwak
  • Suk-Ha Lee
Research Article


The cultivated soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] is widely considered to descend from the wild soybean (G. soja Sieb. & Zucc.). This study was designed to evaluate the genetic variability and differentiation between G. soja and G. max, and to detect signatures of the selection that may have occurred during the domestication process from G. soja to G. max. A total of 192 G. soja accessions and 104 G. max accessions were genotyped using eight selected simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers assigned to three SSR groups. Four SSRs in group A were not located near any known QTL. Three SSRs in group B were associated with seed protein content, and an SSR in group C was associated with resistance to Sclerotinia stem rot. The number of alleles per locus and the level of genetic variability in G. soja were higher than those in G. max. A total of 122 out of 125 alleles were present in G. soja, but only 59 alleles were detected in G. max. The average gene diversity was 0.74 in G. soja and 0.64 in G. max. Four SSRs near QTLs of agronomic importance showed strong genetic differentiation and shift change in high frequency alleles in groups B and C between G. soja and G. max, revealing selection signatures that may reflect the domestication events and recent selective breeding. With reduced diversity in G. max, some undomesticated genes from G. soja should be prime candidates for introgression to increase the pool of diversity in G. max.


Domestication Gene diversity Glycine max Glycine soja Selection signature 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material, approximately 786 KB.


  1. Arahana VS, Graef GL, Specht JE, Steadman JR and Eskridge KM (2001) Identification of QTLs for Resistance to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in soybean. Crop Sci. 41: 180–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beja-Pereira A, Luikart G, England PR, Bradley DG, Jann OC, Bertorelle G, Chamberlain AT, Nunes TP, Metodiev S, Ferrand N and Erhardt G (2003) Gene-culture coevolution between cattle milk protein genes and human lactase genes. Nat. Genet. 35: 311–313.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brinkman MA and Frey KJ (1977) Yield component analysis of oat isolines that produce different grain yield. Crop Sci. 17: 165–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brummer EC, Graef GL, Orf J, Wilcox JR and Shoemaker RC (1997) Mapping QTL for seed protein and oil content in eight soybean populations. Crop Sci. 37: 370–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen Y and Nelson RL (2004) Genetic variation and relationships among cultivated, wild, and semiwild soybean. Crop Sci. 44: 316–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen Y and Nelson RL (2005) Relationship between origin and genetic diversity in Chinese soybean germplasm. Crop Sci. 45: 1645–1652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chung J, Babka HL, Graef GL, Staswick PE, Lee DJ, Cregan PB, Shoemaker RC and Specht JE (2003) The seed protein, oil, and yield QTL on soybean linkage group I. Crop Sci. 43: 1053–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Concibido VC, La Vallee B, Mclaird P, Pineda N, Meyer J, Hummel L, Yang J, Wu K and Delannay X (2003) Introgression of a quantitative trait locus for yield from Glycine soja into commercial soybean cultivars. Theor. Appl. Genet. 106: 575–582.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Diers BW, Keim P, Fehr WR and Shoemaker RC (1992) RFLP analysis of soybean seed protein and oil content. Theor. Appl. Genet. 83: 608–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Excoffier L, Smouse PE and Quattro JM (1992) Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 136: 343–359.Google Scholar
  11. Gregory TR (2009) Artificial selection and domestication: Modern lessons from Darwin’s enduring analogy. Evol. Edu. Outreach 2: 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hahn V (2002) Genetic variation for resistance to Sclerotinia head rot in sunflower inbred lines. Field Crops Res. 77: 153–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hyten DL, Song Q, Zhu Y, Choi I-Y, Nelson RL, Costa JM, Specht JE, Shoemaker RC and Cregan PB (2006) Impacts of genetic bottlenecks on soybean genome diversity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103: 16666–16671.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jun T-H, Van K, Kim MY, Lee S-H and Walker DR (2008) Association analysis using SSR markers to find QTL for seed protein content in soybean. Euphytica 162: 179–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kim HS and Diers BW (2000) Inheritance of partial resistance to Sclerotinia stem rot in soybean. Crop Sci. 40: 55–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kuroda Y, Kaga A, Tomooka N and Vaughan DA (2006) Population genetic structure of Japanese wild soybean (Glycin soja) based on microsatellite variation. Mol. Ecol. 15: 959–974.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li Z and Nelson RL (2002) RAPD marker diversity among cultivated and wild soybean accessions from four Chinese provinces. Crop Sci. 42: 1737–1744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Maynard SJ and Haigh J (1974) The hitchhiking effect of a favorable gene. Genet. Res. 23: 23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ohara M and Shimamoto Y (2002) Importance of genetic characterization and conservation of plant genetic resources: The breeding system and genetic diversity of wild soybean (Glycine soja). Plant Species Biol. 17: 51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Palaisa KA, Morgante M, Williams M and Rafalski A (2003) Contrasting effects of selection on sequence diversity and linkage disequilibrium at two phytoene synthase loci. Plant Cell 15: 1795–1806.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Peakall R and Smouse PE (2006) GenAIEx 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol. Ecol. Notes 6: 288–295.Google Scholar
  22. Remington DL, Thronsbery JM, Matsuoka Y, Wilson LM, Whitt SR, Doebley J, Kresovich S, Goodman MM and Buckler ES (2001) Structure of linkage disequilibrium and phenotypic associations in the maize genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 11479–11484.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sebolt AM, Shoemaker RC and Diers BW (2000) Analysis of quantitative trait locus allele from wild soybean that increases seed protein concentration in soybean. Crop Sci. 40: 1438–1444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tanksley SD and McCouch SR (1997) Seed banks and molecular maps: unlocking genetic potential from the wild. Science 277: 1063–1066.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Vigouroux Y, McMullen M, Hittinger CT, Houchins K, Schulz L, Kresovich S, Matsuoka Y and Doebley J (2002) Identifying genes of agronomic importance in maize by screening microsatellites for evidence of selection during domestication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 23: 9650–9655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang D, Arelli PR, Shoemaker RC and Diers BW (2001) Loci underlying resistance to Race 3 of soybean cyst nematode in Glycine soja plant introduction 468916. Theor. Appl. Genet. 103: 561–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wang D, Graef GL, Procopiuk AM and Diers BW (2004) Identification of putative QTL that underlie yield in interspecific soybean backcross populations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 108: 458–467.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang RL, Stec A, Hey J, Lukens L and Doebley J (1999) The limits of selection during maize domestication. Nature 398: 236–239.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Winter SMJ, Shelp BJ, Anderson TR, Welacky TW and Rajcan I (2007) QTL associated with horizontal resistance to soybean cyst nematode in Glycine soja PI464925B. Theor. Appl. Genet. 114: 461–472.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Xu DH, Abe J, Gai JY and Shimamoto Y (2002) Diversity of chloroplast DNA SSRs in wild and cultivated soybeans: evidence for multiple origins of cultivated soybean. Theor. Appl. Genet. 105: 645–653.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Xu DH and Gai JY (2003) Genetic diversity of wild cultivated soybeans growing in China revealed by RAPD analysis. Plant Breed. 122: 503–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zeder MA, Emshwiller E, Smith BD and Bradley DG (2006) Documenting domestication: the intersection of genetics and archaeology. Trend. Genet. 22: 139–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Genetics Society of Korea and Springer Netherlands 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tae-Hwan Jun
    • 1
  • Kyujung Van
    • 1
  • Moon Young Kim
    • 1
  • Myounghai Kwak
    • 3
  • Suk-Ha Lee
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Plant Science and Research Institute for Agriculture and Life SciencesSeoul National UniversitySeoulKorea
  2. 2.Dept. of EntomologyOhio State UniversityWoosterUSA
  3. 3.National Institute of Biological ResourcesIncheonKorea
  4. 4.Plant Genomic and Breeding Research InstituteSeoul National UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations