Advertisement

Extending Ordinal Regression with a Latent Zero-Augmented Beta Distribution

  • Kathryn M. Irvine
  • T. J. Rodhouse
  • Ilai N. Keren
Article

Abstract

Ecological abundance data are often recorded on an ordinal scale in which the lowest category represents species absence. One common example is when plant species cover is visually assessed within bounded quadrats and then assigned to pre-defined cover class categories. We present an ordinal beta hurdle model that directly models ordinal category probabilities with a biologically realistic beta-distributed latent variable. A hurdle-at-zero model allows ecologists to explore distribution (absence) and abundance processes in an integrated framework. This provides an alternative to cumulative link models when data are inconsistent with the assumption that the odds of moving into a higher category are the same for all categories (proportional odds). Graphical tools and a deviance information criterion were developed to assess whether a hurdle-at-zero model should be used for inferences rather than standard ordinal methods. Hurdle-at-zero and non-hurdle ordinal models fit to vegetation cover class data produced substantially different conclusions. The ordinal beta hurdle model yielded more precise parameter estimates than cumulative logit models, although out-of-sample predictions were similar. The ordinal beta hurdle model provides inferences directly on the latent biological variable of interest, percent cover, and supports exploration of more realistic ecological patterns and processes through the hurdle-at-zero or two-part specification. We provide JAGS code as an on-line supplement. Supplementary materials accompanying this paper appear on-line.

Keywords

Beta regression Cumulative link model Grouped continuous Hurdle model Midpoint regression Non-proportional odds Plant abundance Proportional odds model 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Megan D. Higgs for early discussions on this work and her assistance with WinBUGS code for clipping latent distributions. Dr. Brian Gray provided encouragement and interest in this work and we are appreciative. We also thank Dr. Andrew Hoegh, two anonymous reviewers’, and our associate editor’s comments and suggestion for revising our paper. The work by K. M. Irvine was funded through an Interagency Agreement P12PG70586 with the National Park Service. T. J. Rodhouse was funded by Upper Columbia Basin Network Inventory and Monitoring Program of the National Park Service. I. N. Keren’s participation was secured by an interagency agreement with Montana State’s Institute on Ecosystems with funding by North Central Climate Science Center. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

Supplementary material

13253_2016_265_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (237 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (pdf 237 KB)
13253_2016_265_MOESM2_ESM.csv (99 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (csv 99 KB)

References

  1. Agresti, A. (2010), Analysis of ordinal categorical data John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Agresti, A., and Kateri, M. (2014), Some Remarks on Latent Variable Models in Categorical Data Analysis. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 43, 801–814.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Albert, J. H., and Chib, S. (1993), Bayesian analysis of binary and polychotomous response data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88, 669–679.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Ananth, C. V., and Kleinbaum, D. G. (1997), Regression models for ordinal responses: a review of methods and applications. International Journal of Epidemiology, 26, 1323–1333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andrewartha, H. G., and Birch, L. C. (1954), The distribution and abundance of animals. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.Google Scholar
  6. Bonham, C. D. (1989), Measurements for terrestrial vegetation John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  7. Braun-Blanquet, J. (1932), Plant sociology. The study of plant communities. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, US.Google Scholar
  8. Branscum, A. J., Johnson, W. O., and Thurmond, M. C. (2007), Bayesian beta regression: applications to household expenditure data and genetic distance between foot-and-mouth disease viruses. Australian New Zealand Journal of Statistics, 49, 287–301.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Chambers, J. C., Roundy, B. A., Blank, R. R., Meyer, S. E., and Whittaker, A. (2007), What makes Great Basin sagebrush ecosystems invasible by Bromus tectorum? Ecological Monographs, 77, 117–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen, J., Shiyomi, M, Hori, Y., and Yamamura, Y. (2008a), Frequency distribution models for spatial patterns of vegetation abundance. Ecological Modelling, 211, 403–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen, J., Shiyomi, M., Bonham, C. D., Yasuda, T., Hori, Y., and Yamamura, Y. (2008b), Plant cover estimation based on the beta distribution in grassland vegetation. Ecological Research, 23, 813–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Christensen, R. H. B. (2014), Ordinal:Regression models for ordinal data. R package version 2014.12-22. Available at http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ordinal/index.html.
  13. Congdon, P. (2005), Bayesian models for categorical data. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Coudun, C. and Gegout, J.-C. (2007). Quantitative prediction of the distribution and abundance of Vaccinium myrtillus with climatic and edaphic factors. Journal of Vegetation Science, 18, 517–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Damgaard, C. (2009), On the distribution of plant abundance data. Ecological Informatics, 4, 76–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Damgaard, C. (2012), Trend analyses of hierarchical pin-point cover data. Ecology, 93, 1269–1274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Daubenmire, R. F. (1959), A canopy-coverage method. Northwest Science, 33, 43–64.Google Scholar
  18. Davies, K. W., Boyd, C. S., Beck, J. L., Bates, J. D., Svejcar, T. J., and Gregg, M. A. (2011), Saving the sagebrush sea: an ecosystem conservation plan for big sagebrush plant communities. Biological Conservation, 144, 2573–2584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Davies, K. W., Nafus, A. M., and Madsen, M. D. (2013), Medusahead invasion along unimproved roads, animal trails, and random transects. Western North American Naturalist, 73, 54–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Duff, T. J., Bell, T. L., and York, A. (2011), Patterns of plant abundances in natural systems: is there value in modelling both species abundance and distribution?. Australian Journal of Botany, 59, 719–733.Google Scholar
  21. Eskelson, N. I., Madsen, L., Hagar, J. C., and Temesgen, H. (2011), Estimating riparian understory vegetation cover with beta regression and copula models. Forest Science, 57, 212–221.Google Scholar
  22. Esposito, D. M., Shanahan, E., and Rodhouse, T. J. (2016), UCBN and GRYN Sagebrush Steppe Vegetation Monitoring: Double Observer Study 2015. John Day Fossil Beds National Monument-Clarno Unit and City of Rocks National Reserve. Natural Resource Reporting Series NPS/UCBN/NRR-2016/1052. National Park Service, Fort Collins, Colorado.Google Scholar
  23. Fahrmeier, L, and Tutz, G. (2001), Multivariate statistical modelling based on generalized linear models. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
  24. Feng, X., Zhu, J., and Steen-Adams, M. M. (2015), On regression analysis of spatial proportional data with zero/one values. Spatial Statistics, 14, 452–471.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ferrari, S. L. P. and Cribari-Neto, F. (2004), Beta regression for modelling rates and proportions. Journal of Applied Statistics, 31, 799–815.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Gelbard, J. L. and Belnap, J. (2003), Roads as conduits for exotic plant invasions in a semiarid landscape. Conservation Biology, 17, 420-432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gelfand, A. E. and Smith, A. F. M. (1990), Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 398–409.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. Gruen, B., Kosmidis, I., and Zeileis, A. (2012), Extended Beta Regression in R: Shaken, Stirred, Mixed, and Partitioned. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–25.Google Scholar
  29. Guisan, A. and Harrell, F. E. (2000), Ordinal response regression models in Ecology. Journal of Vegetation Science, 11, 617–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hall, D. B. (2000), Zero-inflated Poisson and Binomial Regression with Random Effects: A Case Study. Biometrics, 56, 1030–1039.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. Heilbron, D. C. (1994), Zero-altered and other Regression Models for Count Data with Added Zeros. Biometrical Journal, 36, 531–547.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. Higgs, M. D. and Hoeting, J. A. (2010), A clipped latent variable model for spatially correlated ordered categorical data. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 54, 1999–2011.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. Higgs, M. D. and Ver Hoef, J. M. (2012), Discretized and Aggregated: modeling dive depth of Harbor Seals from Ordered Categorical data with temporal autocorrelation. Biometrics, 68, 965–974.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. Holland, M. D. and Gray, B. R. (2011), Multinomial mixture model with heterogeneous classification probabilities. Ecological and Environmental Statistics, 18, 257–270.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Irvine, K. M. and Rodhouse, T. J. (2010), Power analysis for trend in ordinal cover classes: implications for long-term vegetation monitoring. Journal of Vegetation Science, 21, 1152–1161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ishwaran, H. (2000), Univariate and multirater ordinal cumulative link regression with covariate specific cutpoints. The Canadian Journal of Statistics, 28, 715–730.Google Scholar
  37. Kelley, M. E. and Anderson, S. J. (2008), Zero inflation in ordinal data: incorporating susceptibility to response through the use of a mixture model. Statistics in Medicine, 27, 3674–3688.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kim, J-H. (2003), Assessing practical significance of the proportional odds assumption. Statistics and Probability Letters, 65, 233–239.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. Kosmidis, I. and Firth, D. (2010), A generic algorithm for reducing bias in parametric estimation.Electronic Journal of Statistics, 4, 1097–1112.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. Lachenbruch, P. A. (2002), Analysis of Data with Excess Zeros. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 11, 297–302.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. Lambert, D. (1992), Zero-Inflated Poisson Regression, with an Application to Defects in Manufacturing. Technometrics, 34, 1–14.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  42. Larrabee, B., Scott, H. M., and Bello, N. M. (2014), Ordinary least squares regression of ordered categorical data: inferential implications in practice. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 19, 373–386.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  43. Link, W. A. and Eaton, M. J. (2012) On thinning of chains in MCMC. Methods in Ecology and Evolution , 3, 112–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mackenzie, D. I., Nichols, J. D., Royle, J. A., Pollock, K. H., Bailey, L. L., and Hines, J. E. (2006), Occupancy estimation and modeling:inferring patterns and dynamics of species occurrence. Elsevier Academic Press, Burlington, MA, USA.Google Scholar
  45. Martin, T. G., Wintle, B. A., Rhodes, J. R., Kuhnert, P. M., Field, S. A., Low-Choy, S. J., Tyre, A. J., and Possingham, H. P. (2005), Zero tolerance ecology: improving ecological inference by modeling the source of zero observations. Ecology Letters, 8, 1235–1246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Milberg, P., Bergstedt, J., Fridman, J., Gunnar, O., Westerberg, L. (2008), Observer bias and random variation in vegetation monitoring data. Journal of Vegetation Science, 19, 633–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Millar, R. B. (2009), Comparison of hierachical Bayesian models for overdispersed count data using DIC and Bayes’ factors. Biometrics, 65, 962–969.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  48. Miller, R. F., Chambers, J. C., Pyke, D. A., Pierson, F. B., and Williams, C. J. (2013), A review of fire effects on vegetation and soils in the Great Basin region: response and ecological site characteristics. RMRS GTR-308. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.Google Scholar
  49. Moulton, L. H. and Halsey, N. A. (1995), A Mixture Model with Detection Limits for Regression Analyses of Antibody Response to Vaccine. Biometrics, 51, 1570–1578.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  50. Neelon, B. H., O’Malley, A. J., and Normand, S-L T. (2010), A Bayesian model for repeated measures zero-inflated count data with application to outpatient psychiatric service use. Statistical Modelling, 10, 421–439.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ospina, R. and Ferrari, S. L. (2010), Inflated beta distributions. Statistical Papers, 51, 111–126.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  52. Plummer, M. (2003), JAGS: A program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Distributed Statistical Computing (DSC 2003), K. Hornik, F. Leisch, and A. Zeileis (eds.) Vienna, Austria. Available at: http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/Conferences/DSC-2003/
  53. Plummer, M. (2008), Penalized loss functions for Bayesian model comparison. Biostatistics, 9, 523–539.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  54. Plummer, M. (2015), JAGS Version 4.0.0 user manual. Available at https://sourceforge.net/projects/mcmc-jags/files/Manuals/4.x/.
  55. Reisner, M. D., Grace, J. B., Pyke, D. A., and Doescher, P. S. (2013), Conditions favouring Bromus tectorum dominance of endangered sagebrush steppe ecosystems. Journal of Applied Ecology, 50, 1039–1049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rodhouse, T. J., Irvine, K. M., Sheley, R. L., Smith, B. S., Hoh, S., Esposito, D. M., and Mata-Gonzalez, R. (2014), Predicting foundation bunchgrass species abundances: model-assisted decision-making in protected-area sagebrush-steppe. Ecosphere, 5, art208.Google Scholar
  57. Royle, J. A. and Link, W. A. (2005), A general class of multinomial mixture models for anuran calling survey data. Ecology, 86, 2505–2512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schabenberger, O. (1995), The use of ordinal response methodology in Forestry. Forest Science, 41, 321–336.Google Scholar
  59. Schliep, E. M. and Hoeting, J. A. (2013), Multilevel latent Gaussian process model for mixed disrete and continuous multivariate response data. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 18, 492–513.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  60. Spiegelhalter, D., Best, N., Carlin, B., and van der Linde, A. (2002), Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 64, 583–639.Google Scholar
  61. Stevens, D. L., and Olsen, A. R. (2004), Spatially balanced sampling of natural resources. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 99, 262–278.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  62. Stroup, W. W. (2014), Rethinking the analysis of non-normal data in plant and soil science. Agronomy Journal, 106, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tamhane, A. C., Ankenman, B. E., and Yang, Y. (2002), The beta distribution as a latent response model for ordinal data (I): estimation of location and dispersion parameters. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 72, 473–494.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  64. Venables, W. N., and Ripley, B. D. (2002), Modern Applied Statistics with S. Fourth Edition. Springer, New York. ISBN 0-387-95457-0CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  65. Wenger, S. J. and Freeman, M. C. (2008), Estimating species occurrence, abundance, and detection probability using zero-inflated distributions. Ecology, 89, 2953–2959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Yeo, J. J., Rodhouse, T. J., Dicus, G. H., Irvine, K. M., and Garrett, L. K. (2009), Sagebrush steppe vegetation monitoring protocol. Upper Columbia Basin Network. Version 1.0. Natural Resource Report NPS/UCBN/NRR–2009/142. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO, USA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Biometric Society 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kathryn M. Irvine
    • 1
  • T. J. Rodhouse
    • 2
  • Ilai N. Keren
    • 3
  1. 1.US Geological SurveyNorthern Rocky Mountain Science CenterBozemanUSA
  2. 2.National Park ServiceUpper Columbia Basin NetworkBendUSA
  3. 3.Washington Department of Fish and WildlifeOlympiaUSA

Personalised recommendations