Species Occupancy Modeling for Detection Data Collected Along a Transect

  • Gurutzeta Guillera-Arroita
  • Byron J. T. Morgan
  • Martin S. Ridout
  • Matthew Linkie
Article

Abstract

The proportion of sampling sites occupied by a species is a concept of interest in ecology and biodiversity conservation. Occupancy surveys based on collecting detection data along transects have become increasingly popular to monitor some species. To date, the analysis of such data has been carried out by discretizing the data, dividing the transects into discrete segments. Here we propose alternative occupancy models which describe the detection process as a continuous point process. These models provide a more natural description of the data and eliminate the need to divide transects into segments, which can be arbitrary and may lead to increased bias in the estimator of occupancy or increased chances of obtaining estimates on the boundary of the parameter space. We present a model that assumes independence between detections and an alternative model that describes the detection process as a Markov modulated Poisson process to account for potential clustering in the detections. The utility of these models is illustrated with the analysis of data from a recent survey of the Sumatran tiger Panthera tigris sumatrae. The models can also be applied to surveys that collect continuous data in time, such as those based on the use of camera-trap devices. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

Key Words

Clustered data Markov modulated Poisson process Wildlife monitoring Zero-inflated Poisson process 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Supplementary material

References

  1. Corless, R. M., Gonnet, G. H., Hare, D. E. G., Jeffrey, D. J., and Knuth, D. E. (2005), “On the Lambert W Function,” Advances in Computational Mathematics, 5, 329–359. MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cox, D. R., and Isham, V. (1980), Point Processes, London: Chapman and Hall. MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Cox, D. R., and Oakes, D. (1984), Analysis of Survival Data, London: Chapman & Hall. Google Scholar
  4. Fischer, W., and Meier-Hellstern, K. (1992), “The Markov-Modulated Poisson Process (MMPP) Cookbook,” Performance Evaluation, 18, 149–171. MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Guillera-Arroita, G., Ridout, M. S., and Morgan, B. J. T. (2010), “Design of Occupancy Studies with Imperfect Detection,” Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 1, 131–139. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hedley, S. L., and Buckland, S. T. (2004), “Spatial Models for Line Transect Sampling,” Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 9, 181–199. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hines, J. E., Nichols, J. D., Royle, J. A., MacKenzie, D. I., Gopalaswamy, A. M., Samba Kumar, N., and Karanth, K. U. (2010), “Tigers on Trails: Occupancy Modeling for Cluster Sampling,” Ecological Applications, 20, 1456–1466. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kaplan, E. L., and Meier, P. (1958), “Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 53, 457–481. MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Karanth, K. U., and Nichols, J. D. (2002), Monitoring Tigers and Their Prey: A Manual for Researchers, Managers and Conservationists in Tropical Asia, Bangalore: Centre for Wildlife Studies. Google Scholar
  10. Linkie, M., Dinata, Y., Nugroho, A., and Haidir, I. A. (2007), “Estimating Occupancy of a Data Deficient Mammalian Species Living in Tropical Rainforests: Sun Bears in the Kerinci Seblat Region, Sumatra,” Biological Conservation, 137, 20–27. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. MacKenzie, D. I., and Royle, J. A. (2005), “Designing Occupancy Studies: General Advice and Allocating Survey Effort,” Journal of Applied Ecology, 42, 1105–1114. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. MacKenzie, D. I., Bailey, L. L., and Nichols, J. D. (2004), “Investigating Species Co-occurrence Patterns When Species are Detected Imperfectly,” Journal of Animal Ecology, 73, 546–555. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. MacKenzie, D. I., Nichols, J. D., Lachman, G. B., Droege, S., Royle, J. A., and Langtimm, C. A. (2002), “Estimating Site Occupancy Rates When Detection Probabilities Are Less Than One,” Ecology, 83, 2248–2255. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. MacKenzie, D. I., Nichols, J. D., Hines, J. E., Knutson, M. G., and Franklin, A. B. (2003), “Estimating Site Occupancy, Colonization, and Local Extinction When a Species is Detected Imperfectly,” Ecology, 84, 2200–2207. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. MacKenzie, D. I., Nichols, J. D., Royle, J. A., Pollock, K. H., Bailey, L. L., and Hines, J. E. (2006), Occupancy Estimation and Modeling: Inferring Patterns and Dynamics of Species Occurrence, New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar
  16. Morgan, B. J. T., Revell, D. J., and Freeman, S. N. (2007), “A Note on Simplifying Likelihoods for Site Occupancy Models,” Biometrics, 63, 618–621. MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Royle, A. J. (2006), “Site Occupancy Models With Heterogeneous Detection Probabilities,” Biometrics, 62, 97–102. MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Rydén, T. (1994), “Parameter Estimation for Markov Modulated Poisson Processes,” Communications in Statistics—Stochastic Models, 10, 795–829. MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Skaug, H. J. (2006), “Markov Modulated Poisson Processes for Clustered Line Transect Data,” Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 13, 199–211. MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Biometric Society 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gurutzeta Guillera-Arroita
    • 1
  • Byron J. T. Morgan
    • 1
  • Martin S. Ridout
    • 1
  • Matthew Linkie
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Mathematics, Statistics and Actuarial ScienceUniversity of KentCanterburyUK
  2. 2.Fauna & Flora International (FFI) in AcehAceh Besar, Nanggroe Aceh DarussalamIndonesia
  3. 3.Durrell Institute of Conservation and EcologyUniversity of KentCanterburyUK

Personalised recommendations