Advertisement

Tensor Cubic Smoothing Splines in Designed Experiments Requiring Residual Modelling

  • Arūnas P. Verbyla
  • Joanne De Faveri
  • John D. Wilkie
  • Tom Lewis
Article
  • 78 Downloads

Abstract

Modelling response surfaces using tensor cubic smoothing splines is presented for three designed experiments. The aim is to show how the analyses can be carried out using the asreml software in the R environment, and details of the analyses including the code to do so are presented in a tutorial style. The experiments were all run over time and involve an explanatory quantitative treatment variable; one experiment is a field trial which has a spatial component and involves an additional treatment. Thus, in addition to the response surface for the time by explanatory variable, modelling of temporal and, for the third experiment, of temporal and spatial effects at the residual level is required. A linear mixed model is used for analysis, and a mixed model representation of the tensor cubic smoothing spline is described and seamlessly incorporated in the full linear mixed model. The analyses show the flexibility and capacity of asreml for complex modelling.

Supplementary materials accompanying this paper appear online.

Keywords

asreml Cubic smoothing spline Mixed models Spatial variation Temporal variation Tensor spline 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The full woodlot data were kindly provided by Rob Stevens. The suggestions and corrections by the Editor, Associate Editor and Reviewers improved the paper considerably and we thank them all.

Supplementary material

13253_2018_334_MOESM1_ESM.zip (203 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (zip 202 KB)

References

  1. Brumback, B. A. and Rice, J. A. (1998), “Smoothing spline models for the analysis of nested and crossed samples of curves (with discussion),” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 93, 961–994.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Butler, D. G., Cullis, B. R., Gilmour, A. R., and Gogel, B. J. (2011), “Mixed models for S language environments: ASReml-R reference manual,” Technical report, Queensland Department of Primary Industries, http://www.vsni.co.uk/software/asreml/.
  3. Claeskens, G. (2004), “Restricted likelihood ratio lack-of-fit tests using mixed spline models,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 66, 909–926.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Craven, P. and Wahba, G. (1979), “Smoothing noisy data with spline functions,” Numerische Mathematik, 31, 377–403.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Cressie, N. and Wikle, C. K. (2011), Statistics for Spatio-Temporal Data, Wiley, Hoboken.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Cressie, N. A. C. (2015), Statistics for spatial data, revised edition, Wiley, Hoboken.Google Scholar
  7. Currie, I. D. and Durbán, M. (2002), “Flexible smoothing with P-splines: a unified approach,” Statistical Modelling, 2, 339–349.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. De Faveri, J., Verbyla, A., Cullis, B., Pitchford, W., and Thompson, R. (2017), “Residual variance–covariance modelling in analysis of multivariate data from variety selection trials,” Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, 22, 1–22.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. De Faveri, J., Verbyla, A., Pitchford, W., Venkatanagappa, S., and Cullis, B. (2015), “Statistical methods for analysis of multi-harvest data from perennial pasture variety selection trials,” Crop and Pasture Science, 66, 947–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Diggle, P. (1988), “An approach to the analysis of repeated measurements”. Biometrics, 44, 959–971.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Eilers, P. H. C. (1999), “Contribution to the analysis of designed experiments and longitudinal data by using smoothing splines by Verbyla et al., 1999,” Applied Statistics, 48, 307–308.Google Scholar
  12. Eilers, P. H. C. and Marx, B. D. (1996), “Flexible smoothing with B-splines and penalties,” Statistical Science, 11, 89–121.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Gilmour, A. R., Cullis, B. R., and Verbyla, A. P. (1997), “Accounting for natural and extraneous variation in the analysis of field experiments,” Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, 2, 269–293.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gilmour, A. R., Gogel, B. J., Cullis, B. R., Welham, S. J., and Thompson, R. (2015), ASReml User Guide Release 4.1: Functional Specification, VSN International Ltd., Hemel Hempstead HP1 1ES, UK. www.vsni.co.uk.
  15. Green, P. J. and Silverman, B. W. (1994), Nonparametric Regression and Generalized Linear Models, Chapman and Hall, London.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Gu, C. (2002), Smoothing spline ANOVA models, Springer Series in Statistics, Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Gu, C. and Wahba, G. (1993), “Semiparametric analysis of variance with tensor product thin plate splines,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, 55, 353–368.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Hastie, T. J. and Tibshirani, R. J. (1990), Generalized Additive Models, Chapman and Hall, London.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Kenward, M. G. (1987), “A method for comparing profiles of repeated measurements,” Applied Statistics, 36, 296–308.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kimeldorf, G. S. and Wahba, G. (1970), “A correspondence between Bayesian estimation on stochastic processes and smoothing by splines,” Annal of Mathematical Statistics, 41, 495–502.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Lee, D.-J. and Durbán, M. (2011), “P-spline ANOVA-type interaction models for spatio-temporal smoothing,” Statistical Modelling, 11, 48–69.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lee, D.-J., Durbán, M., and Eilers, P. (2013), “Efficient two-dimensional smoothing with P-spline ANOVA mixed models and nested bases,” Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 61, 22–37.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. Lewis, T., Hogg, B., and Osborne, D. (2009), “Supporting document for silvicultural requirements of spotted gum forest in Queensland. A summary of growth from long-term thinning experiments,” Research report, Forest and Wood Products, The State of Queensland, Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation.Google Scholar
  24. Marx, B. D. and Eilers, P. H. C. (1998), “Direct generalized additive modeling with penalized likelihood,” Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 28, 193–209.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. Patterson, H. D. and Thompson, R. (1971), “Recovery of interblock information when block sizes are unequal,” Biometrika, 58, 545–554.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. R Development Core Team (2018), R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, http://www.R-project.org. ISBN 3-900051-07-0.
  27. Robinson, G. K. (1991), “That BLUP is a good thing: The estimation of random effects”. Statistical Science, 6, 15–51.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. Rodríguez-Álvarez, M. X., Boer, M. P., van Eeuwijk, F. A., and Eilers, P. H. C. (2018), “Correcting for spatial heterogeneity in plant breeding experiments with P-splines,” Spatial Statistics, 23, 52–71.Google Scholar
  29. Rodríguez-Álvarez, M. X., Cadarso-Suarez, C., and Gonzalez, F. (2012), “Analyzing visual receptive fields through generalised additive models with interactions,” SORT, 36, 3–32.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. Ruppert, D. R., Wand, M. P., and Carroll, R. J. (2003), Semiparametric regression, Cambridge University Press, New York.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. Sánchez-González, M., Durbán, M., Lee, D.-J., Cañellas, I., and Sixto, H. (2017), “Smooth additive mixed models for predicting aboveground biomass,” Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, 22, 23–41.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. Silverman, B. W. (1985), “Some aspects of the spline smoothing approach to nonparametric regression curve fitting (with discussion),” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 47, 1–52.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. Smith, A. B., Stringer, J. K., Wei, X., and Cullis, B. R. (2007), “Varietal selection for perennial crops where data relate to multiple harvests from a series of field trials,” Euphytica, 157, 253–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Speed, T. P. (1991), “Comment on That BLUP is a good thing: The estimation of random effects, by G. K. Robinson,” Statistical Science, 6, 44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stefanova, K. T., Smith, A. B., and Cullis, B. R. (2009), “Enhanced diagnostics for the spatial analysis of field trials,” Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 14, 392–410.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. Stein, M. L. (1999), Interpolation of spatial data, Springer, New York.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. Stringer, J. K., Cullis, B. R., and Thompson, R. (2011), “Joint modeling of spatial variability and within-row interplot competition to increase the efficiency of plant improvement,” Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, 16, 269–281.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. Thompson, R. (1985), “Comment on Some aspects of the spline smoothing approach to non-parametric regression curve fitting by B. W. Silverman,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 47, 43.Google Scholar
  39. Velazcal, J. G., Rodríguez-Álvarez, M. X., Boer, M. P., Jordan, D. R., Eilers, P. H. C., Malosetti, M., and van Eewijk, F. A. (2017), “Modelling spatial trends in sorghum breeding field trials using a two-dimensional P-spline mixed model,” Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 130, 1375–1392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Verbyla, A. P. (1994), “Testing linearity in generalized linear models,” in Contributed Papers, XVIIth International Biometric Conference, Hamilton, Canada, 8–12 August, p. 177.Google Scholar
  41. ——– (1995), “A mixed model formulation of smoothing splines and testing linearity in generalized linear models,” Research Report 95/5, Department of Statistics, The University of Adelaide.Google Scholar
  42. Verbyla, A. P., Cullis, B. R., Kenward, M. G., and Welham, S. J. (1999), “The analysis of designed experiments and longitudinal data by using smoothing splines (with discussion),” Applied Statistics, 48, 269–311.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  43. Verbyla, A. P., Lorimer, M., and Stevens, R. (2000), “A spatio-temporal analysis of a field trial,” in COMPSTAT, Conference on Computational Statistics, Utrecht, Netherlands, pp. 161–172. Invited paper.Google Scholar
  44. Wahba, G. (1983), “Bayesian “confidence intervals” for the cross-validated smoothing spline,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 45, 133–150.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  45. Welham, S. J., Cullis, B. R., Kenward, M. G., and Thompson, R. (2007), “A comparison of mixed model splines for curve fitting,” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Statistics, 49, 1–23.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  46. White, I. M. S., Cullis, B. R., Gilmour, A. R., and Thompson, R. (1998), “Smoothing biological data with splines,” in Proceedings of XIXth International Biometric Society Conference: Invited Papers, p. 9.Google Scholar
  47. Wikle, C. K. (2015), “Modern perspectives on statistics for spatio-temporal data,” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 7, 86–98.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wilkie, J., Sedgely, M., Verbyla, A. P., De Faveri, J., and Olesen, T. (2018), “Macadamia raceme density affects yield, return flowering and vegetative growth,” in preparation.Google Scholar
  49. Wood, S. N. (2006), “Low-rank scale-invariant tensor product smooths for generalized additive mixed models,” Biometrics, 62, 1025–1036.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  50. Wood, S. N., Scheipl, F., and Faraway, J. J. (2013), “Straightforward intermediate rank tensor product smoothing in mixed models,” Statistics and Computing, 23, 341–360.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  51. Xiao, L., Li, Y., and Ruppert, D. (2013), “Fast bivariate P-splines: the sandwich smoother,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 75, 577–599.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zhang, D., Lin, X., Raz, J., and Sowers, M. (1998), “Semiparametric stochastic mixed models for longitudinal data,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 93, 710–719.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Biometric Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Data61CSIROAthertonAustralia
  2. 2.Queensland Department of Agriculture and FisheriesMareebaAustralia
  3. 3.Queensland Department of Agriculture and FisheriesWollongbarAustralia
  4. 4.Queensland Department of Agriculture and FisheriesUniversity of the Sunshine CoastSippy DownsAustralia

Personalised recommendations