A Bayesian Approach to Fitting Gibbs Processes with Temporal Random Effects
- 377 Downloads
We consider spatial point pattern data that have been observed repeatedly over a period of time in an inhomogeneous environment. Each spatial point pattern can be regarded as a “snapshot” of the underlying point process at a series of times. Thus, the number of points and corresponding locations of points differ for each snapshot. Each snapshot can be analyzed independently, but in many cases there may be little information in the data relating to model parameters, particularly parameters relating to the interaction between points. Thus, we develop an integrated approach, simultaneously analyzing all snapshots within a single robust and consistent analysis. We assume that sufficient time has passed between observation dates so that the spatial point patterns can be regarded as independent replicates, given spatial covariates. We develop a joint mixed effects Gibbs point process model for the replicates of spatial point patterns by considering environmental covariates in the analysis as fixed effects, to model the heterogeneous environment, with a random effects (or hierarchical) component to account for the different observation days for the intensity function. We demonstrate how the model can be fitted within a Bayesian framework using an auxiliary variable approach to deal with the issue of the random effects component. We apply the methods to a data set of musk oxen herds and demonstrate the increased precision of the parameter estimates when considering all available data within a single integrated analysis.
Key WordsData augmentation Markov chain Monte Carlo Mixed effects model Musk oxen data Spatial and temporal point processes
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- — (2011), Spatstat Website. URL: www.spatstat.org.
- Berg, T. B. (2003), “Mammals,” in Zackenberg Ecological Research Operations. 8th Annual Report, eds. M. Rasch, and K. Canning, Copenhagen: Danish Polar Center, pp. 43–50. Google Scholar
- Besbeas, P., Borysiewicz, R. S., and Morgan, B. J. T. (2008), “Completing the Ecological Jigsaw,” in Modeling Demographic Processes in Marked Populations, Springer—Series: Environmental and Ecological Statistics, Vol. 3, eds. D. L. Thomson, E. G. Cooch and M. J. Conroy, pp. 513–540. Google Scholar
- Brooks, S. P., King, R., and Morgan, B. J. T. (2004), “A Bayesian Approach to Combining Animal Abundance and Demographic Data,” Animal Biodiversity and Conservation, 27, 515–529. Google Scholar
- Brooker, R. W., Maestre, F. T., Callaway, R. M., Lortie, C. L., Cavieres, L. A., Kunstler, G., Liancourt, P., Tielborger, K., Travis, J. M. J., Anthelme, F., Armas, C., Coll, L., Corcket, E., Delzon, S., Forey, E., Kikvidze, Z., Olofsson, J., Pugnaire, F., Quiroz, Q. L., Saccone, P., Schiffers, K., Seifan, M., Touzard, B., and Michalet, R. (2008), “Facilitation in Plant Communities: The Past, the Present, and the Future,” Journal of Ecology, 96, 18–34. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Clutton-Brock, T. H., and Pemberton, J. (2004), Soay Sheep, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
- Elberling, B., Tamstorf, M. P., Michelsen, A., Arndal, M. F., Sigsgaard, C., Illeris, L., Bay, C., Hansen, B. U., Christensen, T. R., Hansen, E. S., Jakobsen, B. H., and Beyens, L. (2008), “Soil and Plant Community-Characteristics and Dynamics at Zackenberg,” Advances in Ecological Research, 40, 223–248. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hansen, J., Hansen, L. H., Christoffersen, K. S., Albert, K. R., Skovgaard, M. S., Bay, C., Kristensen, D. K., Berg, T. B., Lund, M., Boulanger-Lapointe, N., Sørensen, P. L., Christensen, M. U., and Schmidt, N. M. (2011), “Zackenberg Basic: The BioBasis Programme,” in Zackenberg Ecological Research Operations, 16th Annual Report, 2010, eds. L. M. Jensen, and M. Rasch, pp. 43–66. Aarhus University, DCE—Danish Centre for Environment and Energy, 2011. Google Scholar
- Illian, J. B., Sørbye, S. H., and Rue, H. (2012a). “A Toolbox for Fitting Complex Spatial Point Process Models Using Integrated Laplace Transformation (INLA),” Annals of Applied Statistics, in press. Google Scholar
- Illian, J. B., Sørbye, S. H., Rue, H., and Hendrichsen, D. (2012b), “Using INLA to Fit a Complex Point Process Model with Temporally Varying Effects—A Case Study,” Journal of Environmental Statistics, 3, 7. Google Scholar
- King, R., Morgan, B. J. T., Gimenez, O., and Brooks, S. P. (2009), Bayesian Analysis for Population Ecology, Boca Raton: CRC Press. Google Scholar
- Langrock, R., King, R., Matthiopulos, J., Thomas, L., Fortin, D., and Morales, J. M. (2012), “Flexible and Practical Modeling of Animal Telemetry Data: Hidden Markov Models and Extensions,” Ecology (Statistical Reports), in press. Google Scholar
- Law, R., Purves, D., Murrell, D., and Dieckmann, U. (2001), “Causes and Effects of Small Scale Spatial Structure in Plant Populations,” in Integrating Ecology and Evolution in a Spatial context, eds. J. Silvertown and J. Antonovics, Oxford: Blackwell Science, pp. 21–44. Google Scholar
- Møller, J., and Waagepetersen, R. P. (2007), “Modern Statistics for Spatial Point Processes (with Discussion),” Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 34, 643–711. Google Scholar