Advertisement

Predicting Additive and Non-additive Genetic Effects from Trials Where Traits Are Affected by Interplot Competition

  • Colleen H. Hunt
  • Alison B. Smith
  • David R. Jordan
  • Brian R. Cullis
Article

Abstract

There are two key types of selection in a plant breeding program, namely selection of hybrids for potential commercial use and the selection of parents for use in future breeding. Oakey et al. (in Theoretical and Applied Genetics 113, 809–819, 2006) showed how both of these aims could be achieved using pedigree information in a mixed model analysis in order to partition genetic effects into additive and non-additive effects. Their approach was developed for field trial data subject to spatial variation. In this paper we extend the approach for data from trials subject to interplot competition. We show how the approach may be used to obtain predictions of pure stand additive and non-additive effects. We develop the methodology in the context of a single field trial using an example from an Australian sorghum breeding program.

Key Words

Mixed models Statistical analysis Variogram Spatial trends Competition Pure stand Pedigree information Parental effects 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beeck, C., Cowling, W., Smith, A., and Cullis, B. (2010), “Analysis of Yield and Oil From a Series of Canola Breeding Trials. Part I: Fitting Factor Analytic Models With Pedigree Information,” Genome, 53, 992–1001. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Besag, J., and Kempton, R. A. (1986), “Statistical Analysis of Field Experiments Using Neighbouring Plots,” Biometrics, 42, 231–251. MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burgueno, J., Crossa, J., Cornelius, P. L., McLaren, G., Trethowan, R., and Krishnamachari, A. (2007), “Modeling Additive × Environment and Additive × Additive × Environment Using Genetic Covariances of Relatives of Wheat Genotypes,” Crop Science, 47, 311–320. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Butler, D. G., Cullis, B. R., Gilmour, A. R., and Gogel, B. J. (2009), “ASReml-R Reference Manual Release 3,” Technical report, QLD Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, Brisbane, QLD. Google Scholar
  5. Crossa, J., de los Campos, G., Perez, P., Gianola, D., Burgueno, J., Araus, J. L., Makumbi, D., Singh, R. P., Dreisigacker, S., Yan, J., Arief, V., Banziger, M., and Braun, H.-J. (2010), “Prediction of Genetic Values of Quantitative Traits in Plant Breeding Using Pedigree and Molecular Markers,” Genetics, 186, 713–724. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cullis, B., Smith, A., Beeck, C., and Cowling, W. (2010), “Analysis of Yield and Oil From a Series of Canola Breeding Trials. Part II: Exploring VxE Using Factor Analysis,” Genome, 53, 1002–1016. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cullis, B. R., Smith, A. B., and Coombes, N. E. (2006), “On the Design of Early Generation Variety Trials With Correlated Data,” Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 11, 381–393. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Draper, N. R., and Guttman, I. (1980), “Incorporating Overlap Effects From Neighbouring Units Into Response Surface Models,” Applied Statistics, 29, 128–134. MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gilmour, A. R., Cullis, B. R., and Verbyla, A. P. (1997), “Accounting for Natural and Extraneous Variation in the Analysis of Field Experiments,” Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 2, 269–293. MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Henderson, C. (1976), “A Simple Method for Computing the Inverse of a Numerator Relationship Matrix Used in the Prediction of Breeding Values,” Biometrics, 32, 69–83. MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hunt, C., and Jordan, D. (2009), “Competition Effects in Sorghum Breeding Trials,” in 14th Australasian Plant Breeding Conference, SABRAO Journal of Breeding and Genetics, Cairns, Australia. Google Scholar
  12. Meuwissen, T. H. E., and Luo, Z. (1992), “Computing Inbreeding Coefficients in Large Populations,” Genetics, Selection and Evolution, 24, 269–293. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Oakey, H., Verbyla, A., Cullis, B., Wei, X., and Pitchford, W. (2007), “Joint Modelling of Additive and Non-additive (Genetic Line) Effects in Multi-environment Trials,” Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 114, 1319–1332. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Oakey, H., Verbyla, A., Pitchford, W., Cullis, B., and Kuchel, H. (2006), “Joint Modelling of Additive and Non-additive Genetic Line Effects in Single Field Trials,” Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 113, 809–819. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Piepho, H. P., Möhring, J., Melchinger, A. E., and Büchse, A. (2008), “BLUP for Phenotypic Selection in Plant Breeding and Variety Testing,” Euphytica, 161, 209–228. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. R Development Core Team (2008), R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. ISBN:3-900051-07-0, http://www.R-project.org. Google Scholar
  17. Smith, A. B., Cullis, B. R., and Thompson, R. (2005), “The Analysis of Crop Cultivar Breeding and Evaluation Trials: An Overview of Current Mixed Model Approaches,” Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge, 143, 449–462. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Stefanova, K. T., Smith, A. B., and Cullis, B. R. (2009), “Enhanced Diagnostics for the Spatial Analysis of Field Trials,” Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 14, 392–410. MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Stringer, J. (2006), “Joint Modelling of Spatial Variability and Interplot Competition to Improve the Efficiency of Plant Improvement,” PhD thesis, The University of Qld, Brisbane. Google Scholar
  20. Stringer, J., Cullis, B., and Thompson, R. (2011), “Joint Modeling of Spatial Variability and Within-Row Interplot Competition to Increase the Efficiency of Plant Improvement,” Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 16, 269–281. MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Stringer, J. K., and Cullis, B. R. (2002), “Application of Spatial Analysis Techniques to Adjust for Fertility Trends and Identify Interplot Competition in Early Stage Sugarcane Selection Trials,” Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 53, 911–918. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Thompson, R., Cullis, B. R., Smith, A. B., and Gilmour, A. R. (2003), “A Sparse Implementation of the Average Information Algorithm for Factor Analytic and Reduced Rank Variance Models,” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Statistics, 45, 445–460. MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Biometric Society 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Colleen H. Hunt
    • 1
    • 2
  • Alison B. Smith
    • 3
  • David R. Jordan
    • 4
  • Brian R. Cullis
    • 3
    • 5
  1. 1.Queensland Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and ForestryHermitage Research StationWarwickAustralia
  2. 2.The University of Queensland School of Agriculture and Food ScienceBrisbaneAustralia
  3. 3.School of Mathematics and Applied Statistics, Faculty of InformaticsUniversity of WollongongWollongongAustralia
  4. 4.Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food InnovationHermitage Research StationWarwickAustralia
  5. 5.Mathematics Informatics and StatisticsCSIROClaytonAustralia

Personalised recommendations