Advertisement

Bayesian Inference for Animal Space Use and Other Movement Metrics

  • Devin S. JohnsonEmail author
  • Josh M. London
  • Carey E. Kuhn
Article

Abstract

The analysis of animal movement and resource use has become a standard tool in the study of animal ecology. Telemetry devices have become quite sophisticated in terms of overall size and data collecting capacity. Statistical methods to analyze movement have responded, becoming ever more complex, often relying on state-space modeling. Estimation of movement metrics such as utilization distributions have not followed suit, relying primarily on kernel density estimation. Here we consider a method for making inference about space use that is free of all of the major problems associated with kernel density estimation of utilization distributions such as autocorrelation, irregular time gaps, and error in observed locations. Our proposed method is based on a data augmentation approach that defines use as a summary of the complete path of the animal which is only partially observed. We use a sample from the posterior distribution of the complete path to construct a posterior sample for the metric of interest. Three basic importance sampling based methods for sampling from the posterior distribution of the path are proposed and compared. We demonstrate the augmentation approach by estimating a spatial map of diving intensity for female northern fur seals in the Pribilof Islands, Alaska.

Key Words

Animal movement Correlated random walk Movement metric Posterior distribution State-space model Utilization distribution 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson-Sprecher, R., and Ledolter, J. (1991), “State-space Analysis of Wildlife Telemetry Data,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 86, 596–602. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blundell, G. M., Maier, J. A. K., and Debevec, E. M. (2001), “Linear Home Ranges: Effects of Smoothing, Sample Size, and Autocorrelation on Kernel Estimates,” Ecological Monographs, 71, 469–489. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. CLS (2008), “Argos user’s manual,” http://www.argos-system.org/manual/.
  4. de Jong, P., and Penzer, J. (1998), “Diagnosing Shocks in Time Series,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 93, 796–806. MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Durbin, J., and Koopman, S. (2001), Time Series Analysis by State Space Methods, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 253 pp. zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. — (2002), “A Simple and Efficient Simulation Smoother for State Space Time Series Analysis,” Biometrika, 89, 603–615. MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fieberg, J. (2007a), “Kernel Density Estimators of Home Range: Smoothing and the Autocorrelation Red Herring,” Ecology, 88, 1059–1066. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. — (2007b), “Utilization Distribution Estimation Using Weighted Kernel Density Estimators,” Journal of Wildlife Management, 71, 1669–1675. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Givens, G., and Hoeting, J. A. (2005), Computational Statistics, New York: Wiley. zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Goebel, M. E. (1998), “Female Foraging Behavior: Inter- and Intra-annual Variation in Individuals,” in Behavior and Ecology of the Northern Fur Seal, ed. R. Gentry, Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 243–259. Google Scholar
  11. Gurarie, E., Andrews, R., and Laidre, K. (2009), “A Novel Method for Identifying Behavioural Changes in Animal Movement Data,” Ecology Letters, 12, 395–408. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Horne, J., and Garton, E. (2006), “Selecting the Best Home Range Model: An Information-Theoretic Approach,” Ecology, 87, 1146–1152. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Horne, J. S., Garton, E. O., Krone, S. M., and Lewis, J. S. (2007), “Analyzing Animal Movements Using Brownian Bridges,” Ecology, 88, 2354–2363. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Johnson, D. S., London, J. M., Lea, M.-A., and Durban, J. W. (2008), “Continuous-time Correlated Random Walk Model for Animal Telemetry Data,” Ecology, 89, 1208–1215. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jonsen, I., Flemming, J., and Myers, R. (2005), “Robust State-space Modeling of Animal Movement Data,” Ecology, 86, 2874–2880. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jonsen, I. D., Myers, R. A., and Flemming, J. M. (2003), “Meta-analysis of Animal Movement Using State-space Models,” Ecology, 84, 3005–3063. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jonsen, I. D., Myers, R. A., and James, M. C. (2007), “Identifying Leatherback Turtle Foraging Behaviour from Satellite Telemetry Using a Switching State-space Model,” Marine Ecology-Progress Series, 337, 255–264. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Katajisto, J., and Moilanen, A. (2006), “Kernel-based Home Range Method for Data With Irregular Sampling Intervals,” Ecological Modelling, 194, 405–413. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kuhn, C. E., Crocker, D. E., Tremblay, Y., and Costa, D. P. (2009a), “Time to Eat: Measurements of Feeding Behaviour in a Large Marine Predator, the Northern Elephant Seal Mirounga Angustirostris,” Journal of Animal Ecology, 78, 513–523. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kuhn, C. E., Johnson, D. S., Ream, R. R., and Gelatt, T. S. (2009b), “Advances in the Tracking of Marine Species: Using GPS Locations to Evaluate Satellite Track Data and a Continuous-time Movement Model,” Marine Ecology Progress Series, 393, 97–109. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Morales, J. M., Haydon, D. T., Friar, J., Holsinger, K. E., and Fryxell, J. M. (2004), “Extracting More out of Location Data: Building Movement Models as Mixtures of Random Walks,” Ecology, 85, 2436–2445. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Otis, D. L., and White, G. C. (1999), “Autocorrelation of Location Estimates and the Analysis of Radiotracking Data,” Journal of Wildlife Management, 63, 1039–1044. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Patterson, T. A., Thomas, L., Wilcox, C., Ovaskainen, O., and Matthiopoulis, J. (2008), “State-space Models of Individual Animal Movement,” Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 23, 87–94. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. R Development Core Team (2010), R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. Google Scholar
  25. Rue, H., Martino, S., and Chopin, N. (2009), “Approximate Bayesian Inference for Latent Gaussian Models by Using Integrated Nested Laplace Approximations,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B—Statistical Methodology, 71, 319–392. MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Van Winkle, W. (1975), “Comparison of Several Probabilistic Home-range Models,” Journal of Wildlife Management, 39, 118–123. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Worton, B. J. (1989), “Kernel Methods for Estimating the Utilization Distribution in Home-range Studies,” Ecology, 70, 164–168. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Biometric Society 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Devin S. Johnson
    • 1
    Email author
  • Josh M. London
    • 1
  • Carey E. Kuhn
    • 1
  1. 1.National Marine Mammal Laboratory, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries ServiceNOAASeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations